Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 1 Introduction to LANALP February 26, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Head of Learning: Job description
Continuous Improvement Through Continuous Learning Until you are willing to be confused about what you already know, what you know will never become wider,
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Supporting Quality After School Programs for Our Students Tuesday, September 23, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP September 4, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Kevin Croff Educational Leadership Portfolio March 2005.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 2 CPSEL 1 & Reflective Leadership October 1, 2015.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Candidate’s Name: Date:.  Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
SAS CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY Professional SAS Strand Rubrics December 14, 2009 DRAFT 1.0 Curriculum Design PAGE 0.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.
Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 3, CPSEL 2 Instructional Leadership, Social Justice, & Equity May 7, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 1 Introduction to LANALP February 26, 2015

LANALP Staff Dr. Anita Moultrie-Turner LANALP Program Director Dr. Matthew Horvath Administrative Coordinator, External Partnerships Ms. Irene Herrera-Stewart LANALP Curriculum Director Dr. Marco Nava Administrative Coordinator, LANALP

Agenda Welcome Coach-Candidate Match-Up Connections Theoretical Framework Direct Learning Break Assessment Next Steps

LANALP Meeting Norms Process Watch your airtime Avoid sidebars Each participant brings strengths Trust the Process Focus on what we can do Honor diversity of thought Assume positive intentions

LANALP Meeting Norms Procedural Start and end on time Always have an agenda Develop action steps Reflect at the end of each meeting Respond to Parking Lot (MyPLN)

Connections “A leader is a juggler, a person who maintains a dynamic vision of “what could be” while dealing with the everyday “what is” crises and mundane demands” – Matusak & Young

Theoretical Frameworks California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSEL), 2014 LAUSD School Leadership Framework (SLF), 2014 LANALP Habits of Mind

CPSEL STANDARD 1: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED VISION STANDARD 2: INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP STANDARD 3: MANAGEMENT AND LEARNING ENVIRONMENT STANDARD 4: FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STANDARD 5: ETHICS AND INTEGRITY STANDARD 6: EXTERNAL CONTEXT AND POLICY

LAUSD School Leadership Framework

“Leadership is second only to classroom instruction as an influence on student learning. We have not found a single case of a school improving its student achievement record in the absence of talented leadership.” -Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, & Anderson, 2010, p. 9

The LAUSD School Leadership Framework provides a common language and expectations around the principal’s role is based on research about successful leadership of schools promotes objective evidence collection of principal practice

Diving into the LAUSD School Leadership Framework v2 6 STANDARDS 14 COMPONENTS 50 ELEMENTS

LAUSD School Leadership Framework v2 1. Leadership and Professional Growth 4. Culture of Learning and Positive Behavior 2. Change Management 5. Family and Community Engagement 3. Instruction6. Systems and Operations

Context for the School Leadership Framework v2 Throughout this presentation, standards, components and elements from the LAUSD School Leadership Framework will be referenced. Note: This content is taken directly from the working draft of the School Leadership Framework, which was developed with our stakeholders, but does not substitute for current language in the LAUSD-AALA Collective Bargaining Agreement.

SLF Placemat

Standard 1- Leadership and Professional Growth

Standard 2-Change Management

Standard 3 - Instruction

Standard 4-Culture of Learning and Positive Behavior

Standard 5-Family and Community Engagement

Standard 6 – Systems and Operations

LANALP Habits of Mind

Habits of Mind Reflective Leadership Social Justice and Equity Moral Courage Promote Diversity Commitment to Partnerships Persistence

CPSEL Alignment Table

Direct Learning

2-Year Induction Flowchart

Professional Learning Matrix

Assessment in LANALP

Role of Assessment in LANALP To provide documentation and meet compliance requirements To ensure that the candidate will have necessary documentation of meeting the CTC requirements for clearing administrative credential To ensure that the program will have evidence of fidelity in preparing administrators to clear their credential

Role of Assessment in LANALP To provide candidates opportunity to apply learning to increasingly new and unfamiliar task in challenging context and situations. To provide candidates opportunity to initiate, sustain, extend and deepen learning. To ensure LANALP program is constantly reviewed, revised and refined.

Initial Assessment Self-Assessment

Benchmark Assessment Coach Form CPSEL Assessment Action Research Findings

Summative Assessment Coach Form CPSEL Assessment Portfolio Review Process Action Research Findings

Next Steps/Follow-Up MyPLN Coaching Action Research Strengths Finder 2.0 Preparation for CPSEL 1: Mission & Vision

Final Thoughts

Save the Date! Next Unit of Study & Coach Meeting: Date: Thursday, March 12th, Dinner 4:30-5:00pm Meeting 5:00pm-8:00pm Location: CARECEN Watch for with updates and document links