June 17, 2006 Nuclear I&C and Information Engineering Laboratory Dept. of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering KAIST Jong Joo Sohn 증기발생기 시스템 식별 (II) (Identification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 RELAP5 Users Seminar, Nov, Idaho Falls, USA 1 Coupled Thermal-hydraulic and Neutronic Model for the Ascó NPP using RELAP5- 3D/NESTLE L. Batet,
Advertisements

Physics 12 Mr. Jean May 6 th, The plan: Video clip of the day AC/DC power generation AC/DC electric engines.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 11.
WATERLOO ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING 60s: Power Engineering 1 WATERLOO ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING 60s Power Engineering Department of.
Specialization project 2012 Temperature control of an unstable chemical reactor By Ola Sæterli Hjetland Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad, Krister Forsman.
Summer Co-op Experience: OPG Aditi Garg. Darlington Nuclear G.S Located in Bowmanville, ON.
Analysis Simulator for Kozloduy NPP Units 5 and 6 N.Rijova (ENPRO Consult), J.Steinborn (GRS mbH) International Nuclear Forum BULGARIAN NUCLEAR ENERGY.
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna LEADER 5 th WP5 Meeting JRC-IET, Petten,
LEADER Project: Task 5.4 Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with CATHARE G. Geffraye, D. Kadri – CEA/Grenoble G. Bandini - ENEA/Bologna.
1 ACPR Advanced, cost competitive, proven technology, and reliable The Third Generation Nuclear Reactor.
PROCESS INTEGRATED DESIGN WITHIN A MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL FRAMEWORK Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega, Omar Pérez University of Salamanca – Spain University.
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT with RELAP5 and RELAP/PARCS Codes WP5.1 Progress Meeting Empresarios Agrupados - Madrid, November.
ENGINEERING PROJECT PROPOSAL MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DAN FLAHIVE Analytical Method to Predict Primary Side Steam Generator Pressure.
INTEGRATED DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES USING MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega University of Salamanca – Spain European.
NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL Pastora Vega, Mario Francisco, Eladio Sanz University of Salamanca – Spain.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
ENGINEERING 536 MASS TRANSFER OPERATIONS FALL 1997 TEAM MEMBERS: Dr. Jim Henry, P.E. Sean Cunningham Mark Koss, P.E. Sandy Koss Tara Ostrander, E.I. Nittaya.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
A Vapor Power Cycle Boiler T Turbine Compressor (pump) Heat exchanger
Chapter 8. The PID Controller Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
Nuclear Fundamentals Part II Harnessing the Power of the Atom.
Exergy Analysis of STHE P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Formalization of Thermo-economics…..
INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SURVEILLANCE AND DIAGNOSTICS 2.
1st Qtr Results and Outlook/ / Confidential KGM / 1 Improving Feedwater Regulation Performance Using a System Based Approach FW Systems User’s.
Thermal hydraulic analysis of ALFRED by RELAP5 code & by SIMMER code G. Barone, N. Forgione, A. Pesetti, R. Lo Frano CIRTEN Consorzio Interuniversitario.
Department of Nuclear Engineering & Radiation Health Physics IAEA-ICTP Natural Circulation Training Course, Trieste, Italy, June 2007Flow Stagnation.
Continuous Rod Withdrawal
17th Symposium of AER, Yalta, Crimea, Ukraine, Sept , 2007.
TVA Sequoyah and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
INTRODUCTION TO CONTROL SYSTEMS
Physics 12 Mr. Jean May 4 th, The plan: Video clip of the day AC/DC power generation.
A Vapor Power Cycle Boiler T Turbine Compressor (pump) Heat exchanger
Procedures for managing workflow components Workflow components: A workflow can usually be described using formal or informal flow diagramming techniques,
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
IAEA Meeting on INPRO Collaborative Project “Performance Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (PGAP)” December, 2011, Vienna A.K. Nayak, PhD.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
Modeling a Turbine with TRACE
LEADER Project Analysis of Representative DBC Events of the ETDR with RELAP5 and CATHARE Giacomino Bandini - ENEA/Bologna Genevieve Geffraye – CEA/Grenoble.
Page 1 Petten 27 – Feb ALFRED and ELFR Secondary System and Plant Layout.
Chapter 6 Analysis of Feedback Control Systems Prof. Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan June,
E3 Teacher Summer Research Program. Willie L. Smith - IPC, Physics Tidehaven ISD Tidehaven High School.
Modeling a Steam Generator (SG)
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 In-vessel retention as retrofitting measure for existing nuclear power plants M. Bauer, Westinghouse Electric.
INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL
"... To design the control system that effectively matches the plant requires an understanding of the plant rivaling that of the plant's designers, operators,
I & C.
Chapter 11 Digital Control Systems
Evaluation of a rate form of the equation of state L.H. Fick, P.G. Rousseau, C.G. du Toit North-West University Energy Postgraduate Conference 2013.
Nonlinear balanced model residualization via neural networks Juergen Hahn.
Chapter 3 : Simple Process Dynamics and Transfer Function
Dr. Owen Clarkin School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Summary of Energy Topics Chapter 1: Thermodynamics / Energy Introduction Chapter 2: Systems.
Introduction It had its early roots in World War II and is flourishing in business and industry with the aid of computer.
1 Computer Based Procedure(CBP) System 백승민.
NUCLEAR REACTORS G. HETSRONI Emeritus Danciger Professor of Engineering Technion – Haifa – Israel.
Cascade Control Systems (串级控制系统)
ERT 321 – Process Control & Dynamics Feedforward & Ratio Control
Chemstations Dynamic Seminar
EP4P03 Nuclear Plant Systems and Operation
Thermodynamics Cycles.
Unscented Kalman Filter for a coal run-of-mine bin
Physics 12 Mr. Jean December 17th, 2012.
루프-쉐이핑 H 제어기 설계 (Design of Loop-Shaping H Controller)
Fluid Force Identification
Steam Turbine Optimization for Solar Thermal Power Plant Operation
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
The Perfect Marriage! Ephesians 5:21-33.
Modelling and Validation
CONTROL SYSTEM AN INTRODUCTION.
Presentation transcript:

June 17, 2006 Nuclear I&C and Information Engineering Laboratory Dept. of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering KAIST Jong Joo Sohn 증기발생기 시스템 식별 (II) (Identification of KSNP-Type Steam Generator for Control)

1 I.Introduction II.Identification of Steam Generator III.Summary IV.Future Works Contents

2 I. Introduction Previous work (IV. Future Works ) Model Identification of Primary & Feedwater temperature Structure (System Order) Selection Parameter Estimation

3 Steam Generator & FW Control Components ♦ Two(2) Control Valves : Economizer, Downcomer ♦ Two(2) Main Feedwater Pumps I. Introduction

4 Model Identification Procedure II. System Identification of SG 1. Thermal-Hydraulic Model 2. Plant Experimentation 3. Model Structure Selection 4. Model(Parameter) Estimation 5. Validation Complete If not appropriate

5 1. Thermal-Hydraulic Model : RELAP II. System Identification of SG

6 Reactor Power Steam Flowrate(kg/s) Feedwater Flowrate FW Temp. (Deg. K) Rx Power(%) WfWf △Wf△Wf WsWs △Ws△Ws TfTf △Tf△Tf ф pф p △фp△фp 5% % % % % % % % % Plant Experimentation ♦ Initial Test Conditions & amount of Step Change

7 II. System Identification of SG 2. Plant Experimentation ♦ Test on Reactor power instead of Primary temperature was performed. Because; - Simulation of Primary temperature Step changes can not be easily performed with the closed RCS loop in the current RELAP model. - Step changes of Primary temperature are rarely occurred in the operating NPPs.

8 II. System Identification of SG 2. Plant Experimentation & Model Validation (5%, 15%) ♦ Step increase in feedwater temperature step change (10 deg. K)

9 II. System Identification of SG 2. Plant Experimentation & Model Validation( 20%, 50%) ♦ Step increase in feedwater temperature step change (10 deg. K)

10 II. System Identification of SG 2. Plant Experimentation& Model Validation( 80 %) ♦ Step increase in feedwater temperature step change (10 deg. K)

11 II. System Identification of SG 2. Plant Experimentation & Model Validation (10%, 30%) ♦ Step increase in Reactor Power (1 % )

12 II. System Identification of SG 2. Plant Experimentation & Model Validation (80 %) ♦ Step increase in Reactor Power (1 % )

13 II. System Identification of SG At 5 % K = 3.23*10^(-9); Tp1 = Tp2 = Td = Tz=17800 At 10% K = 1.7*10^(-7); Tp1 = Tp2 = Td = Tz=500 ; At 15% K = 4.58*10^(-9); Tp1 = Tp2 = Td = Tz=17000 At 19% At 20% K = 8.38*10^(-9); Tp1 = Tp2 = Td = Tz=18500 At 30% K = 8.78*10^(-9); Tp1 = Tp2 = Td = Tz=18500 At 50% K = -2.18*10^(-7); Tp1 =0 Tp2 = Td = Tz=-1000 ♦ Transfer function G tf (s) from feedwater temperature to Level At 80% K = -4.30*10^(-5) Tp1 = 4.2 Tz = At 100 % 1+Tz*s G tf (s) = K * * exp(-Td*s) s(1+Tp1*s)(1+Tp2*s)

14 II. System Identification of SG ♦ Transfer function G p (s) from Reactor Power to Level At 5% At 10% K = 2.8*10^(-6); Tp1 = Tp2 = Td = Tz=500 At 15% At 19 % At 20 % At 30% K = 1.98e-005 Tp1 = 8.5 Tp2 = Td = 2 Tz = 2.0 At 50% At 80% K = *10^(-5); Tp1 =0 Tp2 = Td = Tz=-80 At Tz*s Gp(s) = K * * exp(-Td*s) s(1+Tp1*s)(1+Tp2*s)

15 III. Summary Model Tests ♦ Tests on feedwater, steam flow, feedwater temperature, and Reactor power were performed and completed ♦ Test on Reactor power instead of Primary temperature was performed Development of Transfer Function (Structures & Parameters) ♦ TFs from Steam & Feedwater to Level were successfully validated ♦ TFs from feedwater temperatre and Reactor power to Level were partly completed and validated KSNP SG System Identification for Control

16 III. Summary Identified Model will be in a form of Linear Parameter Varying Model ♦ Linear Transfer Function (MISO) : 4 Inputs, 1 Output ♦ △ L = G f (s) △ W f (s) + G s (s) △ W s (s) + G p (s) △ T p (s) + G tf (s) △ T f (s) Where G f (s) : Transfer Function bet. Feedwater Flow and Level G s (s) : Transfer Function bet. Steam Flow and Level G tp (s) : Transfer Function bet. Primary Temperature and Level G tf (s) : Transfer Function bet. Feedwater Temperature and Level

17 IV. Future Works Completion of Model Identification of Primary & Feedwater temperature Development of H  Optimal Controller (Loop-Shaping Techniques)

18 END

19 II. System Identification of SG 3. Model Structure Selection ♦ Structure of transfer function G tf (s) from FW Temperatre to Level ♦ Structure of transfer function G p (s) from Feedwater Flow to Level 1+Tz*s G p (s) = K * * exp(-Td*s) s(1+Tp1*s)(1+Tp2*s) 1+Tz*s G tf (s) = K * * exp(-Td*s) s(1+Tp1*s)(1+Tp2*s)

20 II. System Identification of SG 4. Model(Parameter) Estimation ♦ Parameters Estimation using MATLAB System Identification Toolbox - Process Model

21 II. System Identification of SG 5. Model Validation ♦ Identified Models were validated using SIMLINK & MATLAB

22 II. System Identification of SG 5. Model Validation