District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME February 30, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION UPDATE DECEMBER 7, 2011 AYP DETERMINATIONS ESEA WAIVER.
Advertisements

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
10/27/14 LaGrange School District 105 First Quarter Goals Update
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
ESL Results and Targets Montgomery County Schools.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
7 Accountability Getting clear about what you want to accomplish with technology How will you measure its use? How will you communicate its effects?
Centennial High School School Wide Literacy Plan
Needs Assessment Sample Clover School Data Source: ADE, Federal Programs and School Improvement Units
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
District Planning in ePlan July Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Eve Carney Executive Director Renee Palakovic Director of Planning
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
SIP Training Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 29, 2012.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Quarterly Data Review. Total population at Forest Street 363 students (Additional 30 pre-K students) Students receiving additional services 116 total.
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Strengths Challenges  Helped to organize thoughts and activities  Gave better direction  Opportunity to share with fellow counselors and county officials.
Administrators Academy August 9, Closing the Achievement Gap.
1 Lodi Unified School District High Priority Schools Grant (HPSGP) Review of Progress for Live Oak, Needham, and Washington Elementary Schools Mary Camezon,
Focus Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
MERA November 26,  Priority School Study  Scorecard Analyses  House Bill 5112 Overview.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Low Performing Schools Plan Presentation New Hanover County Schools October 20, 2015.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME DATE 1.
Carol Revels, Senior Administrator.  Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in the following areas occur: Technology, Accountable Talk, ELA Instructional.
Capstone Presentation Vicky Chiles Sabin Middle School EDLS 643.
IMPLEMENTING TITLE I IN BARROW COUNTY SCHOOLS ANNUAL PARENT MEETING
ABC District Next-Generation Accountability Report March
MID-YEAR STAKEHOLDER’S ASSESSMENT REVIEW TWIN LAKES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY JANUARY 23, 2014.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
ABC School Data Wall Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Elbert County Middle School School Improvement Goals
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Strategic Plan Implementation Update Omaha Public Schools Board of Education October 20, 2014.
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Tchefuncte Middle Parent & Family Engagement Night
Tchefuncte Middle Parent & Family Engagement Night
Tchefuncte Middle Parent & Family Engagement Night
Local District Northeast
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Tomlinson Middle School August 27, 2019
Presentation transcript:

District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME February 30, 2013

Table of Contents About this Template SIP Implementation Progress and Quality Student and Staff Attendance Student Discipline Culture and Climate Survey Benchmark/End of Unit Assessments High School Graduation Rate Questions/Comments 2

About this Template This template is intended to be a model to consider when conducting SIP Cycle reviews. Content is based on the Focus/Priority Goals, Past/Future Proficiency Targets, reason school has been designated focus/priority, and SMART Goals. 3

SIP Implementation Progress and Quality Goal: At least 80% of school improvement plan actions are accomplished at each 6-8 week period.

SMART GOAL #1 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 5

SMART GOAL #2 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 6

SMART GOAL #3 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 7

SMART GOAL #4 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 8

Student and Staff Attendance At least 92% attendance for targeted subgroups, school wide, and teachers that support those subgroups and school wide. Less than 5% of targeted subgroup students and students school-wide are chronically absent (>10% of schools days missed)

10

11

12

13

Student Discipline Goal: Less than 5% of targeted subgroup students and students school-wide are suspended

Suspension Summary Office Referrals : – September-[count] – October- [count] – November- [count] – [Include Additional months as needed] Suspensions: [Count] Students Suspended: [Count] Total days of lost instruction due to suspension: [count] 15

16

Culture and Climate Survey 95% of students & teachers school-wide and for targeted subgroups participate in the survey 25% of parents (households) participate in the survey At least 80% of survey responders state that the school “meets expectations” 17

18

19

20

97% Positive 21

22

23

24

Focus for SCHOOL NAME: Benchmark/End of Unit Assessments At least 95% participation of students on the end-of-unit assessment At least 70% of students demonstrate proficiency on each Subject Learning Objective on standards-aligned end-of-unit assessments Reason for Classification Schoolwide Proficiency Lowest- Performing Subgroup Second Lowest- Performing Subgroup Highest- Performing Subgroup Avg Prof of Two Lowest Subgroups Highest Subgroup Proficiency Highest Within-School Gaps 51.00%SpedAf. Am.Asian19.80%66.80% Performance Gap:47.0% 25

Estimated* Participation Rate Site Name ELA MP1 Studen t Count ELA MP1 Students Tested ELA MP1 Part. Target ELA MP 1 Comp. Rate Math MP1 Student Count Math MP1 Students Tested Math MP1 Part. Target Math MP1 Comp. Rate SCHOOL NAME %99% %65% Grade % % Grade % % Grade % % Grade % % Student Counts Based on SIS student count report on ______________ Students tested based on Interim Assessment data extracts from ___________ 26

27

28

29

30

31

33

34

35

36

Goal: At least 75% graduation rate for each cohort year High School Graduation Rate 38

Grade 9 – English 1 – Quarterly Grades 39

Grade 9 – Algebra 1 Quarterly Grades 40

41

Conclusion Questions? Comments? 42