The UI Federal/State Partnership At Work REENGINEERING UI BENEFIT ACCOUNTABILITY PROCESSES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
Advertisements

EuropeAid Entry points and models for parliamentary development EC support to governance in partner countries – with a focus on the African continent –
The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
Intensified action on seven behaviours by all development partners Session objectives 1.To review status of intensified action: progress, issues and challenges.
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Overview. Consistent with the Technology Committee’s mission to develop, monitor and update a technology vision and strategy for the Cathedral, and consistent.
System Office Performance Management
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
B&O Committee May 2015 iTRAK - Change Management An Agency Adapting to Change.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Cash Based Interventions in unhcr
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Managing a Training Program Why train? Who will attend the training? What are the learning objectives? Strategies? Coverage? How will the training program.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
TTBIZLINK PROJECT MINISTRY OF TRADE, INDUSTRY, INVESTMENT & COMMUNICATIONS.
NATIONAL SAICM IMPLEMENTATION: DEVELOPING A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Gillian Guthrie Ministry of Local Government and Environment June 19, 2006 THE CASE OF.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
1 Climate and Clean Air Coalition Landfills and Municipal Solid Waste Initiative Cities Program July, 23 rd, 2013 México City, México.
VISIONING SESSION May 29, NWD Planning Grant  One year planning grant, started October 1, 2014; draft plan by September 30, 2015; final plan by.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
POST DISASTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT I n t e r n a t I o n a l R e c o v e r y P l a t f o r m.
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
LEAP 3 An Update for SOCCER March 2014
11 Viv Lees, Branch Chief Child Nutrition Division USDA Food & Nutrition Service SNA State Agency Conference December 1, 2011.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee Meeting Stockholm, 8-10 September 2015 SAI capacity from a Post-2015 development agenda perspective The PASAI cooperative.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration USDOT – PHMSA HMEP Grants Major Audit Findings NASTTPO April 25,
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
UK Wide Core Skills & Training Framework Findings of 2 nd Stage Consultation and Implications for Development of the Framework.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
1 Free Help: State Support Team Technical Assistance Services 2012 MIS Conference February 15, 2012 Corey Chatis, State Support Team Jan Petro, CO Department.
Strong field project [URL]| 1 strong field project model strategies outcomes DV Orgs & Leaders Intermediary Partners Technical Assistance Providers BSCF.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proposed Framework for Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Negussie Gorfe.
Changing Perspectives on Workforce System Performance Workforce Innovations Conference July 2004 Employment and Training Administration Performance and.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: March 18, 2014 Presented by: National Office of.
GSA IT Strategic Plan 2009 – 2011 August 2007 US General Services Administration 1.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
1 Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance Update.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: August 3, 2015 Presented by: U.S. Department of.
UI Benefits Operations. State Self-Assessments
Integrated Management System and Certification
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Item #8 Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC) Program TPB Planning and Implementation Briefing May 21, 2008 Richard W Steeg,
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Managed Content Services
An Introduction to LiFE
Presentation transcript:

The UI Federal/State Partnership At Work REENGINEERING UI BENEFIT ACCOUNTABILITY PROCESSES

WHY REENGINEERING NOW?  Diminished System Capacity/Resources  New Program Challenges  Loss of Experienced Staff  Evolving Methods of Program Administration  Need for Greater Focus on Program Operations

REENGINEERING GUIDING PRINCIPLES  Processes must ensure program integrity  Maximize the use of specific program expertise within the UI system  Eliminate duplication where feasible  Need new processes to address program operations comprehensively, not by program or individual function  Greater support for states in addressing operational/administrative issues that lead to poor program performance/integrity  Support improvements in UI staff capacity system-wide  Must take things “off the table” if adding new things  Automate where feasible

REENGINEERING FRAMEWORK Taking Things Off the Table:  Changes to SQSP Process  Move to 2 year cycle  Changes to Frequency and Logistics for Federal/State Peer Reviews for BAM/BTQ/Appeals  Elimination of BPC Peer Reviews

REENGINEERING FRAMEWORK New Accountability Features  Focus on program operations impacting program performance/integrity  TPS-like state self assessment process  ETA monitoring to include operational elements  New “At Risk” Determination Process/Still Focused on Technical Assistance  Use of UI System (federal & state) program experts to support continuous improvement in accountability processes  Including More Formalized Training Components to Peer Review Processes

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY PROGRAM OPERATIONS?  Business processes that support program administration in key functional areas:  Initial claims  Non-Monetary Adjudications  Appeals  Benefit Payment Control  Call Center Operations  Information Technology Infrastructure  Management Controls

REENGINEERING PROCESS Structure:  Executive Committee  Steering Committee  Working Groups Timing:  New SQSP Cycle Implemented for FY 2015  Target for New Operational Assessments and Expert UI Teams is FY 2016  Cycles for Peer Reviews - Will be Staggered in FY 2015 and FY 2016

STATE ENGAGEMENT A MUST!  State Participation on Workgroups  Opportunities for All States to Review and Comment on Key New Accountability Features  Consultation with NASWA UI Committee  Opportunity for All States to Provide Comments to Federal Register Notices Related to Paperwork Reduction Act Clearance  Webinars To Introduce New Reengineered Processes

WHAT’S IN IT FOR YOU?  We all gain an improved UI system that meets the needs of our customers and carries out the mission of the program.  Opportunities for states to continuously assess opportunities for improvement.  New ways to capture state best practices related to program administration that can be shared.  New structure to enable state peer-to-peer technical assistance by including state SMEs on expert teams supporting “at risk” states.

CHANGES TO BAM/BTQ PEER REVIEW FREQUENCY  We recognize the need to reduce the frequency and focus on a national approach.  Reducing the frequency will allow time to address operational functions identified by BAM/BTQ case reviews.  National approach will provide better opportunities for training/peer- to-peer sharing and greater consistency across the UI system.  Specifics still being worked out, we need your input and help!

OPERATIONAL REVIEWS OF BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION  Based on TPS model, state self- assessment approach puts states in control of their own continuous improvement  Propose to provide dedicated funding for 1 FTE to be independent reviewer to conduct self assessment.  Approach will promote State identification of benefits operational issues, help target TA and help build a robust collection of best practices for dissemination throughout the UI system.  This element needs your help and input!

NEW “AT-RISK” DEFINITION/PROCESS  Currently, two different processes and definitions.  Propose one definition that is clear and consistent, based on UI’s rich data and input from operational assessments.  Objective is the same: provide targeted technical assistance to states with challenges to improve system performance.

LEVERAGING OF UI SYSTEMS SKILLS  With reduced resources and talent turnover, we will better leverage UI talent throughout the UI System (Federal and State) for better impacts.  Propose to deploy “expert” teams to most “At-Risk” states to provide better assistance.  Want to include State experts for peer guidance and expertise.  Need your help and input on this element!

NEXT STEPS AND COMING MONTHS  Outreach to States for Workgroup Members Based on Nominations from NASWA and ETA’s Regional Offices  Onboarding contractor to support the development of the State Self-Assessment Tool  Workgroups are heads-down fleshing out the strategies in each area  Periodic “touch bases” with the system to provide additional information and enable input from all states  Guidance to states as new processes are finalized  Federal Register Notices and opportunity to provide comment related to PRA clearance.  Routine updates to NASWA UI Committee

Questions???