| The price argument in urban innovative transport strategies Brussels, 6 December 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Encouraging Car Free Leisure How to influence visitor behaviour A presentation by Olivia Morris – Policy and Campaigns Officer October 2005.
Advertisements

Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
Mobility in Cities Database
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
White Paper 2011 and Development Perspectives of Transport System in Latvia Guntars Jansons Manager Development Planning.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Welcome to CIVITAS.
Introduction to CIVITAS‘ Definition of “Collective Passenger Transport“ and a Snapshot of its Results 13 September 2011 Brussels, Belgium Siegfried Rupprecht,
Stakeholder meeting on the SHIFT²RAIL Strategic Master Plan Manuel Pereira, IST Lisbon ERRAC Vice Chairman 20 th June 2014, Brussels 1.
SPUTNIC – Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Funded by the EU Project introduction.
™ Steve Phillips POLIS, October 2006 ERTRAC Priorities for Road Transport Research until 2020 Steve Phillips, FEHRL & ERTRAC Research Area Leader.
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
Congestion targets & Road pricing Steve Gooding Director, Roads Performance and Strategy Steve Gooding Director, Roads Performance and Strategy.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
Getting involved in Social Innovation Research – participation and experimentation David Ludlow, Centre for Research in Sustainable Planning and Environments,
EESC public hearing White Paper on Transport: Where do we stand? Stocktaking of the 2011 White Paper vision and action points – what has been achieved,
Public transport framework plan for Buffalo City July, BUFFALO CITY MUNICIPALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT FRAMEWORK PLAN PRESENTATION August 2008.
Urban Transportation 6. Introduction The major problem facing the transportation is congestion. The major problem facing the transportation is congestion.
Car sharing in European CIVITAS cities lessons learned and evaluation May 21th, 2015 Utrecht, The Netherlands Janiek de Kruijff, CIVITAS & TNO.
Promoting Sustainability through Mobility Management Concepts, Belgian Experience Bart Desmedt General manager Traject.
Laurent Dauby Director World Bank Towards a lower carbon urban mobility World and Africa perspective.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Systematic Transfer of Innovative Solutions for Public Transport: the TIDE Experience Website:
Transport Sustainable Mobility and Integrated Planning in Urban Areas: Trade Union Dialogue with Local Authorities Day 2: 5th February 2013, SESSION 1:
T RANSITIONING URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY Ljubljana partner and case study presentation Rotterdam,
Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities 16 April 2013 Geneva Marjan Frederix, Mobiel 21, CIVITAS Vanguard.
1 Todays Challenges for transport corridors The perspective of the Interreg IVC project PORT Integration Michael Stange.
Gzim Ocakoglu European Commission, DG MOVE World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 24/06/2010.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
Smart cities Rasmus Lindholm, Director, ERTICO – ITS
| The Planning and roll-out of accessible and human-centred public transport services in Europe The cities’ perspective Karen Vancluysen, Polis.
EU Transport Policy Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June Wioletta Szymanska Project Manager.
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
INTEGRATED TRANSPORT CHAINS Transparencies 2003 EU-funded Urban Transport Research Project Results TRANSPORT TEACHING MATERIAL.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
CIVITAS PLUS Skopje sustainable transport measures MIRJANA APOSTOLOVA, City of Skopje Skopje, 17 September 2012.
TIDE Overview and Context TIDE Workshop Stuttgart, November 2013 Karen Vancluysen, Polis.
Factors of success of International tourism destinations Lecture 9.
UITP EUROPEAN POLICIES – A UITP PERSPECTIVE EMTA MEETING, LONDON, 09/10/14.
The Palestinian Perspective on the Cooperation in R&D in Sustainable Urban Mobility Khaled Al-Sahili An-Najah National University Palestine Rabat 19 May.
OLDER PEOPLE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT Challenges and Chances of an Ageing Society UITP Light Rail Committee Tenerife, October 2007 UITP Waterborne Transport.
Study on the mobility needs of elderly people for the European Metropolitan Transport Authorities Meeting with the EMTA working group on accessibility.
TIDE Final Conference Cluster Systematic Transfer 15 th September – Marcel Meeuwissen, EMPOWER.
Workshop EMTA on European programmes Rotterdam, 15 May 2014 Johan Diepens Ronald Jorna.
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
3rd Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development
EU Infrastructure charging and investment policy Christophe Deblanc DG TREN.
ETF Conference – 23 October 2003 A Trans-European Network at the service of Europe’s citizens José Papí Secretary General European Union Road Federation.
SocialCar a Horizon 2020 project
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
 European Urban Roadmaps to 2030  Dr Guy Hitchcock  Knowledge Leader  ETC, 28 th September 2015.
| 1 Magda Kopczynska – Urban Mobility Action Plan – EMTA Workshop, Warsaw, 5 November 2009 Urban Mobility Action Plan Magda Kopczynska Clean Transport.
| Making cities smarter: The changing landscape of urban transport innovation Ivo Cré, Polis.
The developments in Milan’s sustainable transport initiatives to reduce air and noise pollution Maria Berrini - CEO, Milan Mobility Environment and Territory.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
CIVITAS PLUS Testing Innovative Strategies for Clean Urban Transport, examples from Skopje, MIRJANA APOSTOLOVA, City of Skopje Regional Public Transport.
Road user charge, City of Zagreb Marko Slavulj Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities, Athens, 24 April 2012.
Janos MONIGL director of TRANSMAN Ltd 1968 TU Dresden – M.Sc.traffic engineer 1974 TU Budapest – M.Sc.engineer economist 1976 Hungarian Academy of Science.
Cornie Huizenga Secretary General Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon Transport Work in Progress.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Private Sector Contribution to Economically Sustainable Mobility David Martin, 2 December 2009.
Summary of the State of the Art of Programme Implementation CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika.
| The price argument in urban innovative transport strategies Tallinn, 26 October 2012.
Orientations towards the Scoping Paper H2020 Transport Programme Committee Brussels, 22 June 2016 SMART, GREEN and INTEGRATED TRANSPORT.
LOW-CARB Workshop Brno | 25 May 2018
Long term strategy and structure
Recent developments in the EU transport policy
Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems Directive 2010/40/EU
Focus Collection and use of data in support of urban transport policy:
Presentation transcript:

| The price argument in urban innovative transport strategies Brussels, 6 December 2012

| Innovation... Road user charging CIty wide free public transport Stockholm Oslo Göteborg London Milano Trondheim Singapore Hasselt Zagreb Perth Controversial Polarising For the bold... Well-studied Often a succes!

| TIDE – Transport Innovation Deployment for Europe  Enhance the broad take-up of 15 innovative urban transport and mobility concepts throughout Europe to establish them as mainstream measures  Make a range of new and feasible solutions easily accessible to address key challenges of urban transport such as energy efficiency, decarbonisation, demographic change, safety, access for all, and new economic and financial conditions 8 June

| Spreading Innovation Figure based on Rogers TIDE Innovative Transport and Mobility Concepts Contribution to Mainstreaming Key Target Groups

| Thematic cluster 1: New pricing measures Road user charging in urban areas Parking charge policies Market segmentation and price differentiation in public transportation The cost of parking at privately owned lots – taxation and other economic incentives Efficient and convenient pricing and charging for multimodal trips

| Thematic cluster 5: Public transport organisation Creation of public transport management bodies for metropolitan areas Market research as optimization tool in public transport Contracting of services focused on improvement of passenger satisfaction and efficiency Integration of collective and individual forms of urban transport Sustainable urban public transport corridors

| TIDE kicking off! 8 June Call for Champion Cities to be launched mid December! Survey online until 7 December.

| What do cities want to achieve with free public transport schemes?  ‘Accessibility’  Social inclusion (job seekers, -16/+60)  Combat congestion (e.g. Dutch Spitsmijden, corridor approach)  Improve the Environmental situation (e.g. Belgian Ozone Plan)  Make a mark! (Hasselt, a.o.)  Change activity patterns (-16/+60, students)  Help people discover the city (tourist schemes e.g. Basel)  Increase or change economic activity (Free market bus, job seekers)  Road safety (e.g. Free nocturnal PT, New Year’s Night)

| Fare box strategies are only one piece of the puzzle...

| Function of  distance traveled  per time unit  at what cost (financial, physical, psychological)  per destination reached About accessibility Increasing accessibility: “Tamper” with  distances  speed  financial cost  physical accessibility  psychology (travel horizons)  nature and location of destinations

| Reduce psychological barriers Simple network Coupling and linking of lines Visualisation Weekend versus week service Simple fare structure

| Social Inclusion: Eclipse recommendations ObjectiveAction STEP1Allow people to access a transport system… Provide a universally designed Public Transport network that is accessible to all STEP2… that gives access to relevant destinations and services… Give access to specific areas and destinations, bringing services to people STEP3… and that allows people to participate to society at the fullest. Personalised transport promotion and services. Fare Policies

| AccessSkillsAppropriation Modes’ availability Knowledge of the city City image Spatial distribution Perception public transport & measure PriceValues SupplyHabits Kaufmanns Motility Concept

| Motorisation Market share of public transport (mechanised and motorised trips) depending on motorisation rate Parking supply Market share of public transport depending on number of parking spaces per 1000 jobs in CBD. Volume of supply Market share of public transport depending on public transport supply per hectare (vehicle x km / ha) Relative speed Market share of public transport depending on relative speed of cars. – source UITP

|

| Free Public Transport strategies will need justification

| Legal justification – link to local planning activities  ‘Accessibility’  Social inclusion  Combat congestion  Improve the Environmental situation Make a mark!  Change activity patterns (spatial planning)  Help people discover the city  Increase or change economic activity  Road safety SUMP! Regulation on Public Service Obligations

| Economic justification – positive CBA (source TNO) consumers, households companies, facilities public transport society primary beneficiaries: they are the passengers of public transport! secondary beneficiaries: these parties can benefit from consumers using public transport

| All costs have to be compensated by benefits Benefits for consumers, households Benefits for companies, facilities Benefits for society Price of the ticket Contracts Subsidies Total:≥ 100 % of costs

| Justification – alternative financing models  Third party payment systems (Beer Bus!)  Specific fare policies offer the possibility to financially involve other sectors  Earmarking specific (new) revenue streams

| Justification: Evalution Objectives – targets - indicators  Logical chain of objectives – targets – indicators e.g.  Congestion  Measure congestion  More PT passengers  A substantial share of which are former car drivers  More P&R users  Discovering the city  Destinations reached  Mental mapping

| Mitigate adverse effects  crowding out soft modes  filling in road space  dismantling travel chains and combined trips  capacity and punctuality problems  Lack of opportunity to package mobility solutions  Loss of data about the system (free vs open)

| Sharing the experiences… Ongoing  Polis working group on Social and Economic issues  TIDE project  3iBS  CIVITAS The Future…  Future calls for proposal within the STEER framework  Opportunities within the INTERREG framework or the future HORIZON2020  Better be prepared: express your interest! 8 June

| Good luck! You have our support!

| Contact details  Ivo Cré    June