TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 GMOS: Multi-model assessment of mercury pollution and processes Environment Canada Oleg Travnikov, Johannes Bieser, Ashu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Present and Future Activities of the Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research Partnership Area - UNEP Mercury Programme - Nicola Pirrone Director CNR-Institute.
Advertisements

The UNEP Global Mercury Programme and Fate and Transport Research
GMOS: A GEO Initiative to Support the Global Treaty Nicola Pirrone GMOS: A GEO Initiative to Support the Global Treaty Nicola Pirrone GMOS Coordinator.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin, Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob Constraining the global budget of.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin GEOS-CHEM meeting 6 April 2005.
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East.
Climate Change Science Program Climate Policy & Voluntary Programs Mercury & Water Quality Pesticides & Other POPs Local & Regional Air Quality Intercontinental.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin, Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob Constraining the global budget of.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2013 Heavy metal and POP pollution: Dissemination of output information Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Briefing to UNFPA on UNHCR Operations Geneva 07 February 2007.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF AIR POLLUTION WITH GMI AND PLANS FOR THE NEW HEMISPHERIC TRANSPORT OF AIR POLLUTANTS (HTAP) MODEL INTERCOMPARISON STUDY ROKJIN.
Assessment of HM and POP pollution in EMEP domain Long-term trends ( ) Pollution levels (2012) Transboundary transport Intercontinental transport.
Trans-Pacific Chemical Transport of Mercury: Sensitivity Analysis on Asian Emission Contribution to Mercury Deposition in North America Using CMAQ-Hg C.-J.
Global Modeling of Mercury in the Atmosphere using the GEOS-CHEM model Noelle Eckley, Rokjin Park, Daniel Jacob 30 January 2004.
Nicola Pirrone GMOS Project Coordinator & Director CNR - Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research Rome, Italy Global Mercury Observation System - GMOS.
12 th ICMGP, Jeju, Korea, 2015 Multi-model assessment of mercury cycling in the atmosphere Oleg Travnikov, Johannes Bieser, Ashu Dastoor, Carey Friedman,
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2014 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin EPS Day 12 March 2005.
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale Ilya Ilyin, Oleg Travnikov, Victor Shatalov, Alexey Gusev Meteorological Synthesizing Centre.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2015 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
1 Improving the parameterization of land-surface exchange in the GEOS-Chem Hg model Shaojie Song and Noelle Selin Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
TF HTAP, TF IAM, Vienna, February HTAP-GAINS scenario analysis: preliminary exploration of emission scenarios with regard to the benefits of global.
SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF MERCURY EXPOSURE FOR U.S. SEAFOOD CONSUMERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Noelle Eckley Selin Joint Program on the Science and Policy.
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
UNECE/CLRTAP Task Force on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution Policy-Relevant Science Questions André Zuber European Commission.
UNEP Global Partnership on Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research - Canadian Contribution - Grace Howland Environment Canada, Chemicals Management Division.
EMEP/WGE Bureau, Geneva, March 2016 Main results of Long-term trends of HMs and POPs on the basis of modeling results and measurements.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
17 th TFMM Meeting, 17 – 20 May, 2016 Progress of HM and POP modelling: main activities and results Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor Shatalov,
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
CONSTRAINTS FROM RGM MEASUREMENTS ON GLOBAL MERCURY CHEMISTRY Noelle Eckley Selin 1 Daniel J. Jacob 1, Rokjin J. Park 1, Robert M. Yantosca 1, Sarah Strode,
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
Funded by: European Commission – DG Research (2010 – 2015)
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Overview of country-specific studies of heavy metal and POP pollution
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
EMEP case study on heavy metal pollution assessment:
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
From hemispheric to local scale air pollution: Mercury
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Research of heavy metal pollution on regional (EMEP) and national (Germany) scales Ilyin I, Travnikov O. EMEP/MSC-E.
Co-operation with TF on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution
Data Analysis Techniques
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Comparison of model results with measurements
From hemispheric to local scale air pollution: Mercury
Assessment of heavy metal pollution within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 GMOS: Multi-model assessment of mercury pollution and processes Environment Canada Oleg Travnikov, Johannes Bieser, Ashu Dastoor, Carey Friedman, Ian Hedgecock, Volker Matthias, Andrew Ryzhkov, Noelle Selin, Francesco De Simone, Shaojie Song, Xin Yang

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 GMOS Mercury Modelling Task Force Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS) Aircraft measurements Marine cruises RV Urania Ground-based sites Hg processes in the atmosphere Objectives: Evaluation of model performance using GMOS measurement data Multi-model study of Hg emissions and atmospheric processes Assessment of Hg intercontinental transport and future scenarios

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Participating chemical transport models (CTM): ModelScaleInstitution GLEMOSglobal/regionalEMEP/MSC-E ECHMERITglobalCNR-IIA (Italy) GEM-MACH-HgglobalEnvironment Canada GEOS-ChemglobalMIT (USA) CMAQ-HgregionalHZG (Germany) WRF-ChemregionalCNR-IIA (Italy) p-TOMCATglobalCambridge (UK) GMOS Mercury Modelling Task Force

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Participating chemical transport models (CTM): ModelScaleInstitution GLEMOSglobal/regionalEMEP/MSC-E ECHMERITglobalCNR-IIA (Italy) GEM-MACH-HgglobalEnvironment Canada GEOS-ChemglobalMIT (USA) CMAQ-HgregionalHZG (Germany) WRF-ChemregionalCNR-IIA (Italy) p-TOMCATglobalCambridge (UK) GMOS Mercury Modelling Task Force

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Measurement data Monitoring networks: GMOS (global) EMEP (Europe) NADP/MDN (USA/Canada) AMNet (USA) NAtChem (Canada) GMOS partners: Measurement data used for the analysis (2013) Location of monitoring sites GEM/TGM in air (31 sites) Wet deposition (135 sites) GEM, GOM, PBM in air (25 sites)

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Model evaluation vs. measurements GLEMOS GEOS-Chem GEM-MACH-HgECHMERIT Hg 0 air concentration (2013)

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Base run Simulation with the state-of-the-art model configuration (BASE) Model experiments Emission effects Model run with no anthropogenic emissions (NOANT) Modified speciation of Hg anthropogenic emissions (ANTSPEC) Unified natural/secondary emissions (COMNAT) Improved emissions base on inverse modelling (INVEMI) Atmospheric chemistry Model run with no atmospheric chemistry (NOCHEM) Simulation with Br oxidation chemistry with two different sets of Br air concentration (BRCHEM1 and BRCHEM2) Simulation with OH - initiated oxidation chemistry (OHCHEM) Simulation with O 3 - initiated oxidation chemistry (O3CHEM)

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Model experiments Source region apportionment Evaluation of Hg dispersion from 14 major source regions (Europe, North America, East Asia, South Asia etc.) Emission sectors apportionment Evaluation of Hg dispersion from 3 groups of emission sectors (stationary combustion, industrial sources, intentional use) Study setup Anthropogenic emissions: AMAP/UNEP inventory for 2010 Natural/legacy emissions: Model specific Target year: 2013

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Study of atmospheric chemistry Seasonal variation of Hg wet deposition Measurements ECHMERITGLEMOSGEM-MACH-HgGEOS-Chem Sites measuring Hg wet deposition Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Wet deposition, ng/m 2 /day 99 sites Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Wet deposition, ng/m 2 /day 14 sites

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Wet deposition, ng/m 2 /day Hg 0 + Br (Br dataset I) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Wet deposition, ng/m 2 /day Hg 0 + O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Wet deposition, ng/m 2 /day Hg 0 + OH Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Wet deposition, ng/m 2 /day Hg 0 + Br (Br dataset II) Study of atmospheric chemistry Seasonal variation of wet deposition (North America) MeasurementsECHMERITGLEMOSGEM-MACH-HgGEOS-Chem Latitude Br concentration, ppq Br concentration Br dataset I Br dataset II

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Simulated Hg deposition flux (2013) Mercury dispersion on a global scale Contribution of current emissions vs. legacy and natural sources Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y Anthropogenic sources Legacy/natural sources

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Simulated Hg deposition flux (2013) Intercontinental transport Source apportionment of Hg anthropogenic deposition Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y EuropeAfrica Middle East North America Central America South America South Asia East Asia Southeast Asia Australia and NZ CIS countries Antarctica Arctic Source/receptor regions

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Simulated Hg deposition flux (2013) Mercury atmospheric load to the ocean Hg anthropogenic deposition to aquatic regions (FAO) Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y Source regions EuropeAfrica Middle East North America Central America South America South Asia East Asia Southeast Asia Australia and NZ CIS countries Antarctica Arctic Other regions

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Industrial sources Hg deposition from different emission sectors (2013) Stationary combustion Effect of Hg emission speciation Intentional use and product waste Speciation of global Hg emissions Intentional use & product waste Industrial sources Stationary combustion Hg emission, t/y Hg 0 HgII gas HgII part

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Future changes of mercury pollution Model evaluation of future emission scenarios (2035) Hg emission scenarios for 2035: ‘Current Policy’ scenario (CP 2035) Governmental policies and measures existing in 2010 have been adopted, including those that have not been fully implemented ‘New Policy’ scenario (NP 2035) Policy commitments announced by countries worldwide to reduce GHG emissions and phase out fossil-energy subsidies have been fully implemented ‘Maximum Feasible Reduction’ scenario (MFR 2035) Maximum possible Hg emission reductions that could be achieved if no other constraints have been taken into account Anthropogenic Hg emissions in 2010 and CP 2035 NP 2035 MFR 2035 Total emission, kt

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Source and receptor regions Model evaluation of future emission scenarios (2035) Future changes of mercury pollution CP 2035 NP 2035 MFR 2035 Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y North America CP 2035 NP 2035 MFR 2035 Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y Europe CP 2035 NP 2035 MFR 2035 Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y South Asia CP 2035 NP 2035 MFR 2035 Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y East Asia CP 2035 NP 2035 MFR 2035 Average Hg deposition, g/km 2 /y Arctic

TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 Summary An ensemble of global models has been applied to study Hg emission, dispersion and cycling in the atmosphere Oxidation chemistry of Hg in the atmosphere is still not fully understood. There is possibility of multiple oxidation mechanisms Contribution of current anthropogenic emissions to deposition varies between 20% and 50% in different regions. Contribution of intercontinental transport is comparable or prevails over domestic sources in most regions except for South and East Asia Emissions speciation strongly affects the range of Hg dispersion and deposition. Hg speciation in available inventories contains significant uncertainties Future scenarios predict decrease of Hg deposition in the next 20 years except for South and East Asia where the ‘Current Policy’ can lead to deposition growth