Corporate Liability for Environmental Damage: A Human Rights Approach Dr. Svitlana Kravchenko University of Oregon 7 th Colloquium of the IUCN Academy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Law and Policy
Advertisements

Legal Research & Writing LAW-215
Q3 LAW NOTES 1 TORTS.
Climate in the Courts: Climate Change Liability and Litigation Tracy D. Hester Bracewell & Giuliani LLP Air & Waste Management Association 13 th Annual.
Commercial Law (Mgmt 348) Professor Charles H. Smith Professional Liability and Accountability (Chapter 51) Spring 2009.
HOW DO TNCS AFFECT SOVEREIGNTY?. Brainstorm How do TNCs affect the sovereignty of states?
Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with an affiliated limited liability partnership conducting the practice in the.
Coverage Issues: Pennsylvania Unfair Insurance Practices Act, Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations, Reservation of Rights Letters and Non-Waiver.
1 Judicial Review Under NEPA Bob Malmsheimer April 1, 2006.
Law I Chapter 18.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Deborah M. Smith United States Magistrate Judge District of Alaska LAWS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Second Asian Judges Symposium.
International Law and Torture The American Court System.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. CHAPTER 2 International Law and the World’s Legal Systems.
Types of Courts American Government. Standing  In order for a case to be heard in our legal system, the plaintiff must have standing to sue  This means.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
University of Antwerp The application of human rights in oppressive/dictatorial countries and its consequences for investment policies Philip Nauwelaerts.
Globalization and Human Rights LAWS Global Citizenship Conference Josephine Wong and Parneet Kahlon.
Massachusetts v. E.P.A., 127 S.Ct (2007) Chevron Analysis.
THE LAW 8 Rights of a citizen accused of a crime: 1.Protection from ____________________(person can only be re-tried in case of a hung jury) 2.Right to.
Chapter 2 Courts and Jurisdiction
Civil Law. Sources of American Law Constitutional Law – Supreme law of the land, limits government and defines rights Statutory Law – Written by Legislative.
© 2011 South-Western | Cengage Learning GOALS LESSON 1.1 LAW, JUSTICE, AND ETHICS Recognize the difference between law and justice Apply ethics to personal.
Dispute Resolution Chapter 2. Judicial Review Marbury v. Madison –Establishes the idea of judicial review.
Business and Human Rights Menno Kamminga. Faculty of Law 2 Emergence of non-state actors IGOs NGOs Individuals MNEs.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
Criminal Vs. Civil Cases. Definition  Civil Law  Deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, or between the two.  Compensation is awarded.
Public law governs:  relationships between individuals and the state/government; and  the structure, administration and operation of the state/government.
Lawsuits -Type of Civil Court Case -Lawsuits are when one person sues another for damages An award of money paid for harm (compensatory or punitive) -Property.
The Judiciary Chapter 10- The Judiciary. Federal Judiciary Act of 1789 O Established the basic 3 step federal court system. 3. Supreme Court 2. Appellate.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Mon. Dec. 3. claim preclusion scope of a claim Rest. (2d) of Judgments § 24. Dimensions Of “Claim” For Purposes Of Merger Or Bar—General Rule Concerning.
Civil liability for environmental damage – The contribution of Private international law Ius Commune A'Dam November 2012 Geert Van Calster Leuven law,
Liability for Climate Change-Related Damage in Domestic Courts: Claims for Compensation by Elena Kosolapova Centre for Environmental Law University of.
Business and Human Rights Ian Thomson KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives.
Suing the Federal Government FTCA I. History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
Tues., Oct. 21. practice midterm Wed. 10/ Room 119 Thurs 10/ Room 141 Thurs 10/ Room 127.
Fri., Oct. 17. amendment 15(a) Amendments Before Trial. (1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course.
TRACY ANN WARD LIBM 6320 DR. RICKMAN A Picture is Worth…? A Case Study of Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
Climate litigation & insurance issues The Future of Mass Tort Claims British Institute of International and Comparative Law London, 6 February 2009 Prof.
Why is the power of judicial review key to the system of checks and balances? Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 12Slide 1 Settlements - In General A settlement is an agreement by both parties to resolve the dispute through compromise.
The Citizen's Role in Environmental Matters The Argentinean case Gabriel R. Macchiavello.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW DEBATE CYCLE #2. STATE OF SETONIA (PETITIONER) V. THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (RESPONDENT)
The President, The Bureaucracy and the Judiciary PPT 9 pp The Judicial System.
Law and Society CJUS/POLS 102 Chapter 5: Limitations.
© 2007 Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved. What is a Civil Case?
GHG LITIGATION Peter Glaser Climate Challenges in the Sunshine State Orlando, FL February 13, 2008.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
Remaining Legal Issues From World War II: Domestic Courts and International Law John Yoo Heller Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley.
Liability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Litigation Challenges Zen A. Makuch IC Legal/Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College, London, UK
Dr Engobo Emeseh – Aberystwyth University & Dr Rhuks Akoh- University of Hull 01 April 2010SLSA UWE Bristol1.
Ethical Considerations in Economic Development Aaron J. Harkins 17 th Annual DC Indian Law Conference November 10, 2015.
Courts and Arbitrations:
Bell Ringer – if you were not here last class, don’t ask me questions…. RQ #7 – STUDY!
Judicial Review Under NEPA
Introduction to Environmental Law
Courts and Arbitrations:
COURT SYSTEMS AND JURISDICTION
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Nuisance Tort Litigation
Climate in the Courts: Climate Change Liability and Litigation Tracy D. Hester Bracewell & Giuliani LLP Air & Waste Management Association 13th Annual.
Texas anti-SLAPP in Employment Cases: Defendants’ Superpower
Nuisance Tort Litigation
COURT SYSTEMS AND JURISDICTION
Nuisance Tort Litigation
Chapter 15 Law in America.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Climate Change Torts Environmental Law Oct. 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Corporate Liability for Environmental Damage: A Human Rights Approach Dr. Svitlana Kravchenko University of Oregon 7 th Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law Dr. Svitlana Kravchenko University of Oregon 7 th Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law

International Standards of Voluntary Corporate Responsibility U.N. Draft Code of Conduct of TNC (1992)U.N. Draft Code of Conduct of TNC (1992) OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, 2000)OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, 2000) ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning ME and Social PolicyILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning ME and Social Policy U.N. Global CompactU.N. Global Compact Soft law: Enforcement?Soft law: Enforcement? U.N. Draft Code of Conduct of TNC (1992)U.N. Draft Code of Conduct of TNC (1992) OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, 2000)OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, 2000) ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning ME and Social PolicyILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning ME and Social Policy U.N. Global CompactU.N. Global Compact Soft law: Enforcement?Soft law: Enforcement?

Applying Alien Torts Statute Any civil actionAny civil action By alienBy alien For tort claim onlyFor tort claim only Violation of law of nationsViolation of law of nations Any civil actionAny civil action By alienBy alien For tort claim onlyFor tort claim only Violation of law of nationsViolation of law of nations

Violation of law of nations Thomas Jefferson : the law of nations is “an integral part of the laws of the land.”Thomas Jefferson : the law of nations is “an integral part of the laws of the land.” American courts in early 1800s regularly decided cases under the law of nations.American courts in early 1800s regularly decided cases under the law of nations. Then in 1980s courts allowed cases against individuals for human rights abuses.Then in 1980s courts allowed cases against individuals for human rights abuses. In 2004, such human rights cases were allowed against corporations.In 2004, such human rights cases were allowed against corporations. But federal courts exercise extreme caution when adjudicating environmental rights claims under international lawBut federal courts exercise extreme caution when adjudicating environmental rights claims under international law Thomas Jefferson : the law of nations is “an integral part of the laws of the land.”Thomas Jefferson : the law of nations is “an integral part of the laws of the land.” American courts in early 1800s regularly decided cases under the law of nations.American courts in early 1800s regularly decided cases under the law of nations. Then in 1980s courts allowed cases against individuals for human rights abuses.Then in 1980s courts allowed cases against individuals for human rights abuses. In 2004, such human rights cases were allowed against corporations.In 2004, such human rights cases were allowed against corporations. But federal courts exercise extreme caution when adjudicating environmental rights claims under international lawBut federal courts exercise extreme caution when adjudicating environmental rights claims under international law

Applying ATS to corporations for human rights abuses In Sosa v. Alvares (2004) the Supreme Court “explicitly contemplates the existence of corporate liability under customary international law.”In Sosa v. Alvares (2004) the Supreme Court “explicitly contemplates the existence of corporate liability under customary international law.”

Doe v. Unocal HR abuses in Myanmar: forced labor, murder, rape, and torture; complicityHR abuses in Myanmar: forced labor, murder, rape, and torture; complicity During construction of a gas pipelineDuring construction of a gas pipeline Plaintiffs based their claims on ATSPlaintiffs based their claims on ATS Dismissal by district courtDismissal by district court Reversed in part by 9 th Cir., so case could proceedReversed in part by 9 th Cir., so case could proceed Settlement (terms confidential)Settlement (terms confidential) HR abuses in Myanmar: forced labor, murder, rape, and torture; complicityHR abuses in Myanmar: forced labor, murder, rape, and torture; complicity During construction of a gas pipelineDuring construction of a gas pipeline Plaintiffs based their claims on ATSPlaintiffs based their claims on ATS Dismissal by district courtDismissal by district court Reversed in part by 9 th Cir., so case could proceedReversed in part by 9 th Cir., so case could proceed Settlement (terms confidential)Settlement (terms confidential)

Wiwa v. Shell Human rights claims against Royal Dutch/Shell and its Nigerian subsidiaryHuman rights claims against Royal Dutch/Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary Charged complicity in the torture, killing, and other abuses of Ogoni leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and other Ogoni activistsCharged complicity in the torture, killing, and other abuses of Ogoni leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and other Ogoni activists After Unocal case, this one settled in June 2009 for $15.5 millionAfter Unocal case, this one settled in June 2009 for $15.5 million Settlement was public, not secretSettlement was public, not secret Human rights claims against Royal Dutch/Shell and its Nigerian subsidiaryHuman rights claims against Royal Dutch/Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary Charged complicity in the torture, killing, and other abuses of Ogoni leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and other Ogoni activistsCharged complicity in the torture, killing, and other abuses of Ogoni leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and other Ogoni activists After Unocal case, this one settled in June 2009 for $15.5 millionAfter Unocal case, this one settled in June 2009 for $15.5 million Settlement was public, not secretSettlement was public, not secret

Not all cases will succeed Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy (Oct. 2009) a U.S. Court of Appeals held:Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy (Oct. 2009) a U.S. Court of Appeals held: Mere investment in a country where human rights are abused is not enough to make a corporation liable under the ATS.Mere investment in a country where human rights are abused is not enough to make a corporation liable under the ATS. The plaintiffs must prove the company had specific intent to help the government violate human rights.The plaintiffs must prove the company had specific intent to help the government violate human rights. Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy (Oct. 2009) a U.S. Court of Appeals held:Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy (Oct. 2009) a U.S. Court of Appeals held: Mere investment in a country where human rights are abused is not enough to make a corporation liable under the ATS.Mere investment in a country where human rights are abused is not enough to make a corporation liable under the ATS. The plaintiffs must prove the company had specific intent to help the government violate human rights.The plaintiffs must prove the company had specific intent to help the government violate human rights.

Environmental rights claims Pollution in ChinaPollution in China

Beanal v. Freeport-McMoran: Copper, gold, & silver mine in Indonesia, but HQ in USACopper, gold, & silver mine in Indonesia, but HQ in USA Alleged environmental abuses, human rights violations, and cultural genocideAlleged environmental abuses, human rights violations, and cultural genocide Alleged violation of international lawAlleged violation of international law Failure to show that these treaties enjoy universal acceptance in the international communityFailure to show that these treaties enjoy universal acceptance in the international community Copper, gold, & silver mine in Indonesia, but HQ in USACopper, gold, & silver mine in Indonesia, but HQ in USA Alleged environmental abuses, human rights violations, and cultural genocideAlleged environmental abuses, human rights violations, and cultural genocide Alleged violation of international lawAlleged violation of international law Failure to show that these treaties enjoy universal acceptance in the international communityFailure to show that these treaties enjoy universal acceptance in the international community

Flores v. Southern Peru Copper Pollution and alleged violation of the right to life and the right to healthPollution and alleged violation of the right to life and the right to health Pollution caused lung diseasePollution caused lung disease US district court for Southern District of NY held that plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of a customary international law “right to life” or “right to health”US district court for Southern District of NY held that plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of a customary international law “right to life” or “right to health” Pollution and alleged violation of the right to life and the right to healthPollution and alleged violation of the right to life and the right to health Pollution caused lung diseasePollution caused lung disease US district court for Southern District of NY held that plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of a customary international law “right to life” or “right to health”US district court for Southern District of NY held that plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of a customary international law “right to life” or “right to health”

Sarei v. Rio Tinto Rio Tinto built open-pit copper mine, PNGRio Tinto built open-pit copper mine, PNG Severe river and bay pollutionSevere river and bay pollution Alleged human rights and environmental abusesAlleged human rights and environmental abuses 9 th Cir.: Potential violation of UNCLOS, customary international law against marine pollution (166 Parties)9 th Cir.: Potential violation of UNCLOS, customary international law against marine pollution (166 Parties) 9th Cir. en banc: plaintiffs did not exhaust local remedies, so case is returned9th Cir. en banc: plaintiffs did not exhaust local remedies, so case is returned Rio Tinto built open-pit copper mine, PNGRio Tinto built open-pit copper mine, PNG Severe river and bay pollutionSevere river and bay pollution Alleged human rights and environmental abusesAlleged human rights and environmental abuses 9 th Cir.: Potential violation of UNCLOS, customary international law against marine pollution (166 Parties)9 th Cir.: Potential violation of UNCLOS, customary international law against marine pollution (166 Parties) 9th Cir. en banc: plaintiffs did not exhaust local remedies, so case is returned9th Cir. en banc: plaintiffs did not exhaust local remedies, so case is returned

State Torts for Harm Abroad: Forum non conveniens

Class action (1993) (NY)Class action (1993) (NY) 18 mln gallons of oil contamination without treatment (banned in the US)18 mln gallons of oil contamination without treatment (banned in the US) Company ignored Ecuador’s lawCompany ignored Ecuador’s law Remediation contract ( )Remediation contract ( ) Government and Petroecuador released Texaco from all claimsGovernment and Petroecuador released Texaco from all claims Dismissed in U.S. on FNC ground (2002)Dismissed in U.S. on FNC ground (2002) Class action (1993) (NY)Class action (1993) (NY) 18 mln gallons of oil contamination without treatment (banned in the US)18 mln gallons of oil contamination without treatment (banned in the US) Company ignored Ecuador’s lawCompany ignored Ecuador’s law Remediation contract ( )Remediation contract ( ) Government and Petroecuador released Texaco from all claimsGovernment and Petroecuador released Texaco from all claims Dismissed in U.S. on FNC ground (2002)Dismissed in U.S. on FNC ground (2002) Aguinda v. Texaco

Oil, Ecology, and Culture

Aguinda v. Texaco ( ) In a local court of EcuadorIn a local court of Ecuador Pablo Fajardo on behalf of communityPablo Fajardo on behalf of community With support of Kohn, Swift, and Graf of PhiladelphiaWith support of Kohn, Swift, and Graf of Philadelphia Court-appointed expert – $ 27 billion in remediation costsCourt-appointed expert – $ 27 billion in remediation costs Court decision pendingCourt decision pending In a local court of EcuadorIn a local court of Ecuador Pablo Fajardo on behalf of communityPablo Fajardo on behalf of community With support of Kohn, Swift, and Graf of PhiladelphiaWith support of Kohn, Swift, and Graf of Philadelphia Court-appointed expert – $ 27 billion in remediation costsCourt-appointed expert – $ 27 billion in remediation costs Court decision pendingCourt decision pending

Oil, Ecology, and Culture

“Forum non conveniens- blocking” Statutes Tellez v. Dole: case of banana workers affected by use of DBCP pesticidesTellez v. Dole: case of banana workers affected by use of DBCP pesticides Law No.364 of Nicaragua -- to facilitate the prosecution of lawsuits for damages filed by people whose health has been adversely affected by the use and application of the DBCP pesticideLaw No.364 of Nicaragua -- to facilitate the prosecution of lawsuits for damages filed by people whose health has been adversely affected by the use and application of the DBCP pesticide Tellez v. Dole: case of banana workers affected by use of DBCP pesticidesTellez v. Dole: case of banana workers affected by use of DBCP pesticides Law No.364 of Nicaragua -- to facilitate the prosecution of lawsuits for damages filed by people whose health has been adversely affected by the use and application of the DBCP pesticideLaw No.364 of Nicaragua -- to facilitate the prosecution of lawsuits for damages filed by people whose health has been adversely affected by the use and application of the DBCP pesticide

Law No. 364 Defendants must pay US $100,000 deposit per plaintiffDefendants must pay US $100,000 deposit per plaintiff Law 364 conclusively determined that DBCP caused sterilityLaw 364 conclusively determined that DBCP caused sterility The only question to be litigated is whether a plaintiff worked on a banana plantation and is sterileThe only question to be litigated is whether a plaintiff worked on a banana plantation and is sterile The Supreme Court of Nicaragua upheld the Law as constitutionalThe Supreme Court of Nicaragua upheld the Law as constitutional Defendants must pay US $100,000 deposit per plaintiffDefendants must pay US $100,000 deposit per plaintiff Law 364 conclusively determined that DBCP caused sterilityLaw 364 conclusively determined that DBCP caused sterility The only question to be litigated is whether a plaintiff worked on a banana plantation and is sterileThe only question to be litigated is whether a plaintiff worked on a banana plantation and is sterile The Supreme Court of Nicaragua upheld the Law as constitutionalThe Supreme Court of Nicaragua upheld the Law as constitutional

Tellez v. Dole in trial court Half million dollars awarded for each plaintiffHalf million dollars awarded for each plaintiff But Dow/Dole investigated for fraudBut Dow/Dole investigated for fraud By plaintiffs’ lawyerBy plaintiffs’ lawyer Verdict thrown outVerdict thrown out Half million dollars awarded for each plaintiffHalf million dollars awarded for each plaintiff But Dow/Dole investigated for fraudBut Dow/Dole investigated for fraud By plaintiffs’ lawyerBy plaintiffs’ lawyer Verdict thrown outVerdict thrown out

Corporate Accountability for Climate Change

Connecticut v. Am. Elec. Power US Court of Appeals for 2 nd Circuit Decision of Sept US Court of Appeals for 2 nd Circuit Decision of Sept “Public nuisance” case“Public nuisance” case Case not precluded by political question doctrineCase not precluded by political question doctrine Case will go forward to trial nowCase will go forward to trial now US Court of Appeals for 2 nd Circuit Decision of Sept US Court of Appeals for 2 nd Circuit Decision of Sept “Public nuisance” case“Public nuisance” case Case not precluded by political question doctrineCase not precluded by political question doctrine Case will go forward to trial nowCase will go forward to trial now

Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Village will have to be relocated, as a result of climate change, at a cost estimated up to $400 millionVillage will have to be relocated, as a result of climate change, at a cost estimated up to $400 million District court dismissed caseDistrict court dismissed case Claims not justiciable under the political question doctrineClaims not justiciable under the political question doctrine On appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for 9 th CircuitOn appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for 9 th Circuit Village will have to be relocated, as a result of climate change, at a cost estimated up to $400 millionVillage will have to be relocated, as a result of climate change, at a cost estimated up to $400 million District court dismissed caseDistrict court dismissed case Claims not justiciable under the political question doctrineClaims not justiciable under the political question doctrine On appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for 9 th CircuitOn appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for 9 th Circuit

In US courts: Comer v. Murphy Oil USA Fifth Circuit, reversing the district court, the panel unanimously found:Fifth Circuit, reversing the district court, the panel unanimously found: –property owners had standing –case not precluded by political question doctrine in alleging nuisance, trespass and negligence claims –against oil companies for climate change leading to sea level rise and property damages –however, conspiracy claim not allowed Fifth Circuit, reversing the district court, the panel unanimously found:Fifth Circuit, reversing the district court, the panel unanimously found: –property owners had standing –case not precluded by political question doctrine in alleging nuisance, trespass and negligence claims –against oil companies for climate change leading to sea level rise and property damages –however, conspiracy claim not allowed

ConclusionsConclusions Corporations will be held accountable in various ways for human rights abuses including environmental rights and degradation of the environmentCorporations will be held accountable in various ways for human rights abuses including environmental rights and degradation of the environment

The Oregon LL.M. In Environmental and Natural Resources Law