CSv2 for the Hematopoietic Neoplasms 1. 2 This includes five schemas …. Hematopoietic, Reticuloendothelial, Immunopro-liferative and Myeloproliferative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Advertisements

TNM staging and prognosis Alexandru Eniu, MD, PhD Medical Oncologist Department of Breast Tumors Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuţă Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Acknowledgments American College of Surgeons (ACOS) Commission on Cancer (COC) Canadian Cancer Registries.
Lung “Coding Bootcamp” Nicole Catlett, CTR 2014 Kentucky Cancer Registry Fall Workshop.
Hematopathology Lab December 12, Case 1 . Normal Peripheral Blood Smear.
STAGING MCR Staff Show Me Healthy Women March 27, 2008 Supported by a Cooperative Agreement between DHSS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Esophagus, Esophagus GE Junction, Stomach
Hematopoietic Database and Manual
Hodgkin’s Disease (HD)
HAEMATOLOGY MODULE: LYMPHOMA Adult Medical-Surgical Nursing.
Hodgkin lymphoma Histologic subtypes: - Nodular sclerosing - Mixed cellularity - Lymphocyte predominance -Lymphocyte depleted new category: - Lymphocyte.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Primary Site and Histology Rules Steven Peace, BS, CTR Westat October 2009.
LYMPHOMAS By DR : Ramy A. Samy.
Clinical Management of Lymphoma 新光醫院 血液腫瘤科 溫 武 慶.
Cancer Registry Coding Changes for 2014 Presented by the Kentucky Cancer Registry February, 2014.
Coding Pitfalls Jessica K. Dohler, BS, CTR. Objectives 0 Know how to code the Tumor/Ext Eval code when using intraoperative findings 0 Know when to code.
2010 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project Issues, Timing and Transformations.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Primary Site and Histology Rules Peggy Adamo, RHIT, CTR NCI SEER October 2009.
Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
Staging and Grading of cancers By Haleigh Nelson.
Focusing on Hodgkin Disease
Lymphoma Nada Mohamed Ahmed , MD, MT (ASCP)i.
LYMPHOMA.
Lymphoma DR: Gehan Mohamed.
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas-definition and epidemiology
1 LUNG. 2 Equivalent Terms, Def, Charts, Tables, Illustrations.
Extranodal Lymphoma: Waldeyer’s Ring Lymphomas, primary Muscle Lymphoma Sinus Lymphomas , Bone.
O THER MALIGNANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS The lymphomas and plasma cell problems.
(Relates to Chapter 31, “Nursing Management: Hematologic Problems,” in the textbook) Copyright © 2011, 2007 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc.
Edward Camacho Mina 1061 MD4 WINDSOR UNIVERSITY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA.
Cancer Staging.
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma By: Tonya Weir and Paige Mathias Date: October 13, 2010.
Putting the Puzzle Together: Breast Collaborative Staging Melissa Riddle, RHIT, CTR October 6, 2012.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Acknowledgments American College of Surgeons (ACOS) Commission on Cancer (COC) Canadian Cancer Registries.
EVALUATION OF LYMPH NODES & PATHOLOGIC EXAMINATION FOR BREAST CASES Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry.
L YMPHOMA FOR THE G ENERALIST Lee Berkowitz, MD. G OALS AND O BJECTIVES 1. Understand the importance of pathology and staging in the approach to management.
Bone Marrow Biopsy Focal involvement by small B-cell neoplasm without significant plasmacytic differentiation (CD3-, CD20+, PAX5+, kappa IHC-, lambda IHC-,
1 Myeloma Plasma Cell Disorders (Schema Name: MyelomaPlasmaCellDisorder) V0203.
VS. CSv2 Changes CSv2 compared to CSv1 Part 1, Section 1.
2015 CHANGES IN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND CANCER CODING INSTRUCTIONS KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY SPRING TRAINING 2015 PRESENTED BY FRANCES ROSS.
AGGRESSIVE NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA (NHL) EBMT 2015 CLINICAL CASE.
Myeloproliferative Disorders (MPDs)
PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Oregon State Cancer Registry Abstracting Hematologic Malignancies Stepping Up Your Game LeeLa Coleman, CTR Cancer Data Consultant.
Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies
LYMPHOMA Malignant transformation of cell in Lymphatic system There are about 600 Lymph Nodes in the body Spleen and gut also have lymphatic tissue.
Lymphoma Rob Jones. Aim and learning outcomes Aim ◦ To revise the key points of lymphoma Learning outcomes ◦ Revise the basics of haemopoiesis ◦ Understand.
Hodgkin's Lymphoma Joe Cliver. Definition  Hodgkin's lymphoma or formerly known as Hodgkin's disease is a cancer of the lymphatic system, which is part.
Pathology.
APPROACH TO LYMPHOID MALIGNANCIES. Patient Evaluation of ALL Careful history and PE CBC Chemistry studies Bone marrow biopsy Lumbar puncture.
Staging evaluation for NHL Ann Arbor Staging system is applicable to both Hodgkin’s disease and NHL.
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Disease in which malignant (cancer) cells form in the lymph system Type of cancer that develops in.
ajcc TNM Staging: chapter 1, and Summary stage
HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA. Anemia,bleeding tendency. Hepatosplenomegaly.
Collaborative Staging for Colon Site Specific Factors Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR QA Manager Abstracting and Coding Kentucky Cancer Registry.
© Cancer Research UK 2005 Registered charity number Hodgkin’s Lymphoma The statistics in this presentation are based on the Cervical CancerStats.
Chapter 11 Lymphatic System Disorders Mitzy D. Flores, MSN, RN.
NPCR Data Completeness and Quality Audits Review of: Collaborative Stage and Surgery Data Mary Lewis, CTR NPCR Program Consultant.
Asymptomatic lymphadenopathy Mediastinal mass Systemic symptoms Fever, Pruritus Other nonspecific symptoms and paraneoplastic syndromes Intra-abdominal.
Cancer: Staging and Grading What is meant by the term “biopsy”? How do tumors behave differently from one another ? Examples of the stages of cancer and.
CLINICAL ASPECT OF GRADING AND STAGING Hanggoro Tri Rinonce, MD, PhD Department of Anatomical Pathology Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University.
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma March 13, 2013 Suzanne R. Fanning, DO Greenville Health System.
The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project The 8th Edition
MLAB Hematology Keri Brophy-Martinez
Changes to the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Coding Manual
What’s New for 8th Edition
Cancer Staging.
TNM 8 UPDATE Head and Neck SSG March 2018
Lymphomas.
Presentation transcript:

CSv2 for the Hematopoietic Neoplasms 1

2 This includes five schemas …. Hematopoietic, Reticuloendothelial, Immunopro-liferative and Myeloproliferative neoplasms Myeloma and Plasma Cell Disorders Lymphoma Lymphoma, Ocular Adnexa Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome 2

3 CS Data Items new in 2010 are NA Data ItemCodeExplanation Grade Path ValueBlankNot applicable Grade Path SystemBlankNot applicable Lymph vascular invasion (LVI) 8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Bone8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Lung8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Brain8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Liver8Not applicable 3

Hematopoietic / Reticuloendothelial Neoplasms

Based primarily on histology 9733, , , , , , , , 9820, 9823 [C420, C421, or C424 ONLY], 9826, 9827 [C420, C421, or C424 ONLY], , 9840, , 9863, , , 9891, , 9910, 9920, , 9940, , 9948, 9950, , 9970, 9971, 9975, 9980, , 9989, Note: AJCC does not define TNM staging for this site. 5

Heme Retic Schema 6

CS Extension Description 100Localized disease: (single/solitary/unifocal/isolated) may be coded for: Mast cell sarcoma (9740) Malignant histiocytosis (9750) Langerhans cell histiocytosis (9751) Histiocytic sarcoma (9755) Langerhans cell sarcoma (9756) Dendritic cell sarcoma (9757, 9758) Myeloid sarcoma (9930) 800Systemic disease All histologies including those in Unknown, cannot be assessed, not documented in record 7

8 Remaining CS Data Elements All these fields are “not applicable” ▫ Tumor size=988 ▫ CS Lymph nodes=988 ▫ Reg LNs positive and Reg LNs examined=99 ▫ CS Mets at Dx=98 ▫ CS Eval fields (TS/Ext, Reg Nodes, Mets)=9 8

CS Site Specific Factor 1 - JAK-2 CodeDescription 000JAK-2 test result stated as negative 010JAK2 test performed, positive for mutation V617F in exon JAK2 test performed, positive for mutation of exon JAK2 test performed, positive for other specified mutation 810JAK2 test performed, positive for more than one mutation 850JAK2 test performed, positive NOS; specific mutation(s) not stated 888 OBSOLETE DATA CONVERTED V0200 See code 988: Not applicable for this schema 988 Not applicable: Information not collected for this case (May include cases converted from code 888 used in CSv1. If this item is required to derive T, N, M, or any stage, use of code 988 may result in an error.) 997Test ordered, results not in chart 998Test not done 999Unknown, Insufficient information, Not documented in record 9

Myeloma / Plasma Cell Disorders

11

MyelomaPlasmaCell - Extension 12

Myeloma – Lymph Nodes 13

Myeloma – CS Mets at Dx – use 98 14

Other CS fields Not applicable Tumor size/Extent Eval = 9 CS Lymph Nodes Eval = 9 CS Mets Eval = 9 Regional Nodes Positive = 99 Regional Nodes Examined = 99 15

Myeloma – SSF1 JAK2 –Obsolete Use only code

Myeloma SSF2- Durie-Salmon Stage Note 1: Durie-Salmon staging applies to multiple myeloma (9732) only. For plasmacytomas, (9731 and 9734), use code 987 for not applicable. Note 2: The A and B subclassifications reflect the serum creatinine levels at diagnosis. If the A or B subclassification is not noted, use the NOS codes. Note 3: Only code the Durie-Salmon stage when the stage is documented in the medical record. Note 4: Code the stage as Durie-Salmon when the record states the stage, but does not identify the staging system. 17

New: Myeloma – SSF2 18

Myeloma SSF 3- MM Terminology Note 1: Descriptors for multiple myeloma (9732) only are collected. Code 987, not applicable, for histologies 9731 and Note 2: A number of terms are used to characterize early multiple myeloma at time of diagnosis. All these terms are reportable according to the new Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasms rules effective for cases diagnosed January 1, 2010 and later. Note 3: Code the terminology used by a physician at the time of diagnosis. The terminology may be taken from sections of the record other than a pathology report. Do not change the code in this Site Specific Factor if a term used at a later time indicates progression to a more aggressive disease course. 19

New: Myeloma – SSF 3 20

Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Lymphatic vs Extralymphatic sites LymphaticExtralymphatic Lymph nodes (C77._) Thymus (C37.9) Spleen (C42.2) Peyer’s patches (C17.2) Nodules in the Appendix (C18.1) Waldeyer’s Ring (C14.2) ▫Pharyngeal tonsil ▫Tubal tonsils ▫Palatine tonsils ▫Lingual tonsils Stomach Small Intestine Gastrointestinal tract Brain Lung Any organ can be involved by lymphoma 22

23 The Importance of the Diaphragm The diaphragm’s role in staging: ▫ The muscle that separates the chest (thoracic) cavity from the abdomen. ▫ Is the dividing point for staging in lymphomas (below and above, on both sides) The diaphragm is used in defining stage: ▫ Same side of the diaphragm ▫ Opposite side of the diaphragm ▫ Both sides of the diaphragm 23

24 CS Extension Summary table Nodal/ Lymphatic Extranodal/ Extralymphatic Spleen (involvement) * , , *Primary site=Spleen (C42.2), no other organs or lymph nodes involved Side of Diaphragm Same Both Both, metastatic Unknown

25 CS Extension-Lymphatic 100 (Stage I) ▫ Primary site: Lymphatic ▫ Involvement of single lymph node region 200 (Stage II) ▫ Primary site: Lymphatic ▫ Two or more lymph node regions involved on same side of diaphragm 300 (Stage III) ▫ Primary site: Lymphatic ▫ Lymph node regions involvement on both sides of the diaphragm 25

26 CS Extension-Extralymphatic 110 (Stage IE) ▫ Primary site: Extralymphatic organ ▫ Involvement of extralymphatic organ only 210 (Stage IIE) ▫ Primary site: Extralymphatic organ ▫ Lymph node involvement on same side of diaphragm 310 (Stage IIIE) ▫ Primary site: Extralymphatic organ ▫ Lymph node involvement on both sides of diaphragm 26

27 CS Extension-Spleen 120 (Stage IS) ▫ Primary site: Spleen ONLY 220 (Stage IIS) ▫ Primary site: Spleen or lymphatic structure ▫ Spleen involved ▫ Lymph nodes below the diaphragm involved 230 (Stage IIES) ▫ Primary site: Extralymphatic organ ▫ Spleen involved ▫ Extralymphatic organ below the diaphragm involved ▫ Lymph nodes below the diaphragm involved/not involved 27

CS Extension-Spleen 320 (Stage IIIS) ▫ Primary site: Spleen or lymphatic structure ▫ Spleen involved ▫ Lymph nodes above diaphragm or on both sides of diaphragm involved 330 (Stage IIIES) ▫ Primary site: Extralymphatic organ ▫ Spleen involved ▫ Lymph nodes involved on opposite or both sides of the diaphragm 28

29 CS Extension 800 (Stage IV) ▫ Lymphatic sites (including Spleen)  Metastatic sites (Bone marrow, Liver, Lung) ▫ Extralymphatic sites  Diffuse or disseminated (multifocal) involvement of one or more extralymphatic sites with or without lymph node involvement  Involvement of isolated extralymphatic organ in absence of involvement of adjacent lymph nodes, but in conjunction with disease in distant sites  Metastatic sites (Bone marrow, Liver, Lung) 999 (Unknown)

30 CS TS/Ext Eval 30

31 Remaining CS Data Elements All these fields are “not applicable” ▫ Tumor size=988 ▫ CS Eval fields (Reg Nodes, Mets)=9 ▫ CS Lymph nodes=988 ▫ Reg LNs positive and Reg LNs examined=99 ▫ CS Mets at Dx=98 31

32 New Data Items Data ItemCodeExplanation Grade Path ValueBlankNot applicable Grade Path SystemBlankNot applicable Lymph vascular invasion (LVI) 8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Bone8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Lung8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Brain8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Liver8Not applicable 32

33 SSF 1 and SSF 2 SSF 1 Associated with HIV/AIDS ▫ If there is no mention of AIDS in the chart and no evidence of HIV testing, code 999 for unknown SSF 2 Systemic symptoms at diagnosis ▫ Coding “none” if H&P, progress notes and consults make no mention of B symptoms ▫ B symptoms  Drenching Night sweats  Unexplained fever (above 38 degrees C)  Unexplained weight loss (greater than 10% loss of body weight in last six months before admission) ▫ Pruritis (alone it does not mean B symptoms) 33

34 SSF 3-5 SSF 3 International Prognostic Index (IPI) ▫This SSF applies to B-cell lymphomas ▫Additional categories added (stated as “low” risk, stated as “intermediate” risk, etc.) ▫Criteria have been listed, DO NOT figure out index, only enter what has been documented SSF 4 Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) SSF 5 International Prognostic Score (IPS) ▫Used with Hodgkin Lymphoma 34

Lymphoma, Ocular Adnexa 35

36

Mycosis fungoides Sézary syndrome

38 Histology Mycosis Fungoides (9700) is the most common form of Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) Sezary Syndrome (9701) is an aggressive leukemic form of CTCL Different staging system from other CTCL due to the prognosis of these diseases 38

39 CS Extension 100 OBSOLETE (see codes ) 110 Patches only with less than 10% of skin surface involved 120 Plaques, with or without patches, with less than 10% of skin surface involved 130 Plaques, papules, or eythematous patches (“plaque stage”); Limited plaques/patches; MFCG Stage I; Stated as T1 39

40 CS Extension 200 OBSOLETE (see codes ) 210 Patches only with more than 10% of skin surface involved 220 Plaques, with or without patches, with more than 10% of skin surface involved 230 Plaques, papules, or erythematous patches (“plaque stage”); Generalized plaques/patches; MFCG Stage II; Stated as T2 40

41 CS Extension 250 Plaques, papules, or erythematous patches (“plaque stage”); body surface not stated 300 Skin involvement, NOS 500 OBSOLETE 550 One or more tumors (tumor stage) less than 1 cm, cutaneous tumors, size not stated 600 One or more tumors (tumor stage) greater than 1 cm 650 Stated as T3 41

42 CS Extension 700 OBSOLETE 730 Generalized erythroderma (greater than 50% and less than 80%) 750 Generalized erythroderma (greater than or equal to 80%) 800 Stated as T4 950 No evidence of primary tumor 999 Unknown

43 CS Lymph Nodes Lymph node staging is based on clinical and pathologic factors Lymph node biopsies only recommended on clinically abnormal nodes greater than 1.5 cm Clonality (negative, positive or unknown) will determine a, b or NOS Dutch grade system and NCI LN grade system are also included in lymph node definitions 43

44 CS Mets at Dx Referred to as “Visceral Organ Involvement” instead of mets 00 No visceral organ involvement 05 Clinical confirmation only of Visceral (non cutaneous, extra nodal) involvement (except for Liver and Spleen imaging, see code 10) 10 Imaging confirmation of Spleen or Liver metastases 40 OBSOLETE 44

45 CS Mets at Dx 45 Visceral (non cutaneous, extra nodal) involvement, pathologically confirmed, involvement by at least one organ outside the skin, nodes or blood or bone marrow 60 Carcinomatosis; Distant mets, NOS; MFCG Stage IV; Unknown if clinical or pathologic confirmation 70 Stated as M1 99 Unknown 45

46 New Data Items Data ItemCodeExplanation Grade Path ValueBlankNot applicable Grade Path SystemBlankNot applicable Lymph vascular invasion (LVI)8Not applicable Mets at Dx-Bone0,1,9Applicable Mets at Dx-Lung0,1,9Applicable Mets at Dx-Brain0,1,9Applicable Mets at Dx-Liver0,1,9Applicable 46

47 SSF1 Peripheral blood involvement A peripheral blood smear must be done to detect peripheral blood involvement The categories for peripheral blood involvement are: ▫B0 – no significant blood involvement ▫B1 – Low blood tumor burden ▫B2 – High blood tumor burden Clonality may also be assessed on blood samples. Record the B rating as stated by the physician. If counts or percentages of neoplastic cells, flow cytometry test results, and/or clonality test results are performed but a B rating is not stated by the physician, use code

48 Summary remarks for this schema Mycosis fungoides/ Sézary syndrome ▫Extension divides T1, T2 into ‘a’ and ‘b’ categories based on whether you have patches or plaques ▫Lymph nodes are divided into “a” and “b” categories for N1, N2 based on clonality (negative vs positive) ▫Peripheral blood involvement (SSF1) now a part of TNM stage group and is further divided into “a” and “b” categories for B0 and B1 based on clonality (negative vs positive) 48