MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rangeland Health United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management.
Advertisements

DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Climate Change, Water and Indigenous People. PART I: WATER IS LIFE.
Project WILD. What the Public Should Know  Fish and wildlife resources are a public trust  Conservation and management of terrestrial and water resources.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
1 Floodplain Management Session 13 Biology Management and restoration of floodplain ecology Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Lake Superior Binational Program and Lakewide Management Plan Lynelle Hanson Lake Superior Binational Forum Meeting Ashland, Wisconsin March 23, 2012.
Do Now: We know that groundwater and river basins alone do not contain enough water to meet our present needs. Are there any ways that we can harvest the.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Climate Change: SEAFWA Thoughts? Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission September 2007.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Integrating Water Management Statewide Integrated Water Management (IWM) Gary Bardini, Deputy Director IWM Rijkswaterstaat & California Coordination Kickoff.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Climate Change Adaptation Across the Landscape Michelle Selmon Regional Climate Change Specialist June.
Integrating environmental flows into water management to reduce social vulnerability - Learning from NeWater research in the lower Amudarya River Basin.
Standards for Ecologically Successful River Restoration Palmer et al., 2005, Standards for Ecologically Successful River Restoration Palmer et al., 2005,
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
DRAFT MURRAY DARLING BASIN PLAN. Where is the Murray–Darling Basin? Large system in south-eastern Australia 1 million km 2 1/7 area of Australia Contains.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Managing Western Water as Climate Changes Denver, CO February 20-21, 2008.
BDCP, Interfacing with Conservation Plans Habitat Conservation Planning from Tahoe to the Bay 7 th Annual Workshop November 18, 2009 Carl Wilcox California.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Wetland Wetland San Francisco Bay & Delta San Francisco Bay & Delta Wetland Wetland Steven Ortiz Per.1.
FOREST PLAN REVISION Release of Draft Topic Papers INYO NATIONAL FOREST MAY - JUNE 2013.
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
CREEKS & COMMUNITIES Laura Van Riper – Social Scientist National Riparian Service Team.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
“The minimum flow for a given watercourse shall be the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Considering Ecosystem Services in Restoration Decisions on the Upper Mississippi River System ACES, 2008 K. S. Lubinski K. Barr J. Barko S. Bartell R.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
Climate-Smart Conservation: securing our future Melissa Pitkin and Point Blue Staff CA State Parks Commission September 19, 2014.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Sierra Water Workgroup Summit Daniel Schultz State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Rights June 12, 2014.
Fran Dunwell Hudson River Estuary Coordinator Hudson River Estuary Program/NYSDEC.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
1 Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda BERINA UWIMBABAZI.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Ben Graeff  Individual state losses range from 9% to 91%. The continental United States was once home to over 215 million acres of wetland habitat,
BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN SEPTEMBER SUISUN BAY SACRAMENTO STOCKTON STATE & FEDERAL PUMPING PLANTS Getting Oriented – The Delta.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
Benefits of Biodiversity Section 3. Does Biodiversity Matter?  Scientists have offered a number of concrete, tangible reasons for preserving biodiversity.
Ecosystem Management Chapter 5. Shifting management n Fisheries management is shifting from commodity production of single resource to management of whole.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
Tips for success at the IRL Envirothon Wildlife Section.
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Rebecca Tharme Riverfutures Limited – UK
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Executive Order – The Basics
Common Stream Habitat Problems
Presentation transcript:

MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program A Review of the Purpose and Need Discussion

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Objectives Review the CAT input on Purpose and Need so far. Describe the breakout group exercise to review, revise, and supplement the discussion

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Purpose and Need – A review The purpose is a broad statement that tells readers what the agency intends to accomplish by taking action. Need is the proper framing of the question “WHY take action?,” not why “do NEPA.” Can be thought in terms of problems and opportunities.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Draft Purpose To determine the actions required to mitigate losses of aquatic and terrestrial habitat; to recover federally listed species under the Endangered Species Act; and to restore the ecosystem to prevent further declines among other native species, while seeking to balance with social, economic, and cultural values for future generations.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Draft Need The MRERP-EIS is needed to: –Fully implement the direction received in Subsection (a) of Section 5018 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007; and –Address current trends indicating: diminished natural habitat reduced populations of native species and communities reduced variability of physical processes such as flows, flooding, and sediment erosion/deposition

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Need Discussion Themes Adaptive Management Sustainability System Alteration and Decline of Natural Processes Restoration of Processes and Ecological Function Water Quality and Quantity Sustainable Water Supply Climate Change Education Collaboration, Coordination, and Integration

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Adaptive Management Include a usable adaptive management plan Base plan on the best available data to address –Diminished natural habitat; –Reduced populations of native species and communities; and –Reduced variability of physical processes. Take a comprehensive, science-based approach Include more robust monitoring Restore natural processes and systems that were in place in the past

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Sustainability Ecological sustainability Economic sustainability Cultural sustainability

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision System Alteration and Decline of Natural Processes Natural systems in the basin are in decline and the system is not sustainable Specific problems with the natural systems include: –channel degradation; –lack of sediment transport; –radical changes in the flow regime; –loss of connectivity with floodplain and wetlands associated with the river; –loss of habitat for native communities of plants, animals and fish; –loss of important ecological communities such as cottonwood; –loss of riparian wetlands, altered hydrology; and –recent increase non-native species impacts.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Restoration of Processes and Ecological Functions Need to restore the function and form of the river and for reconnection to the river Sediment transport restoration can be closer to natural levels, and riparian corridors can be restored Restoration of the sediment transport can help delivery of sediment to the Mississippi Delta Sediment transport needs to be addressed

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Water Quantity and Quality Water rights issues are a problem –Become more acute during droughts The natural hydrograph may change

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Sustainable Water Supply Need more flexibility to accommodate uncertainty in water supply A goal of a sustained water supply for the next thirty to fifty years There is an opportunity to examine water rights/allocation throughout the basin

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Climate Change Climate change predictions include more extreme flow events, loss of groundwater, etc. May affect the ecological communities present in the basin Climate change goals of reducing CO2 emissions by 60% must also be considered

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Education An opportunity to increase education and awareness in the basin Education and outreach about the basin and the plan can broaden the public trust benefits Perception could hinder restoration efforts Need to clearly describe and convey the environmental services that the river can provide to the basin.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Collaboration, Coordination, and Integration A collaborative approach to mitigate, recover and restore has never been attempted with the full suite of actions An opportunity to conduct a comprehensive, coordinated and integrated plan that addresses ecological and management problems Activities should be coordinated across agencies and government entities, and BiOp activities should be integrated with a larger vision Work done to balance needs of disparate uses and recognize the value of the environmental services provided by the river

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Need Considerations (Cont) Use stronger words: “diminish” is too soft and needs to be more direct More specificity concerning the meaning of “diversity of habitats” More than just “Congress said so” – hard to explain to public, not compelling Terms such as restoration, mitigation, balance need to be defined Add “fish, wildlife, and plants” after the statement about native communities Integrate socioeconomic, cultural impacts, and issues

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Purpose Considerations Looking beyond past efforts; defining a collective vision The basin is large and has multiple uses, ecosystem characteristics and issues Species of Concern in the Plan Purpose Statement is for the public Implementable Plan/Constraints Collaboration and Coordination

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Breakout Groups Review Purpose and Need summary from last meeting. Do the Need themes identify the general problems, opportunities, and needs to be considered as they related to ecosystem restoration? (elaborate on how each theme relates to ecosystem restoration) Do they represent the full suite of problems, opportunities, and needs that should be considered in the planning process?

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Breakout Groups (Cont.) Do the “purpose considerations” adequately identify what broadly needs to be considered in this plan to accomplish ecosystem restoration? Are there more specific “How” statements that should be considered in accomplishing the purpose of this plan? What terms/concepts need to be more defined to improve clarity?