DEVELOPING STUDENT LITERACY SKILLS.  Abby Stotsenberg, Senior Administrator for SS  Catherine Trudell, Senior Administrator for HS ELA (well, sort of)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for Advancing Adolescent Literacy RESA-I 21 st Century Education Leadership Series October 21, 2008 Terry Reale, WVDE Coordinator Reading English.
Advertisements

Public Schools of Robeson County ASW Analysis of Student Work ASW Analysis of Student Work The Standard 6 Process: What Teachers Need to Know Now The Standard.
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
First Administration: June 3, 2014 Presented by Brenna Farrell, RCSD.
Consistency of Assessment
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
 Department of Secondary Curriculum.  Language Arts Florida Standards (LAFS)  Test Specifications for Florida Standards Assessment (FSA) and FSA Writing.
Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
ELA Coordinators Meeting: Close Reading and Text Complexity Tamra Gacek October, 2012 Literacy and Early Learning Unit Office of Teacher Effectiveness.
Deep Learning ThroughLiteracy-Rich Instructional Strategies Sara Overby Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Preparing our students for the EAP English Prompt.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT AND LEADERSHIP! PRESENTED BY: SHERYL WHITE EDUCATOR LEADER CADRE- ELA CHAIR Common Core Shifts in English Language.
Anne Zeman, Ed.D., Director, Curriculum/Professional Learning Don Azevada, Program Specialist, History/Social Science Ray Pietersen, Program Specialist,
PAK Forum: Literacy Lake Windward Elementary December 5, 2013.
CCI Bootcamp Back to School Staff Development Rotation.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Layers of Intentionality: Tasks, Assessments & Interventions Amanda Huddleston and Jennifer Edmondson-Neily Robert Thirsk High School.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
Welcome! Please visit Our Wiki and download resources
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
FACILITATOR SARA OVERBY COORDINATING TEACHER FOR SECONDARY LITERACY Performance Tasks: An Integrated.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional Development page of Healthful Living Wiki at
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session Approaching Argument Writing: Module 9.4.
Teaching Integrated Literacy Lessons by Aligning Reading and Writing Standards and Incorporating Reciprocal Processing Strategies to Improve the Writing.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
English Department Chairs October 14, 2014 Sara Overby, Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Analyzing Student Work to Change Teacher Practice.
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT Essay Writing Oakland Schools.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards Monday, January 23rd - 4pm EST Deconstructing the Common Core Standards: Analyzing for Content, Level of Cognition.
Literacy in the High School John Williams, Sr. Director Catherine Trudell, Sr. Admin.
Argument-Driven Inquiry is designed to make reading, writing, and speaking a central component of doing science. It therefore enables science teachers.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
ACCESS for ELLs Score Changes
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Critical Reading Charting the Text.
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Implementing English II Benchmarks
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
English II Benchmarks September 24, 2014
ACCESS for ELLs Score Reports
Measures of Student Learning
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
What Teachers Need to Know Now
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Presentation transcript:

DEVELOPING STUDENT LITERACY SKILLS

 Abby Stotsenberg, Senior Administrator for SS  Catherine Trudell, Senior Administrator for HS ELA (well, sort of)  Sara Overby, Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy INTRODUCTIONS

 Understand how to develop critical reading, writing and thinking skills  Understand how strategic writing instruction will increase reading achievement and increase the capacity for teaching students to develop complex thoughts  Consider strategies for making thinking visible in classroom instruction PURPOSE

“Commonplaces are never tiresome. It is we who become tired when we cease to be curious or appreciative [We] find that it is not a new scene which is needed, but a new viewpoint.” -Norman Rockwell WHY SHOULD WE ENGAGE IN CLOSE READING?

CLOSE READING What does it mean to engage students in close reading? What are the skills the students need to learn in order to navigate language and make deep meaning? How can you provide opportunities for students to practice these skills?

CLOSE READING AN IMAGE What did you see? Note all the details from the picture. What questions do you have? What did you see? Note all the additional details that you saw. What questions do you have? Were any previous questions answered? Share your observations with your table team. Are you able to answer questions when you share your cognitive resources?

 What does the image represent?  How does the author develop that meaning for the audience? What evidence can you cite from the image?  What questions does the image create for you as the reader? What do you need to know to better understand the image and its impact or role as an argument?  What might Rockwell’s central argument be?  What counterclaims might he be addressing? UNCOVERING MEANING

CLOSE READING AN IMAGE Take a close look at the image on the right. What do you notice? What questions does the image create for you?

“Commonplaces are never tiresome. It is we who become tired when we cease to be curious or appreciative [We] find that it is not a new scene which is needed, but a new viewpoint.” -Norman Rockwell WHY SHOULD WE ENGAGE IN CLOSE READING?

“IT IS NOT A NEW SCENE WHICH IS NEEDED, BUT A NEW VIEWPOINT.”

PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER

MAKING THINKING VISIBLE Fortunately, neither others' thinking nor opportunities to think need to be as invisible as they often are. As educators, we can work to make thinking much more visible than it usually is in classrooms. When we do so, we are giving students more to build on and learn from. By making the dancers visible, we are making it much easier to learn to dance.

A NEW VIEWPOINT Revisiting an earlier question How did your understanding of Rockwell’s central argument change with each additional piece of evidence?

WRITING: TEACHING STRUCTURE Teach the positioning of ideas to impose or understand value and hierarchy Teach the complex sentence structures to teach complex thinking Teach structure to increase reading comprehension Develop three sentences that address Rockwell’s central argument.

 There is a lot of evidence showing the importance of grammar in reading comprehension. Studies over the years have shown a clear relationship between syntactic or grammatical sophistication and reading comprehension; that is, as students learn to employ more complex sentences in their oral and written language, their ability to make sense of what they read increases, too. -Tim Shanahan FROM THE FIELD OF RESEARCH

CLOSE READING A TEXT What is the tone of the piece? What evidence can you use to support your assertion? How does the author use diction and syntax to develop the tone? What evidence can you use to support your assertion?

CHORAL PERFORMANCE

ANALYZING THE COMPLEXITY OF A TEXT

QUANTITATIVE MEASURES

QUALITATIVE FEATURES

QUESTIONS?

English Department Chairs “Is it too much to expect from the schools that they train their students not only to interpret but to criticize; that is, to discriminate what is sound from error and falsehood, to suspend judgement if they are not convinced, or to judge with reason if they agree or disagree?” ― Mortimer J. AdlerMortimer J. Adler

 Clearly align the text to standards.  How will this text facilitate student learning better than other texts?  Make sure all texts, particularly those that may have potential challenges, are listed in the syllabus that goes home to parents.  Have a clear plan to address the sensitive material in the text.  Make sure the form is on file in your school. UPDATES AND REMINDERS: SUPPLEMENTAL TEXT

 If a parent challenges the reading material, speak with the parent about the merit of the work and how you are handling the sensitive material in class.  Provide an alternate text that will facilitate the same learning objectives for the student.  Be mindful of length and difficulty of the alternate reading selection to make sure both are comparable to the original text.  If a parent wishes to formally challenge a text, contact the administrator over your department, and that person will assist in following the process within Board Policy.  Keep in mind that we need to be sensitive to the values and beliefs of others. A parent choosing to have learning facilitated through an alternate text is not a judgment of you as an educator. CHALLENGES

FOCUS: WRITING District Rubrics Performance Tasks

 More information about the process will be coming through your administrative team  Phase 1: District Assessment  Phase 2: School-based Assessment (Could be a performance task)  Eligible courses: English I,II,III,IV CREDIT BY DEMONSTRATED MASTERY

ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK

PROCESS/PURPOSE OF THE ASW Measure student growth to contribute to NC Teacher Evaluation Standard VI score.

5 Rating Categories Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System

Overview of Standard 6 Contribute to Academic Success End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 NC Final Exams 6 Career Technical Education Assessment 6 Analysis of Student Work K-3 Checkpoints 6 6

Analysis of Student Work 6 Contribute to Academic Success In , ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

ASW FLOW CHART

 We will not be using Case 21 assessments at the high school level this year  English has been given permission to try using performance tasks as the benchmark assessment  Sara will be leading you in that initiative over the next few chair meetings BENCHMARKS

Have a great year! “A LECTURE HAS BEEN WELL DESCRIBED AS THE PROCESS WHEREBY THE NOTES OF THE TEACHER BECOME THE NOTES OF THE STUDENT WITHOUT PASSING THROUGH THE MIND OF EITHER.” ―MORTIMER J. ADLERMORTIMER J. ADLER