Genetic polymorphisms, toxicity, & response rate in African Americans (AA) with metastatic colorectal cancer compared to Caucasians (C) treated with IFL,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Advertisements

CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
The Very Best, Most Perfect Possible Way to Treat Advanced Colorectal Cancer in 2005: Agent Choice and Ideal Sequencing Charles D. Blanke, M.D. OHSU Cancer.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
NSABP PROTOCOL C-10: RESULTS A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Plus Bevacizumab for Patients with Unresectable.
Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions CD133 Polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of FOLFIRI or FOLFOX with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab for patients w/ KRAS wild type untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Regulatory Background and Past FDA Approvals in Colorectal Cancer Amna Ibrahim M.D DODP, FDA.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
CM A Comparison of Simple Single-Item Measures and the Common Toxicity Criteria in Detecting the Onset of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Diabetes mellitus and the incidence and time to onset of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer: A pooled.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL TRENDS OF COLORECTAL CANCER FROM 2002 TO 2011 BE Ansa; E Alema-Mensah; MD Claridy; JQ Sheats; B Fontenot, and SA Smith Georgia Regents.
Discussion abstracts Alberto Sobrero MD Ospedale San Martino Genoa, Italy.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Is surgical resection of an asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor beneficial for patients with incurable Stage IV disease? A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil,
Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Colon Cancer Treatment Colorectal Cancer Poster Discussion 2006 Neal J. Meropol, M.D. Director, Gastrointestinal.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Living with a Moving Landscape Neal J. Meropol, MD Fox Chase Cancer Center May 16, 2005.
Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Genoa – Italy
Introduction Results Material and Methods Conclusions Genetic variants predict clinical outcome clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Minimal versus Intense Upfront Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Paulo M. Hoff, MD, FACP Hospital Sirio Libanes Sao Paulo, Brazil Centro.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
The treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal: A single institution experience P. Pathak, B. King, A. Ohinata, P. Das, C.H.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
Taiwan 2000 Is UGT1A1*28 homozygosity the strongest predictor for severe hematotoxicity in patients treated with 5- fluorouracil (5-FU)-irinotecan (IRI)?
Mace L. Rothenberg, M.D. Professor of Medicine Ingram Professor of Cancer Research Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Management: KRAS Mutations and EGFR.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Current and Future Perspectives on Irinotecan Pharmacogenomics
DEBIRI TACE Patterns and Predictors of Response
Genetic Variability and Cancer Germline polymorphisms are frequent: 1 SNP every bp (> 1 per gene) Cancer has acquired mutations (some tumor “mutations”
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
A Comprehensive Genomic Approach to the Identification of Predictive Markers using DNA and Tissue Repair Gene Polymorphisms in Radiation.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Integrating Pharmacogenomic Questions Into GCIG Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials Lori Minasian, MD Chief, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research.
A POST-MARKETING EVALUATION OF SAFETY CAMPTOSAR + 5-FU/LV FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER A POST-MARKETING EVALUATION OF SAFETY.
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival analyzed with fixed effect model. Table 1: Relevant trials Table 2. Methodological quality Conclusions.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
Impact of Bevacizumab (Bev) on Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy (CT) for Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of RIBBON-2 Brufsky A et al. Proc.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
Results Abstract Analysis of Prognostic Web-based Models for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-based Validation of Numeracy and Adjuvant! Online.
Pharmacogenetics of Irinotecan Clinical perspectives: utility of genotyping Mark J. Ratain, MD University of Chicago 11/3/04.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
Microsatellite Instability Predicts Improved Response to Adjuvant Therapy With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Stage III Colon Cancer In association.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Chips? SNPs? or PCR? What do we really want and what do we need? Heinz-Josef Lenz, MD Professor of Medicine Co-Director, Colorectal Center Co-Director,
Phase III Clinical Trial of FOLFOX with or without Cetuximab in Resected Stage 3 Colon Cancer: Cooperative Group Trial N0147 (NCCTG*,
Higher Vitamin D Levels Associated With Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
高雄醫學大學附設醫院 外傷及重症外科 胃腸及一般外科
Heinz-Josef Lenz Professor of Medicine and Preventive Medicine
for the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG)
Dan Sargent’s Early Career:
Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients Key Issues
Presentation transcript:

Genetic polymorphisms, toxicity, & response rate in African Americans (AA) with metastatic colorectal cancer compared to Caucasians (C) treated with IFL, FOLFOX or IROX in Intergroup N9741 R. M. Goldberg, H. L. McLeod, D. J. Sargent, R. F. Morton, E. M. Green, C. Fuchs, R. K. Ramanathan, S. K. Williamson, B. P. Findlay, H. C. Pitot, S. R. Alberts

Relative Survival for Colorectal Carcinoma by Race/Ethnicity, SEER Years after Diagnosis Survival (%) White, non-Hispanic Black/African American Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic

Potential Explanations: Societal Socioeconomic Issues Socioeconomic Issues Hypothesis: AA have less access to medical care Hypothesis: AA have less access to medical care Corollary: AA are diagnosed at later stage Corollary: AA are diagnosed at later stage Hypothesis: AA often are of lower socioeconomic status Hypothesis: AA often are of lower socioeconomic status Corollary: AA have poorer access to ideal care Corollary: AA have poorer access to ideal care

Potential Explanations: Biological Tumor Biology Tumor Biology Hypothesis: AA have more aggressive disease Hypothesis: AA have more aggressive disease Corollary: AA have a worse outcome regardless of access Corollary: AA have a worse outcome regardless of access Host Biology Host Biology Hypothesis: AA respond differently to chemotherapy Hypothesis: AA respond differently to chemotherapy Corollary: AA should have different treatment algorithms and may benefit from the use of different drugs or different drug doses Corollary: AA should have different treatment algorithms and may benefit from the use of different drugs or different drug doses

Specific Aims Compare AA to C patients enrolled in N9741 Compare AA to C patients enrolled in N9741 RR, TTP, and OS RR, TTP, and OS Chemotherapy toxicities Chemotherapy toxicities Prevalence of polymorphisms in key genes coding for enzymes involved in drug metabolism Prevalence of polymorphisms in key genes coding for enzymes involved in drug metabolism Correlate clinical endpoints & polymorphisms Correlate clinical endpoints & polymorphisms

1412 stage IV patients 486 with pharmacogenetic data 1412 stage IV patients 486 with pharmacogenetic data IFL: Irinotecan + 5-FU/LVIFL: 5-FU/LV IROX: Irinotecan + oxaliplatin FOLFOX: Oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV RANDOMIRANDOMIZATZATIONIONRANDOMIRANDOMIZATZATIONION N9741: Schema

Number of Patients by Race: Self Reported AACCTotal All 117 (8%) IFL 40 (10%) FOLFOX4 50 (8%) IROX 27 (7%)

Response Rate: Overall and By Arm AACP-Value All31%41%0.015 IFL28%34%0.44 FOLFOX434%49%0.047 IROX26%38%0.22

Median TTP: Overall and By Arm AACP-Value* All 7.3 mo 8.2 mo 0.56 IFL 5.5 mo 6.9 mo 0.13 FOLFOX mo 9.3 mo 0.98 IROX 6.7 mo 7.3 mo 0.62 *Log-rank test p-value

Median OS: Overall and By Arm AACP-Value* All 16.3 mo 17.9 mo 0.44 IFL 12 mo 15.2 mo FOLFOX mo 19.6 mo 0.47 IROX 22 mo 16.7 mo *Log-rank test p-value

Median OS: 95% Confidence Intervals AACP-Value All 16.3 mo mo IFL 12 mo mo FOLFOX mo mo IROX 22 mo mo

Toxicity : All Arms Combined AA n=42 C n=472 P-value Any grade > 3 34%48%0.004 G4 Neutropenia 9%8%0.93 G4 Diarrhea 5%17%<0.001 Paresthesias9%8%0.73 Vomiting6%4%0.43

IFL Toxicity AA n=42 C n=472 P-value Any grade > 3 28%45%0.035 G4 Neutropenia 10%5%0.24 G4 Diarrhea 8%23%0.024 Paresthesias3%2%0.68 Vomiting3%11%0.87

FOLFOX Toxicity AA n=50 C n=590 P-value Any grade > 3 36%46%0.16 G4 Neutropenia 8%12%0.38 G4 Diarrhea 2%10%0.06 Paresthesias1614%0.71 Vomiting4%2%0.42

IROX Toxicity AA n=27 C n=335 P-value Any grade > 3 41%55%0.16 G4 Neutropenia 7%5%0.55 G4 Diarrhea 7%22%0.07 Paresthesias7%6%0.82 Vomiting15%10%0.41

Irinotecan Pathway CPT-11 cell membrane CPT-11 SN-38 TOP1 Cell Death APC SN-38G ABCB1 CYP3A4 CYP3A5 CES1 CES2 UGT1A1 CES1 CES2 ABCC2 ABCG2 ABCC1 ADPRT TDP1 CDC45L XRCC1 NFKB1 NPC ABCB1

Controls Irinotecan and SN- 38 Efflux from Cells AAC p value abcb1_3435< C/C C/C51%18% Other Other49%82% abcg20.02 G/T or T/T G/T or T/T3%22% G/G G/G97%78% abcc2_30.05 A/A A/A5%22% Other Other95%78%

CYP3A: Prevents Activation to SN-38 AACP-value CYP3A4 < A/A G/G T/C A/A G/G T/C89%7% A/A & T/T A/A & T/T11%93% CYP3A5< C/C & T/T C/C & T/T86%11% C/C C/C14%89%

Polymorphisms in UGT1A1 do not predict diarrhea or overall toxicity AACP-value UGT1A /6 6/617%47% 6/7 6/763%44% 7/7 7/721%9% UGT1a T/T T/T12%8% Other Other88%92%

Oxaliplatin Detoxify GSTP1 GSTM1 SOD1 MPO NQO1 POLH POLB Translesional replication Damage recognition HMG1 Excision repair Cell Death ERCC2 ERCC1 XRCC1 cell membrane Oxaliplatin ATP7A SLC31A1 ABCG2 ABCC2 Oxaliplatin Oxaliplatin Pathway

ERCC Genes Repair Oxaliplatin Adducts AACP-value Ercc1_n A/A A/A5%22% Other Other95%78% Ercc2_d A/A A/A4%22% A/B A/B29%50% B/B B/B70%28%

GST Genes Detoxify Oxaliplatin AACP-value Gstp1_I T/T T/T26%44% C/T C/T53%45% C/C C/C21%11% GSTM1_ Absent Absent3%51% Present Present97%49%

Conclusions: Among the Patients in This Trial AA have a significantly lower RR AA have a significantly lower RR No differences in TTP were observed No differences in TTP were observed Differences in OS were inconsistent between AA and C Differences in OS were inconsistent between AA and C AA have significantly less severe toxicity, mainly less severe diarrhea AA have significantly less severe toxicity, mainly less severe diarrhea AA and C have significantly different frequencies of polymorphisms in candidate genes coding for key enzymes involved in drug activation, metabolism, and disposition AA and C have significantly different frequencies of polymorphisms in candidate genes coding for key enzymes involved in drug activation, metabolism, and disposition

Implications FOLFOX remains the preferred regimen in AA & C FOLFOX remains the preferred regimen in AA & C Dose escalation may be possible in some AAs Dose escalation may be possible in some AAs Caution: Correlation of polymorphisms with response and toxicity may not be causal Caution: Correlation of polymorphisms with response and toxicity may not be causal More research in bigger populations is indicated More research in bigger populations is indicated FOCUS (2135 pts) and CALGB/SWOG (2380 pts) have/are collecting germline DNA for pharmacogenetics FOCUS (2135 pts) and CALGB/SWOG (2380 pts) have/are collecting germline DNA for pharmacogenetics

Thanks for your attention