Employee Engagement: Discussing Survey Results With Your Workgroup.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Addressing the needs of the local.  members new in their role  previous training  local issues and culture  prior knowledge and information  work.
Advertisements

Twelve Cs for Team Building
Gallup Q12 Definitions Notes to Managers
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
The Power of Employee Engagement
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Leadership MOT Version 1. The Leadership MOT survey is a tool which will help leaders to benchmark their leadership capabilities within Nuffield Health.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Human Resources The core of any business April 2014.
2014 Employee Engagement Survey Results ILI 33 – Sept 11 & 12, 2014.
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
Questions from a patient or carer perspective
Human Resources Office of Summary of Results 1 University of Minnesota Morris.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Connecting Work and Academics: How Students and Employers Benefit.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
CIPD West of England Branch Conference: Engaging Employees in Hard Times Dean Royles Director,
Leading Culture Conversations The culture data offers a unique opportunity in organizations to discuss ‘how’ people work (or don’t work) together and identify.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Step 2: Interpret and Communicate Results 1.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
York St John University Staff Survey Highlights 2010 David Evans Research Consultant October 2010.
Culture Conversations The data generated by the Denison survey offers an excellent opportunity to engage your employees and colleagues in some important.
Presented by: Karen Gauthier
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
NSW DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITIES – UNIT/DIRECTORATE NAME SASSPA Conference21 August 2015 Performance and Development NSW.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Supporting and Sustaining Volunteers Nonprofit Learning Point September 23, 2015.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Human Resources Office of FACULTY Summary of Results _College of Design_FACULTY.
Action Planning Webinar September 12 th Your speaker today Matt Roddan Director, Employee Research ORC International.
Highlights of the Staff Survey 2011 Cheryl Kershaw Director of Surveys and Research.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Analysis of 2007 BOD Assessment Checklists Prepared by: Cambria Tidwell.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Group Members: Teng Mei Ling031857X Chan Ren Hui031771G Siti Raudhah031569Q R.Laarvanya030886R Ong Woan Wen030954P Final Presentation!!
2005 All-Staff Survey: Survey Results Summary Presentation
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
GHCCG Staff Survey Results Robert Willis Wednesday 12th June 2013.
An essential part of workplace success!
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Effective Teamwork Team Building
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
DGS Town Hall with Director Fred Klass October 3, 2011.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
 In Ned law are a company that provides strategic consulting and management, composed of a team of high academic and social esteem, focused on optimization,
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Top Key Driver Questions That Impact Engagement – Executive Branch
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Presentation transcript:

Employee Engagement: Discussing Survey Results With Your Workgroup

Introductions Brooke Bascom Employee Engagement Manager Human Resources Division Shannon Harris Performance Strategy and Budget

Introductions Your name Where you work Your favorite “gift” ever

Yes, And…

Workshop Agenda Reorienting to our purpose Reading and Interpreting Your Report Break Leading your group to another place

Workshop Goals You will know why engagement is important to King County You will know how to interpret your reports You will have a plan for leading your group in discussing the results You will be able to apply G-PDCA Lean problem solving methodology to improving engagement in your group You will feel supported

Agreements Be present in the room Cell phones on silent

Agreements Be present in the room Cell phones on silent We will support each other so that we feel safe to make mistakes and learn without boundaries.

Why Engagement is Important to King County

Our Goal: To be the Best Run Government From King County’s website: “It means we are embracing continuous improvement, instituting best management practices, empowering employees to innovate, and striving for second-to-none customer service. Every day, we ask ourselves: how can we deliver better services, improve operations, and use fewer resources? We listen. We improve. We deliver.”

Focus on engagement as a strategy to become the Best Run Government

Action Planning Strategy County Department Division Workgroup

Annual Action Planning Timeline December - January Discuss engagement results with your workgroup Pick the thing you will work on February Create your action plan February - September Implement your action plan Check for impact Communicat ion frequently about how it's going Septmeber 2016 Employee Engagement Survey adminstered October Results analyzed November - December Review results Check for impact Discuss with workgroups

Reading and Interpreting Your Results

What the Report Measures How engaged people are What drives engagement Comparisons to benchmarks Variation in experience

Drivers of engagement Strategic Alignment, Trust in Senior Leadership, Relationship with Supervisor, Peer culture, Personal influence, Growth and development, Recognition, Work environment Say Pride and willingness to advocate Stay A sense of belonging and contribution Strive Going the extra mile

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY Executive Branch (9400) RESPONSE RATE: RESPONSES: 59 % 6781 of VARIANCE from COUNTYWIDE: YOUR EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SCORE:  69 % Employee engagement is about more than just satisfaction. It's a mutually beneficial relationship between the employee and organization. Engagement is a good indicator of how connected they are to the organization and in helping it to achieve its goals. VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE 0 questions at least 5% above 67 questions in line 0 questions at least 5% below VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK 7 questions at least 5% above 10 questions in line 15 questions at least 5% below  WHAT NOW? 1. TAKE THE TIME TO EXPLORE AND UNDERSTAND THE RESULTS IN THIS REPORT. 2. DISCUSS THE RESULTS WITH YOUR TEAM IDENTIFY THE THINGS TO CELEBRATE (STRENGTHS) OR IMPROVE (ACTION AREAS). 3. DEVELOP A PLAN OF ACTION SEE THE SUGGESTED TEMPLATE AT THE BACK OF THIS REPORT. Q64. When needed, I am willing to put in the extra effort to get a job done 93% Q3. I understand how my performance contributes to fulfilling my work unit's goals and objectives 85% Q4. I am clear about what I am expected to achieve in my job 81% TOP 3 HIGHEST SCORING QUESTIONS: % POSITIVE Q71. I am aware of my role, as a county employee, during an emergency or natural disaster in the community +2 Q33. My work unit acts on the feedback we receive from customers/clients 0 Q64. When needed, I am willing to put in the extra effort to get a job done 0 TOP 3 COMPARED TO COUNTYWIDE: VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 01. International

GUIDE TO THIS REPORT YOUR BENCHMARK DATA ORC INTERNATIONAL FACILITATES A BENCHMARKING PROGRAM WHICH ALLOWS ORGANIZATIONS TO BENCHMARK THEIR RESULTS AGAINST THE RESULTS OF OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN THEIR SECTOR. IN THIS REPORT, THE EXTERNAL BENCHMARK DATA IS THE AVERAGE % POSITIVE SCORE ACHIEVED FROM RECENT SURVEYS OF ALL OTHER GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS. ANONYMITY IT IS ORC INTERNATIONAL'S PRACTICE NOT TO DISPLAY THE RESULTS OF GROUPS TO THE EXTENT WHERE THE ANONYMITY OF INDIVIDUALS MAY BE COMPROMISED. RESULTS FOR TEAMS WITH LESS THAN 6 WILL NOT RECEIVE AN INDIVIDUAL REPORT. HOWEVER, THEIR DATA WILL STILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE SCORES FOR THEIR DIVISION/DEPARTMENT AND THE ORGANIZATION OVERALL. % POSITIVE WHERE RESULTS ARE SHOWN AS POSITIVE PERCENTAGES (% POSITIVE), THESE ARE CALCULATED BY ADDING TOGETHER POSITIVE RESPONSES ("STRONGLY AGREE" + "AGREE") AND DIVIDING BY THE NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS WHO ANSWERED THE QUESTION. Strongly agree Strongly disagree DisagreeNeitherAgree POSITIVE RESPONS Negative response Neutral response ÷ number of respondents who answered the question = % POSITIVE ROUNDING RESULTS ARE PRESENTED AS WHOLE NUMBERS FOR EASE OF READING, WITH ROUNDING PERFORMED AT THE LAST STAGE OF CALCULATION FOR MAXIMUM ACCURACY. VALUES FROM X.00 TO X.49 ARE ROUNDED DOWN AND VALUES FROM X.50 TO X.99 ARE ROUNDED UP. THEREFORE IN SOME INSTANCES, RESULTS MAY NOT TOTAL 100%. STRONGLY AGREEAGREENEITHERDISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREETOTAL NUMBER OF RESPONSES PERCENTAGE 24.63%27.08%28.71%15.66%3.92%100% ROUNDED PERCENTAGE 25%27%29%16%4%101% NUMBER OF POSITIVE = 317 % POSITIVE 317 ÷ 613 = 52% Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 02. International

KEY QUESTIONS TO FOCUS ON  WHAT TO FOCUS ON? THESE KEY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS BEING IMPORTANT TO EMPLOYEES IN YOUR BUSINESS UNIT. THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE QUESTIONS WITH THE LOWEST SCORES. SOME WILL BE AREAS TO IMPROVE UPON AND SOME WILL BE AREAS TO MAINTAIN. DEVELOP ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE UPON THESE, WHERE POSSIBLE, TO DRIVE HIGHER LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE.  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK.1 Q57. I am supported in balancing my work and home life 61 % -6 .2 Q6. Senior leaders have a clear vision for the organization: Department/Agency leadership 51 % Q15. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: Department/Agency leadership 39 % -.4 Q5. Senior leaders have a clear vision for the organization: County leadership 49 % +3 Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 03. International

HEADLINE SCORES HIGHEST POSITIVE SCORING QUESTIONS % POSITIVE Q64. When needed, I am willing to put in the extra effort to get a job done 93 % Q3. I understand how my performance contributes to fulfilling my work unit's goals and objectives 85 % Q4. I am clear about what I am expected to achieve in my job 81 % Q32. My work unit strives to provide high quality service to our customers/clients 78 % Q40. I feel trusted to do my job well 77 % HIGHEST NEUTRAL SCORING QUESTIONS % NEUTRAL Q17. Senior leaders model the behavior they expect of me: County leadership 39 % Q14. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: County leadership 39 % Q66. I believe that action will be taken on issues identified in this survey 35 % Q15. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: Department/Agency leadership 33 % Q18. Senior leaders model the behavior they expect of me: Department/Agency leadership 33 % HIGHEST NEGATIVE SCORING QUESTIONS % NEGATIVE Q11. Senior leaders are visible to employees: County leadership 41 % Q12. Senior leaders are visible to employees: Department/Agency leadership 31 % Q66. I believe that action will be taken on issues identified in this survey 29 % Q14. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: County leadership 28 % Q15. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: Department/Agency leadership 28 %  FIND YOUR HIGHEST SCORES THESE QUESTIONS ARE YOUR HIGHEST SCORING. - WHAT ARE EMPLOYEES MOST POSITIVE ABOUT? (STRENGTHS) - WHAT ARE EMPLOYEES MOST NEUTRAL ABOUT? WHERE A LOT OF EMPLOYEES ARE RESPONDING 'NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE' (% NEUTRAL), THIS MAY INDICATE MIXED VIEWS OR INCONSISTENT EXPERIENCES. (AREAS OF POTENTIAL) - WHAT ARE EMPLOYEES MOST NEGATIVE ABOUT? (AREAS OF CONCERN) Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 04. International

TIPS & SUGGESTIONS.01 Identify where your team is performing well These tend to be high scores that are above comparative scores. Celebrate these and share the good news with your employees.  Understanding your team’s report and getting to action! As a team, take the time to fully digest your report. View it as an assessment that gives insight into how engaged people are and the most important factors driving their engagement. It matters less where you start – it will be different for each group -- our goal is to learn and improve. Use the Time to Take Action tool at the end of the slide deck to plan how you will address the results. Acting on results is pivotal for improvement. Asking the questions and doing nothing is worse than not asking at all. Identify areas that need improvement 02. These will be the lower scores, and/or those which are scoring notably below your comparators..03 Discuss the results with your team Context is key. Discussions with teams will help us understand what the data means. Approach these discussions with curiosity and appreciation for the honest feedback..04 Agree as a team on actions Create ownership by having everyone play a role in identifying follow up actions and making it happen. Celebrate success 05. Track your progress and celebrate success. This is a human process 06. It will take time and patience and a lot of learning. Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 05. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT 73 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q1. My department's/agency's goals give guidance to my work 64 % - Q2. My work unit works well with other King County groups to solve problems and achieve common goals 61 % -17  Q3. I understand how my performance contributes to fulfilling my work unit's goals and objectives 85 % Q4. I am clear about what I am expected to achieve in my job 81 % 0-3 KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 06. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? SENIOR LEADERSHIP 46 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK KQ5. Senior leaders have a clear vision for the organization: County leadership 49 % +3 K Q6. Senior leaders have a clear vision for the organization: Department/Agency leadership 51 % -2- Q7. Senior leaders have a clear vision for the organization: Division leadership 52 % -2- Q8. Senior leaders communicate the organization's mission and goals: County leadership 52 % - Q9. Senior leaders communicate the organization's mission and goals: Department/Agency leadership 52 % -2- Q10. Senior leaders communicate the organization's mission and goals: Division leadership 53 % - Q11. Senior leaders are visible to employees: County leadership 32 %  Q12. Senior leaders are visible to employees: Department/Agency leadership 44 % -2- Q13. Senior leaders are visible to employees: Division leadership 58 % -2- Q14. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: County leadership 33 % -12  KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 07. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? SENIOR LEADERSHIP 46 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK K Q15. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: Department/Agency leadership 39 % - Q16. Senior leaders communicate openly and honestly: Division leadership 45 % - Q17. Senior leaders model the behavior they expect of me: County leadership 38 % - Q18. Senior leaders model the behavior they expect of me: Department/Agency leadership 44 % -2- Q19. Senior leaders model the behavior they expect of me: Division leadership 49 % -2- KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 08. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? ROLE/RELATIONSHIP OF MANAGER/SUPERVISOR 63 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q20. I am satisfied with the supervision I receive 67 % - Q21. My supervisor gives me regular, constructive feedback on my performance 56 % -9  Q22. My supervisor is accessible to me when I need them 77 % - Q23. My supervisor is open to new ideas to improve the way we work 63 % - Q24. My supervisor supports me in achieving my professional development goals 62 % - Q25. My supervisor treats mistakes as learning opportunities 62 % - Q26. My supervisor cares about me as a person 66 % - Q27. My supervisor takes actions to create an inclusive, fair, respectful and equitable workplace 62 % - Q28. My supervisor deals with problems among co-workers effectively 48 % - KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 09. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? PEER CULTURE 64 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q29. There is a spirit of team work and cooperation among the members of my work unit 65 % -19  Q30. My work unit is open to new ideas to improve the way we work 63 % - Q31. My work unit uses data effectively to learn and improve 54 % - Q32. My work unit strives to provide high quality service to our customers/clients 78 % +7  Q33. My work unit acts on the feedback we receive from customers/clients 65 % 00 Q34. My work unit is working to improve equity and fairness in our internal practices 56 % - Q35. My work unit is working to improve equity and fairness in our delivery of services 62 % - Q36. In my work unit, employees treat each other with respect 69 % +18  KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 10. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? PERSONAL INFLUENCE 64 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q37. I feel encouraged to share new ideas to improve the way we work 60 % - Q38. I have a say in how I complete everyday job duties 69 % -4 Q39. I have the authority I need to do my job effectively 66 % -2-4 Q40. I feel trusted to do my job well 77 % - Q41. I am satisfied with the level of challenge in my work 70 % -8  Q42. I have an acceptable workload that allows me to do my best work 56 % -3 Q43. I use goals and measures developed by my work unit to help guide my performance and work priorities 52 % - KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 11. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT 51 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q44. I am satisfied with the opportunities available to achieve my career goals at King County 49 % +14  Q45. I understand how I can advance in my career at King County 48 % - Q46. In the last year, I have had opportunities to learn and grow professionally 57 % -2- Q47. I have sufficient opportunities to attend trainings to improve my skills and knowledge 54 % -9  Q48. I have full and equal access to staff advancement opportunities 45 % - Q49. I have full and equal access to employee development opportunities 52 % - KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 12. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? ON THE JOB 69 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q50. I have the tools and resources to do my job well 64 % -5  Q51. I receive the information I need to do my job well 63 % -6  Q52. I am treated with respect in my workplace 72 % -8  Q53. I am satisfied with King County's programs to help me manage my health 71 % - Q54. I feel safe in my workplace 76 % - Q55. I feel well informed about King County work-related events and news 71 %  Q56. I am satisfied with my job overall 72 % KQ57. I am supported in balancing my work and home life 61 % -6  KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 13. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 54 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q58. I am satisfied with the recognition I receive for doing a good job 52 % -7  Q59. I feel valued for what I bring to the workplace 57 % -2 KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 14. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? OVERALL 69 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q60. I would recommend King County as a great place to work 69 % +10  Q61. I am proud to work at King County 73 % +6  Q62. If another organization offered me a similar job, with the same pay and benefits, I would stay at King County 49 % -11  Q63. I feel committed to King County's goals 66 % -22  Q64. When needed, I am willing to put in the extra effort to get a job done 93 % 0-3 Q65. Working for King County makes me want to do the best work I can 66 % +16  KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 15. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? TAKING ACTION 36 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q66. I believe that action will be taken on issues identified in this survey 36 % -7  KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 16. International

ALL QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDING POSITIVELY (STRONGLY AGREE + AGREE), NEUTRALLY (NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE) OR NEGATIVELY (DISAGREE + STRONGLY DISAGREE). LOOK AT HOW YOUR POSITIVE SCORE COMPARES TO THE COMPARISONS IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? COUNTY INITIATIVES 54 % RESPONSE SCALE % POSITIVE VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK Q71. I am aware of my role, as a county employee, during an emergency or natural disaster in the community 54 % +2- KEY K KEY DRIVER QUESTIONS  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Strongly agree AgreeNeitherDisagree Strongly disagree Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 17. International

NON STANDARD QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW THE NON STANDARD QUESTIONS ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND HOW THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDED. IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? COUNTY INITIATIVES RESPONSE SCALE % VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE Q67. Are you aware of the following countywide initiatives and programs? Healthy Incentives 91 % 0 Employee Giving Program 82 % Employee Assistance Program/Making Life Easier 71 % 0 Equity and Social Justice 65 % Training and Development 62 % 0 Lean/Continuous Improvement 61 % 0 Records Management 40 % 0 Alternative Dispute Resolution 34 % 0 Performance Management 32 % +1 Climate Change Initiative 29 % +1 Make It Through (Disaster Preparedness) 28 % 0 Best Run Government 26 % +1 Tier Boards/Visual Management 26 % +2 Line of Business 19 % +1 None of these 3%3% 0 KEY  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 18. International

NON STANDARD QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW THE NON STANDARD QUESTIONS ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND HOW THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDED. IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? COUNTY INITIATIVES RESPONSE SCALE % VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE Q68. What is your preferred way of getting information about King County events and information? Regular Notifications 76 % -2 Your supervisor/chief/sergeant 37 % +1 King County Website Home Page 31 % +1 Department Newsletter (online or print) 29 % +1 Printed Bulletin or Announcements 25 % +1 King County Intranet 18 % +1 My Department Website Home Page 15 % +1 King County Social Media Accounts (for example: Facebook, Twitter) 7%7% 0 SharePoint 6%6% 0 Human Resources Division Website Home Page 6%6% 0 None of these 3%3% 0 KEY  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 19. International

NON STANDARD QUESTIONS  EXPLORE THE FULL RESULTS - THESE PAGES SHOW THE NON STANDARD QUESTIONS ASKED IN THE SURVEY AND HOW THE PROPORTION OF COLLEAGUES RESPONDED. IS THERE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT? COUNTY INITIATIVES RESPONSE SCALE % VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE Q69. In the past twelve months, I have participated in The Employee Giving Program (EGP) in the following way(s): Have not participated in the past twelve months 61 % +1 Pledged through payroll deduction, time donation or direct check 29 % 0 Attended a Special Event or Nonprofit Expo 13 % 0 Helped during the Annual Giving Drive at my worksite (e.g. Ambassador, Coordinator, etc.) 8%8% Referred a Nonprofit to the program 4%4% 0 Utilized the EGP Website or other Social Media channels 4%4% 0 Coordinated a Special Event or Nonprofit Speaker Presentation 3%3% 0 Served on the EGP Committee 1%1% 0 Q70. If you are a full-time employee, would you be interested in working part-time, if given the option? (If you are not full-time, please select "Not applicable") No 60 % 0 Yes 26 % 0 Not applicable 14 % +1 KEY  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS GREATER THAN COMPARATOR  AT LEAST 5 PERCENTAGE POINTS LESS THAN COMPARATOR Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE 20. International

WHAT'S NEXT  WHAT'S NEXT? EMPLOYEES HAVE GIVEN THEIR FEEDBACK AND THESE RESULTS SHOW YOU WHERE YOU NEED TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS OR WHERE YOU ARE PERFORMING WELL. IT IS IMPORTANT TO DISCUSS THINGS FULLY IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND UNDERLYING REASONS FOR THEIR OPINIONS BEFORE TAKING ACTION. HOW WILL YOU MEASURE WHETHER YOUR ACTIONS HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL? DON'T JUST WAIT FOR THE NEXT SURVEY. KEEP ASKING YOUR COLLEAGUES FOR THEIR FEEDBACK AND IDEAS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. 36 % of employees replied favorably to: ‘I believe that action will be taken on issues identified in this survey.’ VARIANCE FROM COUNTYWIDE VARIANCE FROM GOV'T BENCHMARK -7  COUNTYWIDE 36% GOV'T BENCHMARK 43% % positive % neutral % negative Executive Branch (9400) | Employee Engagement SurveyPAGE International

Take some time to Discuss: Was there anything that surprised you? Anything you were glad about? Anything that made you sad? Anything you are still confused about?

Leading Your Group to Another Place

On your own: What are your hopes for the discussion with your workgroup? Think about HOW it will go and WHAT will come out of it.

At Your Table: What is your biggest fear about how this conversation will go?

At Your Table: Find the table that will discuss your biggest fear and strategize ways to manage it.

What do you think your staff’s biggest fear is about having this conversation?

Meaningful Action: Lean G-PDCA

TIME TO TAKE ACTION Grasp Ask “Why” 5 times to get to the root cause. What have you learned about the current state of engagement in your workgroup? Plan What will your team do? Who will do what? How will you track progress? Do Use action planning to put your plan into action. (See below) Check Are you moving closer to your goals and how do you know? Adjust Maintain? Implement more widely? Abandon? Try something different? Do! Action Planning Pick 1 ThingTake 2 ActionsCommunicate About it 3x (In 1 Year) Ro: Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation (0907E) | EPAGE 22. International

Do’s and Don’ts Do Say thank you a million times for speaking the truth (no matter how bad it is) Listen Don’t Ask who said what Ask who participated Force people to speak up Get defensive Feel like you have to say yes or no on the spot

Core Practices of a Skilled Facilitator Stay Neutral Listen Actively Paraphrase Summarize periodically Synthesize ideas Manage Digression Manage conflict Ask Questions

At your table: Develop 3-5 questions that you can use to prompt your group to deeper reflection and exploration of the issues raised in the report. Tips: Keep them open ended Without solutions or opinions embedded in them “Asking the right questions takes as much skill as giving the right answers”

TIME TO TAKE ACTION Grasp Ask “Why” 5 times to get to the root cause. What have you learned about the current state of engagement in your workgroup? Plan What will your team do? Who will do what? How will you track progress? Do Use action planning to put your plan into action. (See below) Check Are you moving closer to your goals and how do you know? Adjust Maintain? Implement more widely? Abandon? Try something different? Do! Action Planning Pick 1 ThingTake 2 ActionsCommunicate About it 3x (In 1 Year) Ro: Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation (0907E) | EPAGE 22. International

TIME TO TAKE ACTION Grasp Ask “Why” 5 times to get to the root cause. What have you learned about the current state of engagement in your workgroup? Plan What will your team do? Who will do what? How will you track progress? Do Use action planning to put your plan into action. (See below) Check Are you moving closer to your goals and how do you know? Adjust Maintain? Implement more widely? Abandon? Try something different? Do! Action Planning Pick 1 ThingTake 2 ActionsCommunicate About it 3x (In 1 Year) Ro: Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation (0907E) | EPAGE 22. International

TIME TO TAKE ACTION Grasp Ask “Why” 5 times to get to the root cause. What have you learned about the current state of engagement in your workgroup? Plan What will your team do? Who will do what? How will you track progress? Do Use action planning to put your plan into action. (See below) Check Are you moving closer to your goals and how do you know? Adjust Maintain? Implement more widely? Abandon? Try something different? Do! Action Planning Pick 1 ThingTake 2 ActionsCommunicate About it 3x (In 1 Year) Ro: Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation (0907E) | EPAGE 22. International

TIME TO TAKE ACTION Grasp Ask “Why” 5 times to get to the root cause. What have you learned about the current state of engagement in your workgroup? Plan What will your team do? Who will do what? How will you track progress? Do Use action planning to put your plan into action. (See below) Check Are you moving closer to your goals and how do you know? Adjust Maintain? Implement more widely? Abandon? Try something different? Do! Action Planning Pick 1 ThingTake 2 ActionsCommunicate About it 3x (In 1 Year) Ro: Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation (0907E) | EPAGE 22. International

Resources to Support You

Job Aids/Cookbook