Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGH POINT Sounding Board/Steering Committee Meeting Service Recommendations January 13, 2015.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program Joanne Haracz, AICP responsive client solutions since 1976 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association April.
Transit Improvements on East-West Routes in Downtown Minneapolis Michael Mechtenberg Planner Metro Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN.
Juneau Downtown Tourism Transportation Study May 27, 2003.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Bend Transit Plan Outcomes Updated Public Transit Plan (PTP) Focused on fixed-route system To be adopted as an element of the BMPO Metropolitan Transportation.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan and Construction John Dillery & Mac Sweidan Kingfield Neighborhood Association June 2010.
Improving the Passenger Experience Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (PPTA) April 2015.
The Potential BRT in Asia
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Update on Transportation Activities in Fairfax County Transportation Roundtable Dulles Area Transportation.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Bus Stop Design Guidelines - In Support of Effective Service Planning
1 Example of How Bus Stop Inventory is Used and Issues are Addressed.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Educational Session 101 May 29, 2014.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Department of Transportation Transit Rebranding New Brand Identity City Council November 4, 2013.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis LYNX 2013 Comprehensive Operational Analysis John Lewis, CEO.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Update to Dublin Chamber of Commerce Network Direct Paddy Doherty Thursday 18 th November 2010.
1 Regional Activity Centers and Clusters Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Paul DesJardin Department of Human Services,
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Collier Area Transit February 8, 2012 Report Findings and Recommendation s.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,
29 October 2013 Integrating Public Transport and Land Use Planning Bus Industry Confederation Mark Williams Director, Sustainable Transport Planning Department.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project Presentation to the San Francisco.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW
Center City Connector 101.
Capital Metro Long-Range Financial Forecast ( )
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Bus Rapid Transit Study
D Line Project Overview
MPO Board Presentation
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1

Overview Service Guidelines and Standards were adopted by the Board of Directors in November 2011 The document calls for a biennial update Revised to include additional design and evaluation criteria based on best practices and recent service changes Review by internal staff, CSAC, and Access Advisory Committee capmetro.org | 2

Overview  The document consists of 3 sections:  Introduction – service classification  Service Guidelines – framework for design and allocation  Service Standards – evaluation criteria capmetro.org | 3

Introduction capmetro.org | Revisions to Introduction 4

Introduction Provides general overview of the document and how it is to be used – no change One component lists the types of services in operation - updated capmetro.org | Revisions to Introduction 5

Service Guidelines capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 6

Service Guidelines - Overview Density and Service Coverage Land Use Destinations and Activity Centers Streets and Sidewalk Characteristics Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics Route Directedness Route Deviation Two-way Service Branching and Short-Turns capmetro.org | Service Guidelines - Overview 7 Route Spacing Route Length Route Terminals Service Span Service Frequency Bus Stop Spacing Bus Stop Placement Bus Stop Amenities MetroRapid Stations vs. Bus Stops Transit Centers and Park & Rides

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Streets and Sidewalk Characteristics) Updates language to reflect that frontage roads are not particularly conducive to providing safe and efficient transit services capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 8

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Demographics) Adds supporting maps to Appendix A reflecting the areas that should be prioritized for transit service as a result of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 9

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Route Directedness) Adds graphics to support Route Directedness section Adds caveat that some routes may differ with the numerical standard if time travel advantages can be proven capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 10

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Route Deviation) Adds graphics to Route Deviation Section Adds that routes should strive to utilize existing transit prioritization infrastructure (e.g. transit-only lanes, corridors with transit signal priority, etc.). capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 11

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Two-way Service) Adds graphics depicting Guadalupe Lavaca Transit Corridor in two- way service section capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 12

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Bus Stop Spacing) Adds reference to average block sizes in downtown Austin ( feet per block) capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 13 Area type:Ideal stop spacing range (min-max): Regular local stops in Downtown or on arterial streets 800 – 1,600 feet Suburban and other low- density areas 1,200 – 2,500 feet

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Bus Stop Placement) Adds that mid-block stops may be considered when pedestrian crosswalks and infrastructure are present in that location capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 14 Pedestrian Hybrid beacon mid-block crossing at Oltorf MetroRapid Station

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Bus Stop Amenities) Updates bus stop amenities section to include information about Capital Metro app and real time information on bus stop signage. capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 15

Revisions to Service Guidelines (MetroRapid Stations) Adds section about MetroRapid Station amenities: – Cantilever transit shelter with MetroRapid branding – Real time arrival display – Seating and lean bars – MetroRapid specific route maps for routes departing from station MetroRapid stops should be placed on far- side when possible to best utilize transit signal priority Adds that nearby bus stops should be consolidated to use MetroRapid station when possible capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 16 Republic Square MetroRapid Station Photo: KUT

Revisions to Service Guidelines (Park & Rides) Adds section about Transit Centers and Park & Rides – Existing System – Level of Service Ratings – Guidelines for analysis and expansion of these facilities capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Guidelines 17

Service Standards capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Standards 18

Service Standards - Overview Schedule Reliability Load Factors Ridership Productivity and Cost-Effectiveness Potential Corrective Actions New and Altered Services Service Change Process capmetro.org | Service Standards - Overview 19

Revisions to Service Standards (Schedule Reliability) Updates schedule reliability on-time- performance window to between 0 and 6 minutes after scheduled departure time Previous window indicated that buses were on time if they departed any given time point between 30 seconds early and 5 minutes and 30 seconds late. capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Standards 20

Revisions to Service Standards (Productivity) Adds operating cost per passenger by route as a measure of productivity capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Standards 21 Riders per revenue hour Route RidersAverageRating 300 Govalle 5, % 311 Stassney 1, % 320 St. John's 2, % 323 Anderson 1, % 325 Ohlen 1, % 331 Oltorf 2, % 333 William Cannon 1, % 338 Lamar/45th % 350 Airport Blvd. 2, % 383 Research 1, % 392 Braker % All crosstown routes 21, Riders per revenue hour Operating Cost Per Passenger Route RidersAverageRating $/boarding 300 Govalle 5, % $ Stassney 1, % $ St. John's 2, % $ Anderson 1, % $ Ohlen 1, % $ Oltorf 2, % $ William Cannon 1, % $ Lamar/45th % $ Airport Blvd. 2, % $ Research 1, % $ Braker % $10.11 All crosstown routes 21, Average: $5.79

Revisions to Service Standards (Service change process) Adds graphic describing service change process to document – Proposal development – Board process – Implementation preparation – Implementation capmetro.org | Revisions to Service Standards 22

Benefits Updates document to more accurately reflect existing conditions and agency goals Refines service evaluation process Along with ServicePlan2025, provides a framework for customer-driven and cost-effective service planning Route 2025 Strategic Alignment: Customer Driven Service Excellence capmetro.org | Benefits 23

Questions? capmetro.org | Questions 24