Triggers, Fitters and VErtex LOcators Manchester Christmas Meeting 2010 Adam Webber 21/12/10 VELO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Some answers to the questions/comments at the Heavy/Light presentation of March 17, Outline : 1) Addition of the id quadrant cut (slides 2-3); 2)
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Status on Testbeam Analysis Jianchun Wang Syracuse University VELO meeting, August 28, 2007.
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
HBD Performance Estimates Zvi Citron 3 April 2008 HL Meeting.
A measurement of the Ratio of Tree over Two Jet Cross Sections with CMS at 7TeV P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
B group status and plans Brad Abbott Sept 11, 2002.
Testbeam Studies of the LHCb Vertex Locator Modules Lisa Dwyer.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
1 T1-T3 in L1 algorithm  Outlook: I) Summary of L1-confirmation II) About the TrgForwardTracking package III) Confirming (preliminary)  L1-confirmation.
QCD and Top backgrounds in W+jets and Rjets Alessandro Tricoli (CERN) on behalf of W+jets and Rjets groups 3 rd May 2013 W+jets and Rjets EB Meeting.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Paper on J/  and b production Wenbin Qian, Patrick Robbe for the F-WG, Tsinghua Beijing/LAL Orsay, 2 Dec 2009.
Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events.
Met and Normalization Sarah Eno. I wanted to see if we can learn anything about the MET normalization issue using a toy monte carlo. first, we need a.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
1 Semileptonic physics in FOCUS D  K  0 l form factor measurement –Motivation –Method and Signals D   l form factor measurement –Motivation –Signals.
Lake Louise Winter Institute Outlook:  Introduction  LHCb performance  Radiative decays: CP violation Bs  Φγ  Backward-forward Asymmetry B 
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Abhilash Nair STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago 1 STAR.
Barbara Storaci, Wouter Hulsbergen, Nicola Serra, Niels Tuning 1.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
A. Pulvirenti - Resonances measurement in pp and PbPb with ALICE 1 Outline The Study of Short-Lived Resonances with the ALICE Experiment at the LHC Ayben.
J/  production studies in LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 18 Apr 2011 For the LHCb Collaboration Quarkonium Production Vienna, Austria April 2011.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Paolo Massarotti Charged Kaon Meeting 4 may 2006 Charged kaon lifetime P. Massarotti.
Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.
LHCb Alignment Strategy 26 th September 2007 S. Viret 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
CP Asymetries in the B s system Yasmine Amhis LAL, Orsay 16 Avril 2013 Diane Arbus.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
1 HLT (generic)  Data TDR DaVinci v9r3 DC04 DaVici v12r0 DC04 DaVici v12r1  Outlook! # of track candidates!!! Comparation DC04 & TDR data  L1 does a.
A 2 nd proposal for a Low mass electron pair trigger. Richard Seto University of CA, Riverside Trigger Working Group Meeting 6/7/2001.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Time Independent Analysis
Eduardo Rodrigues, Chris Parkes University of Glasgow
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
LHCb Alignment Strategy
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Presentation transcript:

Triggers, Fitters and VErtex LOcators Manchester Christmas Meeting 2010 Adam Webber 21/12/10 VELO

Hlt2Mu2Tracks 1 The trigger:  L0 (hardware)  Hlt1 – Inclusive (software)  Hlt2 – Inclusive/Exclusive (software) The Idea: Extend on Hlt2MuTrack… B μ D/K/… π/k ν The problem:  Not very good efficiency with current triggers  Efficiency is split between ~3 Hlt1 and ~5 Hlt2 lines Signal Efficiency (± 0.1 %) Efficiency w.r.t. previous trigger level (%) L072.9 Hlt Hlt  Rectangular cuts optimisation on several million real MinBias events and several thousand signal MC (from several different channels) L0 (40->1MHz) Hlt1 (1k->30kHz) Hlt2 (30->2kHz)

Status 2 An optimistic outlook (loose L0): ChannelEfficiency/Rate (%) (each w.r.t previous trigger level) L0Hlt1Hlt2Topo (“or” of all) Hlt2 Mu2Tracks Bd->DsMuNu Bs->DsMuNu Bd->K*MuMu Bs->JpsiPhi MB (mu= A more realistic outlook (tighter L0): ChannelEfficiency/Rate (%) (each w.r.t previous trigger level) L0Hlt1Hlt2Topo (“or” of all) Hlt2 Mu2Tracks Bd->DsMuNu Bs->DsMuNu Bd->K*MuMu Bs->JpsiPhi MB (mu=

B,B lifetime ratio 70s0 The Plan:  Take the ratio of Bs and B yields in bins of lifetime  Signal trigger acceptance functions cancel when we take their ratio  Separate B from Bs by fitting the mass spectrum  (make these plots nicer…)

2 Highs and Lows  Observed: Time  Expected: Happiness My

2 Highs and Lows  Observed: An exponential decay followed by a rise at larger proper lifetime Time  Expected: An exponential decay Happiness My

2 Highs and Lows  Expected: An exponential drop in #Bs/#B followed by a rise due to cosh(ΔΓ s t) term.  Observed: An exponential drop followed by a rise at larger proper lifetime  More than we bargained for. From a simple fit we can measure ΔΓ s as well as the ratio of B lifetimes. “Fantastic” – we said. Time Happiness My

2 Highs and Lows  Expected: An exponential drop in #Bs/#B with increasing proper lifetime.  Observed: An rapid rise followed by a drop at larger proper lifetime  The reality: I plotted #B/#Bs instead of #Bs/#B. Correcting this flips our plot… Time Happiness My

2 Highs and Lows  Expected: An exponential drop in #Bs/#B with increasing proper lifetime.  The reality: used exp(-Γ)=exp(-τ) instead of exp(-Γ)=exp(-1/τ) by accident… Time Happiness My  Observed: An rapid rise followed by a drop at larger proper lifetime  Conclusion: Unexpected bias in selection. Requires investigation.

VELO Resolution The Problem: Vertex resolution in data is not as good as with MC. Idea 1: Lower sensor operational voltage: V Resolution = pitch/√12

VELO Resolution The Problem: Vertex resolution in data is not as good as with MC. Idea 1: Lower sensor operational voltage: smaller V Resolution = weighted mean of several strips

VELO Resolution The Problem: Vertex resolution in data is not as good as with MC. Idea 2: Lower strip threshold. Make more multi-strip clusters. Proof of principle: Would be here if I’d gone home after dinner last night…

Merry Christmas!!! I also grew a pretty good moustache. But it had to go after some classic quotes from my girlfriend: “I think I love you a little bit less” “It makes me feel sick” and