Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Living a Culture of Engagement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
MTSS – What’s That? Session 1 Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ) – Work we are doing Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)  What is this.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
F LORIDA ’ S I MPLEMENTATION OF M ULTI - TIERED S YSTEM OF S TUDENT S UPPORTS (MTSSS) Bambi J. Lockman, LL.D. Bureau Chief, Exceptional Education and Student.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Timberlane Regional School District
Building and Sustaining a Multi-Tiered System of Supports: The Wichita Way Virginia Department of Education March 1, 2011 Virginia Department of Education.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Early Intervention Project Proposal for
Quad-level Engagement: Leveraging Partnerships That Support Change in School and Statewide Professional Development Practices.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
Importance of Building Family and Community Engagement for Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Laura Spenceley, Ph.D. State University of New York at Oswego Presented at the 7 th International Conference on Excellence in School Education Improving.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Response to Intervention: The Georgia Student Achievement Pyramid of Interventions October 22, 2008.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
BRAIDING RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION/INTERVENTION RTI Carol White, Ed.D; Daniel Haithcox; Nancy Keuffer; Michael Thomas Artist: Mark Farrington Durham.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Priority Initiative for KSDE Multi Tiered System of Support.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Kent ISD MTSS Implementation Team.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
OSEP State Personnel Development Grant for NJTSS in Early Reading Key Components and Considerations for Assessing District Capacity Funded by the U.S.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Dr. Neil Guthrie Assistant Superintendent
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Leveraging the Power of MTSS in your School
Welcome to the NJTSS Early Reading Project!
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Living a Culture of Engagement

Integration & Sustainability Evidence-Based Practices Differentiated Instruction Classroom Management Early Intervention Multi-Tier Model Fluid Groups Data-Based Decision Making Problem Solving Process

MTSS and RtI Connection

All Systems Go! Wichita’s Path to Transformation with MTSS

We ALL teach graduates.

Michael Fullan

The Strategic Plan MTSS is the WORK! Vision Strategic Plan Support and Direction from the District

Collaborative Partners Anita Archer Anita Archer: Explicit Instruction James Baker James Baker: Academic Structuring and Implementation George Batsche George Batsche: Leadership and RtI Stevan Kukic Stevan Kukic: Strategic Reform Robert Pipik Robert Pipik: Performance Management Randy Sprick Randy Sprick: Positive Behavior Supports

Multi-Tier System of Supports IS the System Framework in Wichita Public Schools

The culture of collaboration is embraced, expected, and supported at the school and district level as operationalized by the MTSS innovation configuration matrix. District level standard protocols, in the areas of academic and behavior assessment, curriculum, intervention, instruction, and operations are established, implemented and supported with fidelity. The focus of Professional Development is expecting and supporting fidelity of implementation. Results-driven leadership is expected and supported.

District PD Plan

System Considerations Comprehensive Assessment System Positive Behavior Supports Structuring for Academic Literacy System of Data-Driven Decision Making

Comprehensive Assessment System: What is different?

Positive Behavior Supports Safe and Civil Schools (Randy Sprick) o Classroom Management System: CHAMPS/ACHIEVE (4000 instructional staff trained) o Schoolwide Management System: FOUNDATIONS training for structuring Guidelines for Success

Academic Focus: Literacy Narrowing the Focus Three-Pronged Approach o Revising Literacy Curriculum Protocol Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Kindergarten Curriculum Systemic P-12 Intervention Solutions o Professional Development that develops all teachers into Literacy Experts (LETRS) o Instructional Model (including Explicit Instruction)

System of Data-Driven Decision Making Performance Management System Facility Stat School Stat o Principals o Leadership Teams o Grade-level/Department Teams

Kansas MTSS Evaluation Project October 2012

The Study Group Inc.’s Support to KSDE RFP planning & design. Evaluation management & oversight. 23

TSG’s Role in RFP Planning & Design Duration: 4 years. Focus: formative & summative. Parameters: o Address evaluation questions. o Conduct evaluability assessment. o Maximize use of existing data. o Relate to multiple audiences. 24

TSG’s Role in RFP Planning & Design continued Outcomes: o Effects on school practice. o Effects on students. o Effects on systems. 25

TSG’s Role in Management & Oversight Sustain focus on evaluation questions. Ensure integrity of data collection & analysis. Recognize the differences/uses of formative & summative results. Maintain long-term perspective. 26

WestEd’s Evaluation of MTSS as a Statewide Initiative Guided by state’s questions Informed by Evaluability Assessment Informed and driven by research and theoretical framework Both formative and summative 27

MTSS Evaluation Questions 1.Scope 2.Implementation 3.Student Outcomes 4.Statewide System and Infrastructure 5.Sustainability 28

Evaluability Assessment Purpose Explore the feasibility of doing an evaluation Identify how to measure intended outcomes of MTSS initiative Activities Document review Interviews Literature review Examination of data sources 29

What we learned from the EA? MTSS logic model, conceptual framework, and ICM are well aligned Stakeholders at all levels have common understanding of purpose, goals and outcomes of MTSS Data sources are available Some challenges or limitations in data availability  All informed Evaluation Plan 30

Conceptual Framework for MTSS Evaluation Online Survey of School s Case Studies Outcom es Data Interviews, Focus Groups, Documents & Extant Data 31

Data Collection Activities Extant Data Core Team data-MTSS training participation State data-School characteristics Student outcomes-Kansas Statewide Assessment MTSS Training and other documents 32

Data Collection Activities New Data Collection Statewide online survey- All schools Case studies- One district and five schools Collection of Building Level Status Forms and ODR data Interviews and focus groups 33

Evaluation Activities To Date In baseline year of 3 years Formative activities for quick feedback o Participation tracking o MTSS practices school survey o Collection of building level universal screening data 34

MTSS School Survey All schools—1346 buildings 656 usable responses 48.7% response rate Over representation of schools implementing MTSS Responses from 233 of 289 districts statewide 80.6% of all public school districts 35

Survey was designed to… Identify schools implementing MTSS Classify schools into stages of implementation based on their self- reported practices o Worked closely with KSDE MTSS leadership to identify what practices equate to each stage Track implementation and progress through stages over time 36

Survey Topic Areas Introductory Questions Leadership and Empowerment Assessment Practices Curricular and Instructional Practices Data-based Decision-making Tiered Interventions Student Outcomes Professional Development Barriers and Supports to Implementation Integration and Sustainability 37

Survey Findings Highlights 88.2% responding schools implementing or planning to implement MTSS Level of implementation varies: 32.8% initial implementation 6.1% in full implementation MTSS has the potential to become a statewide, fully implemented school improvement initiative. 38

Next Steps Case Study Site Visits Fall 2012 Analysis of quantitative data o State assessment data o Building level status data Document review  Continue evaluation cycle yearly Summative activities will track progress over time. 39

Contact Information Natalie Lacireno-Paquet Kristin Reedy Mike Norman KSDE MTSS Web site: Learning Innovations at WestEd Web site: 40

The Kansas MTSS Framework