LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : 177.31 m (from PIMS out to foil); 69.83 m new line,then.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

LINAC4 and 3 MeV test stand at CERN
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Updates BI-TL MADX Optics Studies C. Bracco. Next Steps from last meeting BHZ40 Nominal beta, -1.4 m dispersion.
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
Transfer Line Linac4 to PSB: Injection Aperture Limitations.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
Linac 4 PSB BI LTB LT L4T m from PIMS to foil: m new line (to BHZ20) m present Linac2 line Active elements : 4+2bendings; quads,
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Lattice, Injection Line and General ELENA Performance Limitations Pavel Belochitskii.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING A.Lombardi BCC 8-19 Nov 09 Linac4 BCC Nov 2009Alessandra Lombardi.
Specifications for PSB Injection System Upgrade C. Bracco, J. Abelleira on behalf of BTP Acknowledgments: E. Benedetto, C. Carli, V. Dimov, L.M. Feliciano,
1 Studies of electron cooling at DESY K. Balewski, R. Brinkmann, Ya. Derbenev, Yu. Martirosyan, K. Flöttmann, P. Wesolowski DESY M. Gentner, D. Husmann,
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Longitudinal Beam Diagnostics with the LBS Line 17. November 2009 Linac4 Beam Coordination Committee Meeting Thomas Hermanns.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
LIU Day – 11 th april 2014 ALESSANDRA LOMBARDI LINAC4 COMMISSIONING OVERVIEW.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
DMS steering with BPM scale error - Trial of a New Optics - Kiyoshi Kubo
Post-LH Diagnostic Line for LCLS-II P. Emma, M. Woodley, Y. Nosochkov, Feb. 26, 2014 Steal beam at Hz with y -kicker after LH (  y = 15 mm) Bend.
3 MeV test stand measurement plans A. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 10/01/2013BCC MeV test stand measurements1.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Some ideas to optimise PSB injection chicane Wim, Brennan, Jan, Masamitsu.
HINS Linac Simulations : Benchmarking, Jitter and Stripping. Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop.
D. Raparia2005/01/27-28 MAC Review EBIS Injector Linac Optics I I D.Raparia EBIS Review 2005/01/27-28 HEBT Booster Injection.
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement,
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Experience with beam instrumentation at Linac4
Linac4 M. Vretenar for the Linac4 design team
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
HIPPI yearly meeting, sep28-sep
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CEPC optics and booster optics
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Optics considerations for PS2
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Transfer Line for EIC.
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : m (from PIMS out to foil); m new line,then join at BHZ20 the present Linac2 line ( meters from BHZ20 to foil). Active elements : 4+2bendings;16+18 quads,11+11 steerers and 1 RF cavity. 1.Optics 2.Layout 3.Tunability 4.Safety margins L2 PSB L4 ↕ 2.5m

Optics-layout. Uncompensated longitudinal space charge forces, Dispersion and space charge X-Y coupling Bottlenecks : RF cavity; septum, distributor Match the six conditions at the PB (disp=0;dis-1.4;various beta) Contain the emittance increase (30% at max, can be reduced) Accept energy swing of 1.2 MeV At foil: 65mA in pi (rms mm mrad norm) ΔE= keV rms WALLWALL

Optics and tunability X,y rms Ratio aperture/rms above 6 everywhere

Errors and Correctors Static alignment errors can be corrected with steerers Jitter in the bending power supplies should be kept below 10-4 Jitter in linac energy is important for DIS and SEP acceptance bendings10% losses at20% losses at L4T.MBH.0150 / L4T.MBH.0250 ±0.7% of the nominal value±0.8% of the nominal value L4T.MBV.0650/ L4T.MBV.0750 ±6% of the nominal value±6.7% of the nominal value BHZ20±0.5% of the nominal value±0.6% of the nominal value BHZ30±0.9% of the nominal value±1% of the nominal value

AT DIS, beam size-all cases. In 4 rms there is more than 90% of the beam Effect of energy painting is of the order of mm (not included in the plot). D=0 D=1.4 vertical aperture might be the limit for tunability in the case D=0, unless we change yc=5.19 mm

At SMV, all cases, beam size. OK