LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
LEA Self-Assessment EC Division Institute March 2015
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Overview. Objectives Become familiar with: Common language of MTSS Tier I, II, III 2.
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
May 20, Purpose of the Self- Assessment Required by the Head Start Performance Standards (i)(1) Head Start Ac 2007 Head Start Act Section.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
The IEP Process MAASE New Administrators Workshop October 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Nancy T. Johnson, Ed.D. Exceptional Children Division, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Data Analyses for Indicator 17/
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: INSTALLATION
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: FULL IMPLEMENTATION
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: FULL IMPLEMENTATION
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Special Education Student Record Review Protocol
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
Presentation transcript:

LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:

Update March 10, 2014 …this is our work… …this is the work… …this is your work… RDA INDICATOR 17 = State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)

Jan 2013Dec Evolution of NCDPI Results Driven Accountabililty IDEA reauthorization SSIP Goal: Improve SWD Graduation rate by improving supports pk-12 EC Division shares RDA work during OSEP visit Inventory of Core, Supplemental, & Intensive Support for LEAs Identification of core elements Report progress on student outcomes LEA Self-Assessment results drive LEA support LEAs submit Continuous Improvement Performance Plans (CIPPs)

SSIP Data Analysis: Data Disaggregation, Infrastructure Analysis of Compliance Data Impact on Outcomes Strategic Vision Summary & Analysis Root Cause Is the Infrastructure we have the Infrastructure we need? Improvement plans drive strategic ECD support & PD ECD Self- Assessment & Improvement Process SSIP Phase I Collaboration Effective General Supervision SSIP Phase I & II Improvement Plan Determine Package of Interventions Plan for implementation in an MTSS framework Identify outcome measures Building ECD capacity Evaluation Examine outcome and implementation data Implementation of Customized Continuum of Support ECD Staff training & Support Strategies/Interventions Fidelity Measures Data for monitoring implementation SSIP Phase III LEA Capacity Customized Support SSIP Phase I SSIP Phase II & III

General Supervision SPP/APR Data Collection Dispute Resolution System Policies, Practices and Procedures Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives, & Sanctions Targeted Technical Assistance Fiscal Management

Academics Continuum of Transitions Behavior SSIP: Focus for Improvement Engagement

This Professional Learning Supports Improved Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities by: Active implementation of evidence-based instruction, preK through secondary Local capacity building Technical and adaptive leadership Comprehensive and efficient assessment system Student, Family, Staff, and Community Engagement Academics Active implementation of evidence-based behavioral programming, preK through secondary Local capacity building Culturally responsive instruction Positive school/class climate Comprehensive and efficient assessment system Student, Family, Staff, and Community Engagement Behavior Active implementation of evidence-based transition practices, preK to post- secondary Local capacity building Systemic and coordinated supports (including wraparound), preK to post-secondary Consistent attendance Extracurricular and/or employment opportunities Student, Family, Staff, and Community Engagement Continuum of Transitions Engagement

Indicator Data Profile Compliance (Policy & Fiscal) Practice Profile Summary & Analysis Identify problems in Academics, Behavior, Engagement Improvement plans drive strategic ECD support & PD LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process DPI LEA with DPI TA Research-Based Instruction & Communication & Collaboration LEA with DPI TA LEA Improvement Plan Select from Package of Interventions Plan for implementation in an MTSS framework Identify outcome measures Evaluation Examine outcome and implementation data Implementation of Full Continuum of Support For Students AND Teachers Strategies/Interventions Fidelity Measures Data for monitoring implementation LEA with DPI TA Problem-Solving for Improvement IEP Development & Implementation Data Collection

Indicator Data Profile Compliance (Policy & Fiscal) Practice Profile LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process DPI Research-Based Instruction & Communication & Collaboration LEA Problem-Solving for Improvement IEP Development & Implementation Data Collection

Indicator Data Profile Compliance (Policy & Fiscal) Practice Profile LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process DPI Research-Based Instruction & Communication & Collaboration LEA Problem-Solving for Improvement IEP Development & Implementation Data Collection

LEA Indicator Data 1.Graduation Rate 2.Dropout Rate 3.Student Participation and Performance on Annual Assessments by subgroup 4.Suspension/Expulsion Rates 5.LRE placements: school- age 6.LRE placements: preschool 7.Preschool Outcomes 8.Parent Involvement 9.Disproportionate Representation - Child with a Disability 10.Disproportionate Representation - Eligibility Category 11.Timely Evaluation 12.Early Childhood Transition 13.Secondary Transition 14.Post-School Outcomes

Indicator Data Profile Compliance (Policy & Fiscal) Practice Profile LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process DPI Research-Based Instruction & Communication & Collaboration LEA Problem-Solving for Improvement IEP Development & Implementation Data Collection

Core Element 1: Policy Compliance and Monitoring For this Core Element, consider the way the LEA monitors and ensures compliance with federal and state policies regarding students with disabilities. Critical ComponentLEA Notes 1.1 LEA provides training on the legal requirements of IDEA, Article 9 and NC Policies Governing Children with Disabilities. 1.2 LEA has an effective system for internal monitoring & general supervision, to include IEP implementation. 1.3 LEA uses effective methods and practices for resolving complaints/disputes (formal and informal) within required timelines.

Core Element 2: Fiscal Management For this Core Element, consider the way the LEA monitors fiscal resources and ensures compliance with federal and state policy. Critical ComponentLEA Notes 2.1 LEA fiscal management policies and procedures comply with federal and state regulations, policies, and procedures for appropriate use of funds. 2.2 LEA Timely and accurately completes and submits eligible grants, funding applications/reimbursements, and required amendments/supplements. 2.3 LEA implements effective practices for fiscal accountability.

Talk Together How familiar are you with your LEA’s: Indicator Data? Policy Compliance and Monitoring practices? Fiscal Management procedures?

Indicator Data Profile Compliance (Policy & Fiscal) Practice Profile LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process DPI Research-Based Instruction & Communication & Collaboration LEA Problem-Solving for Improvement IEP Development & Implementation Data Collection

Critical Component Expected Implementa tion Developmental Variation Needs Improvement LEA Rating (0, 1, or 2) 4.1 LEA collects and analyzes data to problem- solve and develop improvement strategies for any student not meeting IEP goals. LEA has documentatio n of problem- solving process applied to 80% of IEPs where students are not meeting IEP goals LEA has documentation of problem- solving process applied to 50% - 79% of IEPs where students are not meeting IEP goals LEA has documentation of problem- solving process applied to less than 50% of IEPs where students are not meeting IEP goals

WHAT KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES DO I HAVE RELATED TO THESE CORE ELEMENTS?

Core Element 3: IEP Development and Implementation 3.1 Data indicate that students with IEPs are making progress towards grade level standards in the general education curriculum. 3.2 Data indicate that students participating in the Standard Course of Study are making progress on IEP goals. 3.3 Data indicate that students participating in the Extended Content Standards are making progress on IEP goals. 3.4 Data indicate that students with disabilities are graduating. 3.5 IEPs are developed based on each student’s unique needs and relevant progress monitoring data that clearly documents student growth. 3.6 IEPs are implemented at a high level of fidelity.

Core Element 4: Problem-Solving for Improvement 4.1 LEA collects and analyzes data to problem-solve and develop improvement strategies for any student not meeting IEP goals. 4.2 LEA collects and analyzes disaggregated data about groups of students with disabilities to establish priorities for improvement. 4.3 LEA collects and analyzes aggregated data about students with disabilities to establish priorities for improvement. 4.4 LEA uses data analysis and identified priorities for decision-making and continuous improvement of LEA EC Program at least annually.

Core Element 5: Research-based Instruction and Practices 5.1 LEA has a clear data-driven procedure for identifying needed research-based initiatives, practices, and/or instructional methods to ensure students’ mastery of common core and essential standards. 5.2 LEA develops effective implementation plans to support improved outcomes for SWD. 5.3 LEA purposefully carries out implementation plans, monitoring progress and making adjustments to improve outcomes. 5.4 LEA implementation plan includes strategies that support improvement, sustainability, and actively build capacity over time

Core Element 6: Communication and Collaboration 6.1 LEA has effective vertical and horizontal communication processes in place to support policy and practice. 6.2 LEA facilitates meaningful parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities (e.g., rights and procedural safeguards, specific disability information, instructional practices, etc.). 6.3 LEA partners with community stakeholders (including preschool, mental health, etc.) to enhance service provision to students and families 6.4 LEA collaborates with SEA to support program and initiative improvement

Summary & Analysis Identify problems in Academics, Behavior, Engagement LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process LEA with DPI TA

Analysis Identifying Priorities: After the data has been thoroughly reviewed and some possible areas for improvement have been identified, the next step is prioritizing areas for improvement. Consider not only needs, but also strengths that can be built upon.

LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process LEA with DPI TA Improvement Plan Select from Package of Interventions Plan for implementation in an MTSS framework Identify outcome measures

Improvement Plan Connected to or embedded in LEA Strategic Plan Problem statement (what, when, where, who, why) Goal and actions/interventions Person/position responsible Timeline for completion Method for measuring fidelity Method for measuring the effectiveness Documentation of the outcome(s) and next steps

Talk Together In your role, how might you contribute to your LEA’s improvement work?

Improvement plans drive strategic ECD support & PD LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process

LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process Implementation of Full Continuum of Support For Students AND Teachers Strategies/Interventions Fidelity Measures Data for monitoring implementation

LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process Evaluation Examine outcome and implementation data LEA with DPI TA

Indicator Data Profile Compliance (Policy & Fiscal) Practice Profile Summary & Analysis Identify problems in Academics, Behavior, Engagement Improvement plans drive strategic ECD support & PD LEA Self- Assessment & Improvement Process DPI LEA with DPI TA Research-Based Instruction & Communication & Collaboration LEA with DPI TA LEA Improvement Plan Select from Package of Interventions Plan for implementation in an MTSS framework Identify outcome measures Evaluation Examine outcome and implementation data Implementation of Full Continuum of Support For Students AND Teachers Strategies/Interventions Fidelity Measures Data for monitoring implementation LEA with DPI TA Problem-Solving for Improvement IEP Development & Implementation Data Collection