Executive Summary Adopted April 15, 2013 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Gainesville-Hall MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update Public Information Meeting June 29, 2006.
UATS Director’s Workshop Agenda April 30, 2001  Introduction (12:30 – 12:35)  Development Review and Mitigation (12:35 – 2:10) Break (2:10 – 2:15) 
VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Spokane Transportation Planning Partnerships August 23, 2013.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Talking Freight Seminars November 19, 2008 Caroline A. Mays, AICP Atlanta Regional Commission Integrating Freight and Land Use in the Atlanta Region.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN CRTPA Board September 20, 2010.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Comprehensive Plan Planning for the Future of East Bethel City Council / Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing – March 8, 2006.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal 2004 Review and Progress Report.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
What is the state of transportation in the Middle Tennessee area?
Regional Roads Committee
Transportation Forum for Northern Virginia’s Elected Leaders April 23, 2018 Presented by: Monica Backmon, Executive Director.
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
Presentation transcript:

Executive Summary Adopted April 15, Long Range Transportation Plan

The George Washington Region includes the City of Fredericksburg and the counties of Caroline, King George, Spotsylvania and Stafford The FAMPO urbanized area includes the City of Fredericksburg and the counties of Spotsylvania and Stafford FAMPO is governed by a Policy Committee which consists of eleven elected and non-elected voting members Non-voting members include: Caroline and King George counties Federal Highway Administration Virginia Department of Rail & Public Transportation Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board Member Transportation issues exist already and will worsen in the future unless addressed appropriately 1 The Current Situation Existing Congested Corridors

Long Range Transportation Plan Overview Plan is an update to the 2035 Plan, which made major changes to regional transportation planning Plan addresses the region’s future transportation system for all modes of transportation Highways Bicycle & Pedestrians Transit & Transportation Demand Management Freight Aviation Plan is comprised of two parts: Needs (not constrained by revenues) Constrained (constrained by forecasted revenues) Regional dialogue is needed to address the constrained plan’s financing assumptions Plan is a significant policy document for the region George Washington Region 2

Historic Growth and Development Region has a population of more than 327,000 Region is the fastest-growing in Virginia Over 400% increase in region’s population since 1970 Growth in Spotsylvania and Stafford counties 70% of all recent residential development 75% of all recent commercial development Recent growth has created opportunities and challenges More services Increase in home values More jobs More traffic and congestion Increased air pollution Environmental impacts 3 Existing Population Density

Region is forecasted to grow to approximately 617,000 persons by 2040 Region will remain the fastest growing in Virginia Future growth is likely to be low density and largely suburban with pockets of density identified in local comprehensive plans Opportunities will include: Auto-orientation will remain Property values are likely to increase More jobs will come to the region Challenges will become more acute to include: Public transportation choices will be be limited Transportation funding challenges will increase Congestion will increase Mobility will decrease Auto-orientation will increase Future Growth and Development Population Density

Regional Land Use Scenario Planning Study initiated in 2009 Purpose was to explore and debate local and regional growth visions, trade-offs and alternative futures Five growth scenarios examined 1. Decentralized Growth 2. Green Print 3. Compact Center & Corridors 4. Jobs/Housing Balance 5. Comprehensive Plans Comprehensive Plans Scenario used as inputs to the FAMPO travel demand model to develop the Plan Land Use and Transportation Future Land Use Assumptions 5

The Commonwealth of Virginia encourages land use consideration in transportation planning Federal Law (MAP-21) allows multiple land use scenarios to be considered in MPO long range plans Land use decisions are and will be controlled by local governments, while FAMPO has developed an advisory scenario planning model that is integrated into its long range planning process This modeling capability allows the region and/or local governments to explore the implications which different land use patterns and transportation investment strategies have on the region as a whole or on individual localities Example models developed could show potential decreases in highway needs, depending on land use policies adopted by local governments Data, models and other tools will continue to be available to local governments for their use in local planning efforts Land Use and Transportation 6

Region faces significant increases in travel demand over the next 27 years Without improvements to the transportation system: Congestion will increase on the region’s most important transportation corridors People’s mobility will be reduced Region’s Economic competitiveness may decrease Current funding levels are not forecasted to be sufficient to cover future transportation need s 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Congestion Levels With No Highway Improvements

Plan is not fiscally constrained Five needs plans were developed for both urban and rural areas 1. Highway Needs Plan 2. Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan 3. Transit and Transportation Demand Management Plan 4. Freight Plan 5. Aviation Plan Regional Needs Plan 8

Major routes and facilities will struggle to meet travelers’ demand Interchanges with I-95 Major corridors such as I-95, US 1, US 17, Route 208, Route 630, Route 610, and others Many bridges will need rehabilitation and/or replacement Highway Plan mitigates the majority of regional traffic congestion and other transportation issues Carries a significant cost of $12.4 million which includes $327 million of bicycle and pedestrian needs Highway Needs Regional Highway Needs Plan 9

Closely coordinated with the Highway Plan Would increase people’s non-vehicular mobility Would close gaps in the existing network Would create a complete system of sidewalks, bikeways, trails and other facilities Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs Plan 10

Focused on two different transit markets Regional market (George Washington Region) Commuter market (I-95 Corridor) Increased FREDericksburg Regional Transit services in the region Increased commuter services in the I-95 corridor Virginia Railway Express services increased and service extended to Spotsylvania County Express bus service to Washington DC and the Pentagon/Crystal City Park and ride lots capacity increased Transit centers created to support park and ride lots Current Transportation Demand Management programs augmented Vanpool and rideshare People’s mobility will increase, but outside the I-95 corridor, congestion will not be significantly impacted Over, the Plan represents a significant expenditure of $1.5 million Transit and Transportation Demand Management Needs Transit and Transportation Demand Management Needs Plan 11

Resulting congestion if all highway projects are built in the Needs Plan Still some congestion on I-95 and on primary and secondary routes in the urbanized area Very little congestion in the rural area Forecasted Needs Plan Outcomes 12

Recommended improvements are revenue constrained Extent of projects is limited Many of the region’s highways will remain congested Fewer bicycle and pedestrian projects will be implemented Less transit service and fewer Transportation Demand Management programs will be operated Financially Constrained Plan TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY Transportation Needs AreaCosts Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian$10,781,338,000 Non-Urban Highway/Bicycle and Pedestrian$1,428,199,000 Subtotal Highway/Bicycle and Pedestrian$12,209,537,000 Transit/Transportation Demand Management Operations$608,800,000 Transit/Transportation Demand Management Capital$896,900,000 Subtotal Transit/Transportation Demand Management Needs$1,505,700, Total Transportation Needs$13,715,237,000 Transportation Revenues AreaRevenue Forecast Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian$1,202,411,000 I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes$2,119,555,000 Non-Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian$250,000,000 Subtotal Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian Revenues$3,571,966,000 Transit/Transportation Demand Management Operations$247,990,000 Transit/Transportation Demand Management Capital$80,948,000 Subtotal Transit/Transportation Demand Management Revenues $328,938, Total Transportation Revenues$3,900,904,000 Transportation Funding Summary Total Needs$13,715,237,000 Total Revenues$3,900,904,000 Funding Shortfall$9,814,333,000 Note: *Costs are inflated at 3% annually to the needed year of implementation 13

Project identified based on fiscal constraint and prioritization Prioritization Methodology adopted by the FAMPO Policy Committee Ranks projects based on the following factors: Current and Future Congestion Safety and Security Environmental Impact Public and Community Support Ease of Implementation and Funding Economic Growth and Efficient Land Use Approximately $3.3 billion available for projects which includes $2.1 million for HOT/HOV lanes projects Constrained Highway and Bicycle & Pedestrian Plans 14

Address congestion and mobility in a limited area Considerable investment in transportation regionally $138.6 million reserved for smaller-scale projects Fully-funded high profile projects: I-95 Express Lanes Reconstruction/relocation of I-95/Route 630 Replacement of Falmouth Bridge on US 1 Completion of Fall Hill Avenue Improvements Extension of Mary Washington Boulevard Widening of US 17 in Spotsylvania and Stafford counties Improvements to Onville Road Significant Projects for Engineering and Studies I-95 Rappahannock River Crossing I-95 Improvements in the Jackson Gateway area of Spotsylvania County Improvements to Lafayette Boulevard Widening of US 1 (region-wide) Improvements to Gordon Road Constrained Highway and Bicycle & Pedestrian Plans 15

Resulting highway congestion if all projects in the Constrained Plan are built Still significant congestion on I-95, US 1, US17, as well as a number of primary and secondary routes throughout the region Forecasted Constrained Highway Plan Outcomes 16

Virginia Railway Express Extension of service to Spotsylvania County FREDericksburg Regional Transit Due to financial constraints, FREDericksburg Regional Transit remains constant Park and Ride Lot Expansion Consolidation of park and ride lots with expansions to remaining lots 4,000 new parking spaces created Transportation Demand Management Improvements Capital assistance for vanpools Increased guaranteed ride home program Carpool and vanpool incentives for riders and drivers Marketing initiatives Forecasted Constrained Transit and Transportation Demand Management Outcomes 17

The best decisions are made with a fully-informed and involved public, and your opinion makes a difference on vital transportation and planning issues in the region. There are many ways that you can get involved and make a difference. It all depends on your time and interest! Get Involved 18 Join our mailing list by sending an to fampo.gwregion.org Come to the FAMPO Committee meetings. Visit us on: Website: Facebook: Twitter: Give us your comments during the public comment periods Attend the public information meetings Attend the public hearings Send a letter via USPS: 406 Princess Anne Street, Fredericksburg, VA Give us a phone call: Send us a fax: GWRC/FAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Statement “The George Washington Regional Commission and the Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization fully comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. For more information or to obtain a Discrimination Complaint Form, please visit or or call (540) Para información en español, llame al (540) ” 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan