Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers & slides at www.scottaaronson.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum Money Scott Aaronson (MIT) Based partly on joint work with Ed Farhi, David Gosset, Avinatan Hassidim, Jon Kelner, Andy Lutomirski, and Peter Shor.
Advertisements

BosonSampling Scott Aaronson (MIT) Talk at BBN, October 30, 2013.
Quantum Copy-Protection and Quantum Money Scott Aaronson (MIT) | | | Any humor in this talk is completely unintentional.
Quantum Software Copy-Protection Scott Aaronson (MIT) |
Hawking Quantum Wares at the Classical Complexity Bazaar Scott Aaronson (MIT)
An Invitation to Quantum Complexity Theory The Study of What We Cant Do With Computers We Dont Have Scott Aaronson (MIT) QIP08, New Delhi BQP NP- complete.
New Evidence That Quantum Mechanics Is Hard to Simulate on Classical Computers Scott Aaronson Parts based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov MIT vs.
Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Bosons
New Computational Insights from Quantum Optics Scott Aaronson.
New Evidence That Quantum Mechanics Is Hard to Simulate on Classical Computers Scott Aaronson (MIT) Joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
Solving Hard Problems With Light Scott Aaronson (Assoc. Prof., EECS) Joint work with Alex Arkhipov vs.
The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics Scott Aaronson (MIT) Joint work with Alex Arkhipov vs.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable
Scott Aaronson (MIT) The Limits of Computation: Quantum Computers and Beyond.
New Computational Insights from Quantum Optics Scott Aaronson Based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
Quantum Money from Hidden Subspaces Scott Aaronson and Paul Christiano.
Space complexity [AB 4]. 2 Input/Work/Output TM Output.

When Exactly Do Quantum Computers Provide A Speedup?
Scott Aaronson (MIT) Forrelation A problem admitting enormous quantum speedup, which I and others have studied under various names over the years, which.
When Exactly Do Quantum Computers Provide A Speedup? Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers & slides at
Exploring the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers & slides at
CNS2009handout 21 :: quantum cryptography1 ELEC5616 computer and network security matt barrie
Princeton University COS 433 Cryptography Fall 2005 Boaz Barak COS 433: Cryptography Princeton University Fall 2005 Boaz Barak Lecture 12: Idiot’s Guide.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson MIT.
Space complexity [AB 4]. 2 Input/Work/Output TM Output.
Dominique Unruh 3 September 2012 Quantum Cryptography Dominique Unruh.
Exploring the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Research Directions I Like In Complexity and Physics Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers and slides at
Exploring the Limits of the Efficiently Computable (Or: Assorted things I’ve worked on, prioritizing variety over intellectual coherence) Scott Aaronson.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT)
Quantum Information Jan Guzowski. Universal Quantum Computers are Only Years Away From David’s Deutsch weblog: „For a long time my standard answer to.
Exploring the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Research Directions in Computational Complexity and Physics That I Find Exciting Scott Aaronson (MIT)
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson MIT.
Quantum Algorithms & Complexity
CS555Topic 251 Cryptography CS 555 Topic 25: Quantum Crpytography.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson MIT.
Nawaf M Albadia
Quantum computing, teleportation, cryptography Computing Teleportation Cryptography.
Can computer science help physicists resolve the firewall paradox?
Scott Aaronson (MIT) ThinkQ conference, IBM, Dec. 2, 2015 The Largest Possible Quantum Speedups H H H H H H f |0  g H H H.
Barriers in Quantum Computing (And How to Smash Them Through Closer Interactions Between Classical and Quantum CS) Day Classical complexity theorists,
Forrelation: A Problem that Optimally Separates Quantum from Classical Computing.
Verification of BosonSampling Devices Scott Aaronson (MIT) Talk at Simons Institute, February 28, 2014.
The Kind of Stuff I Think About Scott Aaronson (MIT) LIDS Lunch, October 29, 2013 Abridged version of plenary talk at NIPS’2012.
An Introduction to Quantum Computation Sandy Irani Department of Computer Science University of California, Irvine.
Black Holes, Firewalls, and the Complexity of States and Unitaries Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers and slides at
Scott Aaronson (MIT  UT Austin) Aspen Center for Physics, March 25, 2016 Joint work with Lijie Chen Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy.
Scott Aaronson (MIT  UT Austin) Strachey Lecture, Oxford University May 24, 2016 Quantum Supremacy.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT  UT Austin) NYSC, West Virginia, June 24, 2016.
Scott Aaronson (MIT) April 30, 2014
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
Scott Aaronson (MIT) QIP08, New Delhi
Bio Scott Aaronson is David J. Bruton Centennial Professor of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin.  He received his bachelor's from Cornell.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable
Three Questions About Quantum Computing
Scott Aaronson (MIT) Talk at SITP, February 21, 2014
Based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
Black Holes, Firewalls, and the Limits of Quantum Computers
Three Questions About Quantum Computing
BosonSampling Scott Aaronson (University of Texas, Austin)
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) Lakeway Men’s Breakfast Club April 19, 2017
Quantum Computing and the Quest for Quantum Computational Supremacy
Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) Bazaarvoice May 24, 2017
Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) Papers and slides at
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers & slides at

A quantum superposition involving n particles can require ~2 n complex numbers to specify: Quantum Computing Presents an obvious practical problem when using conventional computers to simulate quantum mechanics Feynman 1981: So then why not turn things around, and build computers that themselves exploit superpositions? Could such a machine get any advantage over a classical computer with a random number generator? If so, it would have to come from interference

Applications of Quantum Computing: Proving it’s possible at all! Quantum simulation Breaking public-key cryptography Adiabatic optimization?? Machine learning?? NP NP-complete P Factoring BQP

Suppose we just want to demonstrate “quantum supremacy” (i.e., a quantum system that’s hard to simulate classically)— that’s all BosonSampling Our proposal: Identical single photons sent through network of interferometers, then measured at output modes A.-Arkhipov 2011, Bremner-Jozsa-Shepherd 2011: In that case, we can plausibly improve both the hardware requirements and the evidence for classical hardness, compared to Shor’s factoring algorithm We showed: if a fast, classical exact simulation of BosonSampling is possible, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the third level. Experimental demonstration has now been achieved with 6 photons (by O’Brien group in Bristol)!

Quantum Money Idea: Quantum states that can be created by a bank, traded as currency, and verified as legitimate, but can’t be cloned by counterfeiters, because of quantum mechanics’ No-Cloning Theorem A.-Christiano 2012: First quantum money scheme where anyone can verify a bill, and whose security is based on a “conventional” crypto assumption Wiesner ca. 1970: First quantum money scheme, but only the bank could verify the bills. If anyone can verify a bill, then computational assumptions clearly needed, in addition to QM

A Few Other Things I’ve Worked On The limitations of quantum computers (e.g., for finding collisions in hash functions); the possibility of quantum-secure cryptography What’s the largest possible quantum speedup? (The Forrelation and k-fold Forrelation problems) Quantum computing and the black-hole information loss problem

Some Future Directions The need for structure in quantum speedups Quantum copy-protected software Noisy BosonSampling (in dialogue with experimentalists) Rise and fall of complexity in thermodynamic systems