Working Together 2013- has been modified by Working Together 2015 Regulation 5 of the Local Safeguarding Children Boards Regulations 2006 sets out the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faculty of Health & Social Care Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews Wendy Rose and Julie Barnes.
Advertisements

Child Death Review Process
Representing Central Government in the South East Monday, 27 April 2015 Vivien Lines DCSF Safeguarding Adviser VCS Safeguarding Seminar 17 December 2009.
Serious Case Reviews – key recommendations Clare Kershaw Lead Strategic Commissioner – Standards and Excellence.
Learning from Serious Case Reviews Child B.
The governing body's role in Safeguarding Children
What can we learn? -Analysing child deaths and serious injury through abuse and neglect A summary of the biennial analysis of SCRs Brandon et al.
Supporting Children, Supporting Parents: A North Wales Multi- agency Protocol.
Safeguarding children in Essex- making a difference together
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
The role of the NYSCB. a)to coordinate what is done by each person or body represented on the Board for the purposes of safeguarding and promoting the.
SERIOUS CASE REVIEW PROCEDURE NICKY BROWNJOHN DESIGNATED NURSE FOR SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN SEPTEMBER 2009.
Responding to Domestic Abuse
Safeguarding Adults The Care Act 2014 Jo Wilkins Team Manager, Safeguarding Adults Team Reading Borough Council.
Safeguarding Awareness LSCB Training and Development Officer
Safeguarding in Education. Safeguarding Board – what we do Ensure effective interagency arrangements to protect children and young people To undertake.
Cambridgeshire Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) and Schools in Cambridgeshire Josie Collier – LSCB Business Manager Sally.
Overview of MASH MASH training. What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information)
Welcome. Suspicion, Disclosure and Discovery Helen Edwards Independent Safeguarding Advisor.
Safeguarding Young People Barbara Williams Independent Chair of North Tyneside Local Safeguarding Children board.
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
Last Time – Duty of Care What are the consequences of unsatisfactory duty of care? List one key point of your complaints procedure, share this with another.
Child Sexual Exploitation National Context Safeguarding Children And Young People from Sexual Exploitation, DCSF, 2009 Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation.
Slough Children’s Service Safeguarding Peer Review.
Assessment Improvement Maureen McEnaney Safeguarding & Review Manager Every Child Matters.
Legislation and Working Practices. AIM: To understand the importance of policy and legislation To identify & summarise Key legislation To examine policies.
Presentation for Age Cymru ADULT PRACTICE REVIEWS Mick Collins
Surrey Wide CCG Safeguarding Children Team Surrey Wide CCG Safeguarding Children Team Safeguarding Children & Young People Learning from Serious Case Reviews.
“One Workforce: A Better Future for Children and Young People in Bromley.” Contact us: Bromley Children & Young People Partnership c/o Civic Centre (Room.
Investigation and case planning Your responsibilities under the Children Act 1989 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 9.
Serious Case Review Learning Workshop February 2015.
Senior Management Team : Children’s Safeguarding and Child Protection Briefing This briefing will cover: What is safeguarding and child protection Policy.
Serious Case Reviews Local Lessons & Actions
Scrutiny Panel Serious Case Review Group Activity and outcomes April September 2014 Keith Ibbetson Independent Chair SCR Group.
Case Reviews With thanks to Stuart Smith, CAIU Essex Police.
Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley.
Safeguarding Tutorial The Manchester College 1. Aim of session: To raise awareness of Safeguarding Objectives: By the end of the session you will be able.
Safeguarding Children Marie-Noelle Orzel Director of Nursing & Patient Care Executive Lead for Children.
Bromley Children’s Safeguarding Board Partnership Launch Partnership Working in Bromley Mark Thorn Head of Children’s Social Care Referral & Assessment.
Role of NHS England in protecting and maintaining patient/service user dignity Arden, Herefordshire & Worcestershire Area Team.
Care Act Adult Safeguarding Michelle Jenkins – Head of Safeguarding (Adults)
Safeguarding Update for Schools Autumn Term 2013 Cathryn Adams Lead Commissioner for Children in Care and Safeguarding Standards & Excellence Service.
November 2015 Learning and Improvement SCR HN13. Background Child H was 4 months old when she died. The cause of her death is unknown but she had sustained.
Government Office for London Managing Allegations 12 th June 2008.
Prepared by: Hannah Hogg NSCB Development Manager July 2014 Learning and Improvement No. 1 – EN12.
Prepared by: Hannah Hogg NSCB Development Manager August 2014 Learning and Improvement No. 2 – GN13.
The inspection of arrangements for the protection of children and young people Ofsted unannounced inspections from May 2012.
Multi-Agency Case File Audits (MACFA) Learning Briefing Nicki Pettitt, Independent MACFA Auditor 18 th September 2015.
Pre mobile infants Compilation of themes arising from recent SCR and Management Reviews.
HSCB Inter-agency Child Protection Safeguarding Children Procedures Brenda McLaughlin Head of Child Protection.
Sandwell Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report 2015 Presentation to Council January 12 th 2016 John Harris – Independent Chair.
Learning from Serious Case Reviews Kate McKenna Associate (SDSA) Anne Partington Nottingham City Safeguarding Children Board Steve Baumber Nottinghamshire.
Network Name Celebrating Good Practice Louise Burton & Jane Bhatti Safeguarding Health Practitioners 24 January 2012.
Solihull Safeguarding Learning Faculty Wednesday 4 November Sans Souci Joan McHugh- Development Manager SSAB Denise Lewis- Training and Development Officer.
Safeguarding Adults Lincolnshire County Council April 2010.
Isle of Wight Local Safeguarding Children Board Development Day 17 June 2010.
The role of the NYSCB.
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Wirral Safeguarding Children Board Learning from Case Reviews
Serious Case Review Briefing Child G1
Cardiff Partnership Board
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
2 Serious Case Reviews Child D aged 2 weeks March 2013 – March 2015
1 November 2017 Serious Case Reviews
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Update from the Boards and Community Safety Partnership
Cardiff Partnership Board
Doncaster Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report
Update from the Boards and Community Safety Partnership
Update from the Boards and Community Safety Partnership
Presentation transcript:

Working Together has been modified by Working Together 2015 Regulation 5 of the Local Safeguarding Children Boards Regulations 2006 sets out the functions of LSCBs. This includes the requirement for LSCBs to undertake reviews of serious cases in specified circumstances. Regulation 5(1) (e) and (2) set out an LSCB’s function in relation to serious case reviews, namely: – 5 (1) (e) undertaking reviews of serious cases and advising the authority and their Board partners on lessons to be learned. – (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1) (e) a serious case is one where: – (a) abuse or neglect of a child is known or suspected; and – (b) either — (i) the child has died; or (ii) the child has been seriously harmed and there is cause for concern as to the way in which the authority, their Board partners or other relevant persons have worked together to safeguard the child.

Working Together 2015 SCRs and other case reviews should be conducted in a way which: – recognises the complex circumstances in which professionals work together to safeguard children; – seeks to understand precisely who did what and the underlying reasons that led individuals and organisations to act as they did; – seeks to understand practice from the viewpoint of the individuals and organisations involved at the time rather than using hindsight; – is transparent about the way data is collected and analysed; and – makes use of of relevant research and case evidence to inform the findings.

Serious Case Reviews in Northamptonshire since SCRs undertaken and completed in relation to babies who died aged less than 2 months, 1 of natural causes and 1 from injuries. Publication was delayed for inquest and criminal proceedings to be concluded. Both now published and on NSCB website SCRs initiated in respect of 3 children all under the age of 2 years. 3 of the children died, 1 was seriously injured. 3 of the SCRs have concluded. Fourth [current] in respect of 6 week old baby who was subject to CP plan for neglect, cause of death unascertained SCRs commenced 1 in respect of 5 week old baby who suffered life threatening head injuries. Case also subject to criminal proceedings. Not previously known to CSC but known to adult mental health [current]. 1 SCR being conducted in respect of a baby who died as a result of injuries. Not previously known to CSC but parent known to adult mental health services. This is being conducted with another authority as services were provided across borders.

relating to death of an infant following dog attack- focus on “ hazards identified by universal services relating to death of an infant where safe sleeping and co sleeping identified as an issue. (sofas) In addition a multi- agency review is being conducted in relation to a child who had unexplained bruising and trauma to head. Current SCRs being undertaken by Northamptonshire NSCB

Cases Considered in 2014 which did not meet SCR Criteria but needed Multi- Agency Review 2 referrals relating to dog bites -Case Mapping Exercises held and reported to NSCB A Scoping exercise was conducted in relation to 6 babies, under the age of 4 months who had sustained injuries, 4 had serious injuries, including to the head

Findings Lack of analysis of historical information Lack of robust planning and ineffective communication within and between agencies Lack of recognition of the vulnerabilities of babies or of young mothers Sleeping arrangements not seen or discussed Little, if any, evidence of the child’s voice – i.e. What was it like to be a child in that family? Lack of assessment of fathers or recognition of the role they play in the family – even if “absent” Disguised compliance and focus on adult needs Assumptions about professionals’ roles made and not challenged Lack of risk assessment of “family” members Child Protection plans not SMART

Actions Taken Self harm pathway revised –particular focus on young people who are about to be young adults Leaving care protocol revised Recognition of and response to reported sexual abuse included in training programmes Pre-birth assessment protocol revised and re-launched 2014 Use of CAF addressed Individual agency action plans reported to and monitored by NSCB Varied approach to dissemination of SCR recommendations taken, including training, newsletter and practitioner briefings. Promotion of safe sleeping

NSCB Contact Details: Telephone number: address: Website: