February 2015 An introduction to the switch from trivalent to bivalent oral polio vaccines 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan
Advertisements

New Technologies for Tuberculosis Control: Programme Perspective Draft Definitions Retooling Task Force Meeting Geneva, Switzerland January 2008.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
Immunization Services DR. KANUPRIYA CHATURVEDI DR.S.K. CHATURVEDI.
CARICOM. Ninth EDF Project Caribbean Integration Support Programme (CISP ) Statistics Component 34th MEETING OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF CARIBBEAN STATISTICIANS.
Managing Sharps Waste In Cambodia SIGN Meeting, 25 October 2002 Cambodiana Hotel, Phnom Penh Dr. Chea Kim Ly, Deputy Director National Immunization Program.
Module 1 Introduction to the polio endgame rationale and IPV vaccine
IPV IPV Rapidly produces high level of protective antibodies No risk of vaccine associated illness No interference from other enteroviruses. I.P.V. produces.
NATIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING FORTHE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Product Recall and the Supply Chain: ISO Best Practices Robert Pollock Chair, US Technical Advisory Group for ISO.
Inventory Management: Distribution, ICS, LMIS Nairobi, 21 February, 2006 Yasmin Chandani HIV/AIDS Technical Coordinator.
Supporting Routine AND Supplementary Immunization Activities in STOP.
WHO RAP Team: Perspective and Update WORKSHOP ON ANALYZING THE POLIO ERADICATION ENDGAME, Seattle, 1-2 July 2015.
Global Polio Eradication Initiative Surveillance, Operation and Monitoring Vaccine Procurement, Communication and Social Mobilization Advocacy, Funding.
Completing The Endgame Global Polio Eradication
Measles Partnership Meeting Yalda Momeni September 23 rd - WDC.
The Evolving 'Polio Endgame' Strategy
Conclusions & Recommendations 24 th IEAG March 2012.
Polio Update Pre Tender Meeting 11 th December 2008 UNICEF Supply Division.
Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan Dr. Ajay Khera Deputy Commissioner Ministry of Health & FW, Government of India.
Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes
Polio End-game: What are the implications on polio vaccination policy? Dr Raju Shah.
The Challenge: How to Accelerate Eradication and the 'Endgame'?
Delaware Health Benefit Exchange (HBE) Project Update Delaware Health Care Commission Meeting: March 28, 2013.
Outline Background Objectives and activities GPEI assets
January 2005 Polio Eradication Initiative NVAC Meeting February Polio Eradication: Global Progress and Post-Eradication Strategies.
DRAFT V1 National Vaccine Supply Chain Innovations: Country Commitment to Ownership, Sustainability & Impact GAVI Partners’ Forum WHO – UNICEF – GAVI -
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Progress of Polio Eradication in India, Current Risks & Actions taken on last IEAG report 24 th IEAG, New Delhi 15 March 2012 Dr. Ajay Khera Deputy Commissioner.
1 |1 | Countries using and planning to introduce IPV and the global status of bOPV registration Countries using and planning to introduce IPV and the global.
Polio Eradication and End Game Strategy
JAHSR TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING EPI Report Dr Dafrossa C Lyimo Programme Manager 7th September 2010 Dar es salaam.
Sustaining Polio Eradication IEAG March 2012 The experience of polio-free countries with importations of WPV: Implications for India.
Polio Eradication -- Global Progress and Development of Post-Eradication Strategies: Implications for U.S. Stockpile and Outbreak Response Preparations.
AMC Governance and Institutional Support. Objectives Build on existing capacity Ensure appropriate independence and credibility through transparency,
Withdrawal of OPV type 2 in India
Polio Endgame Strategy in India Considerations and Way Forward WHO-India, NPSP 15 March 2012.
1 Polio Strategic Plan India Expert Advisory Group July 2011 Impact & prospects at the half-way point.
Polio Eradication Update, Challenges & Risks World Health Organization 15 March 2012.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Global Polio Eradication Initiative The 'Intensified Effort' 18 May 2008.
Mid-Decade Assessment of the United Nations 2010 World Population and Housing Census Program Arona L. Pistiner Office of the Associate Director for 2020.
Sudan EPI Benefits From Polio Eradication Program M&RI Annual Partners Meetings Washington D.C September 2015 Sudan EPI Benefits From Polio Eradication.
Polio Research Activities in India Dr Sunil Bahl WHO-India, NPSP 15 March 2012.
ECDC role in public health crisis --- ECDC public health event operation plan Preparedness and response unit Improved co-ordination and support to response.
NVAC The Global Certification Commission declares the world polio-free when: No wild poliovirus has been found for at least 3 consecutive years.
National Immunization Program (NIP)/Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Report Stephen L. Cochi, MD, MPH Acting Director, National Immunization.
How computerized immunization information systems can improve Vaccine Stock Management WHO EURO lessons learned Using information and communication technology.
Module 1 Introduction to the polio endgame rationale and IPV vaccine
Polio and Polio Vaccine Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine- Preventable Diseases National Immunization Program Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
IPV ACCEPTABILITY PANCONF 2015 Background/ Why the study? Dr Beckie Tagbo Chief Consultant: Paediatrics and Child Health Institute of Child Health (ICH),
Perspective and Update
Introduction to the polio endgame rationale and IPV vaccine
The next phase of polio eradication and the vaccines used
Immunization Systems Management Group (IMG)
Immunization Systems Management Group (IMG)
The next phase of polio eradication and the vaccines used
POLIOPLUS FACT SHEET Feb 2018
The Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan
Communicating with caregivers about IPV and multiple injections
المرحلة القادمة من القضاء على شلل الأطفال واللقاحات المستخدمة
Independent Monitoring of the Switch
World Health Organization
The next phase of polio eradication and the vaccines used
Emergency Supply Chain Response Quick Guide
The next phase of polio eradication and the vaccines used
Preparing for the Switch
YELLOW FEVER VACCINE AVAILABILITY AND NEEDS FOR THE AFRICAN REGION
Polio Eradication Progress & Challenges.
The next phase of polio eradication and the vaccines used
Presentation transcript:

February 2015 An introduction to the switch from trivalent to bivalent oral polio vaccines 1

Contents 1.Rationale for OPV withdrawal 2.Timelines for switching from tOPV to bOPV 3.Programmatic implications of the switch 2

Children paralyzed by polio 3 Type 2 polio eradicated (WPV)

Vaccine-derived polio outbreaks (circulating VDPVs) Type 2 (478 cases) Type 1 (79 cases) Type 3 (9 cases) Type 2 Type 1 Type 3

World Health Assembly resolution 65.5 “Declares polio eradication a programmatic emergency for global public health... …“urges the Director General to rapidly finalize a polio endgame plan… “…and inform Member States of the potential timing of a switch from trivalent to bivalent OPV for all routine immunization programmes” (May 2012)

Coming dates for the Endgame Plan 6 May 2015World Health Assembly to consider resolution on the switch December 2015At least 1 dose of IPV introduced into routine immunization programmes in all countries April 2016Withdraw type 2 OPV globally 2020?After all wild polioviruses have been fully eradicated, withdraw all OPVs

Rationale for switching from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV Currently, the risks associated with the type 2 component of tOPV outweigh the benefits Since 1999, type 2 wild poliovirus has not been detected The type 2 component of tOPV: – Causes more than 90% of vaccine-derived polio viruses (VDPVs) – Causes approx. 40% of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) cases – Interferes with the immune response to poliovirus types 1 and 3 in tOPV IPV introduction will help to: – Reduce risks associated with the withdrawal of OPV type 2 – Facilitate interruption of transmission with the use of monovalent OPV type 2 in the case of outbreaks – Hasten eradication by boosting immunity to poliovirus types 1 and 3 7

Contents 1.Rationale for OPV withdrawal 2.Timelines for switching from tOPV to bOPV 3.Programmatic implications of the switch 8

Milestones towards the switch May 2015, World Health Assembly (WHA): Discussion on progress and timelines towards OPV2 withdrawal in April 2016 As proposed by the WHO Executive Board in January 2015, the WHA may consider a resolution calling on member states to implement the switch October 2015, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE): SAGE will review and decide on final risk assessment data to determine if the trigger for OPV2 withdrawal has been met Trigger for OPV2 withdrawal: global absence of cVDPV2s that are known to have been circulating for more than 6 months ("persistent" cVDPV2s) If SAGE confirms that the trigger has been met, GPEI will announce the 2016 switch dates Once the decision to proceed with the switch in 2016 is announced, it is irrevocable. The switch will not be postponed after that date However, if the trigger condition is not met in September 2015, the switch will be reassessed and may be postponed until

General steps for the switch 10 Readiness criteria IPV is introduced in all countries by end 2015 bOPV is licensed for routine immunization Surveillance and response capacity are implemented for WPV2 detection, and a type 2 monovalent OPV stockpile set up Phase 1 containment activities are completed, with appropriate handling of residual type 2 materials WPV2 global eradication is verified Trigger Absence of all ‘persistent’ cVDPV2s globally Synchronized switch Replace tOPV with bOPV globally in a 2-week span No use of tOPV after this period World Health Assembly in May to consider: SAGE in October to consider:

Switch window example: April 2016 in a country 11 week 1 week 2 week 3week 4 Global Validation Day Global switch 2-week window The country selects a ‘National Switch Day’ from this window Global validation 2-week window e.g. National Switch Day: stop tOPV use e.g. National Validation Day: all tOPV disposed disposal and validation 2-week window

Global synchronization and planning To minimize the risk of any type 2 cVDPV re-emergence or outbreaks from the use of tOPV, the switch will need to take place everywhere worldwide within a 2-week period. Implications for tOPV supply planning: tOPV stocks needed for national routine immunization only until March 2016 Countries should coordinate with their relevant supplier to plan around the switch The last in-country distribution of tOPV should take place 4 weeks before the switch date Important to avoid tOPV stock-outs in the weeks before the switch Countries should enhance stock monitoring and management capacity starting in 2015 Implications for bOPV: 3-6 months of supplies of bOPV should be planned for and received in countries from January 2016 onwards New bOPV stocks should be kept at central level, stored separately until distribution Supply may be distributed to vaccination points starting 2 weeks before the national switch date Countries should not switch before the global switch window. 12

Contents 1.Rationale for OPV withdrawal 2.Timelines for switching from tOPV to bOPV 3.Programmatic implications of the switch 13

Mitigating risks before the switch High population immunity is necessary for successful OPV cessation, to help reduce the risks of cVDPV emergence Higher risk countries will conduct tOPV SIAs in Q and Q1 2016, at national and/or subnational level The plan for risk mitigation SIAs was discussed and agreed by SAGE in October 2014.

Requires a complete global replacement of tOPV by bOPV Overall process steps: switch  recall  dispose  validate Switch: tOPV is removed from the (private and public sector) cold chain and replaced with bOPV on the National Switch Date Recall: tOPV is transported to collection points Dispose: tOPV stocks are safely disposed Validate: national and international monitors supervise the process and validate the complete absence of tOPV stock on National Validation Day (2 weeks after National Switch Date) Manufacturers will not supply any more tOPV starting a short period before the switch. 15 Principles of tOPV withdrawal

Country level considerations Planning and management Now: Forecast quantities for supply and procurement of bOPV and tOPV Coordinate with national committees and private sector, for both routine immunization and supplemental campaigns Develop a national operational plan by mid 2015 Regulatory Initiate process for national licensure of bOPV licensure (in countries that require it) Note that bOPV is the same as tOPV for volume, heat sensitivity, VVM, and wastage Implementation, monitoring, logistics, communication Establish a ‘switch support team’ to implement the plan Adapt workplans, communication and training materials to local context and language Update data tools Update information systems to monitor activities at all levels 16

Preparation underway at a global level Involving vaccine manufacturers and national regulatory authorities on bOPV licensure and supply. Consulting on presentations and labelling Developing procurement and distribution strategies to minimize stocks of tOPV while avoiding stockouts prior to the switch date, including with self-procuring countries Developing and disseminating Switch protocol templates, workplans, communication and training materials Seeking endorsement of the switch by WHO member states through an expected World Health Assembly discussion in May 2015 Establishing monitoring systems at all levels to track progress 17

Next steps for switch planning and communications Switch implementation working group (under the IMG) Coordinating planning, preparations, and technical assistance. Communications and training Disseminating information and hosting webinars from Q to inform planning and developing materials for health worker training The Switch Protocol: an implementation guide The Protocol will be published in early 2015 Regional briefings/trainings will help build awareness and capacity Liaison with UNICEF country offices and relevant manufacturers for self- procuring countries vital to implementation and supply strategies Countries will be responsible for monitoring stock levels and adjusting the frequency and/or quantities of tOPV deliveries to minimize risk of excess stocks and stock-outs at country level. Country pilot exercises will help refine preparations, guidance, and information collection systems 18

COMING SOON! OPV technical background, communications and training materials: /endgame_objective2/en/

THANK YOU For more information: 20