Case study the “GEOCOOL” heat pump system in UPV campus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

1 ZonicBook/618EZ-Analyst Resonance Testing & Data Recording.
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment ( )
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
CALENDAR.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt BlendsDigraphsShort.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
Bright Futures Guidelines Priorities and Screening Tables
EIS Bridge Tool and Staging Tables September 1, 2009 Instructor: Way Poteat Slide: 1.
Bellwork Do the following problem on a ½ sheet of paper and turn in.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
VOORBLAD.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Sample Service Screenshots Enterprise Cloud Service 11.3.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
CONTROL VISION Set-up. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 5 Step 4.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
1 Titre de la diapositive SDMO Industries – Training Département MICS KERYS 09- MICS KERYS – WEBSITE.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
Clock will move after 1 minute
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health & Disease Sixth Edition
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Case study the “GEOCOOL” heat pump system in UPV campus José M. Corberán Instituto de Ingeniería Energética Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

GEOCOOL Geothermal Heat Pump for Cooling-and Heating THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME GEOCOOL Geothermal Heat Pump for Cooling-and Heating along European Coastal Areas Project No: NNE5 – 2001 – 00847, July 2002 Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

GEOCOOL Geothermal Heat Pump for Cooling-and Heating THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME GEOCOOL Geothermal Heat Pump for Cooling-and Heating along European Coastal Areas UPV UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE VALENCIA Spain GROHOL GROENHOLLAND Holland CIATESA Compañía Industrial de Aplicaciones Térmicas S.A. Spain AUTH Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Greece ENEA Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, l’Energia e l’Ambiente Italy AEDIE Asociación para la Investigación y la Diagnosis de la Energía Spain Duration: 3 years Feb. 2003 - 2006 Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

GEOCOOL OBJECTIVES To design, construct and demonstrate a GSHP case system in order to produce fair and rigorous data about the: Energy saving potential in comparison to a realistic nowadays alternative system Economic and technical feasibility of GSHP technology in our area Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Ground Source HE main parameters BOREHOLE Configuration: 6 : 2 x 3, rectangle Borehole depth 50 m Borehole spacing 3 m Borehole installation SINGLE-U Borehole diameter 0.14 m U-pipe diameter 0.032 m U-pipe thermal conductivity 0.430 W/m·K(Polyethylene) HEAT CARRIER FLUID: Water HEAT PUMP: IZE70 + R290 (UPV-CIATESA) GROUND(test IN-SITU) Ground thermal conductivity 1.800 W/m·K Volumetric heat capacity 2.4MJ/m3·K Ground surface temperature 18.5 °C Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Hydr. switch Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Ground Source HE Backfilling: sand (course and fine) or sand/bentonite alternative use of spacers Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Ground Source HE Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

GeoCool data acquisition system 44 sensors in the loop (PT100, coriolis mass flowmeters and wattmeters) On site automatic meteorological station w. 22 parameters 1 min sampling during 1 year Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Internal hydraulic group Analysis of data Internal hydraulic group Heat pump system Building Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

GeoCoolizer Instantaneous values Cooling/Heating capacity Absorbed/Transferred capacity from/to the ground Instantaneous COP Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Integrated or averaged values GeoCoolizer Integrated or averaged values Heating and cooling load Total energy absorbed/ transferred from/to the ground - From 7 a.m to 10 p.m - The selected period (one week, all the season…) Electric energy Seasonal Performance Factor (SPF) Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Dynamic behaviour Cooling Mode Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

System performance in heating mode Experimental results System performance in heating mode COP – WW SPF – WW COP – AW SPF - AW SUMMER 3.46 73 % 2.00 Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Total electricity savings Two systems with the same heating load 42 Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Heating mode – Return WT SUMMER Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Energy distribution in heating Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

COP and SPF in cooling mode 4.36 COP – WW SPF – WW COP – AW SPF - AW 60 % 2.72 Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Total electricity savings Two systems with the same cooling load Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Cooling mode - Return WT Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Energy distribution in cooling Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

JANUARY 2005-APRIL 2010

SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

OPTIMUM FLOW RATES: Cooling mode 20% 25% Pump freq. (Hz) Pump freq. (Hz) Both pumps at same speed 40% Pump freq. (Hz) Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

OPTIMUM FLOW RATES: Cooling mode Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

OPTIMUM FLOW RATES: Cooling mode Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

OPTIMUM FLOW RATES: Cooling mode Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

OPTIMUM FLOW RATES: Cooling mode Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

MODELLING WITH TRNSYS Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

TRNSYS MODEL Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

BUILDING THERMAL LOADS: Calculated vs. experiments Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

DAILY TEMPERATURES: Calculated vs. experiments Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán

Conclusions In heating mode, GSHP saves, in terms of primary energy consumption, 41% compared to the air to water roof top system. In cooling mode a 38% saving was obtained. The impact in electricity consumption of the auxiliary elements of the HVAC system was found to be large and should be taken into account to improve overall system efficiency, Capacity adaptation strategies are needed to improve load factor and efficiency of (both) systems. Improved control strategies are being investigated. Seminar: GSHP Systems of High Efficiency – The Ground-Med case study. Madrid, June 23, 2010 José M. Corberán