Santa Rosa District Schools Mr. Lewis Lynn Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
Advertisements

School Grades Model and Historical Background
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
1 Transition to FCAT 2.0, End-of-Course Assessments, and School Accountability and Beyond Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
Test Chairpersons Meeting September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
College and Career Ready Pre K – 12 Public Schools Florida College System State University System 1.
Rule Development Workshop: School Grades Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division of Accountability,
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Student Learning targets
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Top-performing urban school district in Florida State Assessment & Accountability.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Evaluation Update: Proposed Revisions Pilot Evaluation School Board Workshop Tuesday, August 6, 2013.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
Grading and Analysis Report For Clinical Portfolio 1.
Secondary WOLT Grading Committee Recommendations to Support District Benchmarking Initiative.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement School Grade Changes for All Schools in FCAT Writing Standard is set at 3.5. (in rule) Reading performance.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida’s School Grading System Overview and Updates 1.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
Bay District Schools Non-FCAT Tested Decisions.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Mark Howard, Chief Performance Accountability
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Accountability Update
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
DJJ Accountability Rating System
2016 State Assessment Highlights
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Helping your Child Prepare for Testing
Potential Student Measures
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
Student Mobility and Achievement Growth In State Assessment Mohamed Dirir Connecticut Department of Education Paper presented at National Conference.
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability Presentation
Secondary Data Presentation
Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents May 22, 2013
Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents May 22, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Santa Rosa District Schools Mr. Lewis Lynn Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources

Kindergarten- First Grade- Second Grade Reading and Mathematics Discovery Education Assessments and Teacher Evaluation

Discovery Education Assessments Online assessments given to all students - three times during the year. (IEPs/504s honored) Tests A-B-C… Beginning- Middle- End of Year Results are reported as levels and scale scores For evaluation purposes….Test A performance is compared against Test C performance. Three ways a student can “help” the teacher: a.Maintain a level 3 or higher from A to C OR b.Increase a level from A to C OR c.Demonstrate a year’s growth via scale score

Demonstrating a year’s growth Using their most recent results, Discovery provides actual student performance from across the state and nation. Results are broken down by percentiles. Santa Rosa uses 50 th percentile as the required amount of growth to show a gain. Note: Each level has a unique number of required points to show a year’s growth. See Grade Two Mathematics in next slide.

Pre K and ESE Assessments PreK – Class level assessments using –VPK Assessment for Head Start/VPK Items correct converted to percentages, pre/post test comparison, criterion referenced –ESE PreK Using VB Mapp and Brigance IED II (Yellow) Converted to percentages, pre/post, criterion referenced ESE – Using DEA, FCAT, FAA and adding AA K-2 –Alternate Assessment K-2 Students - VB Mapp and Brigance CIBS II (Green), Pre/Post Tests, Criterion Referenced Assessment –School Level Results combined at the Elementary Level for all ESE teachers (due to concerns with assessment results consistency across students/assessments) –6 th - 12 th grade – FCAT and FAA used, class level assessments

ClassificationAssessment Percentage (Must Total 50%)Scale Secondary and Post-Secondary, Career Education Instructors w/Assigned Industry Certification TSA-All Secondary and Post-Secondary, Career Education Instructors not assigned to the classroom Assigned Industry Certification 30% % passing rate of students attempting industry certification % passing rate of students attempting industry certification % passing rate of students attempting industry certification 1-50% or less passing rate of students attempting industry certification FCAT Reading10%4-Positive VAM score minus 1/2 of standard error equals positive number (+,+) 3-Positive VAM minus 1/2 of standard error equals negative number (+,-) OR negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals positive (-,+) 2-Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (top 2/3 of scores) (-,-) 1- Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (lower 1/3 of scores) (-,-) FCAT Writing10%4-80% or Above (3.0) of Students Taking Assessment % Proficiency (3.0) of Students Taking Assessment % Proficiency of Students Taking Assessment 1-Below 60% Proficiency Secondary and Post-Secondary, Career Education Instructors without Assigned Industry Certification FCAT Reading35%4-Positive VAM score minus 1/2 of standard error equals positive number (+,+) 3-Positive VAM minus 1/2 of standard error equals negative number (+,-) OR negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals positive (-,+) 2-Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (top 2/3 of scores) (-,-) 1- Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (lower 1/3 of scores) (-,-) FCAT Writing15% 4-80% or Above (3.0) of Students Taking Assessment % Proficiency (3.0) of Students Taking Assessment % Proficiency of Students Taking Assessment 1-Below 60% Proficiency *All Students within the assigned school are used to Calculate Instructors ’ Scores* Industry Certifications for a program have been aligned to programs based on the Industry Certification Funding List EVALUATING CAREER EDUCATION TEACHERS

ClassificationAssessmentPercentage (Must Total 50%) Scale Adult Basic Education Adult Education Facilitator TABE 40%4-50% or more enrolled students earn an LCP % of enrolled students earn an LCP % of enrolled students earn an LCP 1-29% or less of enrolled students earn an LCP Earn a GED 10%4-50% or more enrolled students earn a GED % of enrolled students earn a GED % of enrolled students earn a GED 1-29% or less of enrolled students earn a GED Drop Out Prevention Science/ABE/ GED/Prep Instructor (1/2 HS/1/2 Adult Ed) FCAT Reading 15%4-Positive VAM score minus 1/2 of standard error equals positive number (+,+) 3-Positive VAM minus 1/2 of standard error equals negative number (+,-) OR negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals positive (-,+) 2-Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (top 2/3 of scores) (-,-) 1- Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (lower 1/3 of scores) (-,-) Biology EOC 10%4-Above 60% proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment % proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment % proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment 1-Below 30% proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment TABE 20%4-50% or more enrolled students earn an LCP % of enrolled students earn an LCP % of enrolled students earn an LCP 1-29% or less of enrolled students earn an LCP Earn a GED 5%4-50% or more enrolled students earn a GED % of enrolled students earn a GED % of enrolled students earn a GED 1-29% or less of enrolled students earn a GED Drop Out Prevention and Adult Education Guidance FCAT Reading FCAT Math 9% 4% 4-Positive VAM score minus 1/2 of standard error equals positive number (+,+) 3-Positive VAM minus 1/2 of standard error equals negative number (+,-) OR negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals positive (-,+) 2-Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (top 2/3 of scores) (-,-) 1- Negative VAM score plus 1/2 of standard error equals negative (lower 1/3 of scores) (-,-) Algebra I Geometry Biology EOCs 4% 4-Above 60% proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment % proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment % proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment 1-Below 30% proficiency (Levels 3,4,5) of students taking the assessment TABE 20%4-50% or more enrolled students earn an LCP % of enrolled students earn an LCP % of enrolled students earn an LCP 1-29% or less of enrolled students earn an LCP Earn a GED 5%4-50% or more enrolled students earn a GED % of enrolled students earn a GED % of enrolled students earn a GED 1-29% or less of enrolled students earn a GED EVALUATING DROP OUT PREVENTION/ADULT EDUCATION TEACHERS *All Students within the assigned school are used to Calculate Instructors ’ Scores*

Challenges 1.Equity – Class level, school level, district level 2.Validity – various criterion assessments used 3.Number of students attached to various assessments and percentages they count 4.VAM and actual impact for special considerations like ESE 5.Defaults and system management

Additional Details - Santa Rosa Process 1.District evaluation committee determines student assessments, percentages and scales used for employee evaluations. 2.Employees are assigned Job Codes and Codes are each aligned with an “evaluation formula”. 3.Student data is compiled, calculated, and applied to the eval. formula for evaluation assessment scores (1,2,3 or 4). 4.If the employee’s student population has no test scores for an assessment then a default is applied. 5. Finance IT staff do the following calculations for each employee: Apply each assessment’s % to assessment result - based on evaluation formula. Apply each job code’s percentage to assessment result - based on hours/day. Compute employee’s overall Evaluation Score (50% of employee’s evaluation) 6.True North Logic (TNL) Imports and Use by Employees ** Details related to system and process available from district upon request

True North Logic Details 1.Imports data into our Professional Growth System (PGS). 2.Compiles and maintains remaining 50% of the employee’s evaluation in PGS. 3.Combines all data and computes overall evaluation score. 4.Presents this data for each employee’s verification/acceptance.

Kindergarten

8 th grade math

MS ESE Alternative Assessment

Tech Center