Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Policy SCE Discussion on the Relationship Between NQC and EFC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Successes in Demand Response
Advertisements

03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
Allowing DSUs to act as Predictable Price Takers in the SEM 4th December, 2014.
Investigating a Higher Renewables Portfolio Standard In California Power Association of California Symposium May 20, 2014 San Francisco, CA Nancy E. Ryan.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
1 R Phase I Resource Adequacy Workshop presentation March 30, am to 5 pm California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Ave.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
What’s Needed for Rational Discussion of Resource Adequacy: A Framework and Some Facts * presented by Kevin Woodruff, Principal, Woodruff Expert Services,
©2012 | Commercial in Confidence | Proprietary to Ventyx, An ABB Company NYISO Real-time Market Presentation to ERCOT METF – April 26, 2012 Confidential.
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO Independent Energy Producers 2011 Annual Meeting - October 5, 2011 Stanford Sierra Conference.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® Page 1 Discussion on CEC’s and SCE’s Forecast Differences Presentation at CEC Preliminary Demand Forecast Workshop July.
Laura Doll Deputy Executive Director, CPUC October 18, 2006 Platt’s CA Power Market Forum C ALIFORNIA P UBLIC U TILITIES C OMMISSION Fulfilling Resource.
Reaching the Next Level of the State’s Environmental Policy Goals Panel: Energy Procurement, Infrastructure and Policy: Climate Challenges Beyond 2020.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Integrated Planning & Environmental Affairs Energy Agencies in California.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Leading the Way in Electricity | Business Customer Division 1 For External Use Economic Development.
Barriers to Energy Storage providing Ancillary Services in ERCOT
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
California ISO – Internal Use Only Flexible Capacity Requirement CPUC RA Workshop March 30, 2012 Mark Rothleder Executive Director Market Analysis and.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
THE MIX: FACTS, FIGURES, AND THE FUTURE INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 William A. Monsen MRW & Associates Oakland, California.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
Utility Procurement: What’s Next? IEP 2015 Annual Conference
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
November 20, 2015 Challenges of Storage Development - Advanced Rail Energy Storage (ARES) Prepared for Bulk Storage Conference, Sacramento November 20,
RiversidePublicUtilities.com Arts & Innovation RiversidePublicUtilities.com MOD GENERATOR TESTING REQUIREMENTS RESOURCE PLANNERS LeeAnne Uhler, Regulatory.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Affairs Demand Response and Local RA Criteria Discussion
Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Storage (ESDER) Initiative California Independent System Operator CAISO – CPUC Energy Storage Workshop May 3, 2016.
Understanding Value of Short-Duration Resources CPUC RA Workshop March 5, 2016.
April 5, 2016 CPUC. JDRP Proposal  Flexible RA Attributes and requirements should be unbundled from the underlying system RA and Local RA attributes.
1 Meredith Younghein Energy Division Local RA Requirements for Demand Response Resources: Staff Proposal.
1 PG&E Proposals for Refinements to the Resource Adequacy (RA) Program Compliance Year 2017 RA Workshop February 18, 2016.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
JOINT WORKSHOP ON MULTIPLE-USE APPLICATIONS. AMS’S 50 MW FLEET FOR SO. CAL EDISON MULTIPLE USE CASE #5: BEHIND- THE-METER DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES.
California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee Oversight Hearing May 10, 2016 Southern California Edison Colin Cushnie Vice President,
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
Shaping Up The Duck Chart Independent Energy Producers Association Annual Meeting Mark Rothleder Vice President, Market Quality and Renewable Integration.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Affairs Net Load Peak ELCC Draft Results / Work.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
The four rules of number
Creating a Clean, Unbreakable Grid
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Min/Max Load field Addition
Enhanced Proxy Demand Resource: ESDER 3 PDR-LSR
Min/Max Load field Addition
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
The Seller’s Webinar will begin promptly at 1:03
GDP and Population up – Emissions Down
Presentation transcript:

Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Policy SCE Discussion on the Relationship Between NQC and EFC February 9, 2015

Group Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Regulatory Policy SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM By Current Design, Effective Flexible Capacity (EFC) is Dependent on Net Qualifying Capacity (NQC) D –Storage and DR resources shall receive an EFC in accordance with the bundling principle, which holds that all Flexible RA resources must also qualify as System RA resources. In other words, storage and DR facilities wishing to qualify for Flexible RA must also be qualified for System RA, and must receive QC values as described previously. Additionally, Pmax RA values for Flexible RA shall be identical to those utilized in determining the resource’s System RA credit, and set according to the rules previously described. –Dispatchable storage shall receive a QC in the same manner as other dispatchable resources, including testing and verification in CAISO operations. Because all RA resources must be able to operate for four or more consecutive hours, the storage operator must submit to the CAISO an output level (in MW) at which the resource is capable of discharging for four or more uninterrupted hours; this is defined to be its Pmax RA, the maximum output that can be considered for RA calculations. 1

Group Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Regulatory Policy SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM By Current Design, Effective Flexible Capacity (EFC) is Dependent on Net Qualifying Capacity (NQC) 2 All categories of resources describe the EFC as it relates to the NQC with one exception Appendix B as adopted in D describes the calculation of Effective Flexible Capacity (EFC) –For storage and DR resources with positive generation only and start-up time < 90 minutes: EFC = Minimum of (NQC) and (Pmin RA + (180 minutes – Start-up Time) * ARR pos ) –For storage and DR facilities with positive generation only and start-up time > 90 minutes: EFC = Minimum of (NQC – Pmin RA ) and (180 minutes * ARR pos ) –For storage or DR resources with negative generation only: EFC = Minimum of (Pdemand min – Pmin RA ) and (180 minutes * ARR neg ), plus the absolute value of Pdemand min iff 180 – (Pdemand min – Pmin RA )/ARR neg ≥ shut-down time –For storage or DR resources that have both curtail/discharge as well as load increase/charge components (Pmin RA 0): EFC = Minimum of (NQC) and (Psupply min + 90 min * ARR pos ) + Minimum of (– Pmin RA ) and (– Pdemand min + 90 minutes * ARR neg )

Group Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Regulatory Policy SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Does EFC Need to be Limited by NQC? SCE is concerned that as resources develop in the future, they may become more targeted in their capabilities –It is possible that Demand Response and Energy Storage may configure their program or device to meet either the peak load need or the ramping need but may not meet both The consequences of not meeting the peak load need and not meeting the system ramping needs are equally important from a reliability perspective Given this, is it still advisable to limit a resources EFC by its NQC? 3