Funders typically looking for applications to demonstrate: Evidence of need for what you are proposing, and why your project is the right approach to meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

Measuring Impact – Making a Difference Carol Candler – NRF Graeme Oram – Five Lamps.
Collecting and Analysing Data Chris Dayson Research Fellow Presentation to: Involve/CRESR Social Impact Masterclass 26th September 2013.
Top Tips on Funding Bids Maximizing your organisation’s chances.
Tired of hanging around Evaluating projects with young people.
Understanding outcomes BLF’s approach to outcomes for applicants [Name of speaker] [Title]
Alcohol Improvement Programme Evaluation Michelle Cornes & Michael Clark.
Communities First Mike Durke. Key Lessons 2002: Early days 2003: Deputy Minister Review 2006: Interim Evaluation 2008: ‘Communities Next’ 2009: Wales.
Grantee Program Plan. Components of the Program Plan Goals  Objectives  Activities  Techniques & Tools  Outcomes/Change.
Reaching Out - Empowering Young People Agenda 2.15 pm Introduction Overview of Reaching Out: Empowering Young People Overview of other Big Lottery Fund.
Islington Reaching Communities Briefing 01/12/2014
Monitoring and evaluation of carers’ services and projects Dr Andrea Wigfield - Associate Professor of Social Policy Centre for International Research.
How to make a good application Big Lottery Fund How to make a good application.
Supporting disadvantaged people and communities for over 26 years Sara Cooney Grant Manager, South Central England and London.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Overview 1. Building a social impact strategy.
Using your data to make your project better Ceris Anderson - StreetGames.
The Prince’s Regeneration Trust Social Investment Rosie Fraser 9 October 2014.
BIG update Sarah Carroll 03/07/2012. Mission statement: ‘Bringing improvements to communities and the lives of people most in need’ Our values: Being.
Big Lottery Fund Paula Torres-Silva 14 October 2014.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
Big Lottery Fund Hackney CVS Grants Workshop 27/08/2014.
The Big lottery Fund – an overview Tri-borough 19 th June 2014.
Big Lottery Fund Improving your chances of success Sarah Carroll Funding Officer (Local) 16 July 2014.
Intervention and Review Measuring outcomes for each child 1 P21.
Katherine Smithson Policy and public affairs officer Charity Finance Group.
Progress report from work of GECES Sub-group on Social Impact Measurement – 6 June 2013 Rapporteur: Lisa Hehenberger Research Director, European Venture.
Submission Writing Fundamentals – Part Webinar Series Leonie Bryen.
The Big lottery Fund – an overview Tri-borough 12 th July 2013.
Outcomes & Need Matthew Rowe Big Lottery Fund. SMART Outcomes.
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Nine steps of a good project planning
Outputs and Outcomes Building Better Opportunities Neil King - Director – CERT Ltd.
Birmingham Changing Futures Together- Research and Evaluation Services Talent Match Birmingham & Solihull – Research and Evaluation Services Bidders Presentation,
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Financial Counselling, Capability and Resilience Hubs Information Session.
The Evaluation Plan.
Supporting voluntary and community action supporting voluntary and community action Measuring Outcomes How do we understand the changes we are making …
Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Children, Young People and Families Early Intervention Fund and Adult Learning and Empowering Communities Fund Application support July/August 2015.
Personalised Learning Work-based learning is, by its very nature, suited to a personalised approach. A definition of personalised learning is contained.
Lambeth Tenants and Residents Association Hugh Stultz – Funding Officer 21 st April 2015.
The Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research Berlin, 26/27 September 2005 Evaluation for a changing research base Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE,
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
The Essentials of Grant Writing Mena Gainpaulsingh International Fundraising Consultancy
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Big Lottery Fund Greenwich Action for Voluntary Service 17 th April 2015.
The P Process Strategic Design
Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Professionals Unit 1 Part 1: Introduction to Nonprofit Evaluation.
NATIONAL INDABA 2015 Breakaway 3: Socio-economic impact of the lottery businesses on the South African economy.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
NHMRC Development Grants Overall Objectives The aim of a Development Grant is to progress research to a stage where it can attract investment from.
Reaching Communities Version 2 – September 2008 Slide 1 Reaching Communities Overview.
Are you fit for funding? Angela Richardson Cheshire Community Foundation WARRINGTON THIRD SECTOR ASSEMBLY North West Funders Forum.
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases Investing for change Seminar August 2012.
Jane Holdsworth 20 January The terminology of outcomes and impact How to evidence outcomes and impact Methods for collecting evidence Sources of.
Developing a Work Based Portfolio
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P21 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Measuring outcomes.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Understanding Outcomes Version 2.1 – September 2008 Slide 1 Understanding outcomes BIG’s approach to outcomes for applicants.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
The Big lottery Fund THCVS Voluntary Sector Conference th March 2016.
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Value for money Guidance Webinar
Welcome Recording Slide Deck Chat Box Mute
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Funders typically looking for applications to demonstrate: Evidence of need for what you are proposing, and why your project is the right approach to meeting this need A set of outcomes linked directly to meeting this need Activities which contribute towards these outcomes Outcome based indicators and tracking Measuring success and learning as project proceeds Each process different and what is required/allowed to be submitted usually tightly restricted, so hard to say exactly what to use and where, but: Taking an outcomes based planning approach in submissions is likely to prove increasingly important Supported by evidence from previously developing, delivering and monitoring outcomes based programmes Developing and using evidence portfolios

Big Lottery Fund: How to make a good application You must be able to demonstrate Your project outcomes meet an identified need and helps to achieve the changes we want to make through the area of investment relevant to your project – and the need for your project must be backed up with evidence Your organisation can deliver the project well and achieve the proposed project outcomes Your evidence of need should be Relevant to the project you are applying to us for, specific to your client group and in proportion to the size and scale of your project Show why your project is the most appropriate way to meet the identified need Show user involvement in project development Our assessment of your application is based around your outcomes – how well your outcomes are meeting an identified need, how likely you are to achieve them and how well they fit with the aims of our funding. Outcome Indicators will tell us how you will measure progress. Also includes a useful slide on writing good outcomes

Outcomes based planning approaches Theory of Change was the outcome based planning approach used in CPAL (and NPC model) Ultimate outcomes Long term outcome Supporting outcomes Activities Key performance indicators Big Lottery refers to the CES planning triangle Aim: the overall point of your project Intended outcomes: the difference you intend to make or the change you aim to bring about for your beneficiaries, the community or the environment Activities: the main services and activities you plan to carry out - what those working on your project will actually do, week by week Plus outcome indicators OBA (Outcomes Based Accountability)/Turning the Curve approaches Share a lot of common ground with Theory of Change, but without placing the same emphasis on the outcomes pathway Outcomes pathway

Making the case Able to answer the following questions for one of your projects What was it seeking to achieve – the overall aim/long term outcome How you knew it was needed What outcomes it set out to deliver - supporting outcomes/intended outcomes What it achieved, how you measured this and over what period Evidence standing by and ready to go Focus groups and interviews Impact assessments and/or distance travelled approaches Case studies Photographs, videos, press releases and/or press coverage Existing evaluations, impact assessments or return on investment/value for money studies Tailored to meet the needs of individual prospective funders

Making the case Outline one of your projects to a health funder or community capacity building funder What was it seeking to achieve overall? How did you know it was needed? What outcomes did it set out to deliver (supporting outcomes/intended outcomes)? What did it achieve, how did you measure this and over what period?