Institutional Effectiveness: Administrative and Educational Support Assessment Units A Practical Handbook Incorporating TracDat Terminology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Advertisements

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Student Affairs Assessment Workshop Presented by: Dr. Gary R. Hanson Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Arizona State University Sponsored by: NASPA.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Strategic Planning Retreat, 2005.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
NCCEA Annual Conference Waynesville, NC Assessment Basics: Implementing and Sustaining a Comprehensive, Outcomes-Based Assessment Plan October 19, 2006.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
The Academic Assessment Process
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Prepared by: Dr. fatma Baddar King Saud university college of nursing Nursing administration & education Dep. mission, vision, goals, objectives, values,
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Assessment 101: Back-to-Basics An Introduction to Assessing Student Learning Outcomes.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Developing Administrative and Educational Support Outcomes and Methods of Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment Beth Wuest.
PROGRAM REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS SERVICES WHY??
EVALUATION RESEARCH. Evaluation Research  How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
 How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit together?  What purpose do they serve?
Partnering for Student Success The Bridge to Clemson University Program Sue Whorton Clemson University National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students.
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Tips for Writing SACSCOC Non-Academic Program Assessment Reports Office of Planning, Institutional Research, and Assessment (PIRA) Fall 2015.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Ascending to Assessment Greatness in presented by the Division of Institutional Effectiveness Helena Mariella-Walrond, PhD Vice President Cory.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Planning and Organizing Chapter 13. The Planning Function Planning for a business should stem from the company’s Business Plan – The business plan sets.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
1 UST Support for Institutional Effectiveness: Information for Academic OA Plan Writers.
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
Planning and Organizing Chapter 4. The Planning Function Business Plan – a written description of the nature of the business, its goals, and objectives,
Assessment of Advising Linda Taylor, PhD, LPC, NCC September 9, 2011.
Help Me Understand the Basics of Non-academic Assessment A BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP Presented by Cory A. Potter Executive.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
The Lycurgus Group: Instructional Effectiveness Survey System
Assessment & Evaluation workshop
Is there another way besides accreditation?
Assessing Administrative and Educational support units
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Dr. Ron Atwell Ms. Kathleen Connelly
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessing Administrative and Educational Support Services
Assessment of Service Outcomes
Co-Curricular Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Effectiveness: Administrative and Educational Support Assessment Units A Practical Handbook Incorporating TracDat Terminology

Table of Contents 2 TracDat 5 Unit Purpose 7 Administrative Outcome 11 Assessment Methods and Criteria 16 Results and Analysis and Use of Results 17 Student Learning Outcome 18 Sample of Administrative Outcome 19 Sample of Student Learning Outcome 20 Appendix 1 – Institutional Goals 21 Appendix 2 – Checklist for Assessment Needs 23 Appendix 3 – Worksheet for Service Outcomes 25 Appendix 4 – Worksheet for Learning Outcomes

What is TracDat? A complete software process application for managing continuous improvement throughout academic and non-academic areas of higher education institutions

TracDat Defines and aligns goals among all levels of the institution Documents how results are used to improve services and learning Real-time visibility and documentation Data stored in a single location for security and accessibility Goal and evidence based decision making

What is an Administrative and Educational Support Assessment Unit? 1.One that receives a separate budget 2.One that provides distinct services

Sample Assessment Units Alumni Relations Financial Aid Human Resources Physical Plant Advising Residential Life Distance Education

Reporting Unit Refers to the Division Unit (Dean or Vice President) that you are responsible to according to the TJC Organizational chart Divisions are: Academic Affairs Advancement/External Affairs Applied Studies Business Affairs Continuing Studies Student Affairs Support Services University Studies

Why Should Administrative and Educational Support Units Be Involved In Doing Effectiveness? 1.Continuous Quality Improvement as part of an overall process of improving services 2.To satisfy regional accrediting agencies 3.State mandates 4.Competition – to attract students by providing better institutional services

Assessment Process AGREE ON PURPOSE AND LINK TO COLLEGE GOALS DEFINE OUTCOMES IDENTIFY ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA USE RESULTS AND ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY WEAKNESSES DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES

Developing a Unit Purpose Your unit’s statement of purpose describes the services you provide and the clients for whom those services are provided. It has: 1.A philosophical statement 2.A list of services, and 3.Needs to be revisited at least once a year to determine if any services have been added or deleted

Link to Institutional Goal Identification of the Specific Goal the Outcome Addresses See Appendix 1

Outcome Type Several Types of Outcomes Administrative Strategic Student Learning

Outcomes At the present time, most Administrative and Support Units have Administrative Outcomes. Student Affairs and Support Services, in particular, may also have Student Learning Outcomes. The remainder of this handbook will focus primarily on Administrative Outcomes within the complete assessment process. Student Learning Outcomes will be briefly discussed at the end.

Administrative Outcome Refers to currently existing services under the control of the unit and is worded in terms of what the unit will accomplish or what it’s clients should think, know, or do following the provision of service Probably no more than 2 outcomes per unit Importance: Forms the basis for the Unit Plan and involves participation by staff See Appendix 2

Once you have identified services, creating administrative outcomes is a piece of cake.

Administrative Outcomes Based on Currently Existing Services provide improve Name of Unit willdecrease Name of Current Service increase provide quality

Administrative Outcomes Based on Currently Existing Services Client…will be satisfied with…Name of Current Service

Administrative Outcomes Based on Currently Existing Services AES Service Verb + Outcome Tutoring Improve… Students attendingAcademic advising will Increase… Workshops Understand… Library orientations

CAUTION

Administrative Outcomes REMEMBER Outcomes refer to Currently Existing Services NOT Future Actions See Appendix 3

Assessment Methods and Criteria Assessment Methods are the tools, activities, and processes used to gather information and explain how the services will be measured and evaluated Criteria are specific, measurable statements identifying the requirements needed to assess the degree to which the administrative outcome was achieved

REMEMBER: Match the assessment method to the outcome and not the reverse

Types of Methods Used by Administrative and Educational Support Units Attitudinal measures of client satisfaction Direct measures or counts of unit services External validation

Attitudinal Methods are the Most Common Form of Assessment for Administrative and Educational Support Units BUT IT LEADS TO OVER SURVEYING THE STUDENTS.

Types of Attitudinal Methods Standardized:  NOEL-LEVITZ  ACT  NCHEMS Locally Developed:  Alumni Surveys  Graduating Student  Employer  Point of contact  Faculty/Staff

Direct Measures or Counts of Unit Services  Volume of Activity (number of persons served)  Level of Efficiency (average time for response)  Measure of Quality (average errors per audit)

Examples of Administrative Applications and Assessment Admissions…………………Application Response Timing Admissions…………………Telephone Response Timing Budgets and Planning…….Budget Processes Business Services…………Payroll Distribution Campus Security…………..Availability of Parking Development……………….Mailing List Development Duplication Services……….Bulk Mail Distribution Duplication Services……….Reduction of job time

Examples of Administrative Applications and Assessment Food Services………….. Cafeteria Services Human Resources…….. Selection processes Information Technology.. Information Distribution Plant Operations……….. Work Order Response Physical Plant……………Remodeling Process Physical Plant……………Equipment Servicing Registrar’s Office………..Grade Posting Registrar’s Office………..Transcript Holds

External Validation Periodic assessment of the relationship of the department/unit’s efforts to “good and acceptable practice,” by a “neutral” person who is knowledgeable in the field Auditor Consultant Public Health Inspector Fire Marshall Peer-Professional Association

Assessment Methods and Criteria Should Include: Specificity when naming the instrument or report to be used A description of “to whom” and “when” the assessment will be administered A statement referencing “by whom” and “based upon what” the results will be judged An indication as to what level of success is desired

Results and Analysis Results: Data collected on what a unit does produced through types of service Analysis (or Evaluation): the procedure for determining the meaning of the assessment results and making recommendations for action

Use of Results How the results will be used by the unit to improve the services it provides to its customers How the results will be used by the unit to justify professional development, travel, equipment, personnel, facilities, etc. (Budget)

REMEMBER: The purpose of assessment is not to compare administrative units, but to use what is learned from the assessment activities to improve your unit’s performance.

Student Learning Outcome A statement describing what the student should be able to think (affective), know (cognitive), or do (behavioral) upon completion of the instruction. See Appendix 4