M. Djordjevic 1 Suppression and energy loss in Quark-Gluon Plasma Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aug , 2005, XXXV ISMD, Czech X.Dong, USTC 1 Open charm production at RHIC Xin Dong University of Science and Technology of China - USTC  Introduction.

Advertisements

First Alice Physics Week, Erice, Dec 4  9, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity at RHIC and LHC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese,

Open heavy-flavor and quarkonium measurements in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC E. Vercellin Università and INFN Torino, Italy Quark Confinement and the.

Charm & bottom RHIC Shingo Sakai Univ. of California, Los Angeles 1.

1Erice 2012, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University.

Probing Properties of the QCD Medium via Heavy Quark Induced Hadron Correlations Huan Zhong Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California.

M. Djordjevic 1 Open questions in heavy flavor physics at RHIC Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.

M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss puzzle at RHIC Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.

Luan Cheng (Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University) I. Introduction II. Interaction Potential with Flow III. Flow Effects on Light Quark.

Honnef, Honnef, 27/06/08 1 Consequences of a  c /D enhancement effect.

1 Heavy Quark Energy Loss Tatia Engelmore Journal Club 7/21.

Cold nuclear matter effects on dilepton and photon production Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Thermal Radiation Workshop RBRC, Brookhaven.

M. Djordjevic 1 Effect of dynamical QCD medium on radiative heavy quark energy loss Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.

M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss in a dynamical QCD medium Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University M. Djordjevic and U. Heinz, arXiv:

University of Catania INFN-LNS Heavy flavor Suppression : Langevin vs Boltzmann S. K. Das, F. Scardina V. Greco, S. Plumari.

Strange and Charm Probes of Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC International Symposium on Multi-Particle Dynamics Aug 9-15, 2005 Huan Zhong Huang University.

1 OPEN HEAVY FLAVOUR PRODUCTION IN pp COLLISIONS WITH AT LHC Rosa Romita ( ) for the ALICE Collaboration.

Heavy-to-light ratios as a test of medium-induced energy loss at RHIC and the LHC N. Armesto Quark Matter 2005: 18th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic.

Anomaly of over ratios in Au+Au collision with jet quenching Xiaofang Chen IOPP, CCNU Collaborator: Enke Wang Hanzhong Zhang Benwei Zhang Beijing Mar.

Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.

Detail study of the medium created in Au+Au collisions with high p T probes by the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory.

1 Search for the Effects of the QCD Color Factor in High-Energy Collisions at RHIC Bedanga Mohanty LBNL  Motivation  Color Factors  Search for Color.

Jet Quenching and Its effects in Strong Interaction Matter

Luan Cheng (Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University) I.Introduction II. Potential Model with Flow III.Flow Effects on Parton Energy Loss.

Jet energy loss at RHIC and LHC including collisional and radiative and geometric fluctuations Simon Wicks, QM2006 Work done with Miklos Gyulassy, William.

June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.

M. Djordjevic 1 Theoretical predictions of jet suppression: a systematic comparison with RHIC and LHC data Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade,

Photon radiation from heavy ion collisions --Early Stage Fu-Ming LIU （刘复明） Thermal Photons and Dileptons ， BNL ， August Motivations Approach Results.

Probing the properties of dense partonic matter at RHIC Y. Akiba (RIKEN) for PHENIX collaboration.

Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.

Radiative heavy quark energy loss in QCD matter Magdalena Djordjevic and Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University.

Probing QGP by Heavy Flavors Santosh Kumar Das Theoretical Physics Division.

Heavy Quark Energy Loss due to Three-body Scattering in a Quark- Gluon Plasma Wei Liu Texas A&M University  Introduction  Heavy quark scattering in QGP.

OPEN HEAVY FLAVORS 1. Heavy Flavor 2 Heavy quarks produced in the early stages of the collisions (high Q2)  effective probe of the high-density medium.

Matt Durham Results on Open and Hidden Heavy Flavor.

Strange Probes of QCD Matter Huan Zhong Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California Los Angeles, CA Oct 6-10, 2008; SQM2008.

Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville.

2010/04/18Yichun Measurements of identified hadron production at high p T in p+p and Au+Au collisions at RHIC-STAR 许依春 (Yichun Xu)

What Can We Learn from Charm Production at RHIC? James Nagle University of Colorado at Boulder c _c_c.

Elastic, Inelastic and Path Length Fluctuations in Jet Tomography Simon Wicks Hard Probes 2006 Work done with William Horowitz, Magdalena Djordjevic and.

Charm elliptic flow at RHIC B. Zhang 1, L.W. Chen 2, C.M. Ko 3 1 Arkansas State University, 2 Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 3 Texas A&M University Charm.

Squaw Valley, Feb. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Take home message  The scaling (p T, ε, R, ∆L, etc) properties of azimuthal anisotropy.

Enke Wang (Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University) I. Introduction II. Ineraction Potential with Flow III.Flow Effects on Light Quark.

Enke Wang (Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University) I.Jet Quenching in QCD-based Model II.Jet Quenching in High-Twist pQCD III.Jet Tomography.

QM04 1/12/04M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss-Applications to RHIC Magdalena Djordjevic and Miklos Gyulassy Columbia University The Ter-Mikayelian.

M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy Quark Energy Loss in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.

Heavy quark energy loss in hot and dense nuclear matter Shanshan Cao In Collaboration with G.Y. Qin, S.A. Bass and B. Mueller Duke University.

M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy flavor suppression in a dynamical medium with finite magnetic mass Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade, University.

M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss in a dynamical QCD medium Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University M. Djordjevic and U. Heinz, arXiv:

M. Djordjevic 1 Hard probes at RHIC and LHC Magdalena Djordjevic Ohio State University.

M. Djordjevic 1 Light and heavy flavor phenomenology at RHIC and LHC Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade.

Heavy Flavor Measurements at RHIC&LHC W. Xie (Purdue University, West Lafayette) W. Xie (Purdue University, West Lafayette) Open Heavy Flavor Workshop.

Parton showers as a source of energy-momentum deposition and the implications for jet observables Bryon Neufeld, LANL 1Neufeld Based on the preprint R.B.

1 RIKEN Workshop, April , Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Primary focus: Scaling properties of flow & Jet quenching.

Production, energy loss and elliptic flow of heavy quarks at RHIC and LHC Jan Uphoff with O. Fochler, Z. Xu and C. Greiner Hard Probes 2010, Eilat October.

Heavy quarks and charmonium at RHIC and LHC within a partonic transport model Jan Uphoff with O. Fochler, Z. Xu and C. Greiner XLIX International Winter.

Review of ALICE Experiments

Probing QGP-medium interactions

Sedat Altınpınar for the ALICE Collaboration

Heavy-flavor particle correlations - From RHIC to LHC

Jet shape & jet cross section: from hadrons to nuclei

for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Heavy-Flavour Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions

ALICE and the Little Bang

Status and Implications of PID measurements at high pT

Modification of Fragmentation Function in Strong Interacting Medium

Motivation for Studying Heavy Quarks

GLOBAL POLARIZATION OF QUARKS IN NON-CENTRAL A+A COLLISIONS

Energy Loss in the Hot QCD Brick I

Modified Fragmentation Function in Strong Interaction Matter

Presentation transcript:

M. Djordjevic 1 Suppression and energy loss in Quark-Gluon Plasma Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade, University of Belgrade

M. Djordjevic 2 Suppression – a traditional probe of QCD matter Light and heavy flavour suppressions are considered as excellent probes of QCD matter. Suppression for a number of observables at RHIC and LHC has been measured. Comparison of theory with the experiments allows testing our understanding of QCD matter.

M. Djordjevic 3 1)Initial momentum distributions for partons 2)Parton energy loss 3)Fragmentation functions of partons into hadrons 4)Decay of heavy mesons to single e - and J/ . Suppression scheme hadrons 1) production 2) medium energy loss 3) fragmentation partons e -, J/  4) decay

M. Djordjevic 4 Jet energy loss Initially, most of the energy loss calculations assumed only radiative energy loss, and a QCD medium composed of static scattering centers. (e.g. GW, DGLV, ASW,BDMPS...) However, these calculations lead to an obvious disagreement with the experimental data. Is collisional energy loss also important? Yes, collisional and radiative energy losses are comparable!

5 With such approximation, collisional energy loss has to be exactly equal to zero! Static QCD medium approximation (modeled by Yukawa potential). Introducing collisional energy loss is necessary, but inconsistent with static approximation! Static medium approximation should not be used in radiative energy loss calculations! However, collisional and radiative energy losses are shown to be comparable. Non-zero collisional energy loss - a fundamental problem Dynamical QCD medium effects have to be included!

We developed the radiative energy loss formalism in a finite size dynamical QCD medium. M. D., Phys.Rev.C80:064909,2009. M. D. and U. Heinz, Phys.Rev.Lett.101:022302,2008. Dynamical energy loss We computed the jet radiative energy loss in dynamical medium of thermally distributed massless quarks and gluons. Abolishes approximation of static scatterers.

M. Djordjevic 7 The dynamical energy loss formalism is based on HTL perturbative QCD, which requires zero magnetic mass. Finite magnetic mass However, different non-perturbative approaches show a non-zero magnetic mass at RHIC and LHC. Can magnetic mass be consistently included in the dynamical energy loss calculations?

M. Djordjevic 8 Generalization of radiative jet energy loss to finite magnetic mass M.D. and M. Djordjevic, Phys.Lett.B709:229,2012 zero magnetic mass From our analysis, only this part gets modified. Finite magnetic mass:, where.

Dynamical energy loss - summary Computed both collisional and radiative energy loss, in a finite size QCD medium, composed of dynamical scatterers. M. D. PRC 80: (2009), M. D. and U. Heinz, PRL 101: (2008). Finite magnetic mass effects M. D. and M. Djordjevic, PLB 709:229 (2012) Includes running coupling M. D. and M. Djordjevic, PLB 734, 286 (2014). State of the art energy loss formalism in a dynamical finite size QCD medium. How numerically important are these effects? – see B. Blagojevic talk Tue 17:40 J.Phys. G42 (2015) 7,

Light flavor production Z.B. Kang, I. Vitev, H. Xing, PLB 718:482 (2012) Heavy flavor production M. Cacciari et al., JHEP 1210, 137 (2012) Path-length fluctuations A. Dainese, EPJ C33:495,2004. Multi-gluon fluctuations M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, I. Vitev, PLB 538:282 (2002). DSS and KKP fragmenation for light flavor D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, PRD 75: (2007) B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, B. Potter, NPB 582:514 (2000) BCFY and KLP fragmenation for heavy flavor M. Cacciari, P. Nason, JHEP 0309: 006 (2003) Decays of heavy mesons to single electron and J/  according to M. Cacciari et al., JHEP 1210, 137 (2012) Temperature T=304 MeV for LHC and T=221 MeV for RHIC. M. Wilde, Nucl. Phys. A , 573c (2013) (ALICE Collab.) A. Adare et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, (2010) (PHENIX Collab.) 10 Numerical procedure

M. Djordjevic 11 Understanding the existing data (200 GeV at RHIC and 2.76TeV at LHC)

M. Djordjevic 12 Provide joint predictions across diverse probes charged hadrons, pions, kaons, D mesons, non-photonic single electorns, non-prompt J/  M. D. and M. Djordjevic, PLB 734, 286 (2014) Puzzles (apparently surprising data) Measured charged hadron vs. D meson supression M.D., PRL 112, (2014) Concentrate on all centrality regions M. D., M. Djordjevic and B. Blagojevic, PLB (2014) All predictions generated  By the same formalism  With the same numerical procedure  No free parameters in model testing

M. Djordjevic 13 Comparison with LHC data (central collision) Very good agreement with diverse probes! M. D. and M. Djordjevic, PLB 734, 286 (2014)

M. Djordjevic 14 Heavy flavor puzzle at LHC Significant gluon contribution in charged hadrons Much larger gluon suppression R AA (h ± ) < R AA (D)

M. Djordjevic 15 Charged hadrons vs D meson R AA R AA (h ± ) = R AA (D) Excellent agreement with the data! Disagreement with the qualitative expectations! M.D., PRL 112, (2014) ALICE data

M. Djordjevic 16 Hadron R AA vs. parton R AA D meson is a genuine probe of bare charm quark suppression Distortion by fragmentation Charged hadron R AA = (bare) light quark R AA M.D., PRL 112, (2014)

M. Djordjevic 17 Puzzle summary R AA (D) = R AA (charm) R AA (light quarks) = R AA (charm) R AA (h ± ) = R AA (D) Puzzle explained! R AA (h ± ) = R AA (light quarks) M.D., PRL 112, (2014)

M. Djordjevic 18 Comparison with RHIC data (central collisions) Very good agreement! RHIC M.D. and M. Djordjevic, PRC 90, (2014)

M. Djordjevic 19 Non central LHC (fixed centrality and charged hadrons) An excellent agreement for different centrality regions! M. D., M. Djordjevic and B. Blagojevic, PLB (2014)

M. Djordjevic 20 Also a very good agreement for RHIC! Non central RHIC (fixed centrality and neutral pions) M. D., M. Djordjevic and B. Blagojevic, PLB (2014)

M. Djordjevic 21 R AA vs. N part for RHIC and LHC Excellent agreement for both RHIC and LHC and for the whole set of probes! M. D., M. Djordjevic and B. Blagojevic, PLB (2014)

M. Djordjevic 22 Predictions for the upcomming 5.1 TeV Pb+Pb at LHC Comparison with the suppressions at lower beam energies

M. Djordjevic 23 The same suppression as at 2.76 TeV for all types of probes! 5.1 TeV Pb+Pb at LHC In line with BES energy scan, which shows similar suppressions between RHIC and LHC. M. D. and M. Djordjevic, arXiv:

M. Djordjevic 24 Why the same suppression? An interplay between initial distribution and energy loss effects. The two effects cancel! M. D. and M. Djordjevic, arXiv:

M. Djordjevic 25 What about jets? The dead cone effect Good agreement at the low energy! As well as for jets! pt~10GeV pt~100GeV

M. Djordjevic 26 At high momentum, all types of particles have the same suppression Good agreement between our model and the data The model is in agreement with the jet data as well!

M. Djordjevic 27 Conclusion Dynamical energy loss formalism. Tested on angular averaged R AA data Good agreement for wide range of probes, centralities and beam energies. Can explain puzzling data. Even jets! Clear predictions for future experiments. Largely not sensitive to the medium evolution. The dynamical energy loss formalism can well explain the jet-medium interactions in QGP.

M. Djordjevic 28 Outlook Predictions of angular differential R AA observables (e.g. elliptic flow) for high pt observables. Dynamical energy loss model Presumably highly sensitive to the medium evolution. Bulk medium evolution models + A new sophisticated tool for precision jet tomography.

Acknowledgement Ministry of Science and Education in Serbia FP7 Marie Curie International Reintegration grant