Endorsing Black Lives Matter The roles of intra-personal, inter-group and structural processes Chairs: Jordan Leitner & Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton Jordan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4 The Supreme Court and the Constitution
Advertisements

ACWS Men’s Attitudes and Behaviours Toward Violence Against Women March 12, 2012.
CHILDLESSNESS AMONG OLDER WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES: TRENDS AND PROFILES Dustin Burton and Joseph Hursey.
CHAPTER 2: CRIME Area of Study 2: Criminal Law. The need for criminal law Read The need for criminal law, Definition of a crime, Elements of a crime,
1 Survey Research (Gallup) Would you vote for a qualified Black presidential candidate? Would you vote for a qualified Black presidential candidate? 1958:
Police officers’ acceptance of stereotypes about rape and rape victims: A comparison study Dr. Emma Sleath and Professor Ray Bull.
The Anatomy of a Criminal Case Government – Libertyville HS.
Seattle Monitoring Survey Findings and Recommendations from Monitoring Survey September 2013.
CRIM 430 Lecture 7 Creating Measures for Data Collection.
Lecture Outline Being the Target of Prejudice Stereotype Threat Positive Prejudice.
Policing Juveniles Police typically encounter juveniles when responding to a call. Police try to treat minors with least restrictive alternative unless.
Attribution of blame scale. Attribution A meaning given to a behaviour, an explanation A meaning given to a behaviour, an explanation.
1.  The New York State Hate Crimes Act of 2000 requires DCJS to collect and analyze demographic and statistical data with respect to the number of Hate.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 330 Race, Ethnicity and Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Justice.
Attitudes an introduction ist=PL03B96EBEDD01E386.
Copyright Standards This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted materials, and literary property of Gallup, Inc. It is for the guidance of.
Preliminary Results of the 2004 Campus Climate Survey Dr. Roger P. Sugarman Director of Institutional Research Boone Faculty Club May 11, 2004 President’s.
Warm Up Explain the phrase “beyond a reasonable doubt” and how it applies to criminal cases. What do you think is the most reliable evidence possible in.
Racial Profiling What is it?. Race is used by law enforcement as a basis for criminal suspicion Race is used by law enforcement as a basis for criminal.
Section 2.2.
Chapters 13 & 14 Discrimination Sexual Harrassment Talbot Kellogg Community College Criminal Psychology.
Historic Cases “Just a Friendly Game of Baseball” according to the rap group Main Source.
How can I adjust my behavior and choices in order to improve the learning environment to represent SMS?
Section 2.2.
Outline of Lecture Sessions Regarding Prejudice and Discrimination Definition of the concepts of prejudice and discrimination.
Examining Police-Minority Youth Contacts in Urban Settings Rod K. Brunson, PhD Associate Professor Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Southern.
Climate for Minorities at UK A Summary of Various Survey Findings (1997 – 2001)
MOUs and MOAs: A Cooperative Approach to Law Enforcement on the Reservation 17 th Annual Multi-Jurisdictional Conference November 3, 2005 Paul Stenzel.
Criminal and Juvenile Justice
Racial Attitudes Concepts, Trends, and Explanations.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
American Criminal Justice: The Process
HATE CRIMES: Investigative Review Chief Thomas Kilcullen SUNY Geneseo Police Department.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 330 Race, Ethnicity and Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali RACE &
U.S. sending 3,000 Troops to Africa. Under pressure to do more to confront the Ebola outbreak sweeping across West Africa, President Obama on Tuesday.
The Executive Branch. “The Role of the President”
PSY 321 Dr. Sanchez Stereotyping, Prejudice, & Discrimination Part II.
Conflict Management for tdfgdfhe Public Health Professional Instructor Name.
Criminal Procedures Flowchart What happens when you get arrested.
Harassment, Discrimination, Prevention, Investigation Unit (HDPIU)
Legal Psychology Gerhard Ohrband ULIM University, Moldova 10 th lecture Jury decision-making.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
Perceptions of Race and the Police in the Eric Garner Case. Maria Elisa Ayala Ted Gournelos Mass, Media, & Society.
A quantitative reasoning activity developed by Rachel Perlin (Psychology dept, Hunter College)
Race and Ethnicity as Lived Experience
Chapter4Chapter4 GLOSSARYGLOSSARY EXIT Glossary Modern Management, 9 th edition Click on terms for definitions Bicultural stress Demographics Discrimination.
Family Matters: The Effects of Adolescents’ Exposure to Political Discussion in the Home David E. Campbell University of Notre Dame.
Interviewing and Interrogation. Lesson Overview: How are crimes solved?  When someone makes the decision to talk to the police  Influenced by the communication.
Unit 8 Housekeeping Interview Analysis & Final Essays—Due Dates: November 15 & November 22 Read the instructions and announcements Page limit reduced:
Synthesizers Integrating diverse thoughts and information into a new single inclusive position to achieve one goal. by Ayesha Judy Kanwal & Nelso n.
An Implicit Measure of Victim/Perpetrator Responsibility: The Effect of Reputation Maria Crossman, Danielle DiFranco, Allyssa Lanza, Karinne Brobst (Professor.
Measures: Police Legitimacy Scale 6 (M=4.88, SD=.57, α=.85) 10 items, 4 point Likert scale “I agree with many of the values that define what the police.
Social Thinking: Attitudes & Prejudice. What is an attitude? Predisposition to evaluate some people, groups, or issues in a particular way Can be negative.
The events in Ferguson, Missouri Erik Gannsjö. SUMMARY Disposition -The prelude -The murder -The trial -The riots -The aftermath of the riots -Conclusion.
Most research on race in the courtroom now centers around modern racism. Today, racism is loaded with social stigma. It is no longer socially acceptable.
U.S. and Texas Politics and Constitution Civil Rights II February 12, 2015 J. Bryan Cole POLS 1336.
Reversing the Error: The Role of Causal Attributions in
Faulty Statistics in the Media – The O’Reilly Factor on police killings of Blacks vs. Whites A quantitative reasoning activity developed by Rachel Perlin.
How Newsworthy is this Incident? What should the Consequences be?
Of Police Brutality: A Mock Jury Study
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
American Psychology-Law Society Conference
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Seven
Racial Tensions in 2014 America
Tuesday, October 14th, 2014 Do Now: Under Day #1
Judicial Branch Lindquist.
Key terms and procedures involved in criminal cases
Race, Bigotry, Prejudice, Racism
Key terms and procedures involved in criminal cases
Section 2.2.
Presentation transcript:

Endorsing Black Lives Matter The roles of intra-personal, inter-group and structural processes Chairs: Jordan Leitner & Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton Jordan Leitner Colin Leach Hemapreya Selvanathan Lydia Hayward

How past intergroup contact shapes judgments of current intergroup conflict The cases of Michael Brown and Eric Garner Lydia E. Hayward, Dr Fiona Kate Barlow, Professor Matthew J. Hornsey The University of Queensland, Australia

Positive contact Negative contact

Outcomes beyond prejudice?

What about negative contact? Disadvantaged group members: negative contact  increase support for social change Advantaged group members: negative contact  reduce support for social change

Judgments of current conflict? Does contact alter the lens through which we perceive intergroup conflict situations?

Judgments of current conflict?

The present study How do White and Black Americans perceive these incidents? How does contact predict these perceptions?

The present study 207 White Americans 92 women M age = 33.55, SD age = Black Americans 68 women M age = 33.87, SD age = 10.11

Intergroup contact 1 never  7 very frequently Overall, how often do you have POSITIVE/ PLEASANT/ GOOD/ FRIENDLY/ ENJOYABLE contact with Black [White] Americans? Overall, how often do you have NEGATIVE/ UNPLEASANT/ BAD/ UNFRIENDLY/ UNENJOYABLE contact with Black [White] Americans? Correlated ~ -.40

The Incident

Outcome Measures Do you agree with the grand jury decision not to indict (charge) Officer Wilson? (1 strongly disagree  7 strongly agree) Attributions of Blame (8 items; 1 strongly disagree  7 strongly agree) Officer Darren Wilson is responsible for the death of Michael Brown. Officer Darren Wilson did not intend for Michael Brown to die. (R) Racial profiling of the victim (4 items; 1 strongly disagree  7 strongly agree) Michael Brown was targeted by police because of his race. Michael Brown would always have been treated this way, regardless of his race. (R)

Outcome Measures Do you think Officer Darren Wilson is guilty or innocent of committing a crime? Guilty/Innocent I have signed a petition in support of the victims of police violence (Michael Brown and Eric Garner) Yes/No

Mean Differences White AmericansBlack Americans Agree with GJ* Blame Officer* Racial Profiling* Officer Guilty?*40.6%84.5% Signed a Petition? *8.3%30.8%

Results: White Americans N = 207

Do those who have had more frequent positive contact with Black Americans… disagree with the grand jury decision? blame the officer? believe the officer is guilty? believe racial profiling was a factor in the incident? sign a petition on behalf of the victims? Does negative contact predict the opposite?

Do you agree with the grand jury decision not to indict the Officer? Positive Contact Agreement with Jury decision Negative Contact.21** -.08 Mean = 4.23 More agreement in Brown case (4.56) than Garner case (3.89) Standardized coefficients (β) reported. † p <.10 * p <.05, ** p <.01, ***p <.001

How much is the Officer to blame? Standardized coefficients (β) reported. † p <.10 * p <.05, ** p <.01, ***p <.001 Mean = 3.63 Positive Contact Officer Blame Negative Contact -.21**.12

Was racial profiling a factor? Standardized coefficients (β) reported. † p <.10 * p <.05, ** p <.01, ***p <.001 Mean = 3.77 Positive Contact Racial Profiling Negative Contact -.26***.05

Is the Officer Guilty? Main Effects: 1.91 x likely to say Guilty in the Garner case (47%) than the Brown case (33%) No main effects of contact Interactions: Marginal negative contact * case interaction (p =.051): Negative contact  less likely to say Guilty (0.63 x), but only for the Garner case

% Yes: 8.33 Main Effects: Marginal main effect of positive contact  1.53 x more likely to have signed a petition Did you sign a petition on behalf of the victims? Yes/No

Negative contact with Black Americans predicted: Agreement with grand jury decision Blaming the officer even less Believing that racial profiling was not a factor Believing the officer was innocent in Eric Garner case Positive contact with Black Americans predicted: Signing a petition on behalf of the victims Summary: White Americans

Results: Black Americans N = 116

Do those who have had more frequent positive contact with White Americans… agree with the grand jury decision? blame the officer less? believe racial profiling was not a factor in the incident? believe the officer is innocent? not sign a petition on behalf of the victims? Does negative contact predict the opposite?

Do you agree with the grand jury decision not to indict the Officer? Positive Contact Agreement with Jury decision Negative Contact * Mean = 2.28 Standardized coefficients (β) reported. † p <.10 * p <.05, ** p <.01, ***p <.001

How much is the Officer to blame? Standardized coefficients (β) reported. † p <.10 * p <.05, ** p <.01, ***p <.001 Mean = 4.98 More blame for Officer in Brown case (5.22) than Garner case (4.73) Positive Contact Officer Blame Negative Contact †

Was racial profiling a factor? Standardized coefficients (β) reported. † p <.10 * p <.05, ** p <.01, ***p <.001 Mean = 5.15 Positive Contact Racial Profiling Negative Contact **

Is the Officer Guilty? % Guilty: 84.5% Main Effects: Positive contact  less likely to say Guilty (0.53 x) Interactions: Positive contact * case interaction: Positive contact  less likely to say Guilty (0.08 x), but only for the Garner case

% Yes: 30.8% Main Effects: Positive contact  less likely (0.60 x) to have signed a petition Did you sign a petition on behalf of the victims? Yes/No

Positive contact with White Americans predicted: Less disagreement with grand jury decision Blaming the officer less (marginally) Lower belief that racial profiling was a factor Believing the officer was innocent in Eric Garner case Not signing a petition on behalf of the victims Summary: Black Americans

Do these outcomes look familiar?

Take home message Past contact may alter the lens through which we perceive events Different effects for advantaged vs. disadvantaged groups (but with a similar end result) For White Americans: Negative contact  defending the police officer. For Black Americans: Positive contact  defending the victim less

Thank you