Feeding Accelerated Milk Replacer to Calves: Effects of Starter Stirring on Performance Nicole Guindon, and Dr. Pete Erickson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cost of Raising Replacement Dairy Heifers
Advertisements

Lambs from Birth to Harvest Feeding and Managing
Dairy Center Research Projects. Skin tests as a predictor of Johne’s disease in cows and heifers An attempt to find an inexpensive and simple way to detect.
Backgrounding Cattle Larry C. Hollis, D.V.M., M.Ag.
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
Residual Feed Intake and the Cow Herd A. M. Meyer 1 *, R. L. Kallenbach 2, M. S. Kerley 1 University of Missouri, Columbia 1 Division of Animal Sciences.
Dairy Calf Rearing.
IFAD Partner Logo Nutritional management of dairy animals Y. Ramana Reddy Milk IT Project Nainital, Uttarakhand, India November, 2014.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
FEEDING TO ENHANCE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY
Dietary Strategies to Reduce Nutrient Excretion from Cattle Dr. Tim L. Stanton Extension Feedlot Specialist Dept. of Animal Sciences, CSU.
Unit 9: Dairy Cattle Feeding
SAE: Dairy Production J. Clown. PAY, Hour 5, Marion High School. Introduction: The SAE that I chose is Dairy Production. I have had an interest in dairy.
Improvement of Beef Cow Biological Efficiency
Sprayfo Life Start validation
Dairy Center Research Projects
Dairy Cow Nutrition Feeding ruminant animals at different life stages Julie Toth.
Alberta Beef Industry From Pasture to Plate. Cow-Calf Operation Beef production starts with ranchers who raise a breeding herd of cows that nurture cattle.
Nutrition Programs for Growing Heifers José Eduardo P. Santos VMTRC.
Wuttigrai Boonkum, Ph.D Data Collecting for Genetic Improvement in Beef, Dairy cattle and Buffalo Wuttigrai Boonkum,
Early Life Management and Long-Term Productivity of Calves M. E. Van Amburgh, F. Soberon, E. Raffrenato, J. Karszes, and R. W. Everett 272 Morrison Hall.
P. C. Hoffman Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin-Madison Strategies to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Replacement Heifers.
Heifer Raising Lecture 11 ANS 336 2/21/01. Once A Day Feeding - Milk Reduces labor? Reduces scours Promotes faster rumen development When a calf drinks.
Is our dairy cow sustainable for the future? L. B. Hansen University of Minnesota.
Breeding cattle for a more efficient and sustainable milk and meat production Oscar González-Recio, J. Pryce, M.E. Goddard, B. Hayes EURO FOOD
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
LOGAN POTTS AND CHRISTINE RINDFLEISCH The Effect of Whole Milk vs. Powdered Milk.
FEEDING METHODS. Introduction  Things to know  The nutritional value of feeds  Animal requirements of nutrients  Nutrients intake  Availability of.
The effects of continuous-suckling and supplementation on growth performance of crossbred Katahdin lambs (Birth weight 4.2 ± 0.2 kg) were investigated.
Beef Lifecycle. Step 1 On cow-calf farms and ranches, cows are bred and give birth to a calf each year.
Nutrition and Reproduction in Beef Cows Cattlemen’s College January 29, 2003 David Lalman Oklahoma State University.
Mineral Supplementation Update and Recommendations Shane Gadberry Associate Professor Department of Animal Science - Extension.
Sprayfo and cow’s milk.
Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle - MP 391 Overview.
NE for Growing/Finishing Beef Cattle NE values of feeds + feed intake can be used to: Predict amount of feed required for particular gain (programmed feeding)
Growth, feed and economics
Feeding the calf up till weaning Is it time for a re-think?
Southern Research and Outreach Center, Waseca Lacey Hanson.
REARING DAIRY HEIFERS PROFITABLY Dr. Rachel J. E. Stewart.
Impact of increased energy and amino acids in sow lactation diets on piglet performance in large litters Aimee-Louise Craig*1, 2 and Dr. Elizabeth Magowan1,
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Diurnal Changes in Forage Quality Affects Animal Preference, Intake, Performance Hank Mayland, Dave Mertens and Bret Taylor USDA-ARS Kimberly, ID; Madison,
Bush Dairy Milking the system. Bush Dairy Getting started Select hardy, docile beef cattle (Tuli tested) These cows are put to dairy bulls (Red Dane Tested)
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Adding weight to lambs is the value added portion of most sheep operations. Goal is to do it as cheap as possible. Feeding Lambs DGM:ISU.
Receiving cattle. Dry matter intake of stressed calves; first 28 days Weeklb/hd/d% of BW Receiving issues.
Know how. Know now. Jerry D. Volesky Walter H. Schacht University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ethanol CoProduct Conference Grazing Management when Supplementing.
LOGO Effects of Adding Extruded Flaxseed on Milk Fatty Acids in Holstein Dairy Cows Ali Mahdavi Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Iran.
Heifer Development OSU Beef Team Growing Phase Lesson 4.
Introduction Young animal nutrition at Nuscience is based on two pillars: FEED INTAKE as much as possible as early as possible YAN at Nuscience ANIMAL.
Creep Feeding Beef Calves By Michael Berry Coffee County Young Farmer Advisor Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office – July, 2002.
Shortened dry cow periods Gabriella Varga Pennsylvania State University.
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
Doubling calf weights by weaning
N P Mokotedi2, K-J Leeuw#1, U Marume3, N Thiebaut1 & S Breytenbach4
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
A. R. Alizadeh1 , M. Pakfar1, K. Karkoodi1, and H. Sadri2
Yan Martel Kennesa, Janie Lévesquea and Caroline Decauxb
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM IMPACTS OF HEAT STRESS
Combination effects of milk feeding methods and starter crude protein concentration: Evaluation on performance and health of Holstein male calves  D.
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Joyce,. J. R. ¹, Jeffries, B. H. ², Stewart, Jr. R. L. ³, Segers, J. R
How does beef get From a cattle Farm to our Fork?
Addah, W., Deku, G. and Ayantunde, A. A.
How do cattle get From cattle Farms to our Forks?
parameters and immune cells of their calves
Preconditioning Elective
Great Plains Veterinary Educational Center
Developing Heifers Earl H. Ward.
Presentation transcript:

Feeding Accelerated Milk Replacer to Calves: Effects of Starter Stirring on Performance Nicole Guindon, and Dr. Pete Erickson

Introduction 70% of US dairy producers use milk replacer Conventional milk replacers contain 20-22% CP and 15-20% fat (DM basis) and fed at a rate of 4 quarts/d until weaning Accelerated or High-protein replacers contain 26% to 28% CP and 15-20% fat. These are typically increased over the milk feeding period. Weaning occurs at d 42 and finalized at d 49.

We need to get from here….

To here….

Who we’re dealing with!

Introduction (cont.) Calves fed the high CP replacer have a higher ADG and are taller as compared to calves fed conventional replacer (Cornell, UNH, UMINN). Decreasing weaning stress can result in increased growth Calves fed the high CP replacer have difficulty during the weaning phase.

Starter Intake (Cowles et al., 2006)

Overall DMI (Cowles et al., 2006)

ADG, Cowles et al., (2006)

Intake behavior of cattle Dairy cows eat when their feed is pushed up Would calves respond the same way by human interaction? Could stirring the calf starter improve performance and decrease the stress of weaning in calves fed high CP milk replacer feeding programs?

Objective To determine if calves fed a conventional or high CP milk replacer feeding regimen that have their coarse starter stirred increase starter intake and skeletal growth. Will this practice reduce poor performance during the weaning period (d 42-d 49).

Materials and Methods 36 newborn Holstein heifer calves 4 treatments – Conventional milk replacer, no stirs (CMR) – Conventional milk replacer, stirs twice daily (CMRS) – High protein milk replacer, no stirs (HPMR) – High protein milk replacer, stirs (HPMRS) 18 Calves were fed a conventional milk replacer (20/20) fed at 12% solids, twice daily until d 41. ½ of these calves had their starter stirred in the morning (10:30 am) and afternoon (2:00 pm)

Materials and methods (cont.) Calves on the high CP milk replacer (28/20) had 0.9 pounds of powder reconstituted to 17% DM twice daily from d2-d8 twice daily and 1.25 pounds of powder reconstituted to 17% DM twice daily from d9-d calves had their starter manipulated twice daily (as the other treatment) Ad libitum coarse starter and water was available to all calves.

Materials and Methods (cont.) Weekly skeletal measurements were made based on the birthday of the calf All feed and water intake measured daily The nursery had a partition to allow the researchers to only visit the calves that had their starter stirred Starter was stirred for 30 sec/calf Only the graduate student was allowed in the nursery

Materials and Methods (cont.) From d 42 –d 49 calves only received milk replacer in the morning. Calves were fully weaned on d 50- measurements continued until d 63.

Results (Preweaning d 2-41) ItemCMRCMRSHPMRHPMRSSES vs. NSHPMR vs. CMR Int. DMI, lb/d < Starter Intake, lb/d < ADG, lb/d < G/F Water intake, lb/d < Wit. g in/d < Girth g in/d Results (Preweaning d 2-42)

Conclusions (preweaning) Calves with starter stirred tended (P = 0.1) to consume less starter. There was a trend for a DMI interaction (P= 0.1). Calves that had their starter stirred consumed less DM if they were fed CMR, but not if they were fed HPMR. Calves fed HPMR consumed more water and calves on HPMRS consumed more water than calves on CMRS who consumed less water.

Preweaning conclusions (cont.) Calves fed HPMR gained more weight, while calves that had their starter stirred tended to gain less weight. Calves fed HPMR were more efficient in converting DM into gain. However, calves that received HPMR were shorter. There were no effects of treatment on girth gain.

Results (d 43-49) ItemCMRCMRSHPMRHPMRSSES vs. NSHPMR vs. CMR INT. DMI, lb/d Starter intake, lb/d < ADG, lb/d G/F Water intake, lb/d Wit.g in/d

Conclusions (Weaning week) Starter intake remained elevated for calves fed CMR. No effect of treatment on water intake, ADG, feed efficiency, height or girth gain. No effect of stirring on any of these parameters.

Results (d 50-63) ItemCMRCMRSHPMRHPMRSSES vs NSHPMR vs CMR INT. Starter intake, lb/d ADG, lb/d G/F Water intake, lb/d Wit. G in/d Girth g in/d

Postweaning Conclusions (d 50-63) Starter intake remained elevated for claves fed CMR. No effect on another parameter measured.

Overall conclusions Stirring starter did not result in any measurable improvements. HPMR increased performance during the preweaning phase as observed in other studies.

Acknowledgements NH AES. Fairchild Dairy Research Center Land O’Lakes George Walker Milk Fund Fernald Farm, Nottingham

Questions