Parastomal Hernia: what to do?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objective Objective Full-thickness rectum prolapse causes perineal discomfort, soiling, spotting, mucosal bleeding and anal sphincter incontinence. Treatment.
Advertisements

Hernias Dr. Saleh M. Aldaqal MBBS, FRCSI,SBGS
Specialists Without Borders
LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY TECHNICAL ASPECTS, CASE SELECTION
Questions: Component Separation
Dr Chan Wai Hei, Arthur Queen Elizabth Hospital
INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: OPEN vs TEP APPROACHES
Stomas: Technical Considerations By: John N. Afthinos, M.D.
How do we manage perforated Crohn’s Disease? Daniel von Allmen, MD Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio.
FASCIAL DEHISCENCE. FASCIAL DEHISCENCE FASCIAL DEHISCENCE  Fascial disruption is due to abdominal wall tension overcoming tissue or suture strength,
Management of the Parastomal Hernia
What inguinal hernia operation and why?
LAP TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIOPLASTY
What Do You Do For This Patient? l Male or female l Age: l Large midline abdominal wall hernia (>12x20 cm)* l S/P multiple repairs or l S/P colectomy,
Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Utilizing Acellular Dermal Matrix University of South Carolina Department of Surgery Randal L. Croshaw, MD, Stephen A. Fann,
Dr. Ibrahim Bashayreh RN, PhD
ABDOMINAL HERNIAS Fadi J. Zaben RN MSN.
Repair of Inguinal Hernia: Open or Laparoscopic
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم IN THE NAME OF ALLAH
Parastomal Hernia Repair
Complications During and After Restoration of Intestinal Continuity After Colostomy. Is it Worth it? Gustavo Plasencia, MD, FACS, FASCRS.
Parastomal Hernia Mesh Computer-Based Training
Morag Sime and Chloe Hymers
LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
SurgerySurgery Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Patch the tire or rebuild the car? Michael J. Rosen MD, FACS Associate Professor of Surgery Chief, Division.
PERISTOMAL HERNIA: THE CASE FOR EXTRAPERITONEAL COLOSTOMY Garnet Blatchford, M.D.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم. Review Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature The American Journal of Surgery Vol 201, No.
Avoiding and Managing Complications for Lap Inguinal Hernia Repair
Anastomotic Leak (lower GI)
Single Site Umbilical Laparoscopic Surgery (SSULS) George W. Holcomb, III, M.D., MBA Surgeon-in-Chief Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, MO.
Dr.Mohammad foudazi Research center of endoscopic surgery, Iran medical university.
The Role of the Laparoscope in the Acute Setting Mr John Griffith Bradford Royal Infirmary.
Cesarean Delivery in the Obese Patient Alexander F. Burnett, MD Division Gyn Oncology UAMS.
Laparoscopic Pancreatectomy Attila Nakeeb, M.D., F.A.C.S. Department of Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine 7th Annual Symposium on Gastrointestinal.
Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer: The LAMA Trial Marietta J. O. E. Bertleff, Jens A. Halm, Willem.
Hernias Dr. Sajad Ali (MBBS., MS.)
HERNIA. DEFINITION HERNIA TYPES Primary Incisional.
VCU DEATH AND COMPLICATIONS CONFERENCE.  Complication  Necrosis of ileostomy  Procedure  Parastomal hernia repair, revision of ileostomy  Primary.
General Surgery Case Presentation Sundeep Guliani.
Minimally Invasive Advances in AWR
Open Approaches for Rectal Prolapse John Hartley Academic Surgical Unit University of Hull.
Morgagni Hernia Brian Belyea Radiology Elective Block 8 February 27, 2004.
Why/When/How to do TEP and TAPP
Lap vs Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Experience and Evidence Archana Ramaswamy MD.
Experience of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (2005 – 2012) UO di Chirurgia Dott. Paolo A. Riccio.
Severe Adhesions Bradley R. Davis, MD, FACS, FASCRS Associate Professor of Surgery Director Surgical Education/Surgical Skills Lab Program Director Residency.
Preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with ULTRAPRO versus PROLENE mesh Chei Mei medical center Uen Yih-huei.
Anastomosis in IBD Barry Salky, MD FACS Professor of Surgery Chief (Emeritus), Division of Laparoscopic Surgery The Mount Sinai Hospital New York.
Milagros Castro Romera Hospital Universitario de Canarias.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a District General Hospital- Audit of clinical practice.
Reyes Tubbs Adams Davidson Newton
“Best Evidence” in AWR Understanding Level 1 & 2 Studies A Park MD, FRCSC, FACS University of Maryland Baltimore,MD.
Important questions As good or better ? Cost effective ? Overall, safer? Is it safe as a cancer operation? Can all surgeons do it? Compare to open surgery.
From the Rooter to the Tooter: Common GI Hernias Tony Weaver, D.O. Surgery
The use of Seprafilm Adhesion Barrier in Adult Patients Undergoing Laparotomy to Reduce the Incidence of Post- Operative Small Bowel Obstruction Erin B.
PATIENTS AND METHOD 5 cases were reported from 1998 to girls and 3 boys. Average age 11 years (3-17y). All of them where taken care of surgically.
Appendicitis: Challenges in Management
Ashraf I. Obaid, MD, PBGS, Karam M. Alslaibi, MD Presented By
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer What is the evidence?
Marina Yiasemidou, MBBS, MSc CT1 General Surgery
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Obese Women
Role of Laparoscopy in Management of Hernias
Component Separation By– Dr Richa Jain.
1: Cardiff Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff
Incisional hernia prevention
SPIGELIAN HERNIA : A CASE REPORT
Presentation transcript:

Parastomal Hernia: what to do? LAPAROCELI: Laparoscopy Live Surgery Parastomal Hernia: what to do? Ospedale di portogruaro U.o.C. chirurgia generale francesco fidanza

parastomal hernia “Some degree of herniation around a colostomy is so common that this complication may be regarded as inevitable” ( Goligher) “It doesn’t matter if God Himself made your ostomy. If you have it long enough you have a 100% risk of a parastomal hernia” (J Byron Galthright)

Magnitude of the problem Between 87000 and 135000 intestinal stomas (ileostomy and colostomy) are created each year Approximately 1/2 will be permanent stomas 30-50% of these (20-35000) will develop parastomal hernias wich will require surgical repair

Parastomal hernia risk factors Patient factors Age Intra abdominal pressure factors Obesity Emphysema

Parastomal hernia risk factors Wound healing factors Infection Steroids / Immune modulators Genetics (collagen deficiency)

Parastomal hernia risk factors Mistakes in surgical technique Site outside of rectus sheath Stoma defect created too large

Symptoms of parastomal hernia Protrusion of stoma beyond abdominal wall Prolapse of stoma Enlargement of stoma Severe parastomal skin irritation Severe parastomal pain Incarceration or strangulation

hernia confirmedd symptoms absolute indication for surgery mayor minor symptoms contraindication for surgery conservative care local repair local repair with mesh re-location symptoms

treatment The best treatment for a parastomal hernia is, of course, reversal of the ostomy (when it is possible) Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frittelle FA Parastomal hernia Br J Surg 2009 The open approaches to repair of parastomal hernias include primary fascial repair, repair with mesh, and stoma relocation. Primary fascial repair, although technically simple, carries a recurrence rate of up to 50%. Allen-Marsh TG, Thomson JP. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications Br J Surg 1998

non-mesh technique ‘Takedown’ Primary suture repair is unacceptable Stoma “resite” results in 3 potential hernias Midline incision Old stoma site Parastomal at new site

Open onlay Easy to reduce hernia Difficult to lyse adhesions Large peri-wound cavity Wound complications Difficult for Patient to care for ostomy postop Via Midline Difficult in obese pts Can devascularize tissue Recurrence up to 26% Steele SR. Am J sunrg 2003 v185 436-440

No recurrences or infections at 30 months open repair REsulTS Author No. of pts Material Results Steele, ’03 58 Polypro mesh 26% recurrence; 9% SBO; 3% prolapse; 3% wound inf.; 3% fistula; 2% mesh erosion Stelzner, ‘04 20 PTFE 3/20 recurred at 3.5 years Longman, ‘05 10 Polypro No recurrences or infections at 30 months

surgical laparoscopic techniques It was not until 1998 when Percheron et Al described the first laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias as a possible solution to this common problem

laparoscopic surgery The most difficult of any laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is the safe division of adhesions Favorable factors for successful laparoscopic approach to bowel surgery Prior laparoscopic surgery Fewer than 2 prior surgeries Milder abdominal distension Pliable abdominal wall Lack of mesh Lack of enterocutaneous fistula

laparoscopic surgery The mesh can be formatted on the basis of either of 2 main principles. The modified Sugarbaker technique with a nonslit mesh covering the hernia defect with at least a 5-cm overlap with lateralization of the colon/ileum going into the stoma. The keyhole technique, where a hole is cut out to encircle the stoma with a slit and the mesh covers the hernia around the bowel. Hanson BM, Slater NJ, Van der Velden AS, et Al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann. Surg. 2012; 255(4): 685-695

O.R. set-up K. Harold Operative Tecniques in Gen. Surg. 2007

sugarbaker technique K. Harold Operative Tecniques in Gen. Surg. 2007

adhesiolysis

sugarbaker (exiting side of mesh)

sugarbaker Fascial defect Stoma bowel exiting side

outcomes lap parastomal hernia repair (sugarbaker technique) Patient Characteristics (N=21) Mean age (yr) 66 (36-82) Mean defect size (cm2) 130 (25-416) Mean mesh size (cm2) 440 (240-780) Mean operative time (mins) 210 (99-326) Mean L.O.S. (days) 6 (2-14) Mean follow up (months) 20 (6-36) Laparoscopic success rate 100% Recurrences 1 (5%) Complications 10 (50%) K. Harold et al. Hernia 2007 Nov

KEYHOLE tecnique K. Harold Operative Tecniques in Gen. Surg. 2007

KEYHOLE tecnique

outcomes lap parastomal repair 55 patients Keyhole technique 85% completed laparoscopically Mean LOS 4 days 6 enterotomies 2 mesh infx 36 mo f/u (12-72mo) 20 recurrences (37%) Hansson, BM et al., Surg Endosc. 2009 July

keyhole vs. sugarbaker (lap) (literature review) Repair type No. pts (60) O.R. time (min) LOS Comp. % Recur. % Keyhole 38 242 4.4 20% (0-33%) 27% (0-44%) Sugarbaker 22 125 3.9 12% (0-25%) 16%(0-19%) K. Harold et al. Presented American Hernia Society 2006

prevention of parastomal hernias

Prophylactic mesh There has been a flurry of interest to reinforce the abdominal wall with a piece of mesh every time a stoma is made. Studies have shown cost-effectiveness in placing a mesh prophylactically in those patients requiring a permanent stoma Lee L, Saleem A, Landry T, Latimer E, Chaudhury P, Felman LS. Cost effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2014

prophylactic mesh a study of mayo clinic I want to show you a study done at Mayo Clinic on prophylactic positioning of a mesh during the packaging of a stoma

Results O.R. Time (min) Ave Blood Loss (ml) Length of Stay (days) Mesh (16) No Mesh (23) O.R. Time (min) 275 285 Ave Blood Loss (ml) 375 1000 Length of Stay (days) 10 (5-17) 9.6 (6-25) F/U (months) 17.5 (3-34) 17.1 (4-36) Hernia 1 (6%) 7 (31%)

results Eight pts (31 %) with a standard stoma formation developed a hernia One pt (6 %) with mesh reinforcement develop a hernia p = .029 pts without hernia pts with hernia reinforcement pts without mesh

follow up standard stoma formation without mesh stoma formation with mesh reinforcement

Complications Mesh Group 1 patient required post- op transfusion of anemia No mesh related complications No Mesh Group 3 patients with ileus 1 patient with CHF 1 patient with pelvic abscess

conclusions Lap parastomal hernia repair is feasible Results appear to be better than open repair Technique is demanding Sugarbaker easier / faster than Keyhole Prevention may be the best answer

our best choice In these years we experimented both techniques: modified Sugarbacker keyhole technique BUT THE TECHNIQUE WE PREFER IS

THANK YOU VERY MUCH! Ospedale di portogruaro U.o.C. chirurgia generale francesco fidanza