Fall 2012 Gifted Directors’ Meeting Cheryl Franklin-Rohr & Wendy Leader.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Marilee Sprenger 9:45 – 10:45 December 8, 2005Successful Memory Raises Achievement Successful Memory Raises Achievement Marilee Sprenger.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Chadwick School Monday, January 31, Megan Holmstrom, Chadwick School: Elementary Math Coach - Elements of a vigorous math program - Changes in math.
Instructional Demands of the 2011 Mathematics Frameworks Challenges and Opportunities Pioneer Valley Regional School District October 28, 2011 Farshid.
A Model for Success for All Students
Increased Rigor in the Standards of Learning: Setting a New Trendline for Virginia Schools Dr. Linda Wallinger Assistant Superintendent for Instruction.
Creating Rigor and Relevance in Garden City Public Schools Refining Instruction and Assessment.
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Lesson Planning. Successful Lessons Engaging and challenging Attaining the goals and objectives Exciting and fun Connecting learning content with students’
DME Collaborative for Active Learning in Medicine 1 Designing Independent Learning Assignments (Formerly known as “homework”) Janet M. Riddle, MD Director.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
DIFFERENTIATING INSTRUCTION. Differentiation: A Way of Thinking About the Classroom Differentiation is not a recipe for teaching. It is not an instructional.
Baker College Curriculum Design Tier II. Curriculum Tier Professional Development Tier I – (required) Professional development for curriculum development.
Identifying Mathematics Levels of Cognitive Rigor (DOK) Office of Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Development - Mathematics February 19, 2015 Module.
Jane E. Pollock, Ph.D. Jane, former ESL and classroom teacher, worked as a district administrator and researcher for McREL Laboratory.
October 24, Today’s Class  Define Direct Instruction  Describe Gradual Release of Responsibility  Observe a lesson and discuss the lesson design.
1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 1: Standards-Based Education and the New GPS.
SIOP Co-Teaching Goal:
1 Differentiated Instruction Kelly Rowles October 24, 2006.
Baker College Curriculum Design Tier III
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Regional Planning Real World Applications for Citizens Delaware Recommended Curriculum Course for 9 th grade Training sponsored by DDOE and SSCD Presenters:
Robin Sabo, Clear Creek ISD. What is rigor? Or is rigor more that that But what about in education? Harder Challenging Focused on higher thinking levels.
Rigor in the Classroom DECEMBER 11, Standards: 3. INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES: The teacher promotes student learning by using research-based instructional.
What does this mean?. Teaching Beyond the Facts Trying to teach in the 21 st century without conceptual schema for knowledge is like trying to build a.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Parent Orientation Night for Gifted Services September 15, :30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. Oscar Smith High School.
Student Assessment Workshop #5 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
360 0 Walkthrough TEACHER TRAINING. Develop and support Professional Learning communities Strengthen the Teaching Profession Support the success of every.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Classroom Instruction That Works Barb Rowenhorst ESA 7
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
E-Sheets Ben Freville St. Bede’s School Oct. 7, 2011 DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY  SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Effectively Implementing Standards and Research-Based Strategies with L EARNING -F OCUSED Effectively Implementing Standards and Research-Based Strategies.
EXPLORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RCR EDUCATION IN THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Jim Vander Putten Department of Educational Leadership Amanda L. Nolen.
Assessment Whittney Smith, Ed.D.. “Physical vs. Autopsy” Formative: Ongoing, varied assessment used as a tool for learning and diagnosing Summative:
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Planning for Instruction Chapter 6 NC Teaching Standard IV.
IST_Seminar II CHAPTER 12 Instructional Methods. Objectives: Students will: Explain the role of all teachers in the development of critical thinking skills.
July 2001Mara Alagic: Differentiating Instruction 1 Differentiating Instruction: Individualized Learning Adapted from: Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
“Unmasking Rigor” Roger P. Cuerquez BSE, MS-AMS, Ph.D.-Mathematics (ABD) (Polytechnic Institute of New York University) New York City Public Schools “Return.
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
Cohort Curriculum Spring 2010 ESU 6. Goals Participants will develop curriculum products. Participants will design collaboration networks.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
 In a small group create a definition of rigor as it applies in education.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Using Formative Assessment in Planning: Differentiation and Grouping
Three-Phase Lesson Plan Model
Jane E. Pollock, Ph.D.
Three-Phase Lesson Plan Model
Teaching habits of mind
Getting Started with MMD
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
EXPLICIT DIRECT INSTRUCTION
Presentation transcript:

Fall 2012 Gifted Directors’ Meeting Cheryl Franklin-Rohr & Wendy Leader

1. Rigor means that the work is harder.

2. Rigor means more work.

3. The work is not rigorous if it asks students to apply what they learned in only one context.

4. The lower half of Bloom’s taxonomy is not rigorous.

5. In order to engage in rigorous instruction, students first have to master the basics.

 Write your own definition.  Think/Pair/Share  Share out

Rigorous instruction requires students to:  Construct meaning for themselves  Impose structure/organization on information  Integrate skills into processes  Apply their skills in more than one context and to unpredictable situations

 Read your assigned section on pages 42-46: ◦ Implicit meaning ◦ Ambiguity ◦ Layers ◦ Complexity  Share your information in groups of 4

Traditional Gifted Education Integrated Framework  Depth  Complexity  Novelty  Sophistication  Implicit meaning  Ambiguity  Layers  Complexity

Traditional Gifted Education Integrated Framework  Depth  Complexity  Novelty  Sophistication  Implicit meaning  Ambiguity  Layers  Complexity

How will you know if your students have met the standard in a rigorous way?  The first step is to select or create a rigorous unit assessment to guide your instruction.  If your assessment is not rigorous, the rest of your instruction won’t matter.

What makes an assessment rigorous?  A rigorous assessment measures student thinking, not factual recall.  It sustains or reinforces rigorous engagement.  It asks students to apply their learning in real-world or unpredictable situations.

 Rigorous assessments make student thinking more observable.  Rigorous assessments do not require students to reproduce what they have learned, but require students to think about and use what they have learned.

 Think about the kind of thinking you want students to engage in  That will determine the assessment format that makes the most sense  It will determine how you plan the rest of your unit

 Analyze the rigor of your learning goals  Analyze the rigor of your learning materials ◦ Make sure materials is ability- and age-appropriate ◦ Select materials for relevance and relatability ◦ Build capacity to engage with rigorous material over time ◦ Make sure material is directly connected to learning goals ◦ Choose material that most closely matches content on summative assessments

 How to select appropriate and rigorous instructional strategies: ◦ Plan for thinking, not just doing ◦ Set a rigorous learning goal; select rigorous learning material ◦ Find the thinking process in the standard ◦ Work backwards to identify the thinking skills ◦ Select Habits of Mind to encourage transfer to new situations

 Four levels ◦ Acquisition ◦ Application ◦ Assimilation ◦ Adaptation Notice how the book organizes the Your Turn segments into these same levels

 To make Acquisition rigorous: ◦ Ask students to organize what they have learned ◦ Consider short- and long-term memory ◦ Link new knowledge to prior knowledge  Acquisition: See Frayer diagram example

 Divide into three groups and complete the Frayer diagram for one of the remaining levels ◦ Application ◦ Assimilation ◦ Adaptation (Use pp for information)  Be prepared to share your information with the group.

 To make Application rigorous: ◦ Teach the thinking skill associated with new learning ◦ Cue students to use thinking skill ◦ Provide practice using the new learning and associated thinking skill ◦ Promote metacognition  Complete the Frayer diagram

 To make Assimilation rigorous: ◦ Teach specific thinking processes ◦ Practice using specific thinking processes ◦ Use the same thinking process in several units  Activity: Complete the Frayer diagram  Example and non-example

 To make Adaptation rigorous: ◦ Show how to define and analyze problems ◦ Show how to detach learning from context ◦ Teach Habits of Mind ◦ Provide practice in solving real-world problems ◦ Allow students to find their own solutions  Complete the Frayer diagram

 Moving Students Through the Four Stages of Rigor shows another way to organize this information.  For our next meeting on February 14 th complete two of the _____ Lesson Planning Worksheets using objectives you are working on in your classroom to share with the group.  Notice how these worksheets follow the gradual release model we are using for the valley-wide PLC trainings.

 For our next meeting on February 14 th complete two of the _____ Lesson Planning Worksheets using objectives you are working on in your classroom to share with the group.  Notice how these worksheets follow the gradual release model we are using for the valley-wide PLC.

 Costa, A.L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and Leading With Habits of Mind: 16 Essential Characteristics for Success. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.  Erickson, H. Lynn. (2007). Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.  Hyerle, David. (2011). Student Success with Thinking Maps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.  Jackson, Robyn. (2011). How to Plan Rigorous Instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.  Kaplan, Sandra. (2002). Depth and Complexity. Presentation, NAGC conference.  Marzano, Robert. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.