WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET 56458 TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO 13485 MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Advertisements

AWARENESS OF ISO 9000 (2000) By C. Das Additional Director
ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Environmental Management System (EMS)
DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Based on ISO 9001:2008
Understanding the Requirements Qimpro Standards Organization
 Contracts  Subcontracting  Suppliers  Complaints  Corrective and preventive actions (CAPA)  Internal audits  Management reviews Management requirements.
Draft BY QI organization June 2014
ISO 9001 : 2000.
EPSON STAMPING ISO REV 1 2/10/2000.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Preparing for Quality System Certification
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
Quality Management System
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
ISO 9001:2000 Intro Presented By: Brad D. Agenda Overview of QMS Fundamentals ISO 9001:2000 Overview & Requirements.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
Five Star Quality Consultants Implementing ISO 9001 Corrective and Preventive Action.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Annex 1 – Changes in the detail
Ships in Service Training Material A-M CHAUVEL QMS Terms & Definitions 2009.
13th &14th July 2010 Gaelle Rousseau-Lamour
Quality Management Systems P.Suriya Prakash Final Mech Vcet
ISO STANDARDS TRAINING & CONSULTING
Quality Management Systems
The Role of the Internal Auditor for Maintaining System Compliance and Promoting Continuous Improvement Wayne M. Uttke
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
Creating a Risk-Based CAPA Process
Introduction to ISO 9001:2000.
ISO 14001:2004, Environmental Management System
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Summary of Changes
4.3 Document control 4.4 Review of requests, tenders and contracts
a guidance to conversion
Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.
AET0012PPT by Dr. Anwar El-Tawil Dr. Anwar El-Tawil Director ISO Programme for Developing Countries QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Exercise 1 Tor Stålhane IDI / NTNU. Intro The strength of ISO 9001 and many other standards is that they focus on “What shall be done” and leave “How.
ISO 9001:2000 The 5 Phase Plan to Implementation Sterling, VA Terry & Associates Quality.
It was found in 1946 in Geneva, Switzerland. its main purpose is to promote the development of international standards to facilitate the exchange of goods.
The common structure and ISO 9001:2015 additions
Internal Auditing ISO 9001:2015
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
Presentation on Quality management systems Presented by: Razeena Ameen Roll no BS(IT) 7 th.
1 Quality Management Z SUZSANNA E SZTER T ÓTH R ITA D ÉNES Department of Management and Corporate Economics 1 March 2016.
Quality Management Quality management systems 6th March 2014.
10 June 2016 | Proprietary and confidential information. © Mphasis 2013 Overview of ISO 9001:2008 Mar Internal Auditor Training.
Certified Internal Auditor-NABH. Terms and definitions  Audit/ Assessment: Systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining evidence and.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
28 June 2016 | Proprietary and confidential information. © Mphasis 2013 Audit and its classifications Mar-2016 Internal Auditor Training.
TEMPUS ME-TEMPUS-JPHES “IMPROVEMENT OF PARTNERSHIP WITH ENTERPISES BY ENHENCEMENT OF A REGIONAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT POTENTIALS IN WBC” TEMPUS
External Validation of Quality Programs
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Agenda Who are we? 1 Introductions Journey so far 2
ISO 9000 Dr. S. Thomas Foster, Jr..
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
ISO-9001:2000 Quality Management Systems
External Validation of Quality Programs
Presentation transcript:

WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS Philippe Bauwin Medical devices expert Belgium

8 Measurement, analysis and improvement 8.1 General The organization shall plan and implement the monitoring, measurement, analysis and improvement processes needed a) to demonstrate conformity of the product, b) to ensure conformity of the quality management system, and c) to maintain the effectiveness of the quality management system. This shall include determination of applicable methods, including statistical techniques, and the extent of their use. NOTE National or regional regulations might require documented procedures for implementation and control of the application of statistical techniques.

Monitoring the work environment as well as production equipment ensures appropriate production conditions. The QMS conformity is verified by internal audits. The efficiency of the system is evaluated during management reviews. Quality indicators are selected for the various processes and help to evaluate their efficiency. They can be changed or adapted as needed.

8.2 Monitoring and measurement Feedback As one of the measurements of the performance of the quality management system, the organization shall monitor information relating to whether the organization has met customer requirements.

The organization shall establish a documented procedure for a feedback system [see c)] to provide early warning of quality problems and for input into the corrective and preventive action processes If national or regional regulations require the organization to gain experience from the post-production phase, the review of this experience shall form part of the feedback system The methods for obtaining and using this information shall be determined.

It is not always easy to obtain customer feed-back except in case of complaint because customers rarely respond to enquiries. The most efficient seems to be through sales representatives reports but they must be motivated to make them. Customer satisfaction can be evaluated by : -collecting and analysing data related to the quality of delivered goods such as shipping incidents, service rate, complaint rate -examining and analysing customers requirements during contract reviews -customer enquiries This is usually described in the procedures of the customer process. These informations will be evaluted during management reviews

8.2.2 Internal audit The organization shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals to determine whether the quality management system a) conforms to the planned arrangements, to the requirements of this International Standard and to the quality management system requirements established by the organization, and b) is effectively implemented and maintained. It is important to verify that the planning is implemented, completed and the schedule followed

An audit programme shall be planned, taking into consideration the status and importance of the processes and areas to be audited, as well as the results of previous audits. The audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods shall be defined. Selection of auditors and conduct of audits shall ensure objectivity and impartiality of the audit process. Auditors shall not audit their own work.

The internal audits take in account results of previous internal audits but also external audits made by Competent authorities or the Notified Body, customer requirements and complaints, previous process problems and improvements identified during previous management reviews Auditors must be independent of the audited proces. In small organisations it may be advantageous to use external auditors for example consultants Auditors shall be qualified. An audit shall not be limited to documentary review. Actual processes need to be followed in order to verify that the procedures are implemented.

The responsibilities and requirements for planning and conducting audits, and for reporting results and maintaining records shall be defined in a documented procedure. The management responsible for the area being audited shall ensure that actions are taken without undue delay to eliminate detected nonconformities and their causes. Follow-up activities shall include the verification of the actions taken and the reporting of verification results The follow-up is important and shall be verified NOTE See ISO for guidance related to quality auditing. This standard gives requirements for auditor qualifications

8.2.3 Monitoring and measurement of processes The organization shall apply suitable methods for monitoring and, where applicable, measurement of the quality management system processes. These methods shall demonstrate the ability of the processes to achieve planned results. When planned results are not achieved, correction and corrective action shall be taken, as appropriate, to ensure conformity of the product.

General requirements The organization shall monitor and measure the characteristics of the product to verify that product requirements have been met. This shall be carried out at appropriate stages of the product realization process in accordance with the planned arrangements and documented procedures. In-process quality control as well as final quality control is important Evidence of conformity with the acceptance criteria shall be maintained. Records shall indicate the person(s) authorizing release of product This includes in process releases not only final releases

Particular requirement for active Implantable medical devices and implantable medical devices The organization shall record the identity of personnel performing any inspection or testing. This is common practice also for other medical devices in the industry

8.3 Control of nonconforming product The organization shall ensure that product which does not conform to product requirements is identified and controlled to prevent its unintended use or delivery. The controls and related responsibilities and authorities for dealing with nonconforming product shall be defined in a documented procedure. The organization shall deal with nonconforming product by one or more of the following ways :

a) by taking action to eliminate the detected nonconformity; b) by authorizing its use, release or acceptance under concession; c) by taking action to preclude its original intended use or application. The organization shall ensure that nonconforming product is accepted by concession only if regulatory requirements are met. Records of the identity of the person(s) authorizing the concession shall be maintained

Records of the nature of nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken, including concessions obtained, shall be maintained When nonconforming product is corrected it shall be subject to re-verification to demonstrate conformity to the requirements. When nonconforming product is detected after delivery or use has started, the organization shall take action appropriate to the effects, or potential effects, of the nonconformity. Records of the nature of nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken, including concessions obtained, shall be maintained When nonconforming product is corrected it shall be subject to re-verification to demonstrate conformity to the requirements. When nonconforming product is detected after delivery or use has started, the organization shall take action appropriate to the effects, or potential effects, of the nonconformity.

If product needs to be reworked (one or more times), the organization shall document the rework process in a work instruction that has undergone the same authorization and approval procedure as the original work instruction. Prior to authorization and approval of the work instruction, a determination of any adverse effect of the rework upon product shall be made and documented Records of the nature of nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken, including concessions obtained, shall be maintained When nonconforming product is corrected it shall be subject to re-verification to demonstrate conformity to the requirements. When nonconforming product is detected after delivery or use has started, the organization shall take action appropriate to the effects, or potential effects, of the nonconformity.

8.4 Analysis of data The organization shall establish documented procedures to determine, collect and analyse appropriate data to demonstrate the suitability and effectiveness of the quality management system and to evaluate if improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system can be made. Records of the nature of nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken, including concessions obtained, shall be maintained When nonconforming product is corrected it shall be subject to re-verification to demonstrate conformity to the requirements. When nonconforming product is detected after delivery or use has started, the organization shall take action appropriate to the effects, or potential effects, of the nonconformity.

This shall include data generated as a result of monitoring and measurement and from other relevant sources. The analysis of data shall provide information relating to a) feedback, b) conformity to product requirements, c) characteristics and trends of processes and products including opportunities for preventive action, and d) suppliers. Records of the results of the analysis of data shall be maintained

8.5 Improvement General The organization shall identify and implement any changes necessary to ensure and maintain the continued suitability and effectiveness of the quality management system through the use of the quality policy, quality objectives, audit results, analysis of data, corrective and preventive actions and management review. The organization shall establish documented procedures for the issue and implementation of advisory notices. These procedures shall be capable of being implemented at any time.

Records of all customer complaint investigations shall be maintained. If investigation determines that the activities outside the organization contributed to the customer complaint, relevant information shall be exchanged between the organizations involved. If any customer complaint is not followed by corrective and/or preventive action, the reason shall be authorized and recorded. If national or regional regulations require notification of adverse events that meet specified reporting criteria, the organization shall establish documented procedures to such notification to regulatory authorities. For example some countries require incidents notification not only by manufacturers but also by professional users and distributors.

8.5.2 Corrective action The organization shall take action to eliminate the cause of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities encountered.

A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for a) reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints), b) determining the causes of nonconformities, c) evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur, d) determining and implementing action needed, including, if appropriate, updating documentation e) recording of the results of any investigation and of action taken, and f) reviewing the corrective action taken and its effectiveness.

8.5.3 Preventive action The organization shall determine action to eliminate the causes of potential nonconformities in order to prevent their occurrence. Preventive actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the potential problems. A documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for a) determining potential nonconformities and their causes, b) evaluating the need for action to prevent occurrence of nonconformities, c) determining and implementing action needed, d) recording of the results of any investigations and of action taken, and e) reviewing preventive action taken and its effectiveness.