2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November, 2012 Maria G. Cervantes, Principal.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Title I & Program Improvement Educational Services Cambrian School District December 1, 2014.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? December 9, 2009.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”
STAR Testing Presented by: Caitlin Cline Theresa Anson EDUC 472.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Corona-Norco Unified School District Accountability Update RAN Meeting May 15, 2015.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Response to Intervention Does it work for ELL & Poverty Children Highland Pacific Elementary School San Bernardino City Unified School District CASP March.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District Catch A Rising STAR Understanding Your STAR Student Report (Revised 2012)
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Department of Research and Evaluation
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
2012 Accountability Determinations
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Hedenkamp Elementary School
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education

Two Accountability Measures State –Academic Performance Index (API) –Goal 2008 – API score of 620 or higher Federal (NCLB) –Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) –District and School-wide –Targeted subgroups –Meet yearly AMOs -

API Academic Performance Index

What is API?? Number ranging from 200 – 1000 Represents overall performance of a district or school No Child Left Behind (Federal) sets annual API targets The target for 2008 is 620 All comprehensive schools in LVUSD scored above 800 with the lowest API score being 839 and the highest being 944.

2008 STAR Program Standardized Testing & Reporting (STAR) California Standards Test –Eng/Language Arts gr 2 – 11 –Math gr 2-9 –Science gr 5, 8, 10 –History/Social science gr 8 & 11 Special Education Students –CST or –CMA - Calif. Modified Assess or –CAPA – Calif. Alternative Perf. Assessment

STAR – Several Measures STAR has five components: CST – California Standards Tests CAT/6 – Calif. Achievement Tests ** –CMA – (2 % Cap) gr 3 – 8 (Calif. Modif. Assess.) trial only – not included in API / AYP calculations *** –CAPA – (1% Cap) Calif. Alternate Perf. Assess.) –STS – Standards-based Tests in Spanish ** A bill with the new CA budget would eliminate Cat/6 in grades 3 and 7 *** State Board may vote to include in this year’s API

Perspective………. Statewide – Only 36% of schools in California are at 800 or above

District Growth API

Elementary API Scores 07 Base08 Growth Change Bay Laurel Chaparral907894(13) CLC856 NA Lupin Hill (5) Rnd. Meadow904890(14) Sumac (17) White Oak Willow Yerba Buena All Schools continue to perform well above State / Federal Averages

Secondary Schools API Scores 07 Base08 Growth Change A. C. Stelle A. E. Wright Lindero Agoura High Calabasas H (6) Indian Hills No Data Available All Schools continue to perform well above State Federal Averages

Numerically Significant Subgroups API

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Federal Mandate / NCLB AYP Based Upon: –Participation Rate –Student Achievement – Annual Measurable Objectives –Maintaining API Score (620 +) –Graduation Rate All Schools Met AYP

Requirements for Adequate Yearly Progress…..AYP Participation rate – school wide and each numerically significant subgroup of 95% participation in STAR Meet % proficient requirement in Language Arts and Math Increase API by 1 point or meet the minimum API criteria For High School: –Also meet 82.9% graduation rate

AYP Targets…..

Growth in API or Minimum API

% Proficient / Elementary Schools

Percent Proficient Secondary Schools

API Growth District ELA & Math (English Language Arts & Math)

How Do We Use This Information? STAR = Universal Screening It is just the start:

Cluster Scores Drill Down

% of 8 th Graders taking Algebra I School 05/0606/0707/0808/09 ACS AEW Lindero

Drilling Down……..

Data Management System Multiple Measures Longitudinal Assessment Reporting System Moving to web based system Every teacher will have a sign in code that allows access to their students achievement data –“As Tested” (last year’s students) –Current students Will be able to determine achievement by content standard skill areas

MMARS Active as of September 22, 2008 Faster, more in-depth access to data Facilitates grade level, department level, teacher level, and student level planning and progress monitoring

Examination of Longitudinal Data “Drill Down” to determine the specific deficit areas for students falling below proficient level. Look for weaknesses in skill acquisition and instruction Grade Levels / Departments collaborate to develop interventions

Response to Intervention Strategies Identification of “At Risk” students Diagnostic assessment to determine skill deficits Interventions that MATCH the deficit area(s)

Response to Intervention Frequent Administration of skills based assessment to determine longitudinal growth and success of interventions Building structures for grouping and time for intensive, research based interventions January 2009 will be able to put data from skills based assessments into the Multiple Measures Longitudinal System

All Schools…….. All schools will use data over time (Longitudinal Data) Each school will develop intervention systems that match the specific needs of their individual students. SPSA Plan requirement to address how each school is moving into a Response to Intervention model SPSA Plan requirement to delineate the skill based assessment(s) they will use to “Drill Down”

If parents have questions they may contact their school principal.