Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engaging Your Community in Practical Program Evaluation Stephanie Welch, MS-MPH, RD, LDN Knox County Health Department Phone (865)
Advertisements

SteeringCoordinating Data / Research Logistics Community Engagement Community Health Planning Committee Structure Austin / Travis County CHA CHIP.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.
Community-Led Evaluation Vancouver Public Library CLA 2012.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Evaluating Outcomes of Federal Grantee Collaborations Patricia Mueller, Chair AEA Conference 2014 Denver, CO The National Center on Educational Outcomes-National.
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
The New York City Experience: Working Toward Better Family Outcomes NCSACW Annual Conference July 14-15, 2004 Lisa Lite-Rottmann, Regional Coordinator,
Immunization Calculation Engine (ICE) An Open-Source, Configurable Clinical Decision Support System that Integrates with Any Clinical Information System.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Comprehensive M&E Systems
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Joy Harris, Accreditation Coordinator. Background Influence the development of the national system. Outside view of department readiness. Readiness to.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
“Walking Through the Steps and Standards” Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Evaluation of the Indianapolis, Indiana September 2002 – August 2003 Stamp Out Syphilis Coalition.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
The New York City Experience: Working Toward Better Family Outcomes NCSACW Annual Conference July 14-15, 2004 Lisa Lite-Rottmann, Regional Coordinator,
National Center on Response to Intervention NCRTI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Tessie Rose, PhD NCRTI Co-coordinator of TA and.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Racial and Ethnic Adult Disparities in Immunization Initiative (READII) Update June 1, 2004 Lance E. Rodewald, MD Immunization Services Division, National.
HMP Evaluation Overview and Tools UNE-CCPH June 22, 2011 Presenters: Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell Patrick Madden Pamela Bruno-MacDonald.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks & Designs HSC 489 – Chapter 14.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Evaluation of the Quebec Community Learning Centres: An English minority language initiative Learning Innovations at WestEd May 21, 2008.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Mid-Decade Assessment of the United Nations 2010 World Population and Housing Census Program Arona L. Pistiner Office of the Associate Director for 2020.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
1 National Indicators and Qualitative Studies to Measure the Activities and Outcomes of CDC’s PRC Program Demia L. Sundra, MPH Prevention Research Centers.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
NIKOLE LOBB DOUGHERTY, MA JESSI LAROSE, MPH OCTOBER 2011 H&AC Promising Strategies: Evaluation & Technical Assistance.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Cross-site Evaluation Update Latino ETAC. Goal of Cross-site Evaluation To facilitate and conduct a rigorous evaluation of innovative and effective service.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Demonstrating the Value of Stakeholder Input for Evaluation Design, Implementation and Dissemination Yvonne Abel, MS Abt Associates Inc. AEA Annual Conference,
.  Evaluators are not only faced with methodological challenges but also ethical challenges on a daily basis.
Disseminating Evidence-Based Strategies Associated With Improved Immunization Rates Denise H. Benkel, MD, MPH Bureau of Immunization New York City Department.
Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids Update November 2011.
Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
American Evaluation Association Annual Conference
September 10, 2017 Stewart Landers, Project Director
MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team
A Framework for Program Evaluation
AFIX Standards: a new programmatic tool
Presentation transcript:

Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and Evaluators: The Example of the New York City Health Bucks Program Evaluation AEA 2010 Annual Meeting

Yvonne Abel, Cheryl Austin, Cristina Booker, Jacey Greece, Erin Lee, Jessica Levin, Leah Staub-DeLong, Lauren Olsho (Task Manager), Debbie Walker (Project Leader) The Intersection of Quality and Collaboration: From an Evaluator’s Perspective AEA 2010 Annual Meeting

November AEA Annual Conference 3 Presentation Overview I. Evaluation Overview II. Collaboration with New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH) III. Collaboration with CDC Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity (DNPAO) IV. Lessons Learned (to date) V. Next Steps

November AEA Annual Conference 4 I. Health Bucks Evaluation Overview  CDC-sponsored evaluation, guided by CDC Framework for Evaluation (e.g., utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy)  Process and outcome evaluation  Mixed-methods public health approach (through two key project phases)  Collaborative approach

November AEA Annual Conference 5 CDC Program Evaluation Framework & Health Bucks Evaluation Design and Implementation Form Core Evaluation Team Engage Key Stakeholders Site Visit Key Informant Interviews Document Review Finalize Research Questions Develop Logic Model Develop Study Protocols Engage Stakeholders Describe the Program Focus Evaluation Design Gather Credible Evidence Findings & Conclusions Ensure Use, Share Lessons Learned Clearance of Study Protocols Data Collection (qualitative & quantitative) Secondary Sources Data Analysis Interim Reports Final Report Toolkit Site Visit Key Informant Interviews Document Review Utility → Feasibility → Propriety → Accuracy

November AEA Annual Conference 6 II. Collaboration with New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH) Influence Across Multiple Phases:  Proposal Phase  Formative Phase  Implementation  …and Findings (data collection and analysis still in process)

November AEA Annual Conference 7 II. Collaboration with New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH), cont Collaboration during (Proposal and) Formative Phase:  Description of Health Bucks Program  Inform planning and evaluation efforts  Identification of and access to key stakeholders

November AEA Annual Conference 8 II. Preliminary NYC Health Bucks Program Description and Logic Model: A Tool for Planning and Evaluation of Ongoing Activities

November AEA Annual Conference 9 II. Inform Planning and Evaluation: Preliminary Research Questions

November AEA Annual Conference 10 II. Inform Planning and Evaluation: Preliminary Data Collection Plan

November AEA Annual Conference 11 II. Identification of and Access to Key Stakeholders… One example

November AEA Annual Conference 12 II. Collaboration with New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH), cont Collaboration during Implementation:  Assistance with data collection  Access to program data from current and past seasons  Inform market and Health Bucks staff  Serve as point-of-contact  Outreach to key stakeholders  Talk to “experts” and listen  Get the timing right  Ongoing input and feedback  Updates on market operations and program changes  Guidance on real-time adjustments

November AEA Annual Conference 13 II. Collaboration During Implementation: Data Collection ActivityType of Respondents/Data SourceTimeframe Qualitative Data Collection Focus Groups Farmers’ market and Health Bucks consumers Farmers’ market vendors September 2010 November or March 2010 Interviews Key informants November 2009 – November 2010 Site Visits and Observation Farmers’ market observation November 2009 – November 2010 Quantitative Data Collection Surveys Farmers’ market consumers Neighborhood residents (RDD survey) Farmers’ market vendors Farmers’ market managers Local community organizations July – November 2010 October – November 2010 September – November 2010 October – November 2010 Secondary Data Analysis Data Analysis NYC Community Health Survey Dataset 2002 – 2009

November AEA Annual Conference 14 II. Collaboration During Implementation: Data Collection, cont Example of Consumer Focus Group Implementation:  Stakeholder assistance  Focus Group logistics  Guidance for recruitment of participants

November AEA Annual Conference 15 II. Collaboration During Implementation: Example of Consumer Focus Groups Stakeholder Assistance… Health Bucks staff, District Public Health Office staff, State staff, Market managers, vendors, survey staff, consumers

November AEA Annual Conference 16 II. Collaboration During Implementation: Example of Consumer Focus Groups, cont …informed Logistics and Recruitment  Recruitment materials were prepared in English and Spanish;  Health Bucks, farmers’ market, and survey staff assisted with recruitment;  $35 incentive payments were provided in cash for consumer participants;  Groups were conducted in libraries and an asthma center in each DPHO – and scheduled for mid- morning and mid-afternoon

November AEA Annual Conference 17 III. Collaboration with CDC Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity (DNPAO) Essential during Design and Formative Phase:  Collaboration on instrument design  Consideration of CDC guidelines for OMB Continuous input & feedback throughout the project (to address challenges, adapt to changes, be time sensitive)

November AEA Annual Conference 18 IV. Lessons Learned Key Lessons Learned  Engage stakeholders at all levels  Practice transparency and gain permission to secure cooperation  Do not underestimate time and level of effort for OMB and IRB requirements  Be knowledgeable and aware of program operations  Build flexibility into data collection

November AEA Annual Conference 19 V. Next Steps Program Enhancements:  Feedback to NYC DOHMH to inform programming and evaluation efforts Future Research and Policy:  Findings to inform CDC’s efforts (as well as other researchers and policy community) Broader Dissemination:  “Tool kit” for other states/programs interested in similar efforts

November AEA Annual Conference 20 Thank You (on behalf of the entire Health Bucks evaluation team) Abt Associates Inc.