Iowa’s SPDG/SSIP Alignment March 2016. Who is collaborating? Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids (C4K) Pre-K K-3 Assistive technology Significant Disabilities.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

Advertisements

It is the depth of our connections that makes it possible to do our work. Mark Paul.

Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.

Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education

The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.

New Era MMSR- Maryland Model for School Readiness ends. Maryland’s Early Learning Framework begins… begins transition:

C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.

Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.

C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.

Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)

1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.

NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.

Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.

EL-Civics Application Remember! If in a consortium: –Must complete Budget Detail page for each consortium member EL-Civics Application.

2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.

FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.

SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.

The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.

What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.

Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.

Evaluating the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) ECTA Center National Center for Systemic Improvement DaSy.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.

SPDG Performance Measure Discussion Monday, March 14 th 2011.

2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.

Ingham ISD RtI District Leadership Team March 8, 2010.

APR Know-how Jennifer Coffey November 2013 The Revised SPDG Program Measures and Other Reporting Requirements.

L EADERSHIP : Contributions to Student Outcomes. Context: Michelle White, FLPBSClark Dorman, FL PS/RtI.

C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.

Vermont Early Childhood MTSS

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.

Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.

Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships

Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.

Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Ronald J. Tomalis, Secretary of EducationCarolyn.

Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.

1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.

LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:

MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.

Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.

EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: INSTALLATION

MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.

Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.

Louisiana State Personnel Development Grant Personnel Development Grant to improve outcomes for SWD Awarded to the LDOE in 2016.

SSIP Implementation: Alignment & Evaluation Across the State System

Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity

Documented District Support Needs

Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)

MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.

Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education

Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016

RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE

SPDG/SSIP TA Alignment, Implementation & Evaluation

Model Demonstration Projects

Vermont SSIP Theory of Action

Assessing Professional Learning via Data Management Systems

Planning & Evaluating Evidence-Based Professional Development SPDG National Meeting 10/5/2017 Andrew Schaper Scott Ross.

What have we learned, where do we need to go?

Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.

Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist

Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer

GA’s SPDG Lessons Learned

Instruments for Measuring High Quality PD Denise Andreski & Elaine Pierrel Maryland SPDG Evaluators This suite of tools was developed to evaluate the extent.

Presentation transcript:

Iowa’s SPDG/SSIP Alignment March 2016

Who is collaborating? Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids (C4K) Pre-K K-3 Assistive technology Significant Disabilities School-family partnerships (PTI)

To accomplish? All learners are proficient readers by the end of third grade (SIMR) The delivery of: Specially designed instruction(SDI) o Improve practitioner capability to diagnose, design and implement instruction

Evaluation Plan Take-Aways SPDG and SSIP evaluations have HUGE OVERLAP- However, SPDG evaluations have additional program measures that grantees must include. The components of the SPDG evaluation- Evidence Based PD rubric and fidelity measures can help support the implementation of the SSIP. Use of Implementation Science, which should be embedded within the SPDG, can support both the SPDG and the SSIP

SDI Diagnose for instructional design Design for instructional delivery Deliver for learner engagement Engage for Learning SDI is distributed and can occur at every level of MTSS

Iowa’s Evaluation Plan What is Iowa trying to accomplish and what do they need to think about to be successful? Establish a TA system to effectively implement and support personnel preparation and professional development in the area of specially designed instruction o Who is involved and how do they communicate effectively? o Are professional learning tools, materials and modules aligned with the SDI Framework? Are they comprehensive to meet the needs of the participants? (Building capacity of the coaching network) o What type of procedures, protocols, assessment tools are developed to ensure fidelity of implementation and sustainability?

Iowa’s Evaluation Plan Guiding Questions: What are the challenges and successes in establishing a TA system? What is necessary to build the capacity of Iowa’s coaching network so that network participants have the capacity to train, coach and support delivery of SDI with integrity? What is the scope, frequency and intensity of PD and TA provided to network with participants by strand?

Iowa’s Evaluation Plan What outcomes of the PD plan need to be measured? Goal: To deliver high quality PD so that SDI is implemented with fidelity and effectively improves learning for a wide range of learners. To what extent is PD carried out with fidelity? To what extent is the PD equitable? To what extent are participants satisfied? To what extent are they implementing SDI? To what extent is SDI PD and follow up implemented with fidelity?