Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Texas Evaluation and Support System
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Systems for Moving Forward
Why change from PDAS? PDAS 1997
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
Texas Educator Appraisal Education Service Center Region 13 C-RAC 2015.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Assessment & Accountability Update Richard A. Blair, Sr. Education Specialist Professional Service Provider Network Meeting October 13, 2015.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Recertification TEAM Teacher Evaluation Process.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)

Texas Teacher Standards 149.1001 – Purpose: The standards are performance standards to be used to inform the training, appraisal, and professional development of teachers. Six (6) Standards Standard 1: Instructional Planning and Delivery Standard 2: Knowledge of Students and Student Learning Standard 3: Content Knowledge and Expertise Standard 4: Learning Environment Standard 5: Data-Driven Practice Standard 6: Professional Practices and Responsibilities Materials: Print the Texas Teacher Standards (Handout #2) for this activity. “Effective June 8, 2014, Texas has new rules regarding Educator Standards. These new Texas Teacher Standards, along with research-based best practices provide the foundation for the T-TESS Rubric. Just like our TEKS for students, these standards define what teachers are supposed to know and be able to do.” “Chapter 149.1001 clearly states that the purpose of these standards is to inform training, appraisal, and professional development for teachers. Training and professional development, or growth, are the impetus for the new evaluation system. “This slide provides the categories for each of the standards, so that you can mentally connect them to the T-TESS Rubric. Know that there is a direct correlation between these standards and what we will be observing and measuring with the T-TESS appraisal process. If we look at this underlined statement, statute clearly states that these standards are intended to inform the training, appraisal, and professional development of teachers. The question then becomes, ‘How do we, as instructional leaders, make these connections with teachers?’ ”

Requirements and Recommendations One observation Multiple observations – formal and informal 45 minute minimum for observation Observations should be lesson length (beginning, middle and end) No requirements for announced versus unannounced At least 1 announced and 1 unannounced observation Post conference within 10 business days (feedback) Post conference within 48 hours in-person Pre-conference is optional Pre-conferences should take place for all announced observations * Teacher self-reflection ratings are not required but recommended.

Appraisal Timeline

T-TESS Rubric Overview Standards and Alignment Data and Assessment Knowledge of Students Activities Planning Achieving Expectations Content Knowledge and Expertise Communication Differentiation Monitor and Adjust Instruction Classroom Environment, Routines, and Procedures Managing Student Behavior Classroom Culture Learning Environment Professional Demeanor and Ethics Goal Setting Professional Development School Community Involvement Professional Practices and Responsibilities

T-TESS Rubric

T-TESS Rubric Domain These slides will highlight each element of the rubric (Domain, Indicator, Descriptors and Performance Levels) in slide show mode. “This section of the rubric is where we see the domain. In this case, it’s Instruction.”

T-TESS Rubric These slides will highlight each element of the rubric (Domain, Indicator, Descriptors and Performance Levels) in slide show mode.

Dimension T-TESS Rubric “This section outlines the Dimensions…In this case it’s Differentiation.”

T-TESS Rubric These slides will highlight each element of the rubric (Domain, Indicator, Descriptors and Performance Levels) in slide show mode.

T-TESS Rubric Descriptors Descriptors These sections provide the descriptors for each performance level of the Differentiation dimension.

T-TESS Rubric These slides will highlight each element of the rubric (Domain, Indicator, Descriptors and Performance Levels) in slide show mode.

T-TESS Rubric Performance Levels This slide shows the performance levels… Distinguished, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing and Improvement Needed. Very Important...(Make sure teachers understand what is below.) “When appraisers use the evidence to score a lesson, they will begin in the proficient column. This performance level – Proficient - signifies a ‘Rock Solid’ teacher. Let me say this again, Proficient is Rock Solid…. What does this mean? We will see a bell curve with T-TESS evaluations…. This is a culture shift in Texas. If teachers are Proficient and Rock Solid, then we will see a bell curve which indicates there are some that fall in the accomplished and distinguished levels and others that will be developing and improvement needed. This process is not about the person… it’s about how the lesson scores, using the evidence collected and the rubric descriptors for each dimension.”

Leading Learning

Four Key Elements of the Instructional Post-Conference Introduction Greeting Review Conference Process Ask a General Impression Question About the Lesson. Reinforcement Reinforcement Area (Dimension) Self-Analysis and Follow-Up Questions Share Evidence for Reinforcement Refinement Refinement Area (Dimension) Share Evidence for Refinement Share Recommendations Review Ratings Share Evidence for Ratings

T-TESS Overview Student Growth (Value Added, Student Learning Objectives, District Assessments, Pre/Post Assessments) Rubric (Four Domains: Planning, Instruction, Learning Environment, and Professional Practices and Responsibilities)

Matrix Approach

T-TESS Thoughts…

Advancing Educational Leadership - AEL 5 themes 7 strands

New Texas Principal Standards Instructional Leadership Standard 2 Human Capital Standard 3 Executive Leadership Standard 4 School Culture Standard 5 Strategic Operations

Texas Principal Evaluation & Support System – T-PESS Standard 1 Instructional Leadership Standard 2 Human Capital Standard 3 Executive Leadership Standard 4 School Culture Standard 5 Strategic Operations Texas Principal Standards Systematic Delivery Model Common vocabulary associated with professional practice Identify pathway for professional improvement Reduce instructional variability Increase instructional quality Student Achievement Professional Outcomes Orientation Self-assessment Goal Setting Pre-evaluation Conference Mid-year Progress Meeting Consolidated Performance Assessment End-of-year Discussion Final Evaluation Goal Setting

Training Portal: Reports and Data https://teachfortexas.org The training portal allows for online certification.

Reports

Reports

Reports

Reports

Reports

Reports

Questions/Comments Chris O’Reilly Region 13 Education Service Center Chris.oreilly@esc13.txed.net 512-919-5208