Institutional Biosafety Committee Member Training October 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

THE NIH RECOMBINANT DNA 2002 GUIDELINES East Carolina University September 5, 2007.
What are the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules?
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLORADO SPRINGS Recombinant and Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (rsNA) Training University of Colorado Colorado Springs Environmental.
BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT
Overview of the Roles, Responsibilities and Interactions of the Principal Investigator with the MSSM Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) pgh/ 10/2004.
Risk Assessment in Animal Biosafety ► Risk Assessment Factors  Pathogen/agent  Animal Model (species)  Procedures ► Proposed manipulations ► Assigned.
Outline Introduction to the National Institutes of Health Office of Biotechnology Activities History and Evolution of IBCs: Asilomar to the Present Overview.
Recombinant DNA Training for Research Group Members How to Use this Training Template Principal Investigators (PIs) whose research involves recombinant.
THE NIH RECOMBINANT DNA 2002 GUIDELINES East Carolina University September 5, 2007.
Institutional Biosafety Committee Member Training
Safety Service 5A Lennoxvale Working Safely with Genetically Modified Organisms.
Overview of the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules.
Overview of the NIH Guidelines and VT IBC VT IBC; 3/2013.
Office of the Vice President for Research
Molecular Biology. It’s a Matter of Perspective The investigators who submit IBC protocols want to perform their experiments safely. The investigators.
Principles and Practices of Biosafety Environmental Health and Safety San Diego State University.
Principal Investigator rDNA/Gene Transfer Training on NIH Guidelines
East Carolina UniversityOffice of Prospective Health/Biological Safety Biological Safety Training.
Institutional Biosafety Committee and Biological Use Authorization.
O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR Welcome to the Research Navigator Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Creation.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
ERIKA BARRETT TECHNICIAN, BIOLOGICAL SAFETY OFFICE OF RADIATION, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL SAFETY FRIDAY, OCTOBER 3.
Biosafety and recombinant DNA technology. Involves.... Experiments involving the construction or use of GMOs should be conducted after performing a biosafety.
Safety Review and Approval Process for Research Proposals Robert Emery, DrPH, CHP, CIH, CBSP, CSP, CHMM, CPP, ARM Vice President for Safety, Health, Environment.
Research & Teaching. Various sections of the NIH Guidelines including: NIH Overview Calvin’s Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Recombinant DNA (rDNA)
Introduction to the MUSC Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Registration Process Daniel Eisenman, PhD MUSC Biosafety Officer
Research Protocol Registration at WUStL Institutional Biological and Chemical Safety Committee/ Environmental Health and Safety Joe Kanabrocki Biological.
IACUC and IBC PROCESS. Office of Research Services Resource Center Building Room Kenneth Kratz, PhD –Director Staff: Nicole Barron – Pre-award.
Human Gene Therapy Application Procedures Robert J. Hashimoto The University of Kentucky November 22, 2002.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
1.02 Advanced Compliance Strategies for Academic Medical Centers Kenneth L. Dretchen and Shelia Zimmet Georgetown University Medical Center.
Local Recombinant DNA Oversight Mass Biotech Council Series Enforcement of the Cambridge Recombinant DNA Technology Ordinance Cambridge Biosafety Committee.
Implementation of the NIH Guidelines Robert J. Hashimoto, CBSP University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota November 15, 2007.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF BIOSAFETY RESEARCH Review of Institutional Biosafety Committee Application Form Robert J. Hashimoto The University of Kentucky.
O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR Welcome to Click Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Learning Module.
Safety. Four Simple Questions What are the hazards? What are the hazards? What are the worst things that could happen? What are the worst things that.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Discuss the major characteristics of the four Biosafety Levels. Define “Risk Group” and give an example of each. Discuss how Risk Groups are used in conjunction.
Safety organization and training. The biosafety officer and biosafety committee A safety policy, A safety manual, and Supporting programmes for their.
BioSafety-’13-Outreach Changes to the NIH Guidelines - What They Mean to You - David W. Emery, PhD Research Associate Professor of Medicine & Chair, Institutional.
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER NEW ORLEANS.
CU-IBC Institutional Biosafety Committee formerly the Recombinant DNA Committee Frank Cantone, Interim IBC Chair Cornell University Biological Safety Officer.
The University of Toledo Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) The following slides are presented as frequently asked questions regarding the role of.
Objectives  Define risk assessment as it relates to biosafety  Understand the risk assessment process and how to implement it  Discuss risk factors.
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving rDNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines) and Institutional Biosafety Committees.
The IBC is: The Institutional Biosafety Committee (aka Biohazards Committee)
THE NIH RECOMBINANT DNA GUIDELINES Bob Hashimoto The University of Louisville April 2001.
Overview - NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules Kathryn Harris (NIH)- Modified by Lorraine McConnell (UI)
Stanford University Dual Use Research of Concern in the Life Sciences
Biosafety at Swinburne
Overview of the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid.
Overview of the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules This is an edited combination of Haverford College’s IBC training materials.
The NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
NIH Guidelines Section III - Levels of Review
Biosafety and Recombinant DNA Technology
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
ROLE OF THE INSTITUTIONAL BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE
IBC Best Practice Meeting November 30, 2016
Institutional Biosafety Committee Member Training
NAS Committee on Gene Editing
Gretchen Hofmeister, April 2017
Institutional Biosafety Committees
IBC APPLICATION REQUIRED (April 18, 2018)
Institutional Biosafety Committees
Human Gene Therapy Institutional Review Procedures
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) OVERVIEW
Kathryn Harris, PhD, RBP Senior Outreach and Education Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Biosafety Committee Member Training October 2013

Background Recombinant DNA work covered under NIH Office of Biotechnology Activities (NIH OBA) in: NIH GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING RECOMBINANT OR SYNTHETIC NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULES(March 2013) Purpose of Guidelines: specify the practices for constructing and handling: (i) recombinant nucleic acid molecules, (ii) synthetic nucleic acid molecules, including those that are chemically or otherwise modified but can base pair with naturally occurring nucleic acid molecules, (iii) cells, organisms, and viruses containing such molecules.

Why 2 Committees? Institutional Biosafety Committee UT System level committee that allows for the review of rDNA related work and makes the minutes available to the public (NIH) without being classified as “medical committee” Biological Safety Committee UTHealth committee that discusses all other relevant Biosafety issues, committee is considered a “medical committee” therefore minutes are not available to public

BSC vs IBC Biological Safety Committee (BSC) Reviews research involving the use of infectious agents NOT rDNA Inclusive of subcommittees-needlestick and healthcare BMBL as a reference document Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Reviews all research that involves the use of rDNA NIH/OBA rDNA Guidelines as reference document

Biosafety Levels Biosafety levels are a combination of facilities, equipment and practices. Level 1: basic lab, good lab practices Level 2: limited lab access, specific training and practices Level 3: containment (biosafety cabinet), specific training and practices Level 4: full containment; specific facility, training and practices

Risk Assessment Factors Pathogenicity Route of Transmission Agent Stability Infectious Dose Concentration Availability of effective prophylaxis, treatment Availability of medical surveillance Host susceptibility

Risk Assessment Organism Hosts Vector Expression of foreign gene Protein produced Containment Facility Laboratory-specific protocol Training & expertise of personnel

History of the Guidelines The NIH Guidelines were implemented in response to public and scientific concern over the emerging science of rDNA technologies in the early 1970’s. By 1976, NIH had published the first set of guidelines which have been amended over time to allow for greater public access and a greater emphasis on safety.

Section I: Scope and Applicability If your institution receives NIH funding for rDNA research, then it must comply with the NIH Guidelines. Even if a project is privately sponsored, that research must still be conducted in accordance with the NIH Guidelines if conducted at an institution subject to the NIH Guidelines.

Section II: Safety Considerations Risk Assessment Risk Group 1 (RG1) agents are not associated with disease in healthy adult humans. Risk Group 2 (RG2) agents are associated with human disease which is rarely serious and for which preventive or therapeutic interventions are often available. Risk Group 3 (RG3) agents are associated with serious or lethal human disease for which preventive or therapeutic interventions may be available. Risk Group 4 (RG4) agents are likely to cause serious or lethal human disease for which preventive or therapeutic interventions are not usually available.

Section II: Safety Considerations Containment Containment should be a combination of standard microbiology practices, engineering controls, laboratory facilities and design. Containment is defined in: Appendices G, P, & Q of the NIH Guidelines Laboratory Safety Monograph (historical document) Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL)

Section III: Experiments covered by the NIH Guidelines III-A: transfer of drug resistance III-B: cloning of lethal toxins III-C: human gene transfer research III-D: infectious agents as vectors & transgenic animals III-E: generation of transgenic rodents III-F: exemptions

Experiments Covered by the NIH Level of ReviewSectionResearch Example IBC, RAC review and NIH Director review and approvalIII-ACipro resistant Bacillus anthracis IBC approval and NIH review for containment determinationIII-BCloning botulinum toxin expression into adenovirus IBC and IRB approval and NIH review before research particpant enrollmentIII-CHuman gene transfer IBC approval before initiationIII-D Expression of a nonnative protein in Staphylococcus aureus IBC notification at initiationIII-E Germline alteration of rodents which may be housed in BL-1 ExemptIII-FPurchased transgenic rodents

III-A: Major Actions Requires: IBC Approval, RAC Review, NIH Director Approval Before Initiation of Work Transfer of therapeutically useful drug resistance to organisms which may compromise human health/agriculture/medicine

III-B: Toxin Transfer Requires: NIH/OBA, IBC Review and Approval Before Initiation of Work Deliberate cloning of toxin molecules lethal to vertebrates at an LD 50 of less than 100 nanograms/Kg of body weight (e.g., botulinum toxin) Containment determined by NIH/OBA

III-C: (Deliberate Transfer of rDNA into Research Participants, ex. Gene Therapy) Requires: RAC Review, IBC and IRB Approval Before Participant Enrollment Human gene transfer (HGT) protocols All HGT trials except those covered under vaccine exemption require RAC registration % will be publicly reviewed and may require public review prior to participant enrollment.

III-D: General Work Requires: IBC Review and Approval Prior to the Initiation of Work Involves RG 2-4 agents, host/vector system Cloned DNA from RG 2-4 agents into non-pathogenic prokaryotes RG 2-4 agents into whole animals, usually transgenic Recombinant plants Large scale experiments greater than 10L Generation of any transgenic animal other than BSL-1 rodents

III-E: Less Restrictive Work Requires: IBC Notification at the Initiation of Work (BSL-1 Containment), and Subsequent IBC Review and Approval rDNA molecules that contains less than 2/3 of any eukaryotic viral genome Transgenic rodents with BSL-1 containment (crossbreeding of transgenics now exempt at BSL-1) Whole plants that require minimal containment Anything else NOT covered under sections III-A through III- D & III-F

III-F: Exemptions Exempt from the NIH Guidelines and Does Not Require IBC Review or Approval rDNA molecules that are: Not in organisms or viruses Not a risk to health or the environment -See Appendix C Note: exceptions to exemptions!

FAQ Review process for human gene transfer protocols Vaccine exemptions Major actions under the guidelines Actions_Under_the_NIH_Guidelines.pdf Transgenic animals AQs-Aug2011.pdf

FAQ IBC committee minutes Experiments that are exempt ments_that_are_Exempt_from_the_NIH_Guidelines.pdf

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the Institution: Ensure compliance with NIH Guidelines Establish IBC Appoint a Biosafety Officer if conducting BSL-3, BSL-4, or large-scale work Ensure IBC has expertise in the research that is reviewed Establish a medical surveillance program as needed Report all incidents to the NIH OBA

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the IBC: Review rDNA research, and approve those research projects that are found to conform with the NIH Guidelines. This review shall include: -(i) independent assessment of the containment levels required by the NIH Guidelines for the proposed research; (ii) assessment of the facilities, procedures, practices, and training and expertise of personnel involved in rDNA research; (iii) ensuring that all aspects of Appendix M have been appropriately addressed by the PI; (vii) ensuring compliance with all surveillance, data reporting, and adverse event reporting requirements set forth in the NIH Guidelines. Notify the PI of the results of the IBC’s review and approval. Lower containment levels for certain experiments as specified in Section III-D-2-a, Experiments in which DNA from Risk Group 2, Risk Group 3, Risk Group 4, or Restricted Agents is Cloned into Nonpathogenic Prokaryotic or Lower Eukaryotic Host- Vector Systems. Set containment levels as specified in Sections III-D-4-b, Experiments Involving Whole Animals.

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the IBC: Periodically review rDNA research conducted at the institution to ensure compliance with the NIH Guidelines. Adopt emergency plans covering accidental spills and personnel contamination resulting from rDNA research. Report any significant problems with or violations of the NIH Guidelines and any significant research-related accidents or illnesses to the appropriate institutional official and NIH/OBA within 30 days. The IBC may not authorize initiation of experiments which are not explicitly covered by the NIH Guidelines until NIH establishes the containment requirement. Perform such other functions as may be delegated to the IBC.

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the Biological Safety Officer (BSO) Periodic inspections to ensure that laboratory standards are rigorously followed; Report to the IBC and the institution any significant problems, violations of the NIH Guidelines, and any significant research-related accidents or illnesses of which the BSO becomes aware; Develop emergency plans for handling accidental spills and personnel contamination and investigating laboratory accidents involving rDNA research; Provide advice on laboratory security; Provide technical advice to PIs and the IBC on research safety procedures.

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the Principal Investigator (PI) Initiate or modify no recombinant DNA research which requires IBC approval prior to initiation until that research or the proposed modification thereof has been approved by the IBC and has met all other requirements of the NIH Guidelines; Determine whether experiments are covered by Section III-E, and ensure that the appropriate procedures are followed; Report any significant problems, violations of the NIH Guidelines, or any significant research-related accidents and illnesses to the BSO, Animal Facility Director (where applicable), IBC, NIH/OBA, and other appropriate authorities (if applicable) within 30 days; Report any new information bearing on the NIH Guidelines to the Institutional Biosafety Committee and to NIH/OBA Be adequately trained in good microbiological techniques; Adhere to IBC approved emergency plans for handling accidental spills and personnel contamination; Comply with shipping requirements for rDNA molecules.

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the PI: Responsible for full compliance with the NIH Guidelines in the conduct of rDNA research. Responsible for ensuring that the reporting requirements are fulfilled and will be held accountable for any reporting lapses. Prior to initiating research: -Make available to all laboratory staff the protocols that describe the potential biohazards and the precautions to be taken; -Instruct and train laboratory staff in: (i) the practices and techniques required to ensure safety, and (ii) the procedures for dealing with accidents; and -Inform the laboratory staff of the reasons and provisions for any precautionary medical practices advised or requested (e.g., vaccinations).

Section IV: Roles and Responsibilities Responsibilities of the PI: During conduct of research: Supervise the safety performance of the laboratory staff to ensure that the required safety practices and techniques are employed; Investigate and report any significant problems pertaining to the operation and implementation of containment practices and procedures in writing to the BSO, Animal Facility Director (where applicable), IBC, NIH/OBA, and other appropriate authorities (if applicable) Correct work errors and conditions that may result in the release of rDNA materials; and Ensure the integrity of the physical containment (e.g., biological safety cabinets) and the biological containment (e.g., purity and genotypic and phenotypic characteristics).

IBC Requirements Required to annually submit IBC roster update including curriculum vitae of new members, brief biographical sketch and any significant updates of existing members to OBA rDNA Knowledge Community interest Research expertise No fewer than 5 members who exhibit:

UTHealth IBC Membership Full Members Serve staggered two year terms (FY 12-14) 3+ faculty members with rDNA experience and/or biological safety and containment 2 individuals not associated with the institution (community member) At least 1 member from each school At least 1 with animal containment At least 1 with infectious disease expertise 1 student member Ex-Officio Members Representative from Risk Management/Legal Affairs Representative from Health Services Director, Environmental Health & Safety VP, SHERM Executive Vice President for Research Representative from HCPC

Expectations: Members Active participation on the Committee Sharing expertise and experience Question and scrutinize protocols Ensure protocols meet requirements of NIH Guidelines, BMBL and other biosafety guidelines Participate as a member of a Subcommittee during preliminary reviews Timely response as a member of a Subcommittee Participate in member training, at least annually

UTHealth Protocol Review Submitted to Biosafety for assessment Communication with PI to produce protocol Submitted to Subcommittee for review Submit protocol to IBC for full review Protocol acceptedProtocol rejected, tabled or pending

Approval Memos Once a protocol is approved the appropriate memo is sent out Approval memo Conditional approval memo

Conditionally Exempt Protocols To be a conditionally exempt protocol, proposed work must meet the following conditions: No work that falls under the NIH Guidelines Only involves the collection of human samples (i.e. blood, urine, tissue, etc.) Sample processing limited to: Centrifugation Storage Biological safety office reviews and approves protocols Protocols appear in meeting packets

IBC Resources NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules es.pdf Office of Biotechnology Activities CDC/NIH Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) L.pdf

Questions?