Abuse-Deterrent Opioids: FDA’s Role and Emerging Challenges Jeanne Ireland Principal, Ireland Strategies, LLC 2015 CWAG Annual Meeting
The Opioid Epidemic Some progress being made, but devastating effects of epidemic continue Each day, 44 Americans die from overdoses of prescription painkillers, including opioids In 2013, nearly 2 million Americans abused prescription pain medications and more than 16,000 died In five of the western states, over 80 painkiller prescriptions are written per 100 residents – the second highest rate in the nation. Even in those western states with the lowest national rates, prescriptions are written per 100 residents 2012 was the first drop/leveling off of prescription overdose deaths since the 1990s AGs and States have played a leading role in addressing opioids abuse and overdose Use of a broad range of approaches, including prescription drug monitoring programs, naloxone access, cracking down on “pill mills,” advocacy for abuse-deterrent technologies Introduction of legislation in 31 states this year alone relating to abuse-deterrent opioids
Abuse-Deterrent Opioids – a New Tool for Reducing Abuse Abuse-deterrent opioids (ADOs) – opioids in formulations that are designed to deter abuse by one or more routes “Abuse-deterrent” = more difficult to abuse, not abuse-proof Current products have properties that deter abuse, including through the often lethal routes of snorting or injecting May never be able to completely prevent abuse since product has to deliver pain relief to patient – current products can still be abused by swallowing more pills than prescribed But, still an important element of a comprehensive strategy for reducing misuse and abuse Shift in landscape – now technological, as well as medical, law-enforcement, and policy tools available Emergence of ADO products presents new challenges for policymakers, including standard-setting, labeling, data, access, and cost
The Federal Role in Combatting the Epidemic Many agencies with different mandates related to opioid abuse, including: Office of National Drug Control Policy– education and training Department of Justice/Drug Enforcement Agency – oversight of controlled substances, enforcement Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse - research Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – epidemiological studies Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration/Indian Health Service/Veterans Administration/Bureau of Prisons – provider education, support for PDMPs Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services- coverage, oversight of utilization Food and Drug Administration – drug approval standards, labeling and other safety measures
FDA’s Role in Regulating Opioids Sets standards for the approval of opioids, i.e., what type of data is required to demonstrate safety and effectiveness, analysis of risks vs. benefits Sets standards for the approval of brand and generic ADOs – additional element of assessment of AD properties Can require drug manufacturers to develop education materials and train practitioners on appropriate use and to conduct postmarket studies Determines what “labeling” a drug will carry Informs patients, providers, and payors for which conditions/uses the drug is approved, how it should be used, safety information Determines the type of claims that can be made by drug sponsor in marketing and promoting the product Can mandate changes to labels of approved products if FDA becomes aware of new safety information
FDA’s Regulation of ADOs: Multiple and Competing Considerations FDA’s vision: “…a future in which most or all opioid medications are available in formulations that are less susceptible to abuse than the formulations that are on the market today.” Incentivize ADO development Incentivize progressively stronger AD properties Set realistic expectations about limitations of current technologies Ensure access to lower-cost generics Maintain access to pain relief for patients in need
Current FDA Efforts Since 2010, approved four opioids with AD properties In 2012, required manufacturers to educate providers and patients on appropriate prescribing and safe use In 2013, ordered safety changes to labels of certain opioids to clarify their use for severe pain and for patients for whom other lower-risk pain medications are not appropriate. Also required manufacturers to conduct additional postmarket studies Issued guidance for the evaluation and labeling of branded ADOs (draft in January 2013, final in April 2015) -- sets the bar for types and strength of data needed to achieve progressively stronger AD labeling Laboratory testing Pharmacokinetic studies Human abuse potential studies Postmarket data on effect in real-world setting
Remaining ADO Policy Decisions For FDA Setting the bar for approval of generic ADOs – guidance expected as soon as this year Refuse approval of new opioids without AD properties? Withdrawal of existing products without AD properties? Additional labeling? Complexities Bar will keep shifting as technologies improve Continuing need for data
Remaining ADO Policy Decision Outside of FDA’s Purview - Access Reimbursement decisions by payors, including CMS, can impact patient access to ADOs Recent study by Avalere found Medicare Part D plans place greater restrictions on patient access to ADOs than to non-abuse-deterrent generics opioids Considerations Cost Need for data
Conclusions Goal remains the same – reduction in abuse ADOs offer an important new tool, but much more needs to be done Critical policy decisions still ahead offer opportunities for continued engagement