Filamentous Foaming Causes and Remedies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EO TP3 SAMPLING WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS.
Advertisements

Desalination Becomes A Reality In Tampa Bay Florida
Operator Observations
Biological Treatment Processes
CE 370 Sedimentation.
CLARIFIERS Prepared By Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
ENVE 420 Industrial Pollution Control EQUALIZATION Dr. Aslıhan Kerç.
Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater
Biological waste water treatment
SECONDARY TREATMENT Main aim is to remove BOD (organic matter) to avoid oxygen depletion in the recipient Microbial action Aerobic/anaerobic microorganisms.
ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS AND KINETICS OF ASP
SURVEY OF THE FOULING CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN ATTACHED AND SUSPENDED SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR.
Advanced Pretreatment: Proprietary Configurations, Operational Issues and O&M.
Toni Glymph Environmental Toxicologist Wisconsin DNR Slime, Slime, Slime!
INTRODUCTION TO THE TREATMENT OF TANNERY EFFLUENTS
Sludge Treatment and Disposal
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Nitrification and Denitrification
Identification of Filamentous Bacteria A Simple Approach.
By Jason Calhoun, PE POLYTEC, INC
Environmental Biotechnology CE421/521 Tim Ellis October 25, 2007.
Wastewater Processes.
Attached Growth Biological WW treatment Systems
Folklore in Activated Sludge Treatment Plant Operations
Environmental Technology ChimH409 (2-0-1) Michel Verbanck 2012 Universite Libre de Bruxelles Bruface Dept Water Pollution.
Domestic Waste Water Treatment
ERT 417/4 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY CH 8 - Suspended Growth Biological Treatment Process Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTES. BOD COD TRATTAMENTO CHIMICO TRATTAMENTO BIOLOGICO Most biological waste and wastewater treatment processes employ.
Dissolved Air Flotation Introduction Dissolved air flotation Dissolved air flotation (DAF) is a process for the removal of particles/flocs by making the.
Aerobic and Anaerobic Reactor Configurations
Wastewater Treatment. Collection Sewers Collect wastewater and bring it to the wastewater treatment plant – Combined sewer overflows: Take untreated sewage.
1 IV. Wastewater Treatment technologies Topic IV. 9. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Suspended Biomass - Aerated Tanks: Kinds, Structures, Basic Technological.
Secondary Treatment Processes
A New Twist on an Old Test for Activated Sludge Process Control Estes Park PWO Seminar October 22, 2004 Greg Farmer – Littleton / Englewood WWTP.
Water Waste Treatment.
ENVE 420 Industrial Pollution Control
Wastewater Treatment Processes
SEWAGE TREATMENT.  Sewage is the mainly liquid waste containing some solids produced by humans, typically consisting of washing water, urine, feces,
OPTIMISATION OF ASSETS BY ULTRASOUND TO ACHIEVE LOWEST OPERATIONAL COSTS 6 th European Waste Water Management Conference & Exhibition th October.
Sewage Treatment.
Anaerobic Treatment Anaerobik Arıtma Biyoteknolojisi
Jenny Merical. Introduction Chromium Sources Biological Removal Methods Activated Sludge Absorption Capacity Biomass Growth Nitrification COD Removal.
Secondary Clarifier Jae K. (Jim) Park, Professor
Hybrid bio-chemical approach for treatment of Industrial Wastewater
Natural Resources Waste Water Management. Wastewater entering the treatment plant includes items like: Wood Rocks Dead animals Wedding Rings  Unless.
Screening: Wastewater entering the treatment plant includes items like wood, rocks, and even dead animals. Unless they are removed, they could cause problems.
CEE 426 October :05 PM UW Madison Room 1209 Engineering Hall
LOW D.O. OPERATION: EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL, OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY, DENITRIFICATION, AND ENERGY SAVINGS.
Immobilized Cell System
Biological Treatment 1 Jae K. (Jim) Park, Professor Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison.
FLOTATION. INTRODUCTION Flotation is an operation that removes not only oil and grease but also suspended solids from wastewaters. Flotation is an operation.
Activated Sludge Workshop Techniques and Tools that Improve Clarifier Performance Mike Beattie Operations and Reliability.
Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim
Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment.
WATER MANAGEMENT.
Microthrix parvicella foam control using a rapid method for assessing chlorine effect in activated sludge Ramírez G.W.*, Alonso J. L.*, Basiero J.A.**,
ERT 417/4 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY CH 14 – Thickening, Aerobic & Anaerobic Digestion Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Conventional Sewage Treatment Plants:
National University Of Kaohsiung Taiwan
Chapter 7 - Fundamentals of Biological Treatment
Attached Growth Biological WW treatment Systems
Application: 100PE to 10,000PE.
Modified Ludzack-Ettinger Wastewater Plant
Lecture (8): liquid wastes treatment (primary, vital, advanced).
Advanced Aeration, Inc. Presentation of Vacuum Bubble® Technology
Wastewater Treatment Activated sludge
Identification of Filamentous Bacteria
Wastewater Treatment Dr.Gulve R.M..
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
Nitrogen Removal University of Kansas
Presentation transcript:

Filamentous Foaming Causes and Remedies

Contents What is foaming? How to recognise types of foaming The filamentous bacteria responsible Identifying which filaments you have Getting rid of foams

Settling problems Once settling problems become apparent in the clarifier… …it is usually too late to fix quickly.

Sludge quality problems Bulking filamentous bacteria or zooglea prevent sludge settling Foaming scum on the top of the reactor/clarifier Pin-point floc turbid effluent, small flocs remain suspended Rising sludge blanket nitrogen gas from denitrification

Filamentous bulking Cause: Impact: Filamentous bacteria so prevalent that bridging between flocs causes poor settling, compaction, and thickening Impact: Reduced sludge settling (poor SVI) Suspended solids overflow Reduced solids concentration in RAS and WAS Can hydraulically overload solids handling processes Worldwide problem

Foaming Cause: Impact: Young sludge Toxic/organic shock Specific filaments Fats/oils/greases Low DO Nutrient deficiencies and denitrification (scums) Impact: Can accumulate and putrefy Foams can overflow tank freeboards

Billowy stiff white foam Young sludge (3-4d) Process start-up High organic loading Toxic conditions Excessive wasting High effluent turbidity Zoogloea Surfactants Filament Type 1863 Young Sludge can be often <2d SRT, but also often within 3-4d of startup.

Brown foam Thick and scummy Viscous greasy, chocolate brown Old sludge Viscous greasy, chocolate brown Specific filaments e.g. Nocardia & Microthrix Rich chocolate brown Plants operating in nitrifying mode

Very dark, black foams Insufficient aeration Coloured influent e.g. dyes and inks Fats, oils or greases

Filamentous foams Brown foams – usually associated with: Nocardioforms Microthrix parvicella Type 1863

Nocardiaforms Persistent and difficult to break mechanically Hydrophobic cell surfaces High numbers mean flocs attract air bubbles and floats Can identify

Identifying Nocardiaforms Shape – True branched filaments Size – 5-30 µm long, and cells 1.0 µm in width Staining: Gram positive – strongly Neisser negative. N positive granules common Many variants (genera), e.g. Nocardia, Gordona, Skermania. Can identify

Microthrix parvicella Persistent and difficult to break mechanically Hydrophobic cell surfaces More common in high SRT biological nutrient removal plants Thrives in anoxic / anaerobic conditions, competitive advantage with lipids.

Identifying Microthrix parvicella Shape: Irregular and coiled Size: 50-200 µm long, and cells 0.8 µm in width Staining: Gram positive – strongly Neisser negative. N positive granules common Coiled growth and beaded granules feature.

Type 1863 White-grey foam which collapses easily When plant operated at <2d sludge age Much higher filament concentrations in foam than in mixed liquor

Identifying Type 1863 Shape: Irregularly shaped cells with no attached growth Size: 10-50 µm long, and cells 0.8-1.0 µm in width Staining: Gram negative Neisser negative. N positive granules common Flexible chain of irregular cell shapes.

How to remove foams Depends on the cause Must identify your filament first!

Dealing with Nocardioforms Most important control – removing foam from process Selective foam wasting and dewatering. Side weirs, channels, or gates – continuously remove top 1-3 cm of water from surface. Chlorination – not effective, as the filaments are protected by the floc which surrounds them. Can achieve some success misting chlorine over the foam surface. Cationic polymer addition to foam (0.5-1 mg/L wastewater). Typically dosed into RAS or mixed liquor stream.

Dealing with Nocardioforms Sludge age – encouraged by high SRT (>9d). Consider reducing SRT by increased wasting. Automated wasting to maintain SRT can significantly reduce occurrence of Nocardioforms. Also encouraged by high temperatures – difficult to control, but allows preparation. Selectors – aerobic selectors effective at >5d SRT, anoxic somewhat effective. Must ensure foam not recycled.

Dealing with Microthrix Causes both foaming and bulking Plug flow systems preferred (avoid intermittently aerated zones). Ensure anaerobic and anoxic recycles enter at aerobic zones and DO is maintained above 2 mg/L. Must not trap foam – separate and dewater.

Dealing with Microthrix Sludge age – encouraged by high SRT, increase wasting if process allows. Addition of polyaluminium chloride based flocculants can be effective (has little effect on Nocardioforms). Also encouraged by low temperatures – difficult to control, but you can prepare when temperatures drop.

Dealing with Type 1863 The foam is typically billowy and weak. Should reduce as the plant biomass matures (i.e. after start up or recovery from toxic shock). Increasing biomass SRT should assist – i.e. consider reduced wasting until a suitable SRT is established. Not typically a significant, ongoing problem.

Digesters Nocardioforms and M. Parvicella will persist and foam in anaerobic digesters too

Preventative monitoring Regular monitoring of your plant biology helps. Identify the problem filaments before they get established, and adjust your plant to select against them. Far more cost effective than reacting to a major foaming incident.

References Images and data sourced from the following: Mott MacDonald microscopy image database FNDAE No.2 and 33 Jenkins D, Richard M, Daigger G; “Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking, foaming, and other solids separation problems”. 3rd edition, 2003.

www.mottmac.com