New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Designing Effective Science Lessons Standards Cognitive Development Content Lesson Format Methodologies Effective Science Lessons.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Differentiated Supervision
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
ADEPT Framework
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Moon Area School District.  tml tml 
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent Fall 2007 Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Linking Professional Development to Goals and Objectives for.
An overview presented by: Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
The professional Route to Licensure “There IS room for excellence!”
State Board of Education Progress Update
Teacher Evaluation Process
Georgia Department of Education
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD

The Facts All teachers have Professional Growth/Improvement Plans (PG/IPs) Non-tenured teachers are observed at least 3 times each year Formal observations include a pre-conference and a post- conference Teachers receive a written report after the post-conference has been conducted The administrator and the teacher sign the report All teachers have a Summative Evaluation

Cycle of Professional Development Develop PG/IP Observation 1 October 30 Observation 2 January 15 Observation 3 March 15 Summative Evaluation March 30

Step One Professional Growth/Improvement Plan Developed: By the teacher and an administrator Linked to NJ Standards for Professional Development Implemented: By the teacher Through BRRSD Teachers College, Collaborative Learning Groups and other opportunities Monitored: By the administration

The Professional Improvement Plan Reflect on your strengths and weaknesses with regard to district philosophy and goals: Active student learning Differentiated instruction Literacy across the curriculum Think about your level of proficiency in each of the domains: Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instructional Strategies and Lesson Implementation Professional Responsibilities

Set Goals Examples: Deepen your understanding of the curriculum for each grade level, including content areas such as social studies, science, and health. Develop lessons related to reading for information Explore methods of differentiating instruction during guided reading Develop lessons that integrate authentic writing into content area instruction

Link goals to standards: Examples: 1.1 Assists educators in acquiring content knowledge within their own discipline(s) and in application(s) to other disciplines. 1.2 Enables classroom professionals to help students achieve the New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards. 2.5 Enables educators to plan and design instructional strategies for inclusive classrooms.

Identify activities to accomplish the goals: Examples: Participate in BRRSD Teacher’s College courses, workshops, conferences or graduate school classes to address these goals. Collaborate with district administrators and colleagues to implement the RTI model and address concerns of No Child Left Behind committees. Collaborate with building and district administrators to develop and implement support for teachers as they differentiate instruction.

Step Two Mentor Observation Highly recommended Helps teacher to understand the process Helps teacher to understand expectations Building principals will facilitate (especially for those teachers being formally mentored)

Step Three Classroom Observations Who, What, When, Where, How, Why Elements of Lesson Design Anticipatory set Objectives and purpose Input Modeling Checking for understanding Guided and independent practice Closure or summary Classroom Management

Who, When, Where, How How often? At least 3 times By whom? By either: curriculum supervisors building administrators central office administrators How long? minutes What follows? A conference between the administrator and the teacher A written report is prepared

Summative Evaluation Supervisor or building administrator will ask for input Teacher reflections Samples of student work Teacher will confer with administrator Supervisor or building administrator will prepare written summative evaluation, finalize PG/IP and develop new PG/IP Teacher and administrator sign