Summary of the State of the Art of Programme Implementation CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME 2007-2013 Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland.
Advertisements

The political framework
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Energy Efficiency within the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME European Roundtable – Financing energy efficiency in European.
The 2 nd Call for Proposals Thematic Poles Meeting 09 June Paris.
Main project Calls How to Apply Seminar 29th February 2012 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
European Territorial Cooperation programmes in Central and South-East Europe Béla HEGYESI SEE – CE – INTERREG IVC Pontact Point Hungary
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
The Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Programme
The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 Judit Fejes Executive Agency of Small and Medium Enterprises (EASME)
Monika Schönerklee-Grasser JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME The CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Staccato is a project of the concerto initiative co-funded.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
URBACT III LAUNCH EVENT Brussels, 16 March The URBACT III programme  Objectives & Activities  Thematic coverage  3 Types of network  Beneficiaries.
URBACT INFODAY FINLAND TOWARDS URBACT III Helsinki, 05 November 2014.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF. O Transnational strategy for „Airport City‟ development,
Current and future cooperation opportunities in CENTRAL EUROPE GovernEE Final Event, Hódmezővásárhely, 3 July 2013 Viera Slavikova, JTS CENTRAL EUROPE.
Preparation of a transnational cooperation programme DANUBE National Stakeholder Consultation XXX June 2014 Location.
Defining CENTRAL EUROPE 2020: state of play Stakeholder dialogue Ljubljana, 25 April 2013 Mirjana Dominovic – Joint Technical Secretariat.
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Introducing the 3 rd SEE Call: a strategic approach SEE Programme: the new Calls Ljubljana, 20 April 2011 Ivan Curzolo – SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) ‏ inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhab / km² 43 inhab.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
The Draft Operational Programme Objective 3 Transnational territorial cooperation North West Europe IIIB NWE Joint Technical Secretariat, Lille,
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Lead Partner Seminar Christopher Parker 12 th of June 2008 – Voss, Norway European Union European Regional Development Fund.
NORTH SEA INTERREG PROGRAMME – Jon Jordan UK Contact Point for the North Sea INTERREG Programme europeanpolicysolutions.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Barbara Di Piazza JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME CENTRAL EUROPE INFODAY Venice, 4 March 2008.
1 9 November 2007 – Torino Silke Brocks Project Officer INTERREG IIIC/IVC JTS Lille, France European Interregional Cooperation as part of the Cohesion.
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Toward the 4 th Call for proposals SEE Programme: the new Calls Ljubljana, 20 April 2011 Ivan Curzolo – SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
NATIONAL INFO-DAY Tirana, Albania, September 16th 2015.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Conference on regional governance in a global context The experience of Emilia Romagna Morena Diazzi Managing Authority ERDF ROP
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic project Call and themes for the Seventh Call How to Apply Seminar 16 th February 2011 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
– Opportunities for a low-carbon economy – Focus on Italy Brussels, 30 September 2015 Rosanna Micciché European Commission, DG REGIO 1.
HELPS PROJECT Housing and Home-care for the Elderly and vulnerable people and Local Partnership Strategies in Central European cities Štěpánka Pfeiferová.
Danube Transnational Programme – opportunities for cooperation Bucharest
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
1 Framework Programme 7 Overview. 2 The Programmes within FP7 IDEAS European Research Counsel ERC PEOPLE Marie Curie Measures Initial Training Life-long.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
Interreg Baltic Sea Region What type of projects can receive funding? Policy-to-project-to-policy Conference Copenhagen| 28 April 2016 Ilze Ciganska, Marta.
COSME ENHANCING EUROPEAN TOURISM’S COMPETITIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY Tourism Work Programme
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Preparatory projects as tool for project development 4th February 2009 – Sundsvall, Sweden Maxi Nachtigall European Union European Regional Development.
Project design – Activities and partnership CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser.
URBACT INFODAYS PORTUGAL TOWARDS URBACT III Lisbon 21st January 2015.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 17 th June 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European Regional.
SEE Programme 2007 – 2013 Experiences in the Danube Region and next steps toward Danube Programme DRS Joint PA7 SG, PA8 SG and PA9 SG Meeting Bratislava,
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Interreg Baltic Sea Region: Introduction to the Programme
INTERREG IV A 2 Seas Programme An efficient framework to boost crossborder cooperation and the economic development of the territories BERISUAS Cluster.
Danube Transnational Programme DTP First Call for Proposal and beyond
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities th August 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European.
Promoting European Excellence Rooted in Regions and Cities: Territorial Connections Anna Lisa Boni Secretary General EUROCITIES @EUROCITIEStweet.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 5: Interregional co-operation and network programmes DG Regional.
Early School Leaving and NEETs across the Danube Region – Towards new regional perspectives 18th December 2018, Vienna.
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

Summary of the State of the Art of Programme Implementation CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME

CONTENT  The CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Area  Programme state of the art  Results of 1 st and 2 nd Call  Characteristics of approved projects  ERDF allocation  Next Calls  3 rd Standard Open Call  Restricted Call for strategic projects OVERVIEW

CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME AREA 8 EU countries 1 third country Surface: Around 1,050,000 km² Population: Around 148 million citizens 4 Programme Priorities:  Innovation  Accessibility  Environment  Competitiveness and attractiveness of cities and regions

 2 Calls for Proposals already launched and projects selected and approved for funding  ~ 60% of the total ERDF Programme budget already allocated (around 139 Mio € ERDF funds)  66 projects approved  1 st Call: 29 projects  2 nd Call: 37 projects (conditions are currently being fulfilled ) PROGRAMME STATE OF THE ART

PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION Results of the 1 st and 2 nd Call 1 st Call2 nd Call No. of applications received No. of approved projects 2937 Success rate 31 %21 % No. of project partners Average no. of partners per project11 partners Average project size2,3 Mio € ERDF1,95 Mio € ERDF Allocated funds66,8 Mio € ERDF72,3 Mio € ERDF* * Not considering State Aid related budget cuts

 Highest number of approved projects within Priority 3 Environment (58% of the total approved)  Significant increase of approved projects within Priority 1 Innovation and in Priority 2 Accessibility in the 2 nd Call for proposals  All Areas of Interventions are represented in the approved projects, even if with different intensity OVERVIEW ON APPROVED PROJECTS

APPROVED PROJECTS AND AREAS OF INTERVENTION Less represented Areas of Intervention: 1.3 Fostering knowledge development 2.2 Developing multimodal logistics´ cooperation 2.4 Promoting information and Communication technologies and alternative solutions for enhancing access 3.4 Supporting environmentally friendly technologies and activities 4.2 Addressing the territorial effects of demographic and social change on urban and regional development

PROJECT RESUBMISSIONS 2 nd Call: Significant resubmission of projects initially rejected within the 1 st Call (due to eligibility or quality reasons): 35 projects were resubmitted in an amended form – 20 % of total received projects  success rate of 28,5 % (10 approved resubmissions) CZ: 4 resubmitted projects (out of which 1 project was successful)

APPROVED PROJECTS: LEAD PARTNERS PER COUNTRY Average success rate of Lead Partners:  1 st Call: 31% CZ: 5 projects submitted  0 project approved  2 nd Call: 21% CZ: 18 projects submitted  1 approved project – CLUSTERS-CORD 1 st Call 2 nd Call

APPROVED PROJECTS: PROJECT PARTNERS PER COUNTRY Average success rate of Project Partners:  1 st Call: 35% CZ: Success rate of 49% 46 PPs involved in 21 projects (mainly within P3 Environment – 50% of PPs in 9 projects within P3 )  2 nd Call: 25% CZ: Success rate of 22% 38 PPs involved in 29 projects (mainly within P1 Innovation – 45% of PPs in 12 projects within P1) 1 st Call 2 nd Call

PARTNERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS  Strong focus on activities in the CENTRAL EUROPE area  21 projects made use of the opportunity of involving EU countries outside the CENTRAL EUROPE area (20% flexibility rule) in the 2 nd Call: (e.g. Belgium, Denmark, France, Romania, Sweden, UK)  3 out of the 37 approved projects foresee the involvement of 5 Romanian partners (total ERDF of EUR )  Limited use of the 10% flexibility rule (activities in third countries):  2 nd Call: 6 approved projects (total ERDF of EUR )  Involvement of Ukrainian partners:  1 st Call: 2 approved projects involving 3 UA partners 2 nd Call: 3 approved projects involving 4 UA partners

Private institutions` (PVT) participation Projects submitted Partners involved *) Projects with PVT institutions PVT institutions involved PVT institutions involved in approved projects Percentage of PVT institutions 1 st Call ~15% 2 nd Call ~20% *) The same partner can be involved in more than one project. Figures include also partners from outside the CENTRAL EUROPE area. 2 nd Call: 1 approved project with PVT Lead Partner within P1 Innovation (out of 16 received PVT LP projects)

ALLOCATION OF ERDF FUNDS PER PRIORITY

ALLOCATION OF ERDF FUNDS PER AREA OF INTERVENTION

3 rd STANDARD CALL & RESTRICTED CALL FOR STRATEGIC PROJECTS 3 rd Standard Call  Open to all Programme Priorities and all Areas of Intervention  Indicative allocation of ERDF funds: MEUR  Indicative timeline: Restricted Call for strategic projects  Indicative ERDF funds allocation: MEUR  Not open to all, but only to a limited number of partners meeting specific criteria  Strategic projects will be identified through a different methodology and approach:  Top down approach  Pre-identification of topics and project concepts  Stricter steering of partnership development Launch of the standard and restricted call will not be simultaneous.

3 rd STANDARD CALL Same approach as in the 2nd Call, therefore:  Characteristics of eligible partners  Minimum number of partners and their location  Location of activities  Lead Partner requirements  Co-financing rates  Indicative project size and duration  Eligibility and quality requirements Remain unchanged!

STRATEGIC PROJECTS IDENTIFIED TOPICS Priority 1 Strengthening the clustering of innovative strategic industrial sectors in key competence areas of transnational relevance as biotechnology, nanotechnology, creative industries, etc Promoting enterprises innovation in CENTRAL EUROPE in energy and environmental technologies sectors Priority 2 Optimizing European transport corridors, and their connections to national and regional networks, promoting intermodality and interoperability of transport systems for sustainable, energy efficient and competitive transport modes (also with the application of ICT solutions for transport management) Priority 3 Implementing common policies, strategies and practical actions for increasing the share of renewable energy resources (wind, water, solar energy, geo-thermal) and improving energy efficiency in order to mitigate air pollution and climate change - with special reference to metropolitan areas and energy efficiency of buildings Priority 4 Promoting actions tackling demographic changes and impacts on the development of urban and rural areas, also by strengthening the existing social and technical infrastructures

MC decides on topics, project concepts and criteria for the partners selection April 2010 Identification of ideal partners at national level suitable to implement the identified project concepts (launch of the expression of interest) May 2010 Launch of the targeted strategic call Definition of the partnership and elaboration of the project proposal June 2010 Submission of the project proposal to the MA/JTS Mid July 2010 MC approval for funding September 2010 STRATEGIC PROJECTS THE PROCESS Targeted guidance offered by the JTS and CPs

STRATEGIC PROJECTS CHARACTERISTICS At least 4 strategic projects will be selected (at least 1 per Priority) Max duration: 36 months Directly report to the Monitoring Committee (e.g.: twice during the project life-time) Benefit from a special targeted promotion (e.g.: dedicated knowledge management measures and capitalization actions) Further technical information will be provided in Spring 2010!

CLOSING REMARKS  Launch of the standard and restricted call will not be simultaneous  Pay attention to the still available funds in the Programme priorities  Involvement in strategic projects is not open to all but only to a limited number of partners meeting specific criteria  Time enough to start generating good cooperation projects even before the official launch of the calls

Thank you for your attention!