SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESSES IN NASA AND COMMERCIAL PROJECTS Paul Componation Kathryne Schomberg Susan Ferreira Jordan Hansen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

Assessing the Influence of System Engineering Processes on Project Success Presented by Paul J. Componation Professor, Industrial and Systems Engineering.
Metrics and Databases for Agile Software Development Projects David I. Heimann IEEE Boston Reliability Society April 14, 2010.
4 Conducting Marketing Research 1. What is Marketing Research? Marketing research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of data.
National Human Services Training Evaluation Symposium Fasih Ahmed, Ph.D.
Advancing the knowledge of systems engineering
Amirkabir University of Technology, Computer Engineering Faculty, Intelligent Systems Laboratory,Requirements Engineering Course, Dr. Abdollahzadeh 1 Effectiveness.
System-of-Systems Cost Modeling: COSOSIMO July 2005 Workshop Results Jo Ann Lane University of Southern California Center for Software Engineering.
Sampling Basics 2011, 9, 13. Last Class: Measurement  Scale of measurement –Nominal scale –Ordinal scale –Interval-ratio scale  Reliability: Free of.
Company LOGO B2C E-commerce Web Site Quality: an Empirical Examination (Cao, et al) Article overview presented by: Karen Bray Emilie Martin Trung (John)
درس :مهندسي نيازمندي ها استاد: دكتر عبداله زاده دانشجو: خيرالنسا مرچانت Effectiveness of Elicitation Techniques in Distributed Requirement Engineering.
Who is Really Responsible for On-line Students’ Technical Support? James R. Lackey, Ph.D. Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Using Six Sigma to Achieve CMMI Levels 4 and 5
Process: A Generic View
Don Von Dollen Senior Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications Grid Interop December 4, 2012 A Utility Standards and Technology Adoption Framework.
Business Analysis: A Business Unit Perspective International Institute of Business Analysis January 18, 2012.
Designing Survey Instrument to Evaluate Implementation of Complex Health Interventions: Lessons Learned Eunice Chong Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels Lori Webel-Edgar.
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
Software Quality Assurance Activities
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
S Q A.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
User Study Evaluation Human-Computer Interaction.
IT Requirements Management Balancing Needs and Expectations.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
10/16/2015Bahill1 Organizational Innovation and Deployment Causal Analysis and Resolution 5 Optimizing 4 Quantitatively Managed 3 Defined 2 Managed Continuous.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
By Cao Hao Thi - Fredric W. Swierczek
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
1 System for Administration, Training, and Educational Resources for NASA Training Evaluations.
Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.
Environment Change Information Request Change Definition has subtype of Business Case based upon ConceptPopulation Gives context for Statistical Program.
Process Improvement. It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory. »W. Edwards Deming Both change and stability are fundamental to process.
Use of Administrative Data Seminar on Developing a Programme on Integrated Statistics in support of the Implementation of the SNA for CARICOM countries.
Software Product Line Material based on slides and chapter by Linda M. Northrop, SEI.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Develop Project Charter
Requirements Development in CMMI
Module 1: Introducing Windows Server 2003 Network Infrastructure Planning, Tools, and Documentation.
27/3/2008 1/16 A FRAMEWORK FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS DEVELOPMENT (FRERE) Dr. Li Jiang School of Computer Science The.
The Development and Validation of the Evaluation Involvement Scale for Use in Multi-site Evaluations Stacie A. ToalUniversity of Minnesota Why Validate.
Architecture View Models A model is a complete, simplified description of a system from a particular perspective or viewpoint. There is no single view.
Software Project Management (SEWPZG622) BITS-WIPRO Collaborative Programme: MS in Software Engineering SECOND SEMESTER /1/ "The content of this.
Requirements Engineering Process
Project Management Basics
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
 CMMI  REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT  SPECIFIC AND GENERIC GOALS  SG1: Develop CUSTOMER Requirement  SG2: Develop Product Requirement  SG3: Analyze.
Unit – I Presentation. Unit – 1 (Introduction to Software Project management) Definition:-  Software project management is the art and science of planning.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
MSA Orientation – v203a 1 What’s RIGHT with the CMMI?!? Pat O’Toole
Project Management Strategies Hidden in the CMMI Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman CMMI Technology Conference & User Group November.
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
Defining and Managing Project Scope. MOV Scope Phases Time Estimates Resources Tasks Schedule Budget Sequence Project Planning Framework.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
DoD SE Processes (DAG section)
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Project Roles and Responsibilities
Software Quality Engineering
Technical Management Processes
Software Engineering Lecture #14.
CIS12-3 IT Project Management
X-DIS/XBRL Phase 2 Kick-Off
Requirements Management
Requirements Document
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Misc Internal Validity Scenarios External Validity Construct Validity
Requirements Development in CMMI
Presentation transcript:

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESSES IN NASA AND COMMERCIAL PROJECTS Paul Componation Kathryne Schomberg Susan Ferreira Jordan Hansen

Systems Engineering and Project Success Studies in this Research Stream StudyFocus NASA MSFC Flight Hardware Projects SE Processes map to technical, budget, schedule and overall success SE processes appear to impact budget and schedule more than technical success commercially run projects studies Commercial government-focused and commercial commercial-focused were studied. Notable differences between the two populations with SE processes more important in commercial-government focused projects NASA projects studied Evaluate government-focused, commercial-focused, and NASA-focused projects projects from the 2013 and 2014 studies. Quantify the perceived impact of individual SE processes on individual project success metrics. 2

The NASA Systems Engineering Engine 3

Data Analysis 4 Commercially Run Commercial-Focused Projects Commercially Run Commercial-Focused Projects Commercially Run Government-Focused Projects Commercially Run Government-Focused Projects NASA Run NASA-Focused Projects NASA Run NASA-Focused Projects Project Description Project Success Metrics Systems Engineering Processes Participants

Modified Data Collection Instrument Survey comprised of 82 questions. / 50 relevant to this study. Commercial and NASA SME teams – 8 team members each Beta Test – 25 engineers with a paper copy No significant errors so this group was included in the full data set Data collection – 129 engineers from commercial organizations with paper and on-line surveys 46 government-focused 83 commercial-focused Data collection - 51 engineers from NASA with an on-line survey 5

Sample Questions from the Survey 8. This project had significant technical risk. - Strongly Agree - Agree - Neither Agree nor Disagree - Disagree - Strongly Disagree - Not Applicable 15. This project was a success when compared to the original technical requirements. - Strongly Agree - Agree - Neither Agree nor Disagree - Disagree - Strongly Disagree - Not Applicable 28. This project translated the requirements into a design solution. - Strongly Agree - Agree - Neither Agree nor Disagree - Disagree - Strongly Disagree - Not Applicable 38. This project identified, controlled, and preserved (recorded) the system configuration. - Strongly Agree - Agree - Neither Agree nor Disagree - Disagree - Strongly Disagree - Not Applicable 6

Analysis Plan 1. Analysis of Organizational Differences 1.1 Differences between the organization types (commercial-focused, government-focused, NASA- focused)? 1.2 Difference between the project description variables (relevant scope of work, schedule risk, budgetary risk, technical risk)? 1.3 Interaction between organizational types and the project description variables? 2. Analysis of Project Success Metrics 2.1 Difference between the organization types (commercial-focused, government-focuses, NASA- focused)? 2.2 Difference between project success metrics (technical success x2, schedule success x2, budget success x2, management, overall success x2)? 2.3 Interaction between organizational type and project success metrics? 3. Analysis of Systems Engineering Processes 3.1 Difference between the organization types (commercial-focused, government-focuses, NASA- focused)? 3.2 Difference between systems engineering processes (17 processes)? 3.3 Interactions between organization type and systems engineering processes? 7

1. Analysis of Organizational Differences There are significant differences between organizational types 1.2 There are significant differences between project description variables 1.3 There is no interaction between organizational types and the project description variables

2. Analysis of Project Success Metrics There are significant differences between organizational types 1.2 There are significant differences between project success metrics

2. Analysis of Project Success Metrics – cont There is an interaction between organizational types and project success metrics 1 = Commercial-government 2 = Commercial-commercial 3 = NASA Success Metrics: 1.Technical relative to initial requirements 2.Technical relative to similar projects 3.Schedule relative to original plan 4.Schedule relative to similar projects 5.Budget relative to original plan 6.Budget relative to similar projects 7.Satisfaction with project management 8.Overall project success (organization) 9.Overall project success (stakeholder)

3. Analysis of Systems Engineering Processes There are significant differences between organizational types

3. Analysis of Systems Engineering Processes – cont There are significant differences between systems engineering processes

3. Analysis of Systems Engineering Processes – cont There is an interaction between organizational types and the system engineering processes 1 = Commercial-government 2 = Commercial-commercial 3 = NASA Systems Engineering Processes: 1.Stakeholder expectations definition 2.Technical requirements definition 3.Logical decomposition 4.Design solution 5.Product implementation 6.Product integration 7.Product verification 8.Product validation 9.Product transition 10.Technical planning 11.Requirements management 12.Interface management 13.Technical risk management 14.Configuration management 15.Technical data management 16.Technical assessment 17.Decision analysis

Conclusions 1. Analysis of Organizational Differences 1.1 Differences between the organization types (commercial-focused project, government- focuses, NASA-focused)? 1.2 Difference between the project description variables (relevant scope of work, schedule risk, budgetary risk, technical risk)? 1.3 Interaction between organizational types and the project description variables? 2. Analysis of Project Success Metrics 2.1 Difference between the organization types (commercial-focused, government-focuses project, NASA-focused)? 2.2 Difference between project success metrics (technical success x2, schedule success x2, budget success x2, management, overall success x2)? 2.3 Interaction between organizational type and project success metrics? 3. Analysis of Systems Engineering Processes 3.1 Difference between the organization types (commercial-focused, government-focuses, NASA-focused)? 3.2 Difference between systems engineering processes (17 processes)? 3.3 Interactions between organization type and systems engineering processes? 14

Threats to Validity Focus on NASA Systems Engineering model was a perceived threat, but reviews by SME teams and the alpha test group did not find this an issue. The use of parametric statistics is a concern by some researchers although these approaches have been shown to be relatively robust. To compare these results with other studies we need to assess the relative impact of each systems engineering process against each project performance metric. 15

Next Steps The first is to explore the use of other statistical analysis tools that may better fit the survey data. The use of parametric statistics to analysis categorical survey data is open to debate even though it is a common practice. identifying the magnitude of the specific relationships between the project performance metrics and the systems engineering processes. More data 16