EJSCREEN: Environmental Justice Screening Tool 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS from the EJAC to the IRONBOUND COMMUNITY of Newark, NJ Ana I. Baptista, Ph.D. Ironbound Community Corp. Clean Air Council Hearing April.
Advertisements

New Jersey Clean Air Council Public Hearing The Cumulative Health Impacts of Toxic Air Pollutants on Sensitive Subpopulations and the General Public Status.
Overview of Environment Agency Decommissioning and Clean up programme – delivering Nuclear site restoration Peter Orr, decommissioning and clean up programme.
Multnomah County Health Department Environmental Health PACE EH A Tool for Overcoming Health Disparities Lila Wickham, RN MS November 15, 2003.
Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 May 21,  Two documents have been issued ◦ Actions that Regional Offices Are Taking to Promote Public Participation.
Prepared by: Manuel Pastor, USC Jim Sadd, Occidental College Rachel Morello-Frosch, UC Berkeley Source: CBE Source: David Woo Air Pollution and Environmental.
Ellen F. Heineman, Ph.D. National Cancer Institute Epidemiology & Genetics Research Program The GIS for the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project.
Madeline Wander, MURP Measuring Environmental Justice to Create Sustainable Regions.
Environmental Justice at the MPCA Presenters: Kristie Ellickson and Monika Vadali The MPCA EJ Framework Workgroups 2014 Point Source work related to EJ.
Community Air Monitoring Argentine/Turner Kansas November 2013-July 2014 Richard Mabion, Green Czar and Sierra Club Leticia DeGaigny, Global Community.
California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (Cal-EnviroScreen) OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL.
Prepared by: Center for Justice, Tolerance & Community University of California – Santa Cruz Waste Facilities, Environmental Justice, and Community Participation:
17.32 Environmental Politics Environmental Justice Is Environmental Policy Fair? Does it Matter?
Critical Issues of Exposure Assessment for Human Health Studies of Air Pollution Michelle L. Bell Yale University SAMSI September 15, 2009.
May 19 th, 2010 Risk-Based Community Assistance Visit Prioritization Using GIS Methodologies Bret Gates, FEMA Susan Phelps, AECOM ASFPM 2010 Annual Conference.
Diesel Pollution Reduction Initiative The West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project and Pacific Institute.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Toxics Release Inventory Data and Tools Envirofacts Database and Query US EPA Office of Environmental Information Tribal Lands Forum August 2013.
Environmental Risks in the Southern Central Valley, California A presentation for: Californians for Environmental Justice By: Dan Williams.
Presentation: December 16, 2003 California Integrated Waste Management Board Waste Facilities, Environmental Justice, and Community Participation.
Knowing Your Own Community: Conducting a Social Vulnerability Assessment Sessions
INTEGRATED INFORMATION E & H Action Plan Implementation.
The Use of the Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) Program to evaluate 13 Counties of Northwest Florida TRI & RSEI Evaluations.
1 Community Tools and Resources for Tribes Maeve Foley, Air Division, EPA R9 Marti Lindsey, University of Arizona Charles Swanson, Waste Division, EPA.
Environmental Justice and Environmental Health – Northern Manhattan & Beyond Grassroots Academy April 26, 2007 Anhthu Hoang, General Counsel West Harlem.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 8: Environmental Health Progress Review February 2, 2007.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Mid-Course Adjustment Overview. Flood Map Modernization The Question “The committee understands that the 5-year, $1,000,000,000 program will not update.
2008 Wisconsin County Health Rankings Online Webinar Available November 14, 2008 Kyla Taylor.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Icfi.com April 30, 2009 icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. AIR TOXICS IN MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA: A MONITORING AND MODELING STUDY WEBINAR:
TRI-NATA Explorer 2008 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) National Training Conference Washington, DC February 12, 2008 Ted Palma - EPA Office of Air Quality.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Vital Signs 11: Development and Results of Sustainability Indicators 1 Presentation to NNIP Columbus, Ohio June 21, 2013 Matthew Kachura Research Associate.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Draft Environmental Justice Methodology for the Definition of Solid Waste Rule Public Roundtable Discussion February 23, 2010.
Public Workshop UCLA March 4, 2005 Draft Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community and Health Perspective.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Window to My Environment Tom Brody Region 5 US EPA (Chicago)
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Ozone Data and Outreach Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Air Quality Program.
Spatial Analysis of the Characteristics of Poverty in Alachua County Chris Graziano Nick Lehman Dani Cano.
Integrated Health Assessments Jacksonville, Florida – Fairfax St. Wood Treaters Presented by Vernice Miller-Travis and Sarah Malpass.
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE The Environmental Defense Chemical Scorecard National Infrastructure for Community Statistics February 16, 2005 John M. Balbus MD,
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Residential Segregation: A Key Connector Between Race and Environmental Health Disparities Jennifer Davis, Sacoby Wilson, Muhammad Salaam, Rahnuma Hassan.
NEPA. What do they mean?  NEPA  EIS  EA  FONSI  CATEX  CEQ.
TELEHEALTH: IDENTIFYING GEOGRAPHIES WITH GREATEST POTENTIAL IMPACT
Earth Island Institute
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
EJSCREEN: EPA’s Environmental Justice Screening Tool
Environmental Justice and Emerging Contaminants in the Cape Fear and Neuse River Basins Chrissy Garwood, Luke Griffin, Eric Mai, Alex Mebane, Hannah Smith,
Vulnerability of Low Income Neighborhoods to Environmental Pollution
An EPA web based mapping tool for Environmental Justice screening
Environmental Injustice found in North Carolina?
Drinking Water Mapping Application (DWMA) Demonstration
Centrally collected indicators
Examination of the Risk of Superfund Sites In the United States
Herrera Environmental Consultants Clackamas River Water Providers
Identifying Vulnerable Schools in High Risk Environmental Justice Communities Adam Dorr.
Presentation transcript:

EJSCREEN: Environmental Justice Screening Tool 1

Background 2 ♦ EPA’s new tool for EJ screening and mapping ♦ Web-based GIS tool and data for EPA and the public ♦ Plan EJ 2014 announced EPA’s plan to create a new, nationally consistent EJ screening tool ♦ Builds upon NEJAC report on EJ screening, and prior work across EPA programs and Regions ♦ Peer reviewed by experts on geospatial tools and EJ

Combines environmental & demographic data 3 ♦ EJSCREEN provides: »1. environmental indicators »2. demographic indicators (predictors of health status and of potential vulnerability to environment) and combines them as an index… »3. “EJ index” for each environmental factor, in each location.

Key Features 4 ♦ 12 different environmental factors, including several new or improved metrics (e.g., traffic score) ♦ Updated demographics – every 1 year, not every 10 years ♦ A consistent, quantified approach to EJ, not just “overlays” – numerical indexes that combine environmental and demographic indicators ♦ Accessible and transparent to anyone with a web browser ♦ Standard printable reports and bar graphs ♦ Higher resolution maps – 3 times as many data points ♦ A wealth of additional data maps; can add more from the Web ♦ Raw data downloads will also be available

Using EJSCREEN 5 ♦ A tool for everyone »Available to all EJ stakeholders and general public ›But no requirement that state/tribal/stakeholders use it »Basis for further dialogue ♦ EPA uses EJSCREEN in various contexts »Outreach and engagement »Many aspects of environmental programs »Geographically-based initiatives ♦ What does EJ screening show? »Helps show which places may be candidates for further review – where to take a closer look, where to start.

Important Notes About How EPA Uses EJSCREEN 6 ♦ Tool and data to be shared with States, Tribes, public, etc. ♦ Highlights areas that may be candidates for further review ♦ Pre-decisional screening tool ♦ Does not direct final outcomes ♦ Baseline screening should be supplemented with local information and experience ♦ Should not be used to label areas as “EJ community”

Caveats 7 ♦ Demographic and environmental indicators for a single block group may have high uncertainty ♦ Small differences may not be true or meaningful ones ♦ EJSCREEN does not cover all environmental issues. ♦ Other local data and concerns may be very important.

Based on Census Block Groups 8 ♦ Over 217,000 Block Groups in the U.S. ♦ The average block group has a population of about 1,400 residents, and most have between 900 and 1,800 residents.

Twelve Environmental Indicators 9

12 Environmental Indicators 10 Environmental Indicator Raw Data Type (Units) Raw Data Description Indicator Descriptor Particulate Matter (PM2.5 in µg/m3) PM2.5 levels in air, µg/m3 annual averagePotential Exposure Ozone (ppb) Ozone summer seasonal average of daily maximum 8-hour concentration in air in parts per billion Potential Exposure National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) Diesel PM in (µg/m3) Diesel particulate matter (PM) level in air, µg/m3Potential Exposure NATA Air Toxics Cancer Risk (risk per million people) Excess lifetime cancer risk from inhalation of air toxicsHazard/Risk NATA Respiratory Hazard Index Air toxics respiratory hazard index (ratio of exposure concentration to health-based reference concentration) Hazard/Risk NATA Neurological Hazard IndexAir toxics neurological hazard index (ratio of exposure concentration to health-based Reference Concentration (RfC)) Hazard/Risk

12 Environmental Indicators 11 Environmental Indicator Raw Data Type (Units) Raw Data Description Indicator Descriptor Lead Paint Indicator (% pre-1960s Housing) Percent of housing units built before 1960, as indicator of potential exposure to lead-based paint Potential Exposure Traffic Proximity (daily traffic count/distance to road) Count of vehicles (average annual daily traffic) at major roads within 500 meters, divided by distance in kilometers (km)Proximity Proximity to National Priority List (NPL) sites (count/km distance) Count of NPL (Superfund) facilities within 5 km (or nearest one beyond 5 km), divided by distance in km Proximity Proximity to Risk Management Plan (RMP) facilities (count/km distance) Count of RMP (potential chemical accident management plan) facilities within 5 km (or nearest one beyond 5 km), divided by distance in km Proximity Proximity to Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities (TSDF) (count/km distance) Count of TSDFs (hazardous waste management facilities) within 5 km (or nearest one beyond 5 km), divided by distance in km Proximity Proximity to Major Direct Dischargers (count/km distance) Count of NPDES major direct water discharger facilities within 5 km (or nearest one beyond 5 km), each divided by distance in km Proximity

Seven Demographic Indicators 12 Demographic Index Minority Population Low-income Linguistically isolated Less than high school education Under age 5 Over age 64

Demographic Index 13 Demographic Index = (% low-income + % minority) / 2

Twelve EJ Indexes 14

Twelve EJ Indexes 15

Twelve EJ Indexes 16

What does the EJ Index mean? 17 ♦ The EJ index combines environmental and demographic data ♦ It shows how much a block group contributes to the nation’s overall disparity (between demographic groups) in that environmental indicator. ♦ In other words, »Nationwide overall, the average low-income and/or minority individual in the US has a higher lead paint indicator score than the rest of the US population. »The EJ index shows how much this block group contributes to that disparity. »If the block groups with the highest EJ index values (for lead paint) were “cleaned up” first, that would be the fastest way to reduce the disparity in average lead paint scores.

Maps – Drilling down to explore one indicator at a time 18 ♦ A Report: Gives you all the indicators at once, for a single, specified location (e.g. within 1 mile of a facility) »e.g., looking at all the indicators for residents nearby ♦ A Map: Gives you one indicator at a time, for each of the block groups within a wider area (e.g. across several miles) »e.g., for a single indicator like lead paint, exploring and prioritizing hot-spots, or drilling down from a report to compare neighborhoods or small communities

EJSCREEN PROVIDES MANY OTHER MAP FEATURES ♦ The mapping tool adds many other types of data by overlaying various datasets (called “layers”) 19

EJSCREEN Overview 20 Questions?