Operating with Scientific Content DIA Dialogue on Structured Content Management Dec 2, 2010 Melanie Clare, GSK Ruedi Blattmann, LSCP Michael Brennan, J&J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XML in Pharma – Weve Done SPL, Whats Next? SCIENTIFIC SARAH POWELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, REGULATORY STRATEGIES PHILADELPHIA, PA. FEBRUARY 2006.
Advertisements

© 2011 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
1 Future strategy for e-submission as seen by industry Dr Michael Colmorgen, IFAH-Europe 2nd Veterinary Workshop on E-submission 4 Dec 2009, EMEA, London.
Infrastructures For Information Inc. The Collaborative XML Content Company Content Company.
Providing organizations with a unified view of their enterprise content. Use the navigation buttons to move forward through the presentation.
Patients’ Perspective on HTA and Off-label use David Head MBA Chief Executive RP Fighting Blindness 25th Annual EuroMeeting 4-6 March 2013 RAI, Amsterdam.
Data Monitoring Models and Adaptive Designs: Some Regulatory Experiences Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Associate Director for Adaptive Design and Pharmacogenomics,
The Engine Driving Business Management in Project Centric Environments MAGSOFT INTERNATIONAL LLC.
1 Adaptive Management Portal April
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Regulatory Requirement on Dossier of Medicinal.
EFPIA EFPIA IT Proposals ppt Slide 1 EFPIA Proposals for IT Support to the European Regulatory Procedures Mr S. Hasler EFPIA PAT Regulation 2000.
Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
Regulatory Affairs Domain
Justina A. Molzon, MS Pharm, JD
The Engine Driving Purchasing Management in Complex Environments MAGSOFT INTERNATIONAL LLC.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
FDA’s Biosimilars Guidance -- Legal and Regulatory Considerations James S. Cohen, Esq. McDermott Will & Emery DIA Webinar April 10, 2012.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
Introduction to Drug Rediscovery John Lisman Attorney-at-law Lisman Legal Life sciences Insert your logo in this area then delete this text box.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Medicines Regulatory Affairs
How to audit the role of the vendor in the conduct of outsourced studies Kristel Van de Voorde Director Global Quality Regulatory Compliance Bristol-Myers.
J. B. Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. © Copyright 2005 J. B. Chemicals Pharma Ltd. Electronic Submissions – eCTD Advantages Dr Milind Joshi.
Presenter Name Title Organization Twitter Handle Insert your logo here, then delete text.
Towards an Industry Advisory Group An Open Round-Table Conversation 19 May 2009 Do not copy or reproduce without express written permission of Foresight.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Click to add Presentation Title Arial 32, 5 line max title space line 3, title space line 4, title space line 5 Presenter Title Organization Insert your.
CTD Dossier Preparation K. Srikantha Reddy Sr
Copyright (c) 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Introduction to DBMS.
Achieving Semantic Interoperability at the World Bank Designing the Information Architecture and Programmatically Processing Information Denise Bedford.
SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 eCTD An overview of the full day presentation by Dr Olaf Schoepke at the SAAPI conference in July 2008.
1 COMMON TECHNICAL DOCUMENT / ORIGIN OF CTD… ICH EWG CTD WAS OFFICIALLY SIGNED OFF IN NOVEMBER 2000, AT 5 TH ICH CONFERENCE; SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA.
Sherri de Coronado Enterprise Vocabulary Services NCI Center for Bioinformatics and Information Technology March 11, 2009 A Terminology.
Impact Research 1 Enabling Decision Making Through Business Intelligence: Preview of Report.
Accurate  Consistent  Compliant Contact: i4i the structured content company the structured content company.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FFP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in the US Virginia (Ginny) Beakes-Read Executive Director, Global Regulatory Policy and.
Horst Kastrup September 8, 2015 The “T” in PETD.  The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter.
Strategic Analyses and Interpretation: Regulatory Intelligence for Decision Making Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy & Science ViroPharma Incorporated.
An Overview of eCTD for CMC Specialists Dr Martin Moxham June 2010 iRegulatory Ltd, 1 Viewpoint Office Village, Babbage Road, Stevenage, SG1 2EQ, United.
Microsoft Virtual Academy Jamie McAllister | SharePoint MVP & Solution Architect Rob Latino | Program Manager in Office 365 Support.
© Copyright IBM 2007DIA ERS SIAC Presentation, January 2008 The HL7 RPS and SPL Standards - A High Level View Terry Hardin Sr. IT Architect Emerging Software.
Meredith Brown-Tuttle, RAC Director APT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
DIA ERS SIAC IND CMC eCTD Submissions Part II – IND to NDA
Process-based Metadata From a DIA Presentation: eTMF – Migrating from Paper Trial Master Files to Electronic Eldin Rammell, Managing Director, Rammell.
Experiences from building a lessons- learned database for regulatory interactions Åsa Rembratt Sr Reg Intelligence Manager Novo Nordisk A/S 26th Annual.
Group Sequential Tests for Delayed Responses Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Bath Lisa Hampson Department of Mathematics.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in Canada, EU, Japan, and US Chairperson: Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy &
Gabor Fari Life Sciences Solution Strategist Microsoft Corporation
- A “Portable” Implementation
Mutagenic Impurities: Guidances Update w/ CMC Perspectives
Track 11 Symposium 27 June :30 – 3:00 PM
Perspective on GCP Warning Letters
Molly Butler Auditor II Quality Associates, Inc.
CTD Content Management
Interactive Session: Presentation of Scenarios and Q&A
Nonclinical Information in the Common Technical Document: Opportunities for Content Reuse Peggy Zorn, MPI Research Susan Mattano, Pfizer, Inc.
eCTD Lifecycle Gary M Gensinger
Community-Based and Cluster-Randomized Studies –‘Pragmatic’ Approaches for Life Cycle Evidence? Florian Eichmann, PhD Principal Scientific Affairs and.
FirstPoint and FirstDoc Application of the DIA EDM Reference Model
Presenter Name Title Organization.
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
Agile Translation Best Practices Ann Rockley, CEO The Rockley Group
Business Cases and Advantages of eCTD v4.0
Presenter Name Title Organization.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
Presentation transcript:

Operating with Scientific Content DIA Dialogue on Structured Content Management Dec 2, 2010 Melanie Clare, GSK Ruedi Blattmann, LSCP Michael Brennan, J&J Gary Gensinger, FDA Mo Gould, Morphiris Brooke Hinkson, Genzyme

The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenters and should not be attributed to Drug Information Association, Inc. (“DIA”), its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Special Interest Area Communities or affiliates, or any organisation with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenters and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Drug Information Association, DIA and DIA logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Drug Information Association Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Disclaimer 2www.diahome.orgDrug Information Association

Key Elements of the Vision to Reality LSCP, Ruedi F. Blattmann, Managing Partner View: Extensive re-use of content for multiple purposes across the product lifecycle thereby enhancing information value and reducing costs Globally harmonized structured content authoring processes focused on required outcomes and taking advantage of integrated content repositories Clear definition of stewardship and governance for content objects (topics) Optimized search and retrieval capabilities (in context!) Optimized organizational agility to meet new market challenges, including patent expirations, timely and efficient Rx to OTC switches, enterprise collaboration in virtual teams, etc. Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org3

Where to Start with Product Information Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org4 Toxicology Report Discovery Non-Clinical Development Clinical Development Regulatory Approval Product Launch Commercial Development Pharmaceutical Development Manufacturing Medical and Scientific Affairs Analytical Method Stability Protocol Regulatory Affairs IND/eIND IMPD/eIMPD IND/eIND IMPD/eIMPD Clinical Study Report Drug Safety, Surveillance and Epidemiology NDA/MAA eCTD NDA/MAA eCTD SNDA PSUR SOP Batch Record Lifecycle Stages & Stakeholders Example Documents (Content Components managed at a level of granularity that facilitates re- use) Formulary Submission Dossier Medical Information Letter Product Master Sales Aids Advertising Copy Marketing Campaigns Labeling SPL/PIM Labeling SPL/PIM ICSR Annual Report PI to start here

EXAMPLE: Content Re-use within Nonclinical, but many other Opportunities … within PI Lifecycle M Pharmacology study Pharmacokinetics Toxicology study 4.3 Literature References To M2 2.4 & – introduction, tabulation & summaries Author Reviewer Publisher Approver Study Protocol X MONTH(s) ORAL TOXICITY STUDY OF XYZ Study Report X MONTH (s) ORAL TOXICITY STUDY OF XYZ IN RAT 5.6. Observations and Measurements Immunopheno typing Tissue Collection and Evaluation 8. Conclusions Author Reviewer Publisher Approver EXAMPLE – Start define Granularity (Target Audience in Lifecycle) & launch re-use in the eCTD Dossier strucuture, creation process Creation / Use of Template - Population to automation Content Components (e.g. topics) enhancing value on path forward Author Reviewer Publisher Approver Toxicology Report Discovery Non-Clinical Development Clinical Development Regulatory Approval Product Launch Commercial Development Analytical Method Stability Protocol IND/eIND IMPD/eIMPD IND/eIND IMPD/eIMPD NDA/MAA eCTD NDA/MAA eCTD SNDA Labeling SPL/PIM Labeling SPL/PIM Annual Report PI Label Creation PI Label Creation Example Evolution of Information Value Chain Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org5

Example of Requirements for Granularity Increase Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org6 New PIM Version = Higher Granularity / More Semantics PIM Version PIM Version 2.7.5

Example SCA & Formats: EMA’s View (Source: PIM Concept V2, 1209) Many challenges in managing labeling activities. System used before PIM involves exchanging MS Word and PDF files. Main challenges in Word-based system are: Maintaining consistency in repeated information: Whenever a change is made to certain information in one document, the same change has to be made in all places where that information appears In the Word-based system, maintaining the required consistency is time consuming and potentially error prone Ensuring everyone is working on the same version: The number of versions of Word or paper documents increases as an application progresses, making it difficult to ensure that the applicant, the EMA, and the NCAs are all working on the same version Consolidating many comments from multiple sources: In the Centralized Procedure, comments come from reviewers in all NCAs but must be consolidated into a single coherent version for sending to the applicant Getting the formatting and other technicalities right: A lot of effort is spent by all parties on checking that the formatting complies with the QRD templates and generating PDF files to check that the information looks right SCA: Structured Content Authoring … Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org7

Re-use Illustrative Slides Dr. Michael Brennan

The “Real” Problem We manage information at the document level –Review –Approval –Versioning However, the information (“topics”) that we typically need to access or reference is represented at a more granular level –Section (e.g., contraindication section of a product label) –Paragraph –Sentence The information topic most likely is not changing with each version of a document, yet the topic often “inherits” the meta-data from document context within which it appears –Central driver for adoption of SPL and PIM We need an effective means to access and reference information that is not entirely dependent on navigation via a table of contents We need the capability to query information and know the context within which it is represented to determine whether that is indeed the information we need to access Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org9

Consider a Clinical or Non-Clinical Report Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org10 DraftReviewApproveSubmitRe-Use? Where do we see the opportunities for re-use for a document that has a “simple” life cycle?

Consider Possible Opportunities to Query & Referenced “Tagged” Content as Part of Authoring + Approval Process Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org11 DraftReviewApproveSubmitRe-Use? Reference or link to “authoritative sources” for key topics/information Is the report supported/aligned with Approved “authoritative sources”? What is the status of the referenced information? Can I point to source of key information?

Business Use Case Opportunities ( re-use/references from guidance) Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org12

13 Business Use Case Opportunities (re-use/references from guidance) Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org

XML Technical Opportunities eCTD xml ToC M1 regional xml M M3 3.2.S 3.2.P 3.2.A 3.3 M M QOS Introduction Substance S.1 General S.2 Manufacture S.3 Characterisation S.4 Control of Drug Substance S.5 Reference Standards/Materials S.6 Container Closure S.7 Stability 2.3.P Product P.1 Description & Composition P.2 Pharmaceutical Development P.3 Manufacture P.4 Control of Excipients P.5 Control of Drug Product P.6 Reference Standards/Materials P.7 Container Closure System P.8 Stability 2.3.A Appendices … 2.3.R Regional … Identify structure 1.Enforce structure 2.Navigate to structure points 3.Create composite ToC 4.Support granular life- cycle actions 5.More? M3.x … M3.x … M3.x … Identify relationships between structures 1.Support reference 2.Support re-use eCTD Component Meta Data Type, Id, Version, … Identify meta data Type, Id, Version… Identify subcomponents 1.Support granular navigation 2.Support granular reference/re-use 3.Support ref/re-use granular pedigree Stability Data IDMP Data TablesFiguresGraphs Structures 3.Support reference/ re-use pedigree Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org14

Dialogue Conclusions

Try –Visualie the ‘horizontal’ future, try it! Learn –Learn from trying, and from others in the SCM network Implement –Small or big steps: but away from documents and towards information management Going Forward Drug Information Associationwww.diahome.org16