The Political Economy of Social Security Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Goods and Tax Policy
Advertisements

1 Public choice Alexander W. Cappelen Econ
Chapter 16 Economic Inequality
Institutional interactions. Complementarity between pairs of institutions. Labor market institutions never operate in isolation. Their effects on labor.
Social Security Policy in Ageing Societies: The Rich and the Poor Ronald Lee Panelist NTA10, Beijing, Nov
Controversy 9 What Is the Future for Social Security?
The Direction of Intergenerational Transfers and Demographic Transition: Findings from Lee & Mason Robert J. Willis University of Michigan.
Chapter 22: TAXATION AND SAVINGS – THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 The Government Budget, the Public Debt, and Social Security.
Chapter 10 Credit Market Imperfections: Credit Frictions, Financial Crises, and Social Security Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Expectations and our IS-LM model In this lecture we will examine how expectations about the future will impact investment and consumption today. We will.
Macroeconomics - Barro Chapter 14 1 C h a p t e r 1 4 Public Debt.
Social Security Includes a number of government programs designed to insure stability in income and standard of living Programs in Social Security: 1.Old.
Social Security and Unemployment Insurance. Why do we care? SS is one of largest government programs SS is one of largest government programs Important.
Aging and the Welfare State: A Political Economy Model Assaf Razin, Efraim Sadka and Edith Sand October 2005.
Chapter 8 A Two-Period Model: The Consumption-Savings Decision and Ricardian Equivalence.
Chapter 9 – Social Insurance I: Social Security and Unemployment Insurance Public Economics.
Government Expenditure Composition and Growth in Chile January 2007 Carlos J. García Central Bank of Chile Santiago Herrera World Bank Jorge E. Restrepo.
CH. 8: THE ECONOMY AT FULL EMPLOYMENT: THE CLASSICAL MODEL
PAYG pensions with endogenous fertility Volker Meier Ifo Institute for Economic Research.
Chapter 11: Saving, Capital Accumulation, and Output Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Macroeconomics, 5/e Olivier Blanchard.
Social Security Includes a number of government programs designed to insure stability in income and standard of living Programs in Social Security: 1.Old.
Introduction to Taxation
Taxes, Social Insurance, and Income Distribution <Review Slides>
Population ageing - a demographic trend with multiple consequences!! Prof. Manuela Epure, PhD 16/11/2012 Shaping EU Socio-economic challenges.
Social Welfare Policymaking Chapter 18
Unit 5 – Economic Rights Economics Rights of the Citizen.
1 Social Security Chapter Social Security’s Origin The 1935 Social Security Act Part of the FDR “New Deal” Does more than just funding retirement,
Neoclassical production function
Incentives and the Welfare State James Mirrlees University of Melbourne and Chinese University of Hong Kong Trevor Swan Lecture ANU 13 March 2008.
The fiscal costs of ageing in the euro area: will the young have to pay the bill? Ad van Riet Head of the Fiscal Policies Division European Central Bank.
Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 11 Redistributive Taxation Ricardian Equivalence.
Criteria for Evaluating Social Security Systems in Thailand By Estelle James.
Why Have Social Security?
Privatizing Social Security Under Balanced-Budget Constraints: A Political-Economy Approach Assaf Razin and Efraim Sadka.
Chapter 34 Social Security Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
© 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter 15 Government Spending and its Financing.
The Role of the Fiscal Policy in Poverty Reduction Youngsun Koh Korea Development Institute.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Business PublishingMacroeconomics, 3/eOlivier Blanchard Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and Yvonn Quijano 11 C H A P T E R Saving, Capital.
Time Inconsistent Preferences and Social Security By Imrohoroglu, Imrohoroglu and Joines Presented by Carolina Silva 11/9/2004.
CHAPTER 21 Taxes, Social Insurance, and Income Distribution.
Post-Katrina New Orleans: Inequality and Schooling S. Barbieri – J. Edwards Tulane University New Orleans Political Economy Workshop Tulane University.
The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach By Edith Sand and Assaf Razin The Eitan Berglas School of.
1 How to Finance Retirement with an Aging Population Edward C. Prescott W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University and Federal Reserve Bank.
Determinants of the Welfare State: Dependency Ratio, Wage Gap and Low- Skill Migration Assaf Razin, Efraim Sadka, Phillip Swagel.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Who Gets What? The Distribution of Income Who Gets What? The.
1 Dynamic Inefficiency in an Overlapping Generation Economy with Pollution and Health Costs Maria-Jose Gutierrez University of the Basque Country Journal.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 27 Social Security.
Economics 202 Principles Of Macroeconomics Lecture 10 Investment, Savings and the Real Interest Rate The role of the Government Savings and Investment.
Population ageing and future tax burdens An integrated micro-macro analysis of possible taxation policy changes R Aaberge, Statistics Norway U Colombino,
POLITICS, DEFICITS, AND DEBT The social security debate It’s the demography stupid!
28-1 Economics: Theory Through Applications This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.
Chapter 8 Finances and Economics. Table 8.1 Older Population’s Average Annual Income © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Distribution of income. Direct and Indirect Taxation Direct taxes are paid directly to the tax authority by the taxpayer: –Personal income taxes: on all.
20 CHAPTER Social Security PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS: The Role of Government in the American Economy Randall Holcombe.
Political Economics Riccardo Puglisi Lecture 6 Content: An Overview of the Pension Systems Distinguish Features Economic and Political Explanation A Simple.
Political Economics Riccardo Puglisi Lecture 4 Content: Welfare State: Facts, Data and Relevant Issues Economic Policies Size and Composition of the Welfare.
The Swedish Public-Private Mix in Pensions Eskil Wadensjö Swedish Institute for Social Research.
1 Political Economics Riccardo Puglisi Lecture 8 Content: The Future of Pension Systems: Demographic Dynamics A Complex Simulation Model Evaluating the.
Economics of Demeny Voting Reiko Aoki (CIS,IER, Hitotsubashi University) “Political Economy of Low Fertility of Aging” Workshop Center for Intergenerational.
The political economy of government debt Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi.
Time inconsistency and credibility Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi.
Intragenerational Redistributive Policies Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi.
Taxes on Capital and Savings AGZ, Saez + Gruber.
Pension Systems and the Political Game:
Jimmy Norström Erik Nilsson
Fundamental Concepts of Economics
Public Finance - Introductory
Political Economics Riccardo Puglisi Lecture 5
Presentation transcript:

The Political Economy of Social Security Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi

Why does most Redistribution take place through Pensions? Main Component of the Welfare State What do Pensions Systems do? Provide Income to the Elderly Why do different countries feature different welfare states? Main Questions

Pension Systems and the Welfare State Social Spending by Age Group (1980) Age Group Country and over Canada France Germany Italy Japan Sweden UK US Source: World Bank (1994)

 Pension Systems are mainly Pay-As-You-Go (or Unfunded) and Redistribute Across (and Within) Generations  The Size of the Program Increases with Economic Growth  Pension Systems are Financed with Special Payroll Taxes  Pension Systems Induce Early Retirement  Official Retirement Age has not Increased with Life Expectancy and Health Main Feature of Pension Systems

 The Government Determines the Pension Benefit Formula  Benefits Increase with Lifetime Earnings: Bismarckian and Beveridgean Systems  Benefits do not Depend on Asset Income  Benefits are Paid as Life Annuity  Hard to Borrow against Future Benefits Main Feature of Pension Systems: Benefits

Pension Systems: Unanswered Questions  Equity Reasons may Justify the Initial Government Intervention to Set-up a PAYG Pension System:  US after the great Depression (stock market crash)  Italy and France after the WWII (Inflation)  Lack of Private Insurance Markets (Adverse Selection) Explains the Continuation of these Programs as a Substitute for Family Insurance.  However, how to Explain:  Their Enormous Extension over the last three decades  Their Different Characteristics among Similar Economies  The Existence of Growth-Reducing Features

Pensions: Political Economics Approach  We abstract from Equity and Asymmetric Information and Concentrate on the Redistribution  Pension Systems as a Saving Mechanism with Redistribution  Why do a Majority of Young and Middle Age Workers Agree to Transfer Resources to a Minority composed of the Current Elderly (Retirees)?

Political Responses: Young and Old  Generational Differences: Young and Old  Elderly are pension recipients, they always support Pension systems  However, Old are not a Majority  Important Question: Why do some Young and Middle Age Workers Agree to Transfer Resources to the Current Retirees?  Since Pension Systems are a Saving Device Two Elements are needed: 1.Social Norm or Contract Among Successive Generations 2.Economic Convenience to Follow the Contract

Economic Convenience of a Pension System  We assume that a Social Norm or Contract exists: Agents expect their decisions on the Pension Systems to carry on into the future  Which Features may induce an Economic Convenience to Support the Pension System for some Young and Middle Age Voters?  Dynamic Inefficiency or Good Performance of a PAYG Pension System [Imrohoroglu, Imrohoroglu and Jones ET 99]  Reduced Time Horizon or “Middle Age” Median Voter [Browning EI 75, Cooley & Soares JPE 99]  Redistribution Within Generations [Tabellini SJE 00]  General Equilibrium Effects on Savings and Wages [Cooley & Soares JPE 99, Boldrin & Rustichini RED 00]

 3 periods OLG: Young, Adult, Old  Demographic:  population growth rate  Young and Adult Work and Pay Taxes  Old Retire and Receive a Pension Transfer  Young and Adult are Heterogeneous in their working ability (e)  Time constraint: A Simple Model 1 + e = l + n Effective disposable time Leisure Work

e Distribution of Ability elel eueu eMeM E ( e ) = 0 Poor Rich G (e M ) = 1/2 Median Ability e M < 0 Median < Average A Simple Economy e  [e l, e u ] e l 0 e ˜ G (e) E (e) = 0 Average Ability

A Simple Economic Model  Selfish Preferences:  Budget Constraint

A Simple Economic Model  Social Security System Budget Constraint:  Economic Decisions

A Simple Economic Model  Labor supply Individual AverageAbility  Social Security System Budget Constraint:

 Assume Commitment or Voting once-and-for-all voting (constant  )  Old: Voters’ Preferences

 Adult:  Young: Voters’ Preferences

 COST: Every Young pays a Pension Contribution:  n t  COST: Every Adult pays a Pension Contribution:  n t+1  BENEFIT: Every Old receives a Pension Transfer: p  Assume Dynamic efficiency: Pension system provides on average a lower rate of return than alternative saving mechanisms  Internal rate of return, 1+i= (1+g)(1+  )<(1+R) Economic Convenience of Pension System to Voters  Average Young does not support the Pension system

 Although pensions system provides on average a lower rate of return than alternative saving mechanisms…..  ………………some individuals face a Reduced Time Horizon  Adults have already paid some contributions, which represent a sunk cost.  Past Contributions will not be returned to the worker, but as pensions  Middle Age Individuals only consider Current and Future Contributions and Benefits Economic Convenience of Pension System to Voters

 Internal Rate of Return for an Adult Worker: i W : Economic Convenience: Reduced Time Horizon  Average Adult may support the Pension system

 Although pensions system provides on average a lower rate of return than alternative saving mechanisms…..  ………………some (poor) individuals face a higher return, due to the existence of an element of Redistribution Within Generation  Idea: Agents obtain different returns from the pension system, according to their income:  High Income agents pay large contributions and receive a flat pension benefits: their return is below average  Low Income agents pay lower contributions and receive a flat pension benefits: their return is above average Economic Convenience: Redistribution

 Pension Budget Constraint:  Internal Rate of Return, i w : Economic Convenience: Redistribution  Consider a two periods model with Workers and Retirees.  Low-Income Young may support the Pension system

Political Equilibrium  Individual voting:  Old choose the highest tax rate (top of the Laffer curve)  The vote of Young and Adults depend on their ability  For a given ability (e), Adults choose a higher rate than Young  Preferences are single-peaked  Median voter’s theorem applies  The equilibrium tax rate is the one voted by the agent with Median working ability

 Adult:  Young:  Find equivalent voter: e A and e Y such that  A =  Y. Comparing Votes

Old Low  High  Adults Young Voting on Social Security

Empirical Implications  Pensions decreasing in R  Aging of the population has two opposite effects:  Raises the dependency ratio  Increases the median voter age (or reduces her income)  An increase in income inequality increases Pension spending

 Pension systems affect saving decisions: larger pension transfers lead to lower savings and hence to less capital accumulation  Less Capital implies Lower Wages and Higher Returns on Capital  Idea: More pensions lead to Less Capital. Redistribution:  Capitalists enjoy higher returns on their capital  Workers receive lower wages Additional Element of Economic Convenience: general equilibrium effect

 Simplified Version of Boldrin & Rustichini (RED 00)  2 periods OLG: Young & Old  Homogeneous agents (no ability types)  Production economy with savings and capital accumulation  Demographic:  population growth rate (stochastic)  Log-linear utility : Simple general equilibrium model  Individual Budget Constraint

Simple general equilibrium model  Economic Decisions  Equilibrium Conditions

 Median voter is a young agent  Assume commitment, consider steady state and set initial stock of capital equal to its steady state level.  Indirect Utility: Political equilibrium

 General equilibrium effect:

 In a democracy, voters may only determine current policy-makers and policies. Future policies are determined by future voters (or policy-makers)  Consider the existence of some Economic Convenience: why do some Young or Middle Agents agree to incur a current cost against an uncertain future benefit?  Idea: They expect their current voting behavior to affect future voter’s behavior. How they vote today is relevant for tomorrow’s policy Social Norms or Contracts

 Young Voters’ Expectations: If we pay a pension to the current retirees, we will receive a pension in our old age.  What is their Voting Strategy?  If a pension transfer, financed by a tax rate , has always been paid in the past, Vote for   If, at some point in the past, the pension transfer has not been paid, and thus p , Vote for   Is this Voting Strategy the best a young voter can do?  Is not she better off not paying the current tax rate? Social Norm: How does it work?

 A pension transfer has always been paid in the past.  Agent votes for  Lifetime income:  Agent votes for  Lifetime income:   Because of the Economic Convenience, Agents vote for  Voting Strategy: Results

 A pension transfer has not been paid in the past.  Agent votes for  Lifetime income:  Agent votes for  Lifetime income:   To avoid to incur in a current cost attached to no future benefits, Agents vote for  Voting Strategy: Results