1 Cross-Organizational Calendaring: Future Trends A Ferris Research Teleconference 26 February 2003: 8:30am Pacific, 11:30am Eastern, 4:30pm UK, 5:30pm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP and Instant Messaging. SIP Summit SIP and Instant Messaging What Does Presence Have to Do With SIP? How to Deliver.
Advertisements

Fall IM 2000 Introduction to SIP Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Fall VoN 2000 SIP for IP Communications Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Name | Title | Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise CAL Overview. Different Types of CALs Standard CAL base A component Standard CAL is a base CAL that provides access rights to basic features.
4/15/2017 5:36 AM 1 © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered.
IBM Software Group ® Accessing Domino via Outlook iNotes Access for Microsoft Outlook - Notes Domino 5.5 – Domino Access for MS Outlook - Notes Domino.
Page 1 of 29 Net-Scale Technologies, Inc. Network Based Personal Information and Messaging Services Urs Muller Beat Flepp
Hosted Exchange 2010 Enterprise Grade and Collaboration Solutions for Small and Medium Businesses Web Site:
Oracle Beehive Vivek Pavle Orabyte LLC Orabyte.
1 of 2 This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. © 2007 Microsoft Corporation.
Overview of Centra 7. Centra 7 Highlights A real-time collaboration and communication platform Security, Scalability, Flexibility Supports all the critical.
1 Using Account Status Web Service to design value-added services for your online applications Ivan Chan Media & Systems Services 8th Annual HKIUG Meeting.
Make your messaging reliable use it Messaging. A single and global solution Send, receive and process any type of message through the appropriate channel.
Implementing Unified Messaging Joseph Blanchard Joseph Mancuso S. Paul Petroski.
Exchange 2010 Overview Name Title Group. What You Tell Us Communication overload Globally distributed customers and partners High cost of communications.
Microsoft Exchange Exchange is more than just Electronic Mail The server that embraces Internet standards and extends rich messaging and collaboration.
Copyright © 2002 ACNielsen a VNU company Key Features and Benefits of the 3CX PBX for Windows Server.
-I CS-3505 Wb_ -I.ppt. 4 The most useful feature of the internet 4 Lots of different programs, but most of them can talk to each.
Chandler/Westwood: Progress in Open-Source Collaboration Open Source Applications Foundation EDUCAUSE October 2004.
Winter Consolidated Server Deployment Guide for Hosted Messaging and Collaboration version 3.5 Philippe Maurent Principal Consultant Microsoft.
Office 365: Efficient Cloud Solutions Wednesday March 12, 9AM Chaz Vossburg / Gabe Laushbaugh.
Welcome to the Minnesota SharePoint User Group. Introductions / Overview Project Tracking / Management / Collaboration via SharePoint Multiple Audiences.
Notification Protocol in MMS June 2001 Erez Reinschmidt, Rami Neudorfer 3GPP TSG-T2 SWG3#7 Braunschweig, Germany June, 2001 T2M
Mail and C&S - The Next Evolution in Notes Client Messaging Jill Jones Notes Client Product Manager.
Unified. Simplified. Unified Communications Launch 2007.
Improving organizational communication with advanced Outlook features SCPS Market Research Solutions SCPS Nick Riedel December 17, 2013.
SCO Insight Connector Training. The SCO Insight Connector  Product Overview  Technical Specifications  Installation  Using the Components  Target.
Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 2 CS 3830 Lecture 9
Computer Networking From LANs to WANs: Hardware, Software, and Security Chapter 12 Electronic Mail.
Module 8: Managing Client Configuration and Connectivity.
Web Services (Part 1) Service-Oriented Architecture Overview ITEC 625 Web Development Fall 2006 Reference: Web Services and Service-Oriented Architectures.
Microsoft Outlook Uses and Features.
MCSE Guide to Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Administration Chapter Four Configuring Outlook and Outlook Web Access.
CIS 375—Web App Dev II Microsoft’s.NET. 2 Introduction to.NET Steve Ballmer (January 2000): Steve Ballmer "Delivering an Internet-based platform of Next.
Connecting Businesses and Staff Tools for the Virtual Office  Microsoft Groove Office Collaboration Software  Skype VOIP Telephone  Transferring Files.
1 Driving Convergence Harel Kodesh Vice President Productivity Appliances Division Microsoft Corporation.
© Polycom, Inc. All rights reserved. Polycom CX7000 – Customer Presentation Graybar.
Xavier Lawrence March X. Lawrence - Synchronization of Calendars with a Calendar Server - 2 / 20 Presentation Overview Introduction Project Objectives.
WSDL Tutorial Ching-Long Yeh 葉慶隆 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Tatung University
making services simple Adding a Network- Convergent Service to the Connected Services Sandbox.
Web Services Based on SOA: Concepts, Technology, Design by Thomas Erl MIS 181.9: Service Oriented Architecture 2 nd Semester,
Calendaring and Scheduling (C & S) Branch Hendrix Sr. Principal Technology Specialist Central Region - US Microsoft Corporation.
Outlook 2013 & 2010 Lync Messanger. Outlook 2013 Ribbon Navigation Pane Message View Reading Pane Tabs Status Bar.
Mario D’Silva National Technology Specialists Unified Communications UNC307.
Agenda 5 minutes: WG Overview, announcements 10 minutes: Document plans 30 minutes: Interoperability Experience 10 minutes: Timezone Registry work Links:
Securely Synchronize and Share Enterprise Files across Desktops, Web, and Mobile with EasiShare on the Powerful Microsoft Azure Cloud Platform MICROSOFT.
Exchange Deployment Planning Services Exchange 2010 Complementary Products.
Paul Grady Director Australia and New Zealand Unified Communications Group.
1 Chapters 2 & 3 Computer Networking Review – The TCP/IP Protocol Architecture.
MSG331 Exchange Server 2000/2003 Software Development Kit Susan Hill Lead Programmer Writer Microsoft Corporation.
1 Sharing Calendars Over the Internet Mitchell Kapor –President and Chair - Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF) –Chair – Mozilla Foundation Lisa.
Implementing Microsoft Exchange Online with Microsoft Office 365
Module 1: Overview of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007.
S M T W T F S © Copyright 2005, The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium.
MCSE Guide to Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Administration Chapter One Introduction to Exchange Server 2003.
Calendaring and Scheduling Bob Mahoney and Paul Hill MIT.
Patrick Ortiz Global SQL Solution Architect Dell Inc. BIN209.
Interwise Connect Version 8. Interwise Connect V8: What’s New  Conferencing -Web Client -Extended platform support -Faster application sharing -Automatic.
ZIMBRA ROADMAP. Contains proprietary and confidential information owned by Synacor, Inc. © / 2015 Synacor, Inc. Deliver an advanced, feature rich collaboration.
Microsoft Virtual Academy Talbott Crowell | Chief Architect, ThirdM.com Rob Latino | Program Manager in Office 365 Support, Microsoft.
Redmond Protocols Plugfest 2016 Andrew Davidoff Exchange 2016 Protocol Overview Senior Software Engineer.
Redmond Protocols Plugfest 2016 Jinghui Zhang Office Interoperability Test Tools (Test Suites and Open Source Projects) Software Engineer Microsoft Corporation.
Ferris Research Calendaring & Scheduling Interoperability A Ferris Research Teleconference 29 August 2001: 8:30am Pacific, 11:30am Eastern, 4:30pm UK,
Office 365 Upsell Paths.
Microsoft Lync 2010: In the Cloud
iSIP: iTIP over SIP and Using iCalendar with SIP
Project Information Management Jiwei Ma
Presentation transcript:

1 Cross-Organizational Calendaring: Future Trends A Ferris Research Teleconference 26 February 2003: 8:30am Pacific, 11:30am Eastern, 4:30pm UK, 5:30pm Central European

2 Agenda Moderator: Nick Shelness, Ferris Research Speakers: –Pat Egen, IETF CalSch WG/Patricia Egen Consulting –Andre Courtemanch, Oracle –Jensen Harris & Paul Tischhauser, Microsoft Audience Q&A: hit “1” to ask questions 9:30am Pacific: wrap-up

3 Ferris Research Market & technology research in & collaborative technologies. Eg: – , presence, availability, instant messaging, mobile messaging, other collaborative technologies Clients –IT departments of large firms –Software vendors –Service providers

4 Technologies We Track , list servers, instant messaging, discussion groups, fax servers, unified messaging Group scheduling Desktop conferencing, online classrooms Content security, including virus control & secure messaging Directories, people finders Document management Wireless & handheld connectivity

5 IETF Calendar & Scheduling Protocols – Current Status Pat Egen Co-Chair - IETF Calsch Working Group President - Patricia Egen Consulting llc

6 Published IETF C&S RFCs RFC 3283 Guide to Internet Calendaring RFC 2445 Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar) RFC 2446 iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) –Events, busytime, to-dos and journal entries RFC 2447 iCalendar Message-based Interoperability Protocol (iMIP) RFC 2739 Calendar attributes for vCard & LDAP

7 What Do They Do? iCalendar –Defines syntax and semantics of calendar objects and attributes –Carried by iTIP or iMIP iTIP –Defines the format and rules for transport- independent exchange of requests and responses between a publisher and respondents –Eg, an event organizer and other attendees

8 What Do They Do? iMIP –iMIP is an iTIP binding –Defines how to encode and transport iTIP commands and responses in MIME messages Summary: –Define calendar objects with iCalendar –Publish and respond with iTIP –Carry these requests and responses via with iMIP

9 Status of Interop Testing iCalendar, iTIP and iMIP are in interop. testing –3 interops. have been held to date –Currently working on next “virtual” interop. –Shooting for movement to next standard level (from proposed -> draft) by 4th Qtr, –7 vendors and 2 open source groups have expressed interest in attending future interops. After interops., minor changes may need to be made to RFCs. This will be followed by an IETF approval cycle, before new RFCs are issued

10 Calendar Access Protocol Current work in progress For calendar management –Calendar User Agent (CUA) interaction with a Calendar Service (CS) –CS to CS interaction for calendar management A real-time protocol. CUAs and CSs must be inter- connected for the duration of a CAP interchange CAP status –Looking for last call by 4Q2003 –Then vendor implementation, interop. testing

Mary Jack Bob Mary asks her CUA to invite Bob to a meeting. Her CAP-based CUA issues a request (1) to her calendar service. This is relayed as a CAP request (2) to Bob’s calendar service, which, because Bob doesn’t use a CAP-based CUA, transforms the invitation into an iMIP request (3) that is delivered as to Bob’s Client. Bob instructs his client to delegate attendance to Jack. His client informs Mary of this via an iMIP response (4) delivered as to her Calendar Service. His client also informs Jack of this, via a separate iMIP request (5) delivered as to Jack’s Wireless PDA. Mary will again use CAP (1) to read Bob’s response.

12 What’s On The Horizon? An XML iCalendar representation An RDF iCalendar representation (W3C effort) Moving Internet calendaring & scheduling into the mainstream Increased interest from vendors and end users –User community will drive the requirements for standards –Calendaring not quite at the level of or Web usage but rapidly approaching that level

13 Oracle Collaboration Suite André Courtemanche Vice President Time Management Platform Oracle Corporation

14 Our Experience Vendors are adopting standards…slowly –Proprietary protocols & formats remain the norm in commercially available products –Behind-the-scenes areas such as recurrence rules and time zone information are complex Customers suffering from co-existence pains –Scheduling workflow –Free/busy information –Mobile device access –Application integration

15 Oracle Collaboration Suite R2 Oracle Calendar supports the iCalendar data model –Events, tasks –Import/export –SyncML synchronization –SDK / Web services Scheduling workflow through all Oracle Calendar clients – invitations & notifications with iCalendar attachments in.ics file format –Desktop clients, Web client, Connector for Outlook

16 Oracle Collaboration Suite R2 Oracle Connector for Outlook leverages C&S standards supported by Outlook –Key element in solving co-existence with Exchange –Sharing of free/busy information via.vfb file format – invitations with.ics attachments Integration with new Collaboration Suite components such as iMeeting, wireless, & voice

17 Oracle Calendar: Futures Full iTIP/iMIP implementation Adoption of CAP Monitor open source initiatives Web services Support for Office 2003 Sharing calendar information across Oracle’s E-Business Suite Continued cross platform support

18 Jensen Harris Senior Program Manager – Outlook Paul Tischhauser Program Manager – Exchange MS Outlook & Exchange

19 Standards Support in Outlook iMIP support in Outlook for sending & receiving meeting invitations & responses –Outlook 2000 – early iMIP draft –Outlook 2002 – full RFC 2447 iCalendar objects employed in Outlook 2000 for publishing free/busy times to HTTP & FTP servers –Not an IETF standard

20 Standards Support Internet free/busy time service in Outlook 2002 and later –Publish/view free/busy times over the Internet –Requires Passport –Only SMTP address needed for lookup –iCalendar-based –Not an IETF standard Improved iMIP support in Outlook 2003 –Better interoperability with other vendors –Better MIME handling

21 Outlook Calendaring: Futures Continuing to invest in standards-based calendaring in future versions Innovations and features are always based on customer demand Evaluating standards as needed to fill customer needs in future versions

22 Standards Support in Exchange For Exchange Server 2000 and 2003 Full iMIP support through native MIME support Partial iTIP interop support –Support meeting request/response –Eg, VEVENT, VTIMEZONE –No task assignment, free/busy –Eg, VTODO, VFREEBUSY

23 Standards Support Store automatically converts calendar info. to the correct format for client programs –Outlook, OWA, CDOEX, etc. Provide API to send calendar information to any iMIP compliant CUA

24 Commentary Nick Shelness Consulting Analyst Ferris Research, Inc.

25 Demand It was clear quite early on that had to operate not just within organizations but between organizations Today, this need is much less apparent for calendaring & scheduling (C&S) systems As with instant messaging, people may have to start using inter-organizational C&S to discover its utility When will this be an option?

26 Technical Barriers The constructs of different proprietary C&S systems are not fully compatible The constructs of iCalendar differ again from those of proprietary C&S systems This is especially true of repeating events, availability representations, and time zone constructs

27 A Solutions Roadmap For the time being, translation will be required. This will work pretty well for core C&S features, but peripheral C&S features may break Over time, proprietary C&S systems will natively support iCalendar constructs just as proprietary systems now natively support Internet constructs (addresses, MIME, text/html) Multi-vendor iMIP support is in place now CAP adoption remains an unknown

28 Current Vendor Status Notes & Domino R6 support iMIP –Notes generates multi-part/alternative MIME with text/plain, text/html and iMIP encoding of C&S objects plus an iMIP attachment, for all MIME recipients. Domino converts incoming iMIP into native Notes format Outlook & Exchange 2003 support iMIP –Outlook 2003 generates & consumes iMIP encoded C&S objects for MIME recipients & from MIME senders Oracle Collaboration Suite supports iMIP –OCS generates and consumes iMIP messages

29 The Future User demand will drive: –Improvements to iMIP translation –Migration to support of native iCalendar constructs, and –Implementation of CAP

30 Q & A Hit “1” on phone pad to ask a question

31 Wrap-Up Evaluations Next teleconference: –March 26, 8.30am PST –“Integrating Presence into Business Applications: Future Trends” –Register at