National Data Buoy Center Ian Sears National Data Buoy Center An Overview of Quality Control Procedures for Buoy Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAMOS Data Management System
Advertisements

The Operational Marine Climate Monitoring and Forecasting System of Puertos del Estado (PE) Área de Conocimiento y Análisis del Medio Físico Puertos del.
TRIAXYS DIRECTIONAL WAVE BUOY DBCP Conference Chennai, India October, 2004 Don Bryan.
TURKEY AWOS TRAINING 1.0 / ALANYA 2005 TRAINING COURSE ON AUTOMATED WEATHER OBSERVING SYSTEMS ( AWOS ) MODULE D: DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM SONER KARATAŞ ELECTRONIC.
TIDE TOOL: Open-Source Sea-Level Monitoring Software for Tsunami Warning Systems Stuart A. Weinstein 1, Laura S. L. Kong 2, Dailin Wang 1, Nathan C. Becker.
HydroLynx Systems, Inc. 950 Riverside Pkwy., #10 West Sacramento, CA
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Improvements to the CO-OPS Storm QuickLook Product for Real-Time Storm Surge Monitoring.
Overview USING THE INTERNET TO COMMUNICATE METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION Victor Stefanescu (NMA-NCMF) Goals Description Comparative analysis Comparative analysis.
Copyright 2000, Stephan Kelley1 Estimating User Interface Effort Using A Formal Method By Stephan Kelley 16 November 2000.
May 2004Iridium Users Workshop, Seattle National Data Buoy Center’s Experiences with Real-Time Data Retrieval from Remote Stations using Iridium; and Data.
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGIAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE
NDBC Presentation Observational Data Workshop September 14, 2011
GOES Direct Services. Topics  Direct Broadcast Services  GOES Data Collection Services  Search and Rescue.
National Data Buoy Center Presented to the QARTOD III Workshop November 2, 2005 Wave Data Quality Control Chung-Chu Teng.
Industry-IOOS Workshop March 2004 Marathon, Houston IOOS -COASTMAP Model and Management System Eric Anderson ASA Narragansett, RI.
NDBC Real Time Wave Data Processing and QC/QA
The Logistic Requirements for Wave Field Measurement Prof. Dr.-Ing. Chia Chuen Kao Director, Coastal Ocean Monitoring Center, National Cheng Kung University.
SMOS SAG, Villafranca November 2-3, 2006 Development of a Global In-Situ Soil Moisture Network: A SMOS Project Contribution P.J. van Oevelen.
The Carolinas Coastal Ocean Observing and Prediction System (Caro-COOPS) Funded by the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration A partnership among.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves In-Situ Currents: Breakout Group Report Out QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
Integrated Ocean Observing System Data Management and Communications March 2004 The US Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Plan for Data Management.
Atmospheric Sciences 370 Observing Systems January 2007.
Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO- OPS) NOAA/ National Ocean Service.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
An Instrumented Coastal Process Modeling Test Bed US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jeff Hanson U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development.
NovaStar 5 Software. Multi-user web page access to base station database No client access software required User preferences kept on client workstations.
Work Package 2 / 3 TECHNOLOGICAL & PROCEDURAL HARMONISATION FixO3 General Assembly 14 th to the 16 th October 2014, Heraklion-CRETE ESTOC, PLOCAN,
Monitoring and Modelling the Spanish Coastal Waters. A new concept: The Operational PdE PORTUS System Workshop on “The status of coastal observing and.
Towards a Standard for Real-time Quality Control Procedures for in situ Ocean Waves Richard Bouchard 1 and Julie Thomas 2 1.NOAA’s National Data Buoy Center.
UNCW Ocean Observing: Providing Infrastructure, Data, and Products to Support State and Federal Agency Needs AQUARIUS NOAA’s Undersea Research Center (NIUST,
NOAA PORTS ® Partnerships MARACOOS Annual Meeting 12/15/2011 Darren Wright Maritime Services Program Manager.
MADIS – The Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System Current Operational Status and Future Plans Greg Pratt, Leon Benjamin, Thomas Kent, Gopa Padmanabhan,
JCOMM Data Buoy Cooperation Panel October 16, 2006 National Data Buoy Center 2006 Review: A Year of Growth Paul F. Moersdorf, PhD, Director.
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
TECO Geneva1 Integrated Quality Control Functions on AWS-Level Gealog SG Station Manager Gerhard Pevny, Logotronic GmbH, Austria Dietmar Pindeus,
Technical Working Group, II Teruko Manabe Steven Worley Miroslaw Mietus Shawn Smith Simon Tett Volker Wagner Scott Woodruff David Berry Liz Kent.
1 Global Systems Division (GSD) Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) NextGen Weather Data Cube Chris MacDermaid October, 2010.
GOES Data Collection System (DCS) in the GOES R Era William E. Brockman Short & Associates, Inc.
1 NOAA IOOS Program Data Integration Framework (DIF) Project Overview Adapted from a brief to the NOAA Data Management Committee August 6, 2008 by Jeff.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
Topics describe the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) –aims, –achievements and –Challenges network status developments of data buoy technology JCOMM.
Data Acquisition & Data Management Ronald Muzzi Electronics Engineer GLERL’s Marine Instrumentation Lab.
DATA QUALITY CONTROL Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Scripps Institution of Oceanography CI Design Workshop October 2007 La.
Observing System Monitoring Center (OSMC) Status Update April 2005 Steve Hankin – PMEL (co-PI) Kevin Kern – NDBC (co-PI)
Drifting Buoy Update: WOTAN and Iridium
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
RAINEX Data Management UCAR Joint Office for Science Support José Meitín Jim Moore Dick Dirks UCAR Joint Office for Science Support José Meitín Jim Moore.
Maintaining a U.S. Leadership Position In Worldwide Operational Ocean Observations For Spring IOOS Meeting March 8, 2013 Helmut H. Portmann, Director National.
Review of Meteorological Data Sharing Project in China Anyuan XIONG (National Meteorological Information Center, CMA, CHINA)
MADIS Airlines for America Briefing Meteorological Assimilated Data Ingest System (MADIS) FPAW Briefing Steve Pritchett NWS Aircraft Based Observations.
NOAAServer: Unified access to distributed NOAA data Ernest Daddio, NOAA/ESDIM Steve Hankin, NOAA/PMEL Donald Denbo, NOAA/PMEL/JISAO Nancy Soreide, NOAA/PMEL.
Data Assembly Center (DAC) Example Data Quality Procedures VRCO Discussions, 06 December 2006.
Observing System Monitoring Center (OSMC) Work in progress in brief June 2005 Steve Hankin, Kevin O’Brien – PMEL.
Background Real-time environmental monitoring is a field garnering an ever-increasing amount of attention. The ability for sensors to make and publish.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Aquarius Validation Data System Overview and Status Algorithm Workshop March 21-22, 2007 John Gunn Earth.
An Introduction to the Argo Data Sytem South Pacific Workshop 11 – 14 October 2005 Mark Ignaszewski FNMOC.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Update
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center U.S. IOOS MODEL VALIDATION CAPABILITY SURA SUPER-REGIONAL TEST BED Working across agencies to bring observations.
NOAA’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO IOOS Michael Szabados NOAA’s, National Ocean Service.
CO-OPS Expands Meteorological Sensor Network and Quality Control Kathleen Egan, Tom Landon NOAA/NOS/Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.
Access to IOOS Data Relevant to OOI Kathleen Bailey NOAA/NOS/IOOS January 6, 2016.
Atmospheric Sciences 370 Observing Systems January 2012.
Data Management System to Collect, Quality Control, Distribute, and Archive Near Real-time Marine Data Jeremy J. Rolph, Jacob T. Rettig, Mark A. Bourassa,
Automated Operational Validation of Meteorological Observations in the Netherlands Wiel Wauben, KNMI, The Netherlands Introduction QA/QC chain Measurement.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
Terena Networking Conference, , Prague examine the performance and delay of 430 tsunami warning stations SEA LEVEL STATION MONITORING FACILITY.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
Challenges in Centralized Aggregated Data Quality Control
US IOOS®, NDBC, CO-OPS Partnership Discussion
GSICS Data Management and Availability to Users
Presentation transcript:

National Data Buoy Center Ian Sears National Data Buoy Center An Overview of Quality Control Procedures for Buoy Data at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Data Buoy Center (NDBC).

National Data Buoy Center Topics NDBC system and sensor background Automated near real-time quality control Man-Machine mix quality control Pre-archive quality control Planned improvements to quality control process

National Data Buoy Center Introduction NDBC platforms –105 moored buoys –55 Coastal Marine Automated Network (C-MAN) Partner –235 Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) –181 National Ocean Service (NOS)

National Data Buoy Center Introduction NDBC Quality Control –Near real time application of algorithms –Manual look at all data using. (Tabular data and plots) –Monthly check before archival Partner Platform Quality Control –No monthly check/no archival

National Data Buoy Center NDBC system and sensor background 3 meter discus buoy 6 meter NOMAD buoy 10 & 12 meter discus buoy C-MAN

National Data Buoy Center Typical Buoys

National Data Buoy Center Typical C-MAN

National Data Buoy Center 3-meter Staple of Coastal locations. Aluminum hull Meteorological parameters Directional wave capability Ocean parameters Platform descriptions 6-meter Built for survivability Aluminum hull Meteorological parameters No Directional wave capability Ocean parameters 10 & 12 meter Must be towed to location. Steel hull Meteorological parameters Directional wave capability Ocean parameters Capsize in seas > 10m. C-MAN Docks, piers, light houses. Meteorological parameters No Directional wave capability Ocean parameters

National Data Buoy Center Partner Stations (May 2006)

National Data Buoy Center How We Get the Data NDBC data –Geostationary Environmental Operational Satellite (GOES) –Iridium Partner data –Providers send WMO or XML message to NDBC ftp account (most providers use this method) –Process raw GOES messages at the NWSTG –NDBC pulls data from provider’s server in native format and translates to XML (NOS NWLON) –NDBC pulls data from partner database using web services and translates to XML

National Data Buoy Center NDBC Data Quality How? –Evaluate new systems and sensors –Calibrate every sensor –Evaluate data during service visits –Near Real-time automated validation –Next day man-machine mix, 24x7 coverage –End of month man-machine mix archival.

National Data Buoy Center Automated QC in near real-time Data arrive on two redundant computers at the National Weather Service Telecommunications Gateway. Data are checked for truncations to messages and parity errors in transmissions. Data are checked against algorithms and flagged if necessary. Only validated data are packaged and sent to end users. All data, including flagged data, are sent to NDBC. Instructions are given on release status of data.

National Data Buoy Center QC flags Hard flags –Identified by capital letter –Clearly degraded data –Data not released to public Soft flags –Identified by lowercase letter –Questionable data –Human data analyst notified of questionable data –Data released to public (flags not included)

National Data Buoy Center Man Machine mix Conducted with in 24 hours of receipt of data Data analyzed in tabular form –Hard flagged data has red text –Soft flagged data has yellow text Data analyzed in graphical form complete with flags.

National Data Buoy Center

Archive Beginning of each month Senior data analyst checks prior month’s data using graphical aids. Removes erroneous data prior to archive

National Data Buoy Center Planned improvements Presently working on a scored QC algorithm NDBC technical support contractors working to streamline time series plots. Incorporate the same sophistication in QC for oceanographic data