Site Initiation Presentation **site **date PRISM SIV Version 5.0 08/04/2016 Prevention of Respiratory Insufficiency after Surgical Management: PRISM trial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist
Advertisements

1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
CROMS NIDCR Clinical Monitoring
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Research and Development Department A Quick Guide to Using EDGE v2 for Researchers Version 1.2 – 23 February
Launch Event – 6 th November 2014 Trial Information and Design Isabel Rubie – Trial Manager The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults: a clinical and.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Adverse Event Reporting. Reporting Adverse Events Adverse Events (AEs) are “... any untoward medical occurrence in a subject that was not previously identified.
Welcome to ACST-2! Guidance & Useful Information
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
Developed by Klinikos; Roy Fraser (2012) Investigator Study File
Case Report Form Start-up Meeting March 25, 2010 Kingston, ON.
Trial Procedures and Forms
Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) Trial Adverse Event Reporting Catherine Dillon.
M ODULE H I NTERIM M ONITORING V ISIT Denise Thwing 21 Apr Version: Final 21-Apr-2010.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
British Association of Dermatologists’ Biologics Intervention Register Approval Process July 2007.
Template for study specific training for Intrapartum Research Studies [ Please see guide before using this]
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
Adverse Event Reporting.
1 MRC SUPREMO (BIG 2-04) Selective Use of Postoperative Radiotherapy aftEr MastectOmy Phase III randomised trial of chest wall RT in intermediate- risk.
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
Formic software training for the SCOOP study Mikey Desai, Training Consultant, Formic Ltd Liz Lenaghan, SCOOP Study Manager, UEA.
EAE Training EAE Reporting and Assessment Overview DAIDS Regional Training Event, Regulatory Compliance Center Kampala, Uganda, September 2009 DAIDS Regional.
Investigator’s Meeting
**INSERT YOUR TITLE HERE**
Mette Krag, MD, coordinating investigator
Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) Trial Site Monitoring Shirley Frederiksen Donna Harsh.
Agenda Introduction Study Objectives Study Design Delegation
Inside Clinical Trials ® ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. What is a clinical trial? ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
NAP6 Perioperative Anaphylaxis The Royal College of Anaesthetists’ 6 th National Audit Project Starting on 5 th February 2016.
A Tutorial: Simple Steps for Trial Registration.
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
Site Set-up and Conduct Caroline O’Leary and Carrie Bayliss.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
MTN-025/HOPE Decliner Population Procedures. Who are the Decliner Population? Former ASPIRE participants who decline or express no interest in joining.
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring Barbara Gallagher, RN Clinical Research Nurse Jefferson Clinical Research Institute.
HOW TO SCREEN PATIENTS AND BOOK THE BASELINE VISIT APPOINTMENT?
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Site Initiation Presentation Southampton General Hospital
The Role and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Coordinator
REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment
Site Initiation Presentation
Safety Reporting V6.0 17/01/17.
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Taking informed consent and withdrawal
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
HOW TO ENTER BASELINE DATA
Safety Reporting Nichol McBee, MPH, CCRP.
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
22 MAY – 5 JUNE 2017 A South African national, multi-centre fourteen day evaluation of patient care and clinical outcomes for paediatric patients undergoing.
ARCADIA Coordinator Webinar
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
HOW TO ENTER BASELINE DATA
HOW TO SCREEN PATIENTS AND BOOK THE BASELINE VISIT APPOINTMENT?
CONDUCTING THE TRIAL AT
Tailored GCP & Trial Specific training
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
WHAT TO DO IF A PATIENT DEVELOPS AN UNEXPECTED PROBLEM?
THE TRIAL DATABASE AND ONLINE DATA QUERIES
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

Site Initiation Presentation **site **date PRISM SIV Version /04/2016 Prevention of Respiratory Insufficiency after Surgical Management: PRISM trial

PRISM contacts Chief Investigator: Rupert Pearse Senior Research Manager: Richard Haslop Research Fellow: Tom Abbott PRISM Website: Contact Follow us on Twitter

Postoperative complications decrease long-term survival Khuri et al. Annals of surgery 2005; 242:

The problem Atelectasis Pulmonary collapse Pneumonia Respiratory failure

CPAP may prevent respiratory failure after abdominal surgery Ferreyra G et al Ann Surg 2008; 247: 617–626.

Objective To determine whether early postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces the incidence of respiratory complications and improves one-year survival following major intra-peritoneal surgery.

Trial design International multi-centre randomised controlled trial Open study group allocation Sponsored by Queen Mary University of London (UK) Sample size = 4,800 patients Elective surgery only 30 sites (15 UK and 15 Italy)

Day of surgery -Consent -Randomisation -Elective Surgery -Intervention Trial Design Before surgery -Screening -Patient information sheet In-hospital follow-up1-year outcomes 30-day outcomes

Recruitment Aim to contact patients at least 24 hours prior to surgery Identify patients in the pre-admission or surgical outpatient clinic The first approach should be by a member of the clinical team Written informed consent must be obtained before surgery Keep a log of all the patients screening for participation.

Informed consent PI or delegate Explain aims, methods and benefits/hazards Patient information sheet Informed consent form Consent must be given before the start of surgery

Inclusion criteria Age ≥50 years Elective major intra-peritoneal surgery Planned use of open technique

Exclusion criteria Inability or refusal to provide informed consent Anticipated requirement for mechanical ventilation for at least four hours after surgery Pregnancy or obstetric surgery Previous enrolment in PRISM Participation in a clinical trial of a treatment with a similar biological mechanism or related primary outcome measure Clinician refusal

Randomisation After informed consent On day of surgery After you are certain that surgery will go ahead. Via the PRISM online database Randomisation criteria: Planned surgical procedure category Planned use of epidural anaesthesia

Randomisation Visit “data entry” and registerhttp://prismtrial.org Enter “username” and “password” provided at registration Click “randomise patient” and enter relevant information

Intervention CPAP for at least four hours, started within four hours of completion of surgery

Intervention group CPAP for at least four hours started within four hours of the end of surgery Delivered by trained staff Mask, nasal or helmet/hood delivery device Patient monitored according to local policy Clinician can choose CPAP machine Minimum airway pressure 5cmH 2 O Can be increased to maximum of 10cmH 2 O NB. HFNO is not considered CPAP

Intervention algorithm Completion of surgery Patient transferred to appropriate clinical area for delivery of CPAP After 4 hours, CPAP continued at the discretion of clinician Intervention period ends. Follow-up procedures CPAP adjusted according to clinician judgement. Maximum airway pressure 10 cmH 2 O CPAP started via mask, nasal or helmet device at airway pressure of 5 cmH 2 O Consider increasing airway pressure in obese patients

Usual care group Managed by clinical staff according to hospital policy Facemask oxygen is usual good practice Usual care patients receiving CPAP recorded as protocol deviation

Primary outcome Pneumonia, endotracheal re-intubation or death within 30 days of randomisation

Secondary outcomes Pneumonia within 30 days of randomisation Endotracheal re-intubation within 30 days of randomisation Death within 30 days of randomisation Postoperative infection within 30 days of randomisation Mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) within 30 days of randomisation All-cause mortality at one year after randomisation Quality adjusted life years (QALY) at one year after randomisation

Follow-up Review a participant’s medical record (paper or electronic) and contact them on the telephone to conduct brief interviews at 30 days and one year after randomisation Verified by the PI or designee After the completion of one-year follow up the PI or designee will lock each case so that no further data can be entered.

Quality of life EQ-5D(3L) questionnaire Simple descriptive profile and index value for health status Ask the patient each question on the list and record the appropriate answer on the CRF

Questions…..?

Data collection Case Report Form (CRF) completion: Timely and accurate Entered into eCRF Logins to access the eCRF will be issued by the trial team

Minimising Bias Follow-up will be conducted by a member of research staff who is unaware of trial group allocation Complications will be verified by the local PI or designee who is unaware of trial group allocation

Self assessment of blinding To quantify the degree of blinding, research staff will make a self-assessment of blinding when collecting follow-up data Grade as one of the following options: Suitably blinded May have known study group allocation Definitely knew study group allocation

Schedule of assessment Event/VisitScreeningPre-op24 hrs post- op Hospital discharge Post-op day 30 Post-op one year Inclusion/exclusion criteriax Informed consentx Demographic information x Medical history x Height and weight x EQ5D questionnaire x xx Randomisation x Intraoperative information x CPAP x Review of medical notes x Days of ICU and hospital x Telephone contact xx AE/SAE xxxx End of trial form x

Protocol deviations Failure to administer CPAP to patients in the intervention group. Starting CPAP at a dose other than 5cmH2O Administration of CPAP to a patient in usual care group. Administration of CPAP for less than 4 hours or with significant interruption for a patient in the intervention group.

Adverse event reporting Only AEs clearly related to the use of CPAP will be reported PI responsible for confirming relatedness to CPAP Pre-defined AEs are listed in the AE SOP and protocol If AE does not fit into pre-defined categories record as ‘other’ Clinician to decide if it is safe to continue using CPAP Please refer to the AE SOP

Adverse event reporting

SAE reporting Report potential SAEs to the trial coordinating centre within 24 hours Must be assessed by PI (or suitably qualified nominee) as probably or definitely caused by CPAP and meet at least one of the following criteria: Results in death Is life threatening Clearly prolongs hospital stay Causes significant disability or incapacity CI will assess and discuss with PI as required

SAE reporting Untoward medical occurrence in a patient in the intervention group Is the untoward occurrence clearly related to the use of CPAP? Has it resulted in death, significant disability or incapacity, prolonged hospital stay or is it life threatening? Serious adverse event. Please notify the PRISM trial co-ordinating centre by ing and report specific details via the online case report form within 24 hours. Not an adverse event. Does not require reporting as part of PRISM trial. Adverse event. Please report to the PRISM trial co-ordinating centre via the online case report form. No Yes

Withdrawal All study participants are free to withdraw from the study at any time. All randomised patients will be included in the final analysis on an intention to treat basis, unless they specifically ask for their data not to be included. Record a reason using discontinuation form

Patient identifiable information Will be collected and entered on to the secure data entry web portal Please do not send any patient identifiable information by to the trial office e.g. name, address, date of birth, hospital number, national insurance number etc. Use only the PRISM trial ID to identify a participant.

Monitoring Each site will receive 3 monitoring visits: Site initiation visit After 10 patients recruited or at 1 year, whichever is sooner Closeout visit 100% Source Data Verification (SDV) up to 30 day follow-up for up to 10 patients at each visit. At closeout, patients monitored at first visit will have 1 year data verified Possible ad-hoc visits Site self assessment for random selection of 20% of patients

Study Procedures Screening & enrolment log to be completed Investigator Site File (ISF) Delegation log signed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Copies of all investigators CVs & GCP/RGF certificates must be filed in the ISF

Trial Initiation When R&D approval is in place and all documentation has been sent to us, the trial can begin. Please send the following prior to activation: Localised patient documentation (PIS, ICF, GP letter) Signed protocol agreement PI CV&GCP R&D approval letter Completed delegation log Signed SIV checklist (at this meeting or after) The PI must register on the trial database and enter general site information.

Key points Each site must have regulatory approval Randomise once the patient is in theatre Informed consent must be obtained Timely entry of CRF data into the eCRF

Last chance for questions...