Verification Priority Project ‘Quantitative Precipitation Forecast’ Progress report Task 1.1 and 1.2 Silke Dierer and Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COSMO Workpackage No First Results on Verification of LMK Test Runs Basing on SYNOP Data Lenz, Claus-Jürgen; Damrath, Ulrich
Advertisements

Ensemble activities in COSMO C. Marsigli, A. Montani, T. Paccagnella ARPA-SIM - HydroMeteorological Service of Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of COSMO in.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre On the Value of.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Alps – first.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
Warm Season Precipitation Predictions over North America with the Eta Regional Climate Model Model Sensitivity to Initial Land States and Choice of Domain.
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
Verification Precipitation verification (overestimation): a common view of the behaviour of the LM, aLMo and LAMI Francis Schubiger and Pirmin Kaufmann,
Use of GPS RO in Operations at NCEP
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistical Characteristics of High- Resolution COSMO.
Summary of MAP D-PHASE Strategy and Requirements MAP D-PHASE / Olympics Project Meeting 6 February 2006 Prepared by: Ron McTaggart-Cowan.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Report on Workshop « Stratified verification by weather.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Task 1 of PP Interpretation 1.1Further applications of.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High Resolution Snow Analysis for COSMO
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Final PP QPF meeting COSMO General Meeting, 18 September.
Rozinkina Inna, Kukanova Evgenia, Revokatova Anastasia, & Muravev Anatoly, Glebova Ekaterina.
June 16th, 2009 Christian Pagé, CERFACS Laurent Terray, CERFACS - URA 1875 Julien Boé, U California Christophe Cassou, CERFACS - URA 1875 Weather typing.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss PP QPF Workshop 8 March 2007, Langen.
The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Accounting for Change: Local wind forecasts from the high-
Real-time Verification of Operational Precipitation Forecasts using Hourly Gauge Data Andrew Loughe Judy Henderson Jennifer MahoneyEdward Tollerud Real-time.
COSMO WG4 Actvities Concentrated mainly on COSMO LEPS  presentation by Andrea Montani The rest of the activities have been absorbed into the advanced.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Verification results of COSMO at MeteoSwiss in the year.
1 Hyperspectral Infrared Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation James Jung Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
Simulation of heavy precipitation events in Madeira Island using resolution of 1 km Simulation de précipitations orographiques intenses sur Madère (résolution.
3-5 November Workshop Modules for coding and encoding METAR, TAF, GAFOR and SYNOP Peter Schmitt, Günter Rosemann (DWD) Klaus Fischer (DFS)
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Sensitivity studies for the Swiss test cases LM User Seminar,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 3: Overview status report COSMO General Meeting, 19.
Assimilating satellite cloud information with an Ensemble Kalman Filter at the convective scale Annika Schomburg, Christoph Schraff, Hendrik Reich, Roland.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics INCA-CE ─ A Central European Initiative for Severe Weather Warnings and Improved Communication Strategies.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
Verification A first attempt to WP Preliminary results of one test case Matteo Buzzi, Pirmin Kaufmann, Dominique Ruffieux, Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
Kain-Fritsch convection scheme: an update Marco Arpagaus MeteoSwiss.
Latest results in the precipitation verification over Northern Italy Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
CWB Midterm Review 2011 Forecast Applications Branch NOAA ESRL/GSD.
COSMO WG3-WG5 workshop 9 March 2005, Langen. WG3-WG5 workshop, , Langen 1 Agenda for joint WG3-WG5 workshop (1) WP.
Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers Francis.
HIRLAM coupled to the ocean wave model WAM. Verification and improvements in forecast skill. Morten Ødegaard Køltzow, Øyvind Sætra and Ana Carrasco. The.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Quality Monitoring in JMA
SAL - Structure, Ampliutde, Location
New task within PT Support Activities “Support of COSMO licensees”
Results for the COPS Region
André Walser MeteoSwiss, Zurich
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
aLMo from GME and IFS boundary conditions: A comparison
Tuning the horizontal diffusion in the COSMO model
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of aLMo in the year 2005
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
Workshop Results WG5 COSMO General Meeting
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Item Taking into account radiosonde position in verification
Ulrich Damrath Deutscher Wetterdienst
Validation for TPW (PGE06)
Ulrich Pflüger & Ulrich Damrath
COSMO PP QPF workshop 8 March 2006 Langen Marco Arpagaus.
Some ideas on verification targeted to the use of the forecasters Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva Some ideas on the presentation to the forecasters.
VERIFICATION OF THE LAMI AT CNMCA
Presentation transcript:

Verification Priority Project ‘Quantitative Precipitation Forecast’ Progress report Task 1.1 and 1.2 Silke Dierer and Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Outline Work in Task 1.1 Sources for cases with bad precipitation forecast Preliminary list of cases Further steps Work in Task 1.2 Verification for Winter 04/05 and Dec.05/Jan.06 Example of a characteristic period Further steps

Verification Task 1.1 Selection of single test cases

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Selection of test cases: sources I Information from forecasters about bad precipitation forecast Not objective For different forecast ranges Verification of precipitation by forecasters daily average for 15 regions in Switzerland forecast, model results and observations disadvantage: currently no automatic evaluation possible => Situations with bad precipitation forecast in Switzerland

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Selection of test cases: sources II SYNOP-Verification - surface verification for Europe with SYNOP data => Situations with bad precipitation forecast for the aLMo domain

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Selection of test cases Preliminary list of test cases includes periods that are reported by forecasters or have a bad forecast for several regions (forecasters‘ verification) and show high deviation in SYNOP verification

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Selection of test cases: Preliminary list for 2005 DateSourceUnder-/Overestimation classification (based on NCEP data) dd at 500 hPasurface pressure (high, low, flat) FV+NW/NW/NW/NWL/H/H/L FV+NW/NWL/L FV+W/W/NW/NW/NH/H/L/L/L 24.3.FV-SW H, flat 9.4.FV+NOL 16./17.4.FV-SO/OL,flat Fo/FV+/+W/W/SWH 16./17.5.Fo/FV?/+SWH FV-SWH 14.6.FV+SWH 25.6.FV+/-SWH,flat 2.7.Fo+WL 18.7.FV+SWH 29.7.FV+SWH,flat 2./3.8.FV+SW/SH->L, inbetween 6.8.FV+WH 11.8.Fo+WH Fo/FV?/+ (mainly)W/NW/N/N/N/W/SW/SO/O H/L/L/H,flat/H,flat/H/L/L/L 28.8.Fo+NWH,flat 2.9.FV+SH,flat Fo/FV-/- (mainly)S/S/?/SW/SWH,flat/H,flat/L,flat,/L/L 16./17.9.FV-, dann +W/SWL/L Fo/FV+, dann –/-N/W/WH/L/L Foerst -/dann +SWH 22./23.10.Fo-SW/SWL/L 3.11.Fo? SWL 6.11.Fo- SWH,flat

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, ANETZ verification for 21 st January 05 full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Selection of test cases: next steps Complete list for 2004 and 2006 Check if insufficient forecast is due to deviations of the synoptic situation Might be necessary to rerun simulations due to missing output plots that can be compared with analysis Possibly ANETZ verification => skip these cases Specify different kinds forecast errors (e.g. synoptic conditions) and select characteristic test cases

Verification Task 1.2. Seasonal verification

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Verification of aLMo Winter 04/05 SYNOP

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Verification of aLMo Winter 04/05 over Switzerland full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Verification of aLMo: December 05 – January 06 full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, February 2005 full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, ANETZ verification for 10 th -14 th February 05 full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO PP QPF Workshop, Langen, Seasonal verification: next steps Selection of characteristic days Based on scatter plots for winter 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 (measurement vs. simulation) 24h area averages for Switzerland, for different heights (0-800m, 800m-1500m and above 1500m) Selecting days with bad precipitation forecast Specifying synoptic situation Select characteristic periods