© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Eilif Trondsen, Ph.D. SRI Consulting Business.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-line media tools for strategic communications purposes When using media tools for communication we try to use the latest technologies such us blogging,
Advertisements

ASP.NET 2.0 ATLAS Microsofts Framework for building AJAX Applications Sascha P. Corti Developer & Platform Evangelism Microsoft Switzerland mailto:
Det Sociala Nätet Web Peter Giger, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
Creating Collaborative Partnerships
And the Non-Profit World. Books Worth Reading Overview  What does “web 2.0” mean?  Examples of web 2.0  What does it mean for us non-profits?  Why.
Not just for nerds: Using emergent technologies to improve communication Joanne Jacobs Project Manager, Australasian CRC for Interaction Design Seconded.
Web 2.0 Learning Environments and the Open Community Presented by Gerry Snyder and Neal Wollenberg.
Chapter 7 Web 2.0 Learning Environments in Distance Learning.
R2 Consulting LLC Technical Services 2.0 June 25 th 2007 Matt Barnes R2 Consulting, LLC
1 “The Big Ideas in Web 2.0” Bebo White InterLab2006 FermiLab October 2006.
WP2: Design principles; 2 nd AtGentive GM May 2006, Oxford, UK AtGentive WP2 Design Principles AtGentive; 2 nd General Meeting; May 2006, Oxford,
Copyright 2008, Near-Time, Inc. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners 1 Enabling the Interactive Enterprise.
Web Huh?! Leigh Dodds, Engineering Manager, IngentaConnect 23 rd May 2006.
The next-generation online customer acquisition engine THE NEXT GENERATION CUSTOMER ACQUISITION ENGINE Web2.0 Nimish Vohra | India Head, Regalix | June.
Impact of Web 2.0 on Enterprise Udayan Banerjee Technology Innovation Centre NIIT Technologies Ltd.
 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved What Is Web 2.0?  Web 1.0 focused on a relatively small number of companies and advertisers.
1 Web 2.0: Introduction Hsinchun Chen February 2009.
The Social Web: A laboratory for studying s ocial networks, tagging and beyond Kristina Lerman USC Information Sciences Institute.
AN INTRODUCTION TO CLOUD COMPUTING Web, as a Platform…
Ronán Kennedy; NUI Galway e-merging technologies for education and libraries Setting The Scene -- Web 2.0 & Library 2.0.
IBM Corporate User Technologies | November 2004 | © 2004 IBM Corporation An Introduction to Darwin Information Typing Architecture: DITA Presented by Dave.
Web ©Minder Chen, 2014 Web 2.0 and Beyond Minder Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS Martin V. Smith School of Business and Economics CSU Channel Islands.
1 SCIP Africa Summit | October , 2014 Firefighters to Futurists SCIP Africa Summit October 2014 Butterfly Effect Intelligence™: Stuart Maclachlan.
Štefan PERO AIS What is Web 1.0?  statical web pages  contains informations to one use  no reason to comeback  not interactive web pages.
Delivering an Architecture for the Social Enterprise Alpesh Doshi, Fintricity Information Age Social&Mobile Business Conference Tuesday 31st January 2012.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Social Software & LiBraries Michael Stephens Michael Stephens
1 Web 2.0 and Government September /Translates to… Why care? IBM 2006 Global CEO Study identifies the key problems that Web 2.0 can help with.
Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning Dr. Phyo Kyaw Dept. Of Computer Science.
By Crystal Mosley 1. Need Collaboration and sharing information Global diversity Flexibility and convenience Common work and storage space 2.
Keeping on Top of Technological Trends and Uses of Existing Technology Daniel L. Appelman Heller Ehrman LLP.
Web 2.0: An Introduction 許輝煌 淡江大學資訊工程系 NUK.
HPVIS and the "Architecture of Participation" Presented at First U.S. Conference on Characterizing Chemicals In Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
Podcasting Nick Weare Radio and Recorded Sound Specialist National Film and Sound Archive.
D R E W P A R K E R Building Web 2.0 Enterprises: A study of small and medium enterprises in the United States by Kim et al. Case 1.
Future Learning Landscapes Yvan Peter – Université Lille 1 Serge Garlatti – Telecom Bretagne.
Web 2.0: Helene Blowers Moving Libraries Forward to Web 2.0 Infopeople Webcast May 9, 2007 What Library Managers Need to Know.
Using Web 2.0 tools inside and outside of Moodle Di Dawson and Terry Loane.
Nada Dabbagh, PhD Professor & Director Division of Learning Technologies George Mason University Fairfax, VA USA.
S TORYBOARD FOR I NNOVATION : W EB 2.0 By Crystal Mosley 1.
Web Review The Web Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Future of the Web Internet Programming - Chapter 01:XHTML1.
Future & Emerging Technology for Multimedia Wilky Chan ( ) University of Ulster BSc Interactive Multimedia Design Final Research Report.
Web Web 2.0 Definition?! Cloud computingThe Internet of Things perpetual beta network effects mashup Web 2.0 is the network.
ELearning Socrates Minerva Concertation Meeting Helsinki 3 July 2006 « Dissemination and Exploitation of Results » Janette Sinclair European Commission.
Defining Social Media Social Media Marketing Communications Digital Marketing Characteristics Types of Internet Advertising Mobile Marketing Social Behavior.
IC&IC eLearning solutions Bucarest, 2 September 2010.
Foundations of Information Systems in Business. System ® System  A system is an interrelated set of business procedures used within one business unit.
Coaching PBIS Implementation Coaching PBIS Implementation South Dakota PBIS Team sdpbis.wikispaces.com AND….Rob Horner ~ org.
What is…. A Little History…  The term “Web 2.0” was familiarized when Tim O’Reilly hosted the first Web 2.0 conference in 2004  This Link (a characteristic.
Semantic Web Technologies Brief Readings Discussion Class work: Projects discussion Research Presentations.
Web 2.0 Ali Ghandour Based on slides from: Clara Ko, EuropeanPWN Amsterdam.
Today’s Workplace Collapse of traditional boundaries of space & time for interactions with Customers, Suppliers, Employees Fundamental shift between management.
S TORYBOARD FOR I NNOVATION : W EB 2.0 By Crystal Mosley 1.
Web 2.0 Debi McGuire. What is Web 2.0? Huge paradigm shift in the Internet Social implications that impact education Tools are powerful, useful, and.
Social Information Processing March 26-28, 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium Stanford University
S TORYBOARD FOR I NNOVATION : W EB 2.0 By Crystal Mosley 1.
Web Web 2.0 Definition?! Cloud computingThe Internet of Things perpetual beta network effects mashup Web 2.0 is the network.
1 June 2013 Engaging users: initiatives and challenges in VNU-HCM Central Library.
Association for Progressive Communications Web 2.0 From networking documents to networking people.
Social Customer Service and CRM
ELP2 Project & Web 2.0 Leeds Met. 24 April Introduction ‘Web 2.0’ – what’s out there and what’s it for? Mark Power, CETIS  eLearning Programme.
Event 1 Web 2.0 The Read/Write Web From Slides by Hend Al-Khalifa Hugh Davis Learning Societies Lab ECS The University of Southampton, UK
 GEETHA P.  Originally coined by Tim O’Reilly Publishing Media  Second generation of services available on www.  Lets people collaborate and share.
Taiwan e-Governance Research Center Web 2.0 and Citizen Participation : The Taiwan Experience Evaluation on National Policy Think Tank Online and Vision.
Web 2.0. Web as a platform Web 2.0 The Do’s of Web 2.0.
Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 A Brief Overview
Web 2.0.
Lee Bryant, BlogTalk 2, July 2004
Web 2.0 Technologies and Community Building Online by
American Library Association Online Resource Center
Presentation transcript:

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Eilif Trondsen, Ph.D. SRI Consulting Business Intelligence Learning on Demand Program LoD Meeting—Reuters, London May 18, 2005 eLearning 2.0: A Broad Perspective bringing the future into focus

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Agenda  From Web 2.0 to eLearning 2.0  eLearning 2.0 Characteristics, Issues & Questions  Potential Benefits: eLearning 2.0 as Catalyst of Change?  Concerns & Challenges  Action Steps bringing the future into focus

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Debate over Terminology, yet not really important “The term is audacious: Web 2.0 assumes a certain interpretation of Web history, including enough progress in certain directions to trigger a succession… …It is about no single new development. Moreover, the term is often applied to a heterogeneous mix of relatively familiar and also very emergent technologies… …Ultimately, the label ‘Web 2.0’ is far less important than the concepts, projects, and practices included in its scope.” Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? Bryan Alexander; Educause, March/April 2006 Ditto for eLearning 2.0? bringing the future into focus

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Additional Alexander Perspectives on Web 2.0  “’Social software’—blogs, wikis, trackback, podcasting, videoblogs, Myspace, Facebook, and so on—break away from the page metaphor. Rather than following the notion of the Web as book, they a predicated on microcontent.”  “Openness—consisting of variable licenses, feeds, Web APIs, and single identity—is crucial to current Web 2.0 discussions. The flow of microcontent between domains, servers, and machines depends on two-way access.”  “ Openness and microcontent combine into a larger conceptual strand of of Web 2.0, one that sees users as playing more of a foundational role in information architectures. Drawing on the ‘wisdom of crowds’ argument, Web 2.0 services respond more deeply to users than Web 1.0 services.” bringing the future into focus

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Elements of Web 2.0 – Dybwad’s View bringing the future into focus Source: Approaching a definition of Web 2.0; by Barb Dybwad; YASN: Yet Another Social Network

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Elements of Web 2.0 – Dybwad’s View, Cont’d bringing the future into focus Source: Approaching a definition of Web 2.0; by Barb Dybwad;

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. * “The Long Tail is the myriad of niche products whose collective market share can rival the blockbusters;” The Long Tail (blog);; ** Many somewhat different definitions of “hacking” exist. Most typically include elements of unauthorized use, or attempts to circumvent or bypass the security mechanisms of an information system or network Rich user experience “An attitude, no a technology” The Long Tail* Data as the “Intel Inside” Hackability** The perpetual Beta The Right to Remix “Some rights reserved” Software that gets better the more people use it Emergent: User behavior not predetermined Granular Adressability of content Small Pieces loosely joined (web as components) Play Trust your users Strategic Positioning: The Web as platform User Positioning: You control your own data Core Components: Services, not packaged software Architecture of participation Cost-effective scalability Remixable data source and data transformations Software above the level of a single device Harnessing collective intelligence Tagging, not taxonomy (Flickr, Del.icio.us) Rich User Experience (Gmail, Google Maps, and Ajax) User as contributor (PageRank, eBay Reputation, Amazon Reviews) Customer self-service Enabling the long tail (Google Adsense) Participation, not Publishing(Blogs) Radical Trust (Wikipedia) Radical Decentralization (BitTorrent) Tim OReilly’s Web 2.0 Meme Map

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Podcast Database Currently compiling podcasts From 37,000 content providers (More than twice that of competitor Podshow) Collects information by automatically “crawling” the Web for RSS feeds and then determines which ones relate to Podcasts Podcast Directory Webpages (Blogs/ Wikis?) Sharing Podcasts with friends Cross between Del.icio.us, iTunes, and MySpace Business Model: Make money through targeted advertising that are embedded in the audio programs Example of emerging Innovation in Web 2.0: Pluggd – New Start Up in SV bringing the future into focus Source: SRIC-BI; San Jose Mercury News

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. eLearning 2.0 Characteristics  Facilitation of content authoring—enabling more active role of user/learner  Knowledge and information sharing—inherent in many of new tools and technologies  Diversity of learning content and media—in part resulting from new tools and user-generated content  Ease of collaborative learning—online learning environments have easy-to-use tools for interaction and collaboration bringing the future into focus

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.  Use of microcontent and other Web 2.0 features/technologies to create learning experiences  Greater leveraging of “collective intelligence” and “wisdom of crowds”  Facilitating “rapid eLearning” (through use of blogs, wikis, podcasts, etc)—without need of instructional design (or use these tools within larger ID context?)  Leveraging growing social networks and networks of interaction for learning—especially useful to help create culture of innovation? bringing the future into focus eLearning 2.0 Characteristics, Cont’d

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.  Impact on current corporate training organization and operations? (See figure)  Worsening or helping solve the “information overload” problem?  Role vis-à-vis “informal learning”? (i.e. learning outside of formal, course-based training activities)  Will growing role of microcontent enable greater use of mobile devices in learning? (vs. courses and web pages)  Loss of coherence and quality? bringing the future into focus eLearning 2.0 Questions & Issues: Potential Benefits and Concerns

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. eLearning 2.0 as Catalyst for Change in Learning and Training Organizations? bringing the future into focus Role of Next-Generation Training Department? Balance of A and B above? Design and control versus enabling and supporting more self- directed learning A. Emergent Learning Culture “Bottom-up” and less control- oriented Dynamic and changing rapidly Experimenting with new tools and technologies Informal learning finding increasing role Utilizing unstructured content Rising diversity of content types and format Social and community-based networks see growing role B. Training Culture High degree of control Formal events and activities Courses and structured learning play major role Reluctant and slow to experiment High degree of quality control Strong focus on foundation and compliance-driven training Questions Will Web 2.0 and eLearning 2.0 accelerate “power shift” from B to A? How can training professionals help enable and accelerate the practical application of Web 2.0 and eLearning 2.0 tools and technologies to maximize the impact of learning on business performance? Even if eLearning 2.0 tools are now mostly impacting A, will they soon be embraced in B, and perhaps even serve as a way to bridge and lead to convergence between A and B? Source: SRIC-BI

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Action Steps to Prepare for eLearning 2.0 bringing the future into focus Corporate learning and Training professionals eLearning 2.0 Community of Practice Monitor Web 2.0 and eLearning 2.0 tools and technologies Experiment with and test how these tools and technologies can best be used Engage early adopting organizations in dialog and share information External Advisory Group Bring outside perspective Recommend and suggest Prepare roadmap Present value proposition and business case for eLearning 2.0 initiative(s) Source: SRIC-BI

© 2006, SRI Consulting Business Intelligence. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Contact Information Eilif Trondsen, Ph.D. Research & Program Director, SRIC-BI Chairman & Founder, eLearning Forum Tel